Dick Tuck
Board Troll
- Aug 29, 2009
- 8,511
- 505
- 48
- Thread starter
- #41
I'm guessing you feel that tactic should be reserved for Democrats only?? And your premise that government-subsidized flood insurance benefits the 'American people' is so wrong it's laughable. It's nothing more than a money pot for rich bastards to build in dangerous areas without assuming their own risks.
the govt. offers it cause the corp insurance companies won't, and if they did you could no afford it
Private insurance forces those who build in dangerous areas to assume the risk. That's what insurance is supposed to do. That's why your auto insurance rates go up after you've totalled a car or two, or piled up several moving violations.
It's called 'market forces'...
So if it's a bad bill, it should be debated on fact, and not some moron pretending to be a libertarian wanting to confer citizenship on zygots. Rand ought to be protesting fertility clinics.