After laughing through the GOP Presidential Road Show "Debates:" Then anyone noticed that MittCare was as widely opposed as ObamaCare. Republicans have it in for payments made to health care professionals.
And so now a Los Angeles Times contributor has succinctly summarized how the GOP will go into the national elections. It will be the Party Opposed To Health Care Rights, Health Care Access, and Health Care payments to health care providers. The Republican Governors, filing the suit which was subject of the Supreme Court Hearings, have put the Republicans squarely on the side of "Privilege" in the matter of Health Care.
GOP is holding the line of healthcare as a privilege, not a right - latimes.com
Even MediCaid, which is not precisely coerced upon the states: Is opposed.
Justice Kennedy famously remarked, on the third day, that affordable business health plan coverage, under the Act in question, actually assumed the viability of the Individual Mandate--and the lessening of premiums, through the Exchanges. The government contention was the the Act is actually a finance mechanism for health care in the United States. Justice Kennedy's analysis would be a likely outcome. The Conservative contention was that the Act was a coercion to purchase a service, or a product, rather than a compulsory participation in a pool, for example, of potential draftees.
The government's contention of a finance plan shows that the Act has Constitutional Basis. IRS even demands payment in legal tender, the money of the United States. It does not accept payment in ounces of gold, even, in the matter of taxes. Sheep, cows, and pigs, are not accepted: Expecially if they are dead, and burning. The money units are legally required, instead.
Gold is subject to valuations, just like health care premiums are subject to valuations. IRS wants the valuation medium, not any commodity instead. The only compulsion in the Affordable Health Care Act was the use of Legal Tender, the evaluation medium, channeled through the health plans. Unlike Gold, you cannot present a unit of "legal tender," and expect a completely paid for, legal service or health care service. Anyone can expect some service from an ounce of gold, subject to its value in legal tender units. The newer "currency" of the health plans with the Minimum Standards: Is actually about a finance plan, regardless of prevailing commodity values, or of service prices. Congress created a kind of giant voucher plan. It used a commonly understood mechanism, a "risk pool."
Read the entire article from the link
And so now a Los Angeles Times contributor has succinctly summarized how the GOP will go into the national elections. It will be the Party Opposed To Health Care Rights, Health Care Access, and Health Care payments to health care providers. The Republican Governors, filing the suit which was subject of the Supreme Court Hearings, have put the Republicans squarely on the side of "Privilege" in the matter of Health Care.
GOP is holding the line of healthcare as a privilege, not a right - latimes.com
Even MediCaid, which is not precisely coerced upon the states: Is opposed.
Justice Kennedy famously remarked, on the third day, that affordable business health plan coverage, under the Act in question, actually assumed the viability of the Individual Mandate--and the lessening of premiums, through the Exchanges. The government contention was the the Act is actually a finance mechanism for health care in the United States. Justice Kennedy's analysis would be a likely outcome. The Conservative contention was that the Act was a coercion to purchase a service, or a product, rather than a compulsory participation in a pool, for example, of potential draftees.
The government's contention of a finance plan shows that the Act has Constitutional Basis. IRS even demands payment in legal tender, the money of the United States. It does not accept payment in ounces of gold, even, in the matter of taxes. Sheep, cows, and pigs, are not accepted: Expecially if they are dead, and burning. The money units are legally required, instead.
Gold is subject to valuations, just like health care premiums are subject to valuations. IRS wants the valuation medium, not any commodity instead. The only compulsion in the Affordable Health Care Act was the use of Legal Tender, the evaluation medium, channeled through the health plans. Unlike Gold, you cannot present a unit of "legal tender," and expect a completely paid for, legal service or health care service. Anyone can expect some service from an ounce of gold, subject to its value in legal tender units. The newer "currency" of the health plans with the Minimum Standards: Is actually about a finance plan, regardless of prevailing commodity values, or of service prices. Congress created a kind of giant voucher plan. It used a commonly understood mechanism, a "risk pool."
Read the entire article from the link