he liberals want true Communism, and this just proves the point.

Do you think the liberal elites of today could do Communism better than the USSR?

  • Yes, i am a liberal and need someone else to take care of me.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, this country was based on people to be free, and use their God given gifts to excell.

    Votes: 11 100.0%

  • Total voters
    11
Liberals created this country

Conservatives wanted a monarchy

Based on 1776 criteria, I align with free market Capitalism, free speech, Judeo-Christian ethics, limited Government, and the right to bear arms. In 2017, this criteria maps to Conservatives. In 2017, Liberals are nothing like their 1776 counterparts.

As long as you're completely unable to identify what a Liberal is, that might apply. But that's your ignorance, not theirs.

It does not appear that you are able to articulate the definition of a Liberal either.

Actually I've done so here for literally years. It does not appear that some were paying attention.
 

I used to hear that "Communism looks good on paper" bullshit line a zillion times back in the 70s.

It's a stupid meme.

Correct. It looks like shit on paper too.

It's a throwaway line by people who know nothing about the subject.


It's also a 25-second comment from some discussion already in progress and thus completely removed from whatever its context was. Which is par for the coarse for this particular abjectly clueless OP.

Even in full context, Whoopi Goldberg always demonstrates she is a total moron.
 
All libs want is control but that damned Constitution keeps getting in the way. Most lefties aren't smart enough to understand the meaning of "fascism" or "communism" for that matter. The word "fascist" is just something they shout while they are being arrested and they can't decide whether they like communism or not. It's ironic that democrats created the HUAC (House UnAmerican Activities Committee) to focus on the communist menace and when they decided that communism wasn't so bad they got the liberal media to name the whole unfortunate era after a freaking republican.
 
Liberals created this country

Conservatives wanted a monarchy

Based on 1776 criteria, I align with free market Capitalism, free speech, Judeo-Christian ethics, limited Government, and the right to bear arms. In 2017, this criteria maps to Conservatives. In 2017, Liberals are nothing like their 1776 counterparts.

As a liberal- I believe in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and the words of the Constitution.

I don't cherry pick which parts of the Constitution to promote- and which to ignore.

Neither do I. I simply sited the parts Liberals cherry pick to have a problem.

You chose to post which parts of the Constitution you felt it was important to post.

I chose to post that they all are important.
 
Liberals created this country

Conservatives wanted a monarchy

Based on 1776 criteria, I align with free market Capitalism, free speech, Judeo-Christian ethics, limited Government, and the right to bear arms. In 2017, this criteria maps to Conservatives. In 2017, Liberals are nothing like their 1776 counterparts.

In 1776 we did not have free market Capitalism

We were primarily an agrarian economy with limited markets. Our major exports were tobacco and furs which were sold to the Europeans

We did not embrace free market Capitalism until the mid 1800s when we became more industrialized and a rail network connected the country
 
he liberals want true Communism

Strawman.jpg
 
I take it all of you are against sending hurricane aid to Texas. Since that's such a commie thing to do .
 
Judeo-Christian ethics

Judeo-Christian ethics: slavery is ok and you should be smiting your neighbor for not keeping Sabbath.

American ethics: Slavery is amoral, vigilantism is illegal and people are free to practice their religion or no religion at all.

Judeo Christian ethics evolved and stated slavery to be immoral in the 1860s..

How do Judeo Christian ethics evolve?

Did the Bible change in the 1860's?
 
What America would look like if it guaranteed everyone a job
Imagine the US federal government established a policy whereby anyone who didn’t have a job and wanted one could go into a local office for a government agency — call it the Works Progress Administration — and walk out with a regular government position paying a livable wage ($15 an hour, perhaps) and offering health, dental, and vision insurance, and retirement benefits, and child care for their kids.
Different people would do different things: teaching or working for after-school programs or providing child care or building roads and mass transit or driving buses and so on. But everyone would be guaranteed a job, including during recessions. Involuntary unemployment would be a thing of the past.
The USSR tried this with their people, where everyone was supposed to work and get paid the same, so a doctor who went to school for 8 years then intern for 4 would be paid the same as the bread maker who failed out of school at the 6th grade. Soon the doctors didn't want to be doctors any more, so in comes the government and by the point of a gun, FORCED the people to be doctors. People would face dogs or machine guns to get away from the Communists to come to the US of A. and freedom. Yep, liberals love Communism, and they think that their illustrious leaders could do it better. Here is Whoopie Goldberg on Communism.



no one wants communism, you brain dead, toon.

you should probably understand what communism and socialism and capitalism are before you start spewing ignorant nonsense.
 
Judeo-Christian ethics

Judeo-Christian ethics: slavery is ok and you should be smiting your neighbor for not keeping Sabbath.

American ethics: Slavery is amoral, vigilantism is illegal and people are free to practice their religion or no religion at all.

Judeo Christian ethics evolved and stated slavery to be immoral in the 1860s. Are you sure you want to go there where we site the religions that still permit slavery? You just made the case for not letting those religions into the US.

Religions do not evolve, they get dragged by the tail to get in-line with social compact that makes practical sense to people looking to get along well. It's not a Christian or Jewish thing and that's why "Judeo-Christian" pretense is just hogwash. Muslims are just late to the draggin' party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top