Haw! ANOTHER "missing link" discovered!

[ding]

Where did I even mention speciation, let alone make that claim?

If you follow the quote chain you will see multiple references to speciation. What do you think you've been discussing with me for the past two pages?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you follow the quote chain you will see multiple references to speciation. What do you think you've been discussing with me for the past two pages?

That is awesome that everyone else was talking about speciation.
And that I wasn't.

Anything else I can clear up for you?

 

[ding]

That is awesome that everyone else was talking about speciation.
And that I wasn't.

Anything else I can clear up for you?

I'm just glad I have this.

Then we should use that one.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

These evolutionists just luurve announcing the latest "missing link," don't they?

Archaeologists discover missing link in human evolution, in Israel

***

www.haaretz.com

About 1.5 million years ago, a child died near the Sea of Galilee. All that remains of the youngster is a single bone, a vertebra. But that skeletal fragment, first unearthed in 1966 and only now recognized for what it actually is – the earliest large-bodied hominin found in the Levant – changes the story of human evolution.

So keep in mind, they are hanging their hat on one single bone, that was found 55 years ago, but that they have suddenly announced is "the missing link." Here is a photograph* of the fossil:

View attachment 596658

That is four different angles of the same bone, not four bones. It is only one.

But look at all they claim to "know" from that one bone:

Among other things, that one bone proves for the first time that there were multiple exits by archaic humans from Africa. At 1.5 million years of age, the bone is the second-oldest hominin fossil to be found outside Africa. The oldest date to 1.8 million years ago and were found in Dmanisi, Georgia, and that difference of about 300,000 years proves in and of itself that there was more than one exit.

More? This archaic child in the Jordan Valley and the hominins at Dmanisi were not the same species.

This is absurd, but I await several well thought-out attempts at a reasonable defense of this. Just kidding! I await nothing more than ad hominem attacks (insults for the less literate of you).

*That's a photograph. Why do Darwinists find it so hard to show a photograph of a fossil? I asked them to show me the fossils in a thread of the same title and got several paintings and fill in the gap models, but few if any photographs. Wadup with dat?

Killed by global warming

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm just glad I have this.

I'm happy for you?

 

[Seymour Flops]

That is awesome that everyone else was talking about speciation.
And that I wasn't.

Anything else I can clear up for you?

LoL!

Toddster is a slippery boy!

 

[ding]

LoL!

Toddster is a slippery boy!

So much so he's predictable.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Does anyone even know what this means?

???

 

[ding]

Does anyone even know what this means?

View attachment 598197
???

Ramblings?

 

[abu afak]

Does anyone even know what this means?

View attachment 598197
???

Completely OUT of context and pathetic revenge attempted by an outed raging Liar/Sociopath who lost every debate we've had.
so he throws it to some sympathetic @holes.

He Really got his **** Reamed tonight (like 10x worse than usual) so was Reduced to this.

`

 

[Seymour Flops]

Completely OUT of context and pathetic revenge attempted by an outed raging Liar/Sociopath who lost every debate we've had.
so he throws it to some sympathetic @holes.

He Really got his **** Reamed tonight (like 10x worse than usual) so was Reduced to this.

`

Hm . . .

 

[Dale Smith]

Completely OUT of context and pathetic revenge attempted by an outed raging Liar/Sociopath who lost every debate we've had.
so he throws it to some sympathetic @holes.

He Really got his **** Reamed tonight (like 10x worse than usual) so was Reduced to this.

`

Girl, puh-leeeze....you get your ass handed to you on a daily basis and then whine when you get rebuked. You have been a running joke on this forum from day one. You suffer from an over-inflated sense of self.

 

[abu afak]

Girl, puh-leeeze....you get your ass handed to you on a daily basis and then whine when you get rebuked. You have been a running joke on this forum from day one. You suffer from an over-inflated sense of self.

Whatever you say Chemtrails Conspiracy guy!
(He sneaks those into real science threads)
That's how I know him and why he's got a grudge.
I outed Dale's Conspiracy crap too, just Like I've destroyed Seymour Flops Again's "apparent design" fudge.
`
`

 

[Dale Smith]

Whatever you say Chemtrails Conspiracy guy!
(He sneaks those into real science threads)
`

Over 100 patents validate my claims. You can't stand it because it flies in the face of your contention that "fossil fuels" are the cause for weather anomalies. You are a sucker and you buy into the "findings of the IPCC that works at the leisure of the U.N and they have been stone cold busted for fudging data.

 

[abu afak]

Over 100 patents validate my claims. You can't stand it because it flies in the face of your contention that "fossil fuels" are the cause for weather anomalies. You are a sucker and you buy into the "findings of the IPCC that works at the leisure of the U.N and they have been stone cold busted for fudging data.

There ya go!
Dale admits it.
His 'Chemtrail' claims are 'validated.'
`

 

[ding]

What a great example of speciation through genetic mutation and not natural selection.

Human(s) Chromosome 2 resulted from the Fusion of two Ape Chromosomes: Easily seen.

Contrary to what you might read from some IDIOT KWEATIOIST Website... (Like ICR/Institute for Creation Research recently posted here.) this is a SIMPLE one and a BIGGIE. Easy to understand/SEE. We have 23 pairs of Chromos, ALL GREAT Apes 24. Their 2 a/b fused into our #2 as can be easily seen...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Periods of quick evolutionary change disprove how evolution works?
Or they conflict with Darwin's original idea?

Was this me arguing against it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then we should use that one.

Or this?

 

[surada]

Long periods of stasis followed by rapid changes - which is the norm in the geologic record - and leaves gaps (aka lack of transitional fossils) in the fossil record go against Darwin's idea of slight successive changes.

Check out punctuated equilibrium. It fits the fossil record better than Darwin's model does.

Archaeologists discover missing link in human evolution, in Israel

***

www.haaretz.com

 

[surada]

But you specified that particular fossil.

Tell me about it.

Archaeologists discover missing link in human evolution, in Israel