LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
How is guano crazy? It's inanimate and composed of oxalates, urates, and phosphates.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama wants another term to see that it happens...so he can complete his implimentation of Socialist ideals he champions.No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
They must be into inhaling it... Methane does weird things...How is guano crazy? It's inanimate and composed of oxalates, urates, and phosphates.
Obama wants another term to see that it happens...so he can complete his implimentation of Socialist ideals he champions.No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
You sound like you're not so sure of yourself.
You sound like you have to say this to yourself because your guy is so worthless.
The more you focus on our candidates the more it affords you to not recognize how screwed up Obama is.
Sure, these guys all have warts, but just about any one of them would be a major improvement over the lazy stiff that's screwing the pooch today.
Ron Paul should never be President. He would be a disaster. Michelle Bachmann has problems with judgement.
Nobody knows exactly where Mitt stands on the issues.
Perry is a nice guy but he needs seasoning.
Santorum is too angry and to divisive for my tastes.
Huntsman is an Obama plant.
Newt has some crazy ideas......ideas that buck the system.
Every one of them is an improvement over the oxygen-thief in there.....even Ron Paul.
No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
You sound like you're not so sure of yourself.
You sound like you have to say this to yourself because your guy is so worthless.
The more you focus on our candidates the more it affords you to not recognize how screwed up Obama is.
Sure, these guys all have warts, but just about any one of them would be a major improvement over the lazy stiff that's screwing the pooch today.
Ron Paul should never be President. He would be a disaster. Michelle Bachmann has problems with judgement.
Nobody knows exactly where Mitt stands on the issues.
Perry is a nice guy but he needs seasoning.
Santorum is too angry and to divisive for my tastes.
Huntsman is an Obama plant.
Newt has some crazy ideas......ideas that buck the system.
Every one of them is an improvement over the oxygen-thief in there.....even Ron Paul.
No they are not....that is why they match up poorly against Obama head to head
With the exception of Romney and maybe Newt if you clean him up enough, all the GOP candidates scare the hell out of people. They are just not credible candidates
You can spout all the "My dog could beat Obama" nonsense you want. Guess what? Your dog could not beat Obama and neither can most of these embarrassing candidates
You need a serious challenger to beat Obama regardless of what Rush and Hannity may be telling you. Obama is sitting on a zillion bucks, handles himself very well in public and will have an answer for whatever "Obama is a failure" issue you throw at him
barring a major economic collapse, the Republicans will not do well head to head against Obama........and they have only themselves to blame
No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
You sound like you're not so sure of yourself.
You sound like you have to say this to yourself because your guy is so worthless.
The more you focus on our candidates the more it affords you to not recognize how screwed up Obama is.
Sure, these guys all have warts, but just about any one of them would be a major improvement over the lazy stiff that's screwing the pooch today.
Ron Paul should never be President. He would be a disaster. Michelle Bachmann has problems with judgement.
Nobody knows exactly where Mitt stands on the issues.
Perry is a nice guy but he needs seasoning.
Santorum is too angry and to divisive for my tastes.
Huntsman is an Obama plant.
Newt has some crazy ideas......ideas that buck the system.
Every one of them is an improvement over the oxygen-thief in there.....even Ron Paul.
No they are not....that is why they match up poorly against Obama head to head
With the exception of Romney and maybe Newt if you clean him up enough, all the GOP candidates scare the hell out of people. They are just not credible candidates
You can spout all the "My dog could beat Obama" nonsense you want. Guess what? Your dog could not beat Obama and neither can most of these embarrassing candidates
You need a serious challenger to beat Obama regardless of what Rush and Hannity may be telling you. Obama is sitting on a zillion bucks, handles himself very well in public and will have an answer for whatever "Obama is a failure" issue you throw at him
barring a major economic collapse, the Republicans will not do well head to head against Obama........and they have only themselves to blame
You sound like you're not so sure of yourself.
You sound like you have to say this to yourself because your guy is so worthless.
The more you focus on our candidates the more it affords you to not recognize how screwed up Obama is.
Sure, these guys all have warts, but just about any one of them would be a major improvement over the lazy stiff that's screwing the pooch today.
Ron Paul should never be President. He would be a disaster. Michelle Bachmann has problems with judgement.
Nobody knows exactly where Mitt stands on the issues.
Perry is a nice guy but he needs seasoning.
Santorum is too angry and to divisive for my tastes.
Huntsman is an Obama plant.
Newt has some crazy ideas......ideas that buck the system.
Every one of them is an improvement over the oxygen-thief in there.....even Ron Paul.
No they are not....that is why they match up poorly against Obama head to head
With the exception of Romney and maybe Newt if you clean him up enough, all the GOP candidates scare the hell out of people. They are just not credible candidates
You can spout all the "My dog could beat Obama" nonsense you want. Guess what? Your dog could not beat Obama and neither can most of these embarrassing candidates
You need a serious challenger to beat Obama regardless of what Rush and Hannity may be telling you. Obama is sitting on a zillion bucks, handles himself very well in public and will have an answer for whatever "Obama is a failure" issue you throw at him
barring a major economic collapse, the Republicans will not do well head to head against Obama........and they have only themselves to blame
Oh palease..... Obama has given us $15,000,000,000,000 debt, union bailouts, crony capitalism at a whole new level, Fast and Furious, Solyndra, SunPower, massive deficits, inflation, Obamacare, feckless foreign policy, etc. He can't even run on his record; his only shot is to run on platform of personal destruction of the opposition.
He's done... America, save the mind-numbed robots, has had their fill of Barry Obama.
Obama wants another term to see that it happens...so he can complete his implimentation of Socialist ideals he champions.No question the GOP is running it's B Team. A bunch of not ready for prime time candidates who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame
In other years, Romney would be a third or fourth choice candidate. This year, he is the only one who is remotely electable.....and that is if the economy completely tanks
Obama could certainly be beaten in 2012.......but not by this band of misfits
Obama is fighting for his legacy now....nothing else.
He has nothing to build on....his policies have failed for all intents and purposes.
But...to be a one term president leaving a mess no different than it was when he took it on will kill his legacy.
You know how it is....if you drop three passes in a game....you want that fourth one thrown to you so you can save face
Here's my superficial take on the GOP candidates:
Rick Perry: Reminds me of Howdy Doody. I think he's goofy - but most likeable.
Ron Paul: Too old, cranky and goofy - but I think he's by far the most genuine of the bunch. He is what he is.
Mitt Romney: Reminds me of Daffy Duck on meth. I believe nothing he says.
Newt Gingrich: Psycho! Most dangerous! In love with himself. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). I believe nothing he says.
Jon Huntsman: Bland and irrelevant.
Rick Santorum: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy. American Taliban.
Michele Bachmann: Religious extremist. Batshit crazy - and STUPID. American Taliban. Also appears to be a chronic liar.
Obama wants another term to see that it happens...so he can complete his implimentation of Socialist ideals he champions.
Obama is fighting for his legacy now....nothing else.
He has nothing to build on....his policies have failed for all intents and purposes.
But...to be a one term president leaving a mess no different than it was when he took it on will kill his legacy.
You know how it is....if you drop three passes in a game....you want that fourth one thrown to you so you can save face
While he pretends that he just got into office the other day and denies his culpability...while he blames Bush and the Republicans.
Sad part of it? The Republican elites are playing right into it...
Obama is fighting for his legacy now....nothing else.
He has nothing to build on....his policies have failed for all intents and purposes.
But...to be a one term president leaving a mess no different than it was when he took it on will kill his legacy.
You know how it is....if you drop three passes in a game....you want that fourth one thrown to you so you can save face
While he pretends that he just got into office the other day and denies his culpability...while he blames Bush and the Republicans.
Sad part of it? The Republican elites are playing right into it...
the topic of the debates will be his leadership.
He can blame congress....that is blaming his lack of leadership for not being able to lead congress.
He can blame the tea party....that isblaming his leadership for not being able to lead congress beyond the leverage of the tea party.
He can blame corporate America...that is blaming his leadership for not being able to get corporate America to work with him.
The debates will prove to be his downfall assuming the candidate of choice knows what to attack.
Who stands above all the candidates in debate after debate in his knowledge and solutions? New Gingrich is hardly Group B. The fact that he has been divorced more than once makes him more like the population he will be representing. He has made mistakes in his personal lfe and actually, who hasn't? i'm looking for a knowledgable and bold leader. I think I have found him.
If we keep looking for candidates who's personal life and career are pristine, we will be sorely disappointed or not vetting approriately like in the last election.
You sound like you're not so sure of yourself.
You sound like you have to say this to yourself because your guy is so worthless.
The more you focus on our candidates the more it affords you to not recognize how screwed up Obama is.
Sure, these guys all have warts, but just about any one of them would be a major improvement over the lazy stiff that's screwing the pooch today.
Ron Paul should never be President. He would be a disaster. Michelle Bachmann has problems with judgement.
Nobody knows exactly where Mitt stands on the issues.
Perry is a nice guy but he needs seasoning.
Santorum is too angry and to divisive for my tastes.
Huntsman is an Obama plant.
Newt has some crazy ideas......ideas that buck the system.
Every one of them is an improvement over the oxygen-thief in there.....even Ron Paul.
No they are not....that is why they match up poorly against Obama head to head
With the exception of Romney and maybe Newt if you clean him up enough, all the GOP candidates scare the hell out of people. They are just not credible candidates
You can spout all the "My dog could beat Obama" nonsense you want. Guess what? Your dog could not beat Obama and neither can most of these embarrassing candidates
You need a serious challenger to beat Obama regardless of what Rush and Hannity may be telling you. Obama is sitting on a zillion bucks, handles himself very well in public and will have an answer for whatever "Obama is a failure" issue you throw at him
barring a major economic collapse, the Republicans will not do well head to head against Obama........and they have only themselves to blame
Any one as knowledgable as you are about politics is well aware that they all match up behind Obama becuase right now Obama is campaigning to the entire electorate where, on the most part, the GOP candidates are campaigning to GOP voters of particular caucus states.
Obama gets free air time anytime he wants...the GOP candidates must target their dollars.
It really isnt rocket science.
The party is being held hostage by too many extreme views, and has developed the notion that compromise in any form is weakness. People know the world isn't that which is why the party is going through a period of identity crisis. The radical groups are lashing out and being louder than ever. But if you look at the last several elections. The quite moderate republican candidates are doing the best. McCain was quite moderate, this election Romney, Paul, and Newt who have some core moderate views or have demonstrated working across party lines. So I think its the perception of bad candidates because they all have to curtail to the extreme views in an attempt to unite a clearly divided party. Examples, Romney "changing his mind" on everything, Newt jumping religions repeatedly to find the one that "polls" the best. I think the ones performing the best are trying to do this juggling act because of the changing party identity. This generation doesn't care what Reagan did, what are you going to do to get me a job and stop sending them over seas. End of story. Not abortion, trickle-down, or imperialistic views. When I say that I mean in the general election where you have to convince independents who actually operate their brains when voting. The assumption I tend to make is that somewhere between 35-40% of the vote is locked on both sides before any discussion is made. For proof see any post here claiming ANY candidate is better than Obama. If you think Santorum, Bachman, Perry, or Cain are fit to run this nation based on shear logic and credentials, then you fall into that percent. Grats!
No they are not....that is why they match up poorly against Obama head to head
With the exception of Romney and maybe Newt if you clean him up enough, all the GOP candidates scare the hell out of people. They are just not credible candidates
You can spout all the "My dog could beat Obama" nonsense you want. Guess what? Your dog could not beat Obama and neither can most of these embarrassing candidates
You need a serious challenger to beat Obama regardless of what Rush and Hannity may be telling you. Obama is sitting on a zillion bucks, handles himself very well in public and will have an answer for whatever "Obama is a failure" issue you throw at him
barring a major economic collapse, the Republicans will not do well head to head against Obama........and they have only themselves to blame
Any one as knowledgable as you are about politics is well aware that they all match up behind Obama becuase right now Obama is campaigning to the entire electorate where, on the most part, the GOP candidates are campaigning to GOP voters of particular caucus states.
Obama gets free air time anytime he wants...the GOP candidates must target their dollars.
It really isnt rocket science.
Incumbents have advantages. It comes with being an incumbent. You make a good point. Obama is appealing to the entire electorate while the GOP candidates are sucking dick in Iowa and New Hampshire. The GOP candidates will have to transition from an extreme conservative that wins in Iowa to a position that appeals to the middle.
It won't be easy
All one has to do is go to a library and check out his books. Will give you insight into his ideology...and why he as a young lad sought out Marxists/Communists...and why he seeks to take us down.Who stands above all the candidates in debate after debate in his knowledge and solutions? New Gingrich is hardly Group B. The fact that he has been divorced more than once makes him more like the population he will be representing. He has made mistakes in his personal lfe and actually, who hasn't? i'm looking for a knowledgable and bold leader. I think I have found him.
If we keep looking for candidates who's personal life and career are pristine, we will be sorely disappointed or not vetting approriately like in the last election.
The only reason Obama has a good image is because he's had his past erased or had his record sealed by judges to prevent prying eyes.
What we do know his media simply refuses to report on.