Halal supermarket - Sell Alcohol & Pork or Face Closure

[Pogo]

What a crock. I hope the store prevails, that's bullshit. And the idea that being Halal somehow means it's "restricted to Muslims" is preposterous. I went to a halal grocery last week and I certainly didn't have to become a Muslim. I also didn't go there to buy alcohol or pork, for the same reason I don't go to a car parts store to by lettuce.

Wonder what their attitude would be on selling cigarettes.

Aaaaah...but it's a okay to force Christians to sell cakes to the gays.....how tolerant of you.
GFYS Pogo.

Again .... Link?


Nope. Guess not.
There they go again. They never learn.

The OP is my link.
How about you explain how a store can be prejudice to one group yet another cant?

How about YOU explain where I ever said any such thing, Dumbass.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What's the point of a store if it doesn't sell pork or alcohol?

Two things I don't even use so...

We dont care if you only suck kosher cock ya fucken dickhead.
But we will fight for your right to suck any type cock you want.....see i'm being tolerant.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What a crock. I hope the store prevails, that's bullshit. And the idea that being Halal somehow means it's "restricted to Muslims" is preposterous. I went to a halal grocery last week and I certainly didn't have to become a Muslim. I also didn't go there to buy alcohol or pork, for the same reason I don't go to a car parts store to by lettuce.

Wonder what their attitude would be on selling cigarettes.

Aaaaah...but it's a okay to force Christians to sell cakes to the gays.....how tolerant of you.
GFYS Pogo.

Again .... Link?


Nope. Guess not.
There they go again. They never learn.

The OP is my link.
How about you explain how a store can be prejudice to one group yet another cant?

How about YOU explain where I ever said any such thing, Dumbass.

You just said it was okay for muslimes not to sell pork or alcohol.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

How so? It is council property, it replaced a facility providing a general service. Seem reasonable arguments to me.

Council property it may be -- it's not a council business. It would be one thing to order a business to NOT sell something --- guns, alcohol, pornography, drugs, tobacco --- this is an outside official entity trying to tell a business what TO DO. Yuge difference.

Suppose they decided the community needed a bar? A porno store? A brothel? No, I don't think the State gets to dictate how you choose to run your business to the point of forcing you to carry merchandise you're not there to carry. If the community thinks they're not getting enough wine or pork -- let somebody open a facility to do that.

You do realize France isn't in the U.S... Don't you? They have different laws and rules there.

I know. I used to live there. But we're not talking about what the law is; we're talking about what ethical is.

I have yet to hear an explanation of how it "breaches French Republican principles" to *NOT* do something. I didn't eat pork the entire time I lived in France; was I "breaching French Republican principles"?

I did have horse though. I don't recommend it.

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

 

[Pogo]

Council property it may be -- it's not a council business. It would be one thing to order a business to NOT sell something --- guns, alcohol, pornography, drugs, tobacco --- this is an outside official entity trying to tell a business what TO DO. Yuge difference.

Suppose they decided the community needed a bar? A porno store? A brothel? No, I don't think the State gets to dictate how you choose to run your business to the point of forcing you to carry merchandise you're not there to carry. If the community thinks they're not getting enough wine or pork -- let somebody open a facility to do that.

You do realize France isn't in the U.S... Don't you? They have different laws and rules there.

I know. I used to live there. But we're not talking about what the law is; we're talking about what ethical is.

I have yet to hear an explanation of how it "breaches French Republican principles" to *NOT* do something. I didn't eat pork the entire time I lived in France; was I "breaching French Republican principles"?

I did have horse though. I don't recommend it.

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You do realize France isn't in the U.S... Don't you? They have different laws and rules there.

I know. I used to live there. But we're not talking about what the law is; we're talking about what ethical is.

I have yet to hear an explanation of how it "breaches French Republican principles" to *NOT* do something. I didn't eat pork the entire time I lived in France; was I "breaching French Republican principles"?

I did have horse though. I don't recommend it.

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

You dont need to have a halal supermarket to not eat pork or drink wine though, they can sell halal food and still sell alcohol muslims buy halal food and christians buy alcohol and pork but if they dont sell alcohol and pork then elderly christian people need to walk alot to the next food store and this is discrimination.

No it is not. That's INSANELY stupid. You don't have a "right" to haggis just because I have a food store.

the thing is alcohol and pork are everyday basic items for most christians. they drink beer and eat bacon almost everyday. and muslims create muslim zones where you need to observe laws they create, a lack of opportunity is discrimination too.

"Most christians [sic] drink beer and eat bacon almost every day" do they?

EVEN if that were true --- they're not needed for survival, unless you're an alcoholic.
You don't seem to have a clue about what halal means. It's a specific derivation/preparation routine. It doesn't mean you've been denied something. If you came to my house for dinner and you wanted fish but I didn't have fish and you got chicken --- you'd still be fed.

Neither are muslime foods so whats your point.....haji dick sucker?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What's the point of a store if it doesn't sell pork or alcohol?

Two things I don't even use so...

Muslim!

I always figured.

funny thing i know a faggot who supported a somali not wanting to transport beer in his company, and he got fired then he got alot of money from that company for discrimination, thats insane im not even sure this is a islamic law if you dont drink beer it doesnt mean you cant drive the truck with beer, and he doesnt do his job so of course he was fired. the funny thing that faggot supported him eventhough muslims behead faggots, so i wouldnt be surprised if pogo is a muslim or a faggot.

And I'm not surprised to find out you're a retard. I've already AdBlocked that moronic narcissistic photo you insist on running in your sigline which has to be like, the ugliest thing ever.

How intolerant of you....
Are you always this nasty or do you reserve it for those who disagree with you?

 

[Pogo]

I know. I used to live there. But we're not talking about what the law is; we're talking about what ethical is.

I have yet to hear an explanation of how it "breaches French Republican principles" to *NOT* do something. I didn't eat pork the entire time I lived in France; was I "breaching French Republican principles"?

I did have horse though. I don't recommend it.

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Seriously, pulled pork, ribs, bacon, hot dogs, bourbon, scotch, cognac, armagnac, beer, wine.

Without all these, what is the point?

I don't eat pork. But I like a nice glass of vino at the weekend.

You don't?

Why not?

I cants stand the smell of it, nor the taste of it. Same with beef.

You've never had a Texas brisket smoked for 24 hours over post oak with a few pieces of pecan thrown in for the sweetness.
You'll become a beef fanatic...

Franklin is world renowned for his beef...one taste and you'll trip your grandmother to get to the head of the line.
Austin's Franklin Barbecue

I've worked for over twenty years to master this technique,and while I make a kickass brisket this guy is a God!!!

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Seriously, pulled pork, ribs, bacon, hot dogs, bourbon, scotch, cognac, armagnac, beer, wine.

Without all these, what is the point?

I don't eat pork. But I like a nice glass of vino at the weekend.

You don't?

Why not?

I cants stand the smell of it, nor the taste of it. Same with beef.

You have to come to the South. Or Texas.

We'll change your mind.

All it takes is to pass within smelling distance of Franklins.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It is discrimination of christians though and atheists or non-muslims in general who dont observe halal laws, i didnt know the background of the story first.

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

 

[Pogo]

BULLSHIT. There is no "discrimination" in *NOT DOING* something. That's patently absurd.

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

I didn't take the position, Sparkles. *YOU* did. That puts the burden on *YOU*. Not me -- YOU.
I challenged you to back it up;
You couldn't do it.
You still can't.
And yet -- you keep drawing attention to your own gaffe.

Hard to believe.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Than fine....you shouldnt have a problem with bakeries NOT selling cakes to homos.

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

I didn't make the claim, Sparkles. *YOU* did.
I challenged you to back it up;
You couldn't do it.
You still can't.
And yet -- you keep drawing attention to your own gaffe.

Hard to believe.

So you are in agreement that it's okay for bakers to refuse service to gays as it is for muslimes to refuse to sell alcohol and pork.

 

[westwall]

Progressives, like pogo, are only in favor of helping Islamists in their take over of Europe and the US. Funnily enough, if you go to an Islamist country you should conform to THEIR culture. You are after all, visiting their country. Progressives though feel that Islamists are free to ignore the cultures of the places they move to, or visit. It's a strange mental illness they suffer from.

Progressives have been gone for a century, Gummo. But do go ahead and attempt to support the rest. I'm always up for pretzels.

Sure they have. What a 'tard you are...


What It Means To Be A Progressive: A Manifesto

What It Means To Be A Progressive: A Manifesto — ThinkProgress

Whatever that is --- I didn't write it.

Here son --- learn you some history:

>> Progressivism is the term applied to a variety of responses to the economic and social problems rapid industrialization introduced to America. Progressivism began as a social movement and grew into a political movement. The early progressives rejected Social Darwinism. In other words, they were people who believed that the problems society faced (poverty, violence, greed, racism, class warfare) could best be addressed by providing good education, a safe environment, and an efficient workplace. Progressives lived mainly in the cities, were college educated, and believed that government could be a tool for change. Social reformers, like Jane Addams, and journalists, like Jacob Riis and Ida Tarbel, were powerful voiceslld for progressivism. They concentrated on exposing the evils of corporate greed, combating fear of immigrants, and urging Americans to think hard about what democracy meant. Other local leaders encouraged Americans to register to vote, fight political corruption, and let the voting public decide how issues should best be addressed (the initiative, the referendum, and the recall).

On a national level, progressivism gained a strong voice in the White House when Theodore Roosevelt became president in 1901. TR believed that strong corporations were good for America, but he also believed that corporate behavior must be watched to ensure that corporate greed did not get out of hand (trust-busting and federal regulation of business). Progressivism ended with World War I when the horrors of war exposed people's cruelty and many Americans associated President Woodrow Wilson's use of progressive language ("the war to make the world safe for democracy") with the war. << -- The Progressive Era (1890-1920)
​

Toldja.
/completely offtopic

Like I said, you're a tard. The progressive movement has never gone away no matter how hard you try and make people believe so. You're like Kaiser Soze...

Meh. Go argue with George Washington University. I just proved you wrong. You know what to do next.

For what it's worth I can't agree with them about Wilson, who was not so much a Progressive as an Asshole. I'd say the last Progressive was Fighting Bob LaFollette. That's open to debate but either way it's a century ago.

/offtopic

Wow, yet another idiot claiming to "win the internets" What are you 12? Think Progress says you're full of shit. I'll go with them.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What a crock. I hope the store prevails, that's bullshit. And the idea that being Halal somehow means it's "restricted to Muslims" is preposterous. I went to a halal grocery last week and I certainly didn't have to become a Muslim. I also didn't go there to buy alcohol or pork, for the same reason I don't go to a car parts store to by lettuce.

Wonder what their attitude would be on selling cigarettes.

They are not talking about America, but I still remember a time when Walgreens stopped selling beer, the cooperate mom found her ex daughter in law dead in a crack house..sad story

Former wife follows would-be Walgreen heir to early death | Amarillo.com | Amarillo Globe-News

 

[Pogo]

You see that post at the beginning from Pot Head -- something about "wedding cakes"?
You see how he ran away after that?

That's because when I issued the same challenge to him, he went crawling all over the site looking for evidence of somewhere I posted about "wedding cakes". After a while he began to cry when it dawned on him that he wasn't going to find any such thing --- because there IS no such thing. I've never made such a post, ever.

That's what you hear over in the corner, making low whimpering noises. A defeated fallacist, cowering in shame, crying for Mommy.

BUT --- will it dawn on him that he put himself in that position by pulling an ass-umption out of his ass without any evidence? Nope. He'll be back to do the same thing next week. Running the same fallacy, expecting different results.

That's what you just did too. And you won't learn either.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I'll wait right here.

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

I didn't make the claim, Sparkles. *YOU* did.
I challenged you to back it up;
You couldn't do it.
You still can't.
And yet -- you keep drawing attention to your own gaffe.

Hard to believe.

So you are in agreement that it's okay for bakers to refuse service to gays as it is for muslimes to refuse to sell alcohol and pork.

I've made NO COMMENT on bakers. At all. As I said --- prove me wrong. That offer is still open.

You can't do it. Because you pulled it out of your ass.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I dont give a fuck what you post.
Denying service for religious purposes is no different than denying service for being gay.

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

I didn't make the claim, Sparkles. *YOU* did.
I challenged you to back it up;
You couldn't do it.
You still can't.
And yet -- you keep drawing attention to your own gaffe.

Hard to believe.

So you are in agreement that it's okay for bakers to refuse service to gays as it is for muslimes to refuse to sell alcohol and pork.

I've made NO COMMENT on bakers. At all. As I said --- prove me wrong. That offer is still open.

You can't do it. Because you pulled it out of your ass.

Then you agree. Bakers dont have to sell cakes to gays,yes or no.

 

[Pogo]

Progressives have been gone for a century, Gummo. But do go ahead and attempt to support the rest. I'm always up for pretzels.

Sure they have. What a 'tard you are...


What It Means To Be A Progressive: A Manifesto

What It Means To Be A Progressive: A Manifesto — ThinkProgress

Whatever that is --- I didn't write it.

Here son --- learn you some history:

>> Progressivism is the term applied to a variety of responses to the economic and social problems rapid industrialization introduced to America. Progressivism began as a social movement and grew into a political movement. The early progressives rejected Social Darwinism. In other words, they were people who believed that the problems society faced (poverty, violence, greed, racism, class warfare) could best be addressed by providing good education, a safe environment, and an efficient workplace. Progressives lived mainly in the cities, were college educated, and believed that government could be a tool for change. Social reformers, like Jane Addams, and journalists, like Jacob Riis and Ida Tarbel, were powerful voiceslld for progressivism. They concentrated on exposing the evils of corporate greed, combating fear of immigrants, and urging Americans to think hard about what democracy meant. Other local leaders encouraged Americans to register to vote, fight political corruption, and let the voting public decide how issues should best be addressed (the initiative, the referendum, and the recall).

On a national level, progressivism gained a strong voice in the White House when Theodore Roosevelt became president in 1901. TR believed that strong corporations were good for America, but he also believed that corporate behavior must be watched to ensure that corporate greed did not get out of hand (trust-busting and federal regulation of business). Progressivism ended with World War I when the horrors of war exposed people's cruelty and many Americans associated President Woodrow Wilson's use of progressive language ("the war to make the world safe for democracy") with the war. << -- The Progressive Era (1890-1920)
​

Toldja.
/completely offtopic

Like I said, you're a tard. The progressive movement has never gone away no matter how hard you try and make people believe so. You're like Kaiser Soze...

Meh. Go argue with George Washington University. I just proved you wrong. You know what to do next.

For what it's worth I can't agree with them about Wilson, who was not so much a Progressive as an Asshole. I'd say the last Progressive was Fighting Bob LaFollette. That's open to debate but either way it's a century ago.

/offtopic

Wow, yet another idiot claiming to "win the internets" What are you 12? Think Progress says you're full of shit. I'll go with them.

You do that Sparkles. You have Think Progress, I have George Washington University. And the history books.



Now stop trolling, you're completely off topic.

 

[Pogo]

So (a) you have nothing,
(b) you pulled it out of your ass; and
(c) you don't have the balls to admit it.

You lose.

You said nothing ya moron. Explain your reasoning or YOU lose.

I didn't make the claim, Sparkles. *YOU* did.
I challenged you to back it up;
You couldn't do it.
You still can't.
And yet -- you keep drawing attention to your own gaffe.

Hard to believe.

So you are in agreement that it's okay for bakers to refuse service to gays as it is for muslimes to refuse to sell alcohol and pork.

I've made NO COMMENT on bakers. At all. As I said --- prove me wrong. That offer is still open.

You can't do it. Because you pulled it out of your ass.

Then you agree. Bakers dont have to sell cakes to gays,yes or no.

Go find my posts on it and get back to us -- BEFORE you jam your foot in your mouth. Stupid fuck.