growing Islamophobia

[froggy]

I think you are talking about the imperialist west....the brits, the French, and now the US. Hen was the last time Muslim country went on invading other countries?


A different type of bloody conquest occurred through the movement of whole tribal groups between the east and the west. Again, just to name a few, the Huns, the Goths, and the Avars came from as far away as western Asia, central Asia, and China respectively in the fifth through the seventh centuries A.D. Indeed, the Avars from northern China and Mongolia were besieging Constantinople in 626 A.D., at the very moment Mohammed was a merchant in Arabia. Indeed, the Avars, by this siege, were one of the forces that weakened the Byzantines (there were many other, perhaps more important, forces) to the extent that most of the Byzantine mid-eastern empire fell relatively easily to the Muslims

 

[Coyote]

That's what a bigot thinks....I'm a Muslim and I don't fit on your discription nor does most Muslims....stop watching FOX.
I honestly think should worry more about the orange man than terrorist at this point , he's far a bether threat than a anything else right now.

Go take your meds...
London has a Muslim mayor, Muslim policemen, Muslim firefighters, Muslim doctors, ect....
And guess what you bigot...English people are more educated to spit stupidity like you just did....those who did those acts are 0.001% of Muslims, why would put all in one basket you moron?
They voted in a Muslim mayor after all those terror attacks because they. Are not bigots like your ignorant self.
France rejected ted the racist FN to say no to bigotry too despite the terrorist acts.

So does Saudi Arabia and Iran - how's life for females and gays over there...can ya stand on a street corner and quote bible verses in Saudi Arabia? Besides, we had a Muslim president here in the US - not really, but he did once say the call to prayer was one of the 'prettiest sounds on earth'.

For someone who decries stereotyping you sure seem to indulge in it yourself. There are 300+ million Americans in America. What % of those do you think would be diagnosed with 'Islamophobia'? There are anywhere from 1.6 to 1.8 Muslims in the world - if 0.001% are violent extremists as you say they are, that's well over 1,000,000 people. That's not Islamophobia, that's math. So what are you worried about? Why not turn your attention to controlling that 'small' minority, if that's the case - stand tall and educate them about Islam if they are corrupting your religion - there's the proper target for your anger.

But London isn't Saudi Arabia and the mayor is British not Saudi. Why make comparisons as if somehow being of a particular faith precludes any ability at democratic governance, national loyalty and values, and some how instantly pigeonholes a person as a regressive, wife beating, gay killing Misogynist.

Lol Islam is an ideology that's like asking what precludes a national socialist the ability of democratic governance. And as already established 90%+ of the global Muslim population is anti-Semitic, homophobic, theocratic, and misogynistic. In fact a recent poll found that a full 2/3s of British Muslims would not report on a fellow Muslim for joining ISIL.

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

 

[froggy]

Islamic terrorism - Wikipedia

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Think there's any Muslims who speak Arabic? Maybe a couple?
--- because those people ARE Semites by definition, shit-for-brains.

And by definition anti-Semitism does not and never has referred to hatred of the Semitic linguistic category but does now and has always referred exclusively to hatred of Jews, you stupid ignorant cunnt.

Se·mit·ic
səˈmidik/
adjective
adjective: Semitic

1. 1.
   relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
2. 2.
   relating to the peoples who speak the Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.

Idiot.

Thank you for the definition of Semitic, I already told you you fucking moron that the term anti-Semitic does not and has never referred to hatred of the Semitic linquistic classification you fucking moron, it refers today and always has referred exclusively to hatred of Jews:


Definition of anti–Semitism

1. : hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group

See anti–Semitism defined for English-language learners

Definition of ANTI-SEMITISM

Etymology[edit]
From the German Antisemitismus, which was coined in 1879 by German political agitator Wilhelm Marr to replace Judenhass ("Jew-hatred") to make hatred of the Jews seem rational and sanctioned by scientific knowledge. The similar term antisemitisch (“anti-semitic”) was first used in 1860, by Jewish scholar Moritz Steinschneider. See Wikipedia's article on the etymology and usage of the term.

The term is superficially/synchronically equivalent to anti- +‎ Semitism (see Semite), for which reason it is rarely extended to cover prejudice against any Semitic people, or against adherents of any of the religions that originated among the Semitic peoples (the Abrahamic religions). See the usage notes.

Usage notes[edit]

• Though Semitic refers in a broader sense to all those who speak Semitic languages (including e.g. Arabs and Assyrians), the term anti-Semitism has historically referred to prejudice against Jews alone. To avoid the confusion of the misnomer, many scholars of the subject (such as Emil Fackenheim) now favor the unhyphenated antisemitism in order to emphasize that the word should be read as a single unified term, not as a meaningful root word-prefix combination.[1][2][3] (See Wikipedia's article on the etymology and usage of the term.) Use of the term to refer to prejudice against any Semitic people is rare and nonstandard.

God you're a dumb bitch fucking kill yourself.

Are you completely illiterate, or just born stupid? Let's not rule out both.

I just asked you to cite the Question number and/or page number where this citation was. All you did was trot in some links to bullshit sources that lied about this fake question, which does not exist.

I also told you straight out that I busted this fake news several days ago. You could have read it in post 1151. But noooooooo You had to dig yourself even deeper.

Not only does that question not even exist ---- you didn't bother to read the poll results.
I did. And that's why I know a fuck of a lot more than you.

Here it is -- Question 37, page 323. You can read it for yourself.:

"If you thought that someone who is close to you was getting involved with people who support terrorism in Syria, would you:" (followed by choices of what they would do in that case)

The 'winner' in that question was "Talk directly to that person about it to dissuade them" (46%)

Next was "Look for help" at 37%. "Help" was defined in the poll as talking to one's own family, talking to the recruit's family, consulting an imam, and community organisations.

The only other avenue offered to counter the person being recruited was "Report it to the police" at 34%. "I would not get involved" was chosen by less than ten percent.

In other words of the three avenues listed to stop the recruit from getting involved in terrorism (specifically in Syria), "report it to the police" was deemed the least directly effective of the three.

Personal contact was deemed more effective, followed by guidance from community groups, families and religious clerics. ALL of them are methods of dissuading the recruit from that course, the only difference being which avenue would be most effective. Direct personal intervention was preferred over indirect third-party take-a-number intervention. Fucking DUH.

And you'll notice that 46 + 37 + 34 add up to 117%, meaning many would follow more than one of those courses simultaneously. All for the same purpose of arresting the recruitment of this hypothetical person to terrorism. In Syria, specifically.

That's it, the end. They said personal action would be more effective than the indirect "reporting it to the police". Ask any Second Amendment person on this site about a similar situation versus "report it to the police" and watch a similar result.

So where is the negatively-phrased question that says the respondent "would not" report it to the police?

Again that was asserted here:

"Astonishing" two in three British Muslims would NOT give police terror tip-offs​

and here:

A new ICM poll has discovered two out of three Muslims in Britain would not give the government any information if they knew details about a terror plot.​

and here:

Two thirds of British Muslims would not give police terror tip-offs​

Where does that finding appear in this poll?

NOWHERE. That question does not exist. Nowhere does it ask what the respondent would NOT do. That's why you can't answer my pointed question --- you didn't even bother to read your own source material. And in a typical display of the same ignorance, your bottom headline is a triple-lie --- not only did no one say they "would not", the question was never about a "terror plot" NOR was it about informing "the government". NEITHER OF THOSE QUESTIONS IS EVEN ASKED.

When is it ever going to sink in to you Fake News Gullibles that these bullshit headlines are written to play y'all like a three-dollar banjo?

Moreover to add insult to gullibility, the question was never about a "terrorist plot" nor did it refer to "tip offs" about such a plot in the UK. It says, specifically "in Syria". Nowhere does it refer to "informing the government'. And nowhere does it ask the exclusionary "what would you NOT do". There's no way for a respondent to say they "would not alert the police" since there's NO SUCH QUESTION IN THE POLL. ANYWHERE.



Go ahead illiterate moron --- try to prove me wrong. Here's the report in its entirety. All 615 pages of it. Find me anywhere that question is so stated. Fricking IDIOT.

Hey stupid cuntt I already fucking read it, from Pg 323:


Q.37 If you thought that someone who is close to you was getting involved with people who support terrorism in Syria, would you ... Base: All respondents

Only 34% said they would report it to the police you stupid fucking bitch meaning that a full 2/3s would guess what? Not report it to the police.

https://www.icmunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Mulims-full-suite-data-plus-topline.pdf

Now kindly fucking kill yourself you fucking collaborating whore.

Bonus track, bigot-boi: On this post:

On theocracy the overwhelming majority of Muslims surveyed want Sharia to be the official law of the land:

That question came up in the same poll above. Sharia support came in at a whopping 1 (one) percent. That sound like an "overwhelming majority" to you? I could tell you what page that's on but fuck it, slacker, you're already behind. Go get off your lazy ass and do some homework for a change.

Again --- quit being so goddam gullible for every Pam Geller who wants to play you like a three-dollar sword-swallowing banjo just because she thinks it looks funny.

Lying cunnt, on pg. 123 the following is asked:

Table 47 Q.14 To what extent, if at all, would you support or oppose there being areas of Britain in which Sharia law is introduced instead of British law? Base: All respondents-

Only 43% opposed.

Furthermore:

Chapter 1: Beliefs About Sharia

According to the study (German and English), which was funded by the German government, two thirds (65%) of the Muslims interviewed say Islamic Sharia law is more important to them than the laws of the country in which they live.

Three quarters (75%) of the respondents hold the opinion that there is only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran, which should apply to all Muslims, and nearly 60% of Muslims believe their community should return to "Islamic roots."

The survey shows that 44% of the Moroccans and Turks interviewed agree with all three of the above statements, which makes them "consistent fundamentalists," and fundamentalist attitudes are just as widespread among younger Muslims as they are among older Muslims.

According to the study, Islamic fundamentalism is most pronounced in Austria, where 73% of Muslims interviewed say Sharia law is more important than the secular laws of the state; 79% say there is only one correct interpretation of the Koran that should apply to all, and 65% believe Muslims should return to their Islamic roots. In Austria, 55% of the Muslims surveyed say they agree with all three of the above statements.

Europe: Islamic Fundamentalism is Widespread

 

[Papageorgio]

That's what a bigot thinks....I'm a Muslim and I don't fit on your discription nor does most Muslims....stop watching FOX.
I honestly think should worry more about the orange man than terrorist at this point , he's far a bether threat than a anything else right now.

So does Saudi Arabia and Iran - how's life for females and gays over there...can ya stand on a street corner and quote bible verses in Saudi Arabia? Besides, we had a Muslim president here in the US - not really, but he did once say the call to prayer was one of the 'prettiest sounds on earth'.

For someone who decries stereotyping you sure seem to indulge in it yourself. There are 300+ million Americans in America. What % of those do you think would be diagnosed with 'Islamophobia'? There are anywhere from 1.6 to 1.8 Muslims in the world - if 0.001% are violent extremists as you say they are, that's well over 1,000,000 people. That's not Islamophobia, that's math. So what are you worried about? Why not turn your attention to controlling that 'small' minority, if that's the case - stand tall and educate them about Islam if they are corrupting your religion - there's the proper target for your anger.

But London isn't Saudi Arabia and the mayor is British not Saudi. Why make comparisons as if somehow being of a particular faith precludes any ability at democratic governance, national loyalty and values, and some how instantly pigeonholes a person as a regressive, wife beating, gay killing Misogynist.

Lol Islam is an ideology that's like asking what precludes a national socialist the ability of democratic governance. And as already established 90%+ of the global Muslim population is anti-Semitic, homophobic, theocratic, and misogynistic. In fact a recent poll found that a full 2/3s of British Muslims would not report on a fellow Muslim for joining ISIL.

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

 

[Pogo]

Q.37 If you thought that someone who is close to you was getting involved with people who support terrorism in Syria, would you ... Base: All respondents

Only 34% said they would report it to the police you stupid fucking bitch meaning that a full 2/3s would guess what? Not report it to the police.

My, you are a special kind of illiterate aintchya Twinketoes?

THE QUESTION OF WHAT THE RESPONDENT WOULD NOT DO DOES. NOT. EXIST.

What did it go by too fast for ya Twink? Let's see it again in slo-mo.

Q.37 If you thought that someone who is close to you was getting involved with people who support terrorism in Syria, would you ...

STOP. "Would you" is asking what POSITIVE action "you" would take. It is not asking what action you would *NOT* take. This is followed by several choices of what "you" **WOULD** (not "would not") do to address this person "getting involved with people who support terrorism in Syria".​

Here then are the choices, of POSITIVE actions the respondent *WOULD* do:

• Talk to the person directly about it to dissuade them
• Look for help ("help" defined later in the doc as consulting one's own family, the recruit's family, an imam or a community group)
• Report it to the police

These were followed by three cop-out options:

• I don't think someone close to me would get involved with people who support terrorism
• Let the person deal with it themselves -- I wouldn't get involved
• Don't know

There you go, shit-for-brains........... three nonexclusive positive choices of how to dissuade the person from terrorism, and three deflections that don't answer the question at all. ZERO options for "ruling out" anything. The only option up there that in any way approaches your knuckledragger drooling fantasy of "would not alert the police" is number five, "I wouldn't get involved". That pulled under ten percent. Not quite the two-thirds you liars make it out to be, is it, hackbreath?

Again, the question is "how would you talk them out of it" and the answers reflect that direct person-to-person confrontation would be more effective than taking it to the police. The person directly, their family, an imam, a community group --- all *trusted* entities; that is, trusted by the hypothetical person whose judgment is swaying Any freaking moron knows these are more effective than taking it to the police, who are a third party and notorious for needing a crime to be in progress to be able to take action. Because that's their job, Dumbshit.

Want an example of that, Dimbulb? Look no further than the topic of this thread, Jeremy Christian. Fifteen hours before he slashed three Samaritans' throats he was on the same train ranting against the train driver and threatening to stab somebody. Three weeks before he was prancing around a rally giving Nazi salutes and railing against Muslims and "*******". What the fuck did the police do? What could they do before he acted?

Now what if some family member had gotten him into mental health help to defuse him before he went off?
"OH NOES!

THEY DIDN'T GO TO THE POLICE!?"

FUCK you, mental plugged toilet.

And AGAIN for the slow of wit ---- your own bullshit links morphed this question into giving (1) "the government" (2) "tip-offs" about (3) a terrorist "plot" --- NONE of which exist anywhere in the question.

So no imbecile, it does not mean that.

Now on to part two. Question 10, page 83, and I quote:
Q.10 If you had the choice, which one of the following would you consider to be the ideal way for you to lead your life in Britain today?

-- followed by various choices topped by "I would fully integrate with non-Muslims in all aspects of life" followed by other options of integrating on most things while maintaining separate schooling, etc. The bottom choice reads "I would like to live in a fully separate Islamic area in Britain, subject to Sharia Law". You know, like those fantasy "No Go Zones" you comic book fetishists love to dream up and jack off to?

That got one percent. ONE.

 

[Marion Morrison]

No no no and no. Hell broke loose after US invasions....They didn't show the civilian casualties through out the occupation's of Iraq and Afghanistan because is not marketable and you didn't care about them.
Yes thousands among thousands of casualties , and countries turned into ruins , that's how the anger built up and Isis had an easy way to grow and recruit and before them Al Qaeda.
Keep lying to yourself and say that they hate us because of our of life....no honey, the imperialism brought the worst out of that region. Not one single terrorist group was in Iraq, Syria and Lybia....after the weakening of those countries.....they made safe heavens to groups like Isis. I'm from that region and I'm telling you what went down thete. Stop eating the Bullshit.

Isis and AL qaeda wouldn't have thrived in Iraq during Saddam''s rule. The US invasions with the coalition embolded the ISIS and others...

No, that developed from the vacuum left by OBAMA because the Muslim population doesn't have the will to destroy evil in their own midst (can an evil tree bring forth good fruit?)

Huh: Saddam had a TERROR STATE; Syria descended into a cess pit all by itself and Libya was a failed State with a lunatic as a leader. Looks to me like the disease was inherent in the patients!!

Greg

That's not the truth. That's the AP dialogue they would have you believe.

 

[Pogo]

That's what a bigot thinks....I'm a Muslim and I don't fit on your discription nor does most Muslims....stop watching FOX.
I honestly think should worry more about the orange man than terrorist at this point , he's far a bether threat than a anything else right now.

But London isn't Saudi Arabia and the mayor is British not Saudi. Why make comparisons as if somehow being of a particular faith precludes any ability at democratic governance, national loyalty and values, and some how instantly pigeonholes a person as a regressive, wife beating, gay killing Misogynist.

Lol Islam is an ideology that's like asking what precludes a national socialist the ability of democratic governance. And as already established 90%+ of the global Muslim population is anti-Semitic, homophobic, theocratic, and misogynistic. In fact a recent poll found that a full 2/3s of British Muslims would not report on a fellow Muslim for joining ISIL.

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

 

[leftwinger]

I guess until they get some high-up GOVT hogs nothing will change? Blowing up 100 kids don't do it? Running over 100 tourist don't do it? Got to move "up the chain"....poison a GOVT dinner as they feed on taxpayer food? Shoot up a Dem rally? Blow up a bunch of MSM reporters feeding at the buffet line. Maybe then? They got a soccer match and a concert...........nothing happened but more of the same.

remember the old Raw-Hide TV show? "move em' up head em out"

I am French Old Yeller so I do my best to grasp sometimes what is said in English. I hope if that's what you're talking about that Trump will do something against ISIS me I love Americans people and you've been spared for a while you've had attacks but let's say everything is for us now Europe and Obama The heartless man had said but good we are no longer the gendarmes of the world. We do not find a gendarmes in the world thanks to this imbecile Obama and Trump does not have the same vision but he wants countries to pay their share of the cake for security and I agree with him this Is not just the American taxpayer to pay. The Germans are also the ones who make us pay, they do not want to paid anything as they say they want the butter and the money of the butter.
After all its attacks I do not know what could happen for the war to be declared at the Islamic state?

Not to worry Dalia --- that post doesn't make any sense in English either. C'est complètement con.

I keep a list.....when I get on a keyboard/PC the bell will toll for thee

 

[Marion Morrison]

Iraq terror state?
Remember the US backed Iraq in their war against Iran and then they went to get the oil after fabricating the WMD story.
Libya had a crazy leader, that gives us the right to go topple him and leave Isis in charge?? So the whole world thinks Trump is a joke and a threat to the world does that give anyone the right to remove him?
Syria has the US fingerprints all over it....we funded the opposition (AL nusra, Isis and the free army)
Be a man and say yes we screwed up and take part of the reponsibility....now let's find a solution.

Huh: Saddam had a TERROR STATE; Syria descended into a cess pit all by itself and Libya was a failed State with a lunatic as a leader. Looks to me like the disease was inherent in the patients!!

Greg

PCness is ghey.


These are just they type of people ^^ who will be labeled "domestic terrorists" in the future.....the hate-America types who navigate the world in an academia inspired bubble. Nobody cares about some ghey far left theories at this point. Their theory crap 20 years behind the times. People are getting blown up daily......and they will never stop. They need to be hunted down.......aggressively so........and eliminated while they sleep.

The bubble people are the worst.......and when all the PC bullshit finally gets eradicated, these people will go from large minority to fringe.

Actually the domestic terrorists are the subhuman creatures like the one in the OP of this thread, who flip out at the sight of a black/Latino/Muslim/Jew/lefthander/whatever their bigotry is, and start slashing people's throats when they try to settle the scene into the normal condition of peace. That's what this entire thread is about, regardless where you try to deflect it to.

They're also those who gun down Sikhs at temple, gun down Indians in a bar, beat a homeless man with a pipe, bomb gay bars and women's health clinics and Olympics, murder doctors, sit in a black church and then open fire, walk into a white "liberal" church and open fire, dress up in white sheets and burn crosses, blow up buildings with a Ryder truck, desecrate Jewish gravesites and smash their beer mug in the face of a stranger for speaking Swahili. Just to name a few.

Is all that "ghey" enough for ya? Because there's plenty more.

lol........fringe theory is ghey s0n. As the body counts rise, nobody out there is worried about Jewish, Christian et. al. terrorism except the progressive k00k fringe. And that's the only thing that matters thank God........in due time, guys like you will be considered domestic terrorists by the masses. LOL....you're gonna be housebound s0n!!! Yep........white Christian bigots like me will be dominating society because it will be the will of the people........when all the PC bullshit disappears. Progressives will need to leave this country.....or sit on the sidelines and not utter a word.

So you're threatening to come slash my throat like your hero in the OP story? You know -- the "patriot"?

Well isn't that informative.

^Maximum baitcasting achievement unlocked!

 

[Papageorgio]

That's what a bigot thinks....I'm a Muslim and I don't fit on your discription nor does most Muslims....stop watching FOX.
I honestly think should worry more about the orange man than terrorist at this point , he's far a bether threat than a anything else right now.

Lol Islam is an ideology that's like asking what precludes a national socialist the ability of democratic governance. And as already established 90%+ of the global Muslim population is anti-Semitic, homophobic, theocratic, and misogynistic. In fact a recent poll found that a full 2/3s of British Muslims would not report on a fellow Muslim for joining ISIL.

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

Go back and reread my post. What did I say when it involves killing, then they are on the same plains as those killed by the terrorists. When it comes to that Neanderthal in Portland, he needs to be put to death. I'm all for the death penalty and for him, torture would be too good for him.

 

[Coyote]

I guess until they get some high-up GOVT hogs nothing will change? Blowing up 100 kids don't do it? Running over 100 tourist don't do it? Got to move "up the chain"....poison a GOVT dinner as they feed on taxpayer food? Shoot up a Dem rally? Blow up a bunch of MSM reporters feeding at the buffet line. Maybe then? They got a soccer match and a concert...........nothing happened but more of the same.

remember the old Raw-Hide TV show? "move em' up head em out"

I am French Old Yeller so I do my best to grasp sometimes what is said in English. I hope if that's what you're talking about that Trump will do something against ISIS me I love Americans people and you've been spared for a while you've had attacks but let's say everything is for us now Europe and Obama The heartless man had said but good we are no longer the gendarmes of the world. We do not find a gendarmes in the world thanks to this imbecile Obama and Trump does not have the same vision but he wants countries to pay their share of the cake for security and I agree with him this Is not just the American taxpayer to pay. The Germans are also the ones who make us pay, they do not want to paid anything as they say they want the butter and the money of the butter.
After all its attacks I do not know what could happen for the war to be declared at the Islamic state?

Not to worry Dalia --- that post doesn't make any sense in English either. C'est complètement con.

I keep a list.....when I get on a keyboard/PC the bell will toll for thee

Grocery list?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Iraq terror state?
Remember the US backed Iraq in their war against Iran and then they went to get the oil after fabricating the WMD story.
Libya had a crazy leader, that gives us the right to go topple him and leave Isis in charge?? So the whole world thinks Trump is a joke and a threat to the world does that give anyone the right to remove him?
Syria has the US fingerprints all over it....we funded the opposition (AL nusra, Isis and the free army)
Be a man and say yes we screwed up and take part of the reponsibility....now let's find a solution.

No no no and no. Hell broke loose after US invasions....They didn't show the civilian casualties through out the occupation's of Iraq and Afghanistan because is not marketable and you didn't care about them.
Yes thousands among thousands of casualties , and countries turned into ruins , that's how the anger built up and Isis had an easy way to grow and recruit and before them Al Qaeda.
Keep lying to yourself and say that they hate us because of our of life....no honey, the imperialism brought the worst out of that region. Not one single terrorist group was in Iraq, Syria and Lybia....after the weakening of those countries.....they made safe heavens to groups like Isis. I'm from that region and I'm telling you what went down thete. Stop eating the Bullshit.

Isis and AL qaeda wouldn't have thrived in Iraq during Saddam''s rule. The US invasions with the coalition embolded the ISIS and others...

No, that developed from the vacuum left by OBAMA because the Muslim population doesn't have the will to destroy evil in their own midst (can an evil tree bring forth good fruit?)

Huh: Saddam had a TERROR STATE; Syria descended into a cess pit all by itself and Libya was a failed State with a lunatic as a leader. Looks to me like the disease was inherent in the patients!!

Greg

I agree with Issa on this.

The truth is that Bush fucked Saddam over royally and Saddam got mad and put a hit on him.

Therefore his son used the might of the US military to enrich his friends with ties to the MIC by declaring war and go after the guy

who threatened his daddy.


Syria, CIA or somebody was arming "moderate rebels" against Assad. Assad is not the bad guy there.

Libya: Remember how Obama was buddying it up with Momar 2 months before Hillary killed him?

He didn't know.

Saddam was poised to put the African on a gold standard which would weaken the petrodollar, so Hillary's

masters told her to depose him.

Very shortly to Hillary doing her masters' bidding by killing Khadafi, the AP started circulating fake anti-Momar

news stories, they

probably involved "gassing" of some sort, sound familiar? Same crap they do with Assad.

All that being said, Islam and America are incompatible.

Islam is a world-domination program in the guise of a religion.

I hate what our government has done in many Muslim countries, starting with Iran, which was the first failed

"regime-change" that I know of.

So many deaths are on the hands of the Bushes and Clintons it's overwhelming.

Obama too, but the scale of the Clintons and Bushes crimes against humanity is flabbergasting.

Prescott Bush helped fund the Nazis, that's how far back it goes with them.


They should never have been in power, but now it's too late.

All we can do from here is go forward and rebuild.

 

[Pogo]

I guess until they get some high-up GOVT hogs nothing will change? Blowing up 100 kids don't do it? Running over 100 tourist don't do it? Got to move "up the chain"....poison a GOVT dinner as they feed on taxpayer food? Shoot up a Dem rally? Blow up a bunch of MSM reporters feeding at the buffet line. Maybe then? They got a soccer match and a concert...........nothing happened but more of the same.

remember the old Raw-Hide TV show? "move em' up head em out"

I am French Old Yeller so I do my best to grasp sometimes what is said in English. I hope if that's what you're talking about that Trump will do something against ISIS me I love Americans people and you've been spared for a while you've had attacks but let's say everything is for us now Europe and Obama The heartless man had said but good we are no longer the gendarmes of the world. We do not find a gendarmes in the world thanks to this imbecile Obama and Trump does not have the same vision but he wants countries to pay their share of the cake for security and I agree with him this Is not just the American taxpayer to pay. The Germans are also the ones who make us pay, they do not want to paid anything as they say they want the butter and the money of the butter.
After all its attacks I do not know what could happen for the war to be declared at the Islamic state?

Not to worry Dalia --- that post doesn't make any sense in English either. C'est complètement con.

I keep a list.....when I get on a keyboard/PC the bell will toll for thee

Grocery list?

Oh I hope not. I don't trust anyone to make my groceries.

 

[Pogo]

That's what a bigot thinks....I'm a Muslim and I don't fit on your discription nor does most Muslims....stop watching FOX.
I honestly think should worry more about the orange man than terrorist at this point , he's far a bether threat than a anything else right now.

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

Go back and reread my post. What did I say when it involves killing, then they are on the same plains as those killed by the terrorists. When it comes to that Neanderthal in Portland, he needs to be put to death. I'm all for the death penalty and for him, torture would be too good for him.

I already DID read your post. After Coyote said, 'I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families' your reply was "BS".

Where you invoking "Barbra Streisand"?

 

[WEATHER53]

It's stunningly stupid for the usually stupid Muzz defenders to be equating this Jeremey guy with all the terrorists attacks and to suggest that his act somehow mitigates the atrocities is just ghoulish. In a way they are all ghouls, blowing people to bits. And he did not even physically attack anyone until he was attacked. Prior to that it was merely speech . Libs like to make things no where near equal as equal, part of the feelings over facts fraud

 

[Papageorgio]

We hear a lot from the talking heads however nothing from the victims or the families. These are the ones that will live with the death, hate and ramifications from a bunch of low life scum that have no respect for Mohamed or Allah. to kill them and obliterate them from the earth would be to kind.

We need to eradicate the evil that lays with the terrorists, we need to show kindness, warmth and empathy for those that have lost loved ones, that have been injured or maimed by these ruthless cowards that claim they are from Islam.

Families that are turned upside down, losing husbands, wives, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children. Then pain and suffering of those the scum have caused is where the focus should be. The spiritual, physical, emotional damage is the issue, not the terrorist or those being accused of being terrorists, they suffer little as compared to the real victims and their families. The bastard terrorist don't give a shit what religion, what your skin color is, what your sexual preference is, all they want is death and mayhem. The terrorist will kill liberals,conservatives, Muslims, Christians and won't think twice.

The terrorists want war and death, we need to oblige them. Thoughts and prayers to the real victims and their families and death to all the terrorists, everywhere.

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

Go back and reread my post. What did I say when it involves killing, then they are on the same plains as those killed by the terrorists. When it comes to that Neanderthal in Portland, he needs to be put to death. I'm all for the death penalty and for him, torture would be too good for him.

I already DID read your post. After Coyote said, 'I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families' your reply was "BS".

Where you invoking "Barbra Streisand"?

Coyote specifically mentioned lynching and I responded with this, "Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother."

So, I don't equate having to move or being discriminated against as the same level of victims who have lost a life or had a close relative lose a life.

 

[Coyote]

I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families. Because their lives can be just as ruined. They can be lynched and driven from their homes or ostracized. That too is a family turned upside down, but they are invisible.

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

Go back and reread my post. What did I say when it involves killing, then they are on the same plains as those killed by the terrorists. When it comes to that Neanderthal in Portland, he needs to be put to death. I'm all for the death penalty and for him, torture would be too good for him.

I already DID read your post. After Coyote said, 'I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families' your reply was "BS".

Where you invoking "Barbra Streisand"?

Coyote specifically mentioned lynching and I responded with this, "Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother."

So, I don't equate having to move or being discriminated against as the same level of victims who have lost a life or had a close relative lose a life.

Having to move, is losing a home and a community.

Was listening to NPR about a Coptic woman in Egypt, where discrimmination and violence (not killing) have forced her out of a village she's lived in for generations.

I don't think these things should be minimized.

 

[Papageorgio]

BS! I'll take all the hate you want to dish out to spend one more minute with my daughter, to compare the two is just plain insensitive and ignorant. Lose a daughter or a son and your life is ruined and there is no getting rid of the pain.

Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother.

You may equate the two, I cannot nor will I ever.

You don't think the friends and family of Best and Nakmai-Meche are in pain right now?

You don't think the Sikhs shot to death by a bigot who thought he was shooting Muslims felt pain? Or that of the cab driver stabbed for being Muslim? Or Dylann Roof's victims in the church, killed for being black?

HOW could they not?

Go back and reread my post. What did I say when it involves killing, then they are on the same plains as those killed by the terrorists. When it comes to that Neanderthal in Portland, he needs to be put to death. I'm all for the death penalty and for him, torture would be too good for him.

I already DID read your post. After Coyote said, 'I think those being falsely accused end up suffering as much as the families' your reply was "BS".

Where you invoking "Barbra Streisand"?

Coyote specifically mentioned lynching and I responded with this, "Lynching is a different level because it does involve the death of a mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother."

So, I don't equate having to move or being discriminated against as the same level of victims who have lost a life or had a close relative lose a life.

Having to move, is losing a home and a community.

Was listening to NPR about a Coptic woman in Egypt, where discrimmination and violence (not killing) have forced her out of a village she's lived in for generations.

I don't think these things should be minimized.

I don't minimize it, it just not the same for me. I'd rather move than lose I loved one. You may not feel the same.

 

[gtopa1]

Iraq terror state?
Remember the US backed Iraq in their war against Iran and then they went to get the oil after fabricating the WMD story.
Libya had a crazy leader, that gives us the right to go topple him and leave Isis in charge?? So the whole world thinks Trump is a joke and a threat to the world does that give anyone the right to remove him?
Syria has the US fingerprints all over it....we funded the opposition (AL nusra, Isis and the free army)
Be a man and say yes we screwed up and take part of the reponsibility....now let's find a solution.

No no no and no. Hell broke loose after US invasions....They didn't show the civilian casualties through out the occupation's of Iraq and Afghanistan because is not marketable and you didn't care about them.
Yes thousands among thousands of casualties , and countries turned into ruins , that's how the anger built up and Isis had an easy way to grow and recruit and before them Al Qaeda.
Keep lying to yourself and say that they hate us because of our of life....no honey, the imperialism brought the worst out of that region. Not one single terrorist group was in Iraq, Syria and Lybia....after the weakening of those countries.....they made safe heavens to groups like Isis. I'm from that region and I'm telling you what went down thete. Stop eating the Bullshit.

Isis and AL qaeda wouldn't have thrived in Iraq during Saddam''s rule. The US invasions with the coalition embolded the ISIS and others...

No, that developed from the vacuum left by OBAMA because the Muslim population doesn't have the will to destroy evil in their own midst (can an evil tree bring forth good fruit?)

Huh: Saddam had a TERROR STATE; Syria descended into a cess pit all by itself and Libya was a failed State with a lunatic as a leader. Looks to me like the disease was inherent in the patients!!

Greg

I agree with Issa on this.

The truth is that Bush fucked Saddam over royally and Saddam got mad and put a hit on him.

Therefore his son used the might of the US military to enrich his friends with ties to the MIC by declaring war and go after the guy

who threatened his daddy.


Syria, CIA or somebody was arming "moderate rebels" against Assad. Assad is not the bad guy there.

Libya: Remember how Obama was buddying it up with Momar 2 months before Hillary killed him?

He didn't know.

Saddam was poised to put the African on a gold standard which would weaken the petrodollar, so Hillary's

masters told her to depose him.

Very shortly to Hillary doing her masters' bidding by killing Khadafi, the AP started circulating fake anti-Momar

news stories, they

probably involved "gassing" of some sort, sound familiar? Same crap they do with Assad.

All that being said, Islam and America are incompatible.

Islam is a world-domination program in the guise of a religion.

I hate what our government has done in many Muslim countries, starting with Iran, which was the first failed

"regime-change" that I know of.

So many deaths are on the hands of the Bushes and Clintons it's overwhelming.

Obama too, but the scale of the Clintons and Bushes crimes against humanity is flabbergasting.

Prescott Bush helped fund the Nazis, that's how far back it goes with them.


They should never have been in power, but now it's too late.

All we can do from here is go forward and rebuild.

You're giving Carter a pass? You sure about that, Duke?

Greg