Gov. Rick Perry is Obama's Worst Nightmare

Austin news, sports, weather, Longhorns, business | Statesman.com

Site Web Archive
Web Search by YAHOO!
News News feed

Virtual Capitol
State
Nation
World
Elections
StatesmanWatch
Database Central
Last 7 days

Perry's HPV vaccine order draws backlash from GOP
Some lawmakers receiving angry messages about mandate requiring vaccinations for girls.
By Corrie MacLaggan
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Key lawmakers from Gov. Rick Perry's own Republican Party on Monday called on him to rescind his executive order making Texas the first state to require sixth-grade girls to be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

"The public has a right to testify on this issue, and the Legislature has a constitutional duty to be involved in this decision," said state Sen. Jane Nelson of Lewisville, chairwoman of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee.

At the Capitol on Monday, opposition grew against the governor's order Friday to require the human papilloma- virus vaccine for girls starting in September 2008. Lawmakers who said their offices were inundated with angry calls and e-mails from constituents over the weekend rushed to file bills that would override the governor's order, which they said revokes parental rights and could encourage young girls to be promiscuous. The governor, however, stood firm.

"Providing the HPV vaccine doesn't promote sexual promiscuity any more than the Hepatitis B vaccine promotes drug use," Perry said Monday. "If the medical community developed a vaccine for lung cancer, would the same critics oppose it, claiming it would encourage smoking?"

The governor's mandate has drawn enthusiastic support from some lawmakers, including two Democrats who had proposed similar requirements: state Rep. Jessica Farrar of Houston and state Sen. Leticia Van de Putte of San Antonio.

But Perry's moved to bypass the Legislature left Nelson "absolutely stunned." Republican Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst said he didn't see it coming, either.

"I think while the HPV vaccine can play a very important role in preventing cervical cancer, I don't think government should ever presume to know better than the parents," said Dewhurst, who said he wants to work with Perry and the Legislature on a program that parents can opt into. The executive order allows parents to opt out.

The Texas Medical Association isn't taking a stand on whether the vaccine should be required, but the group's physicians support providing the vaccine because it can prevent a cancer, said Dr. Bill Hinchey, president-elect of the group.

"A vaccine is a much less expensive method to do that than treating cervical cancer," Hinchey said.

The position of the American Academy of Pediatrics is that it's too early to consider mandates, said Dr. Joseph Bocchini, chairman of the academy's infectious diseases committee.

"We're very much in favor of this vaccine for routine use in girls and women up to age 26," said Bocchini, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport. But he added that the need now is for educating the public on the benefits of the vaccine.

State Sen. Bob Deuell, a Greenville Republican who is also a medical doctor, said the decision to get the vaccine should be between a physician and a patient.

The vaccine, Gardasil, was approved by federal officials in June. It protects against types of HPV that cause about 70 percent of cervical cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Merck, the company that makes the vaccine, has been lobbying lawmakers around the country to mandate the vaccine. Another vaccine is being developed by GlaxoSmithKline.

Nelson and state Rep. Jim Keffer, R-Eastland, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, have asked the state attorney general to rule on the legality of Perry's order.

Sen. Glenn Hegar, R-Katy, and Rep. Charlie Howard, R-Sugar Land, on Monday filed bills to override the executive order, and some lawmakers have suggested getting around the order by refusing to fund it, said state Rep. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola. Perry's staff members estimate that it would cost $71.7 million a year to pay for the shots for low-income Texans.

The retail price of the three-dose series is $360, according to the CDC. A federal immunization panel recommends the vaccine for 11- and 12-year-old girls, and most insurance plans cover vaccines on the panel's list. However, it might take some time for plans to cover newly approved vaccines.

"I've heard from people back home . . . who are furious about it," Hughes said. "There is some question as to a governor's authority to issue an executive order like this that spends money. That is normally the purview of the Legislature."

Perry has never rescinded an executive order, spokeswoman Krista Moody said.

State Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, said that she hasn't had a chance to fully take the pulse of her constituents but that "as a nurse and someone concerned about health, I commend the governor for this step."

Marcela Contreras of South Austin, who has a 23-year-old daughter, said that if her daughter were younger, she would talk to her about not having sex before allowing her to get the vaccine.

"I sure wouldn't want my kid to be sexually active at that age," Contreras said. "There's always that feeling in the back of your mind any time you tell children about sex, or anything, that they're going to think that you're condoning it."

My biggest fear is that the evil bastard gets there the way Bam Bam did. On the " any one but him" vote.
 
Last edited:
I hope this treasonous, murdering and traitorous piece of filth does run. Perry's from a state filled with traitors. And there will be a national spotlight on that.

thats personal
why dont you come down here to east Texas and stand on the street corner and say that?

There is no reason to behave that way
Rick Perry will make a much better president than the one we got, and he will run I think

I wouldn't set foot in that craphole if I was paid a million bucks. I made it as far as the airport and that was on the way to china. I couldn't wait to leave.

Nothing but fat (How exactly do you guys get SO FAT), cowboy booted, stetson hatted traitorous elephant looking people waddling around.

You're a faggot aren't you? A faggot socialist dip shit from the ass hole of the East Coast. Who could possibly give a shit what you think?

Are these some of your perfectly thin New Yorkers? Ass hole!

 
The Slave owners were those in political power who voted for Secession...they wrapped it in States Rights for the peon poor whites to swallow



Totally false. Unless you think people eat cotton. The Breadbasket was the Northeast to MidWest....the Northerns did not starve during the war....the Southerners did.



Who fired first? Enlighten us. Who starved during the war...enlighten us.



By today's standards he would be a racist not wanting equality...but "Hate"? Not unless you can prove it.

You need to get on your google machine and look for what was going on in the mid west during the civel war. It was not farming. The South grew food as well as cotton. AS for race comeing into play, You are full of shit. Race only comes into play when some one does not get what they want. Al sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Quannel X, Malique Shabazz, and those who speak up for The Race". None of those men have ever held a job in real life. When they needed money they cry "Racist" and rake in all the cash they need.

Globes, World Globes & Gemstone Globes from OnlyGlobes.com-Free Shipping!

Who started the Civil War? The same side who couldn't feed themselves nor their army and deservedly lost.

They lost because they could not produce the things needed to fight the war. Once they were blockaded from the sea they could not get what they needed. Like I said, I will do a racism / civil war debate in another thread. We can resurrect one. Here, I would like to stick to what a fucktard Dick Parry is. Oh, and in those days the men were fighting wars. Crops did not get planted or harvested, and both side made it a point to burn them so neither side could use them.
 
thats personal
why dont you come down here to east Texas and stand on the street corner and say that?

There is no reason to behave that way
Rick Perry will make a much better president than the one we got, and he will run I think

I wouldn't set foot in that craphole if I was paid a million bucks. I made it as far as the airport and that was on the way to china. I couldn't wait to leave.

Nothing but fat (How exactly do you guys get SO FAT), cowboy booted, stetson hatted traitorous elephant looking people waddling around.

You're a faggot aren't you? A faggot socialist dip shit from the ass hole of the East Coast. Who could possibly give a shit what you think?

Are these some of your perfectly thin New Yorkers? Ass hole!


Um....I guess you never learned that people wearing coats and layers look wider. :lol::lol::lol:
 
You need to get on your google machine and look for what was going on in the mid west during the civel war. It was not farming. The South grew food as well as cotton. AS for race comeing into play, You are full of shit. Race only comes into play when some one does not get what they want. Al sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Quannel X, Malique Shabazz, and those who speak up for The Race". None of those men have ever held a job in real life. When they needed money they cry "Racist" and rake in all the cash they need.

Globes, World Globes & Gemstone Globes from OnlyGlobes.com-Free Shipping!

Who started the Civil War? The same side who couldn't feed themselves nor their army and deservedly lost.

They lost because they could not produce the things needed to fight the war. Once they were blockaded from the sea they could not get what they needed. Like I said, I will do a racism / civil war debate in another thread. We can resurrect one. Here, I would like to stick to what a fucktard Dick Parry is. Oh, and in those days the men were fighting wars. Crops did not get planted or harvested, and both side made it a point to burn them so neither side could use them.

:lol::lol: The cotton was PILING us because the plantation owners (who got to stay home if they had a certain # of slaves) kept growing it. The South STARVED because they were stupid and arrogant and couldn't finish what they started.
 
thats personal
why dont you come down here to east Texas and stand on the street corner and say that?

There is no reason to behave that way
Rick Perry will make a much better president than the one we got, and he will run I think

I wouldn't set foot in that craphole if I was paid a million bucks. I made it as far as the airport and that was on the way to china. I couldn't wait to leave.

Nothing but fat (How exactly do you guys get SO FAT), cowboy booted, stetson hatted traitorous elephant looking people waddling around.

You're a faggot aren't you? A faggot socialist dip shit from the ass hole of the East Coast. Who could possibly give a shit what you think?

Are these some of your perfectly thin New Yorkers? Ass hole!


You're putting up a shot of people in heavy winter coats and calling them fat? :lol:

Not only are you a big fucking drag queen of the lowest caliber..always interested in straight man cock..

You are a stupid one at that!:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Globes, World Globes & Gemstone Globes from OnlyGlobes.com-Free Shipping!

Who started the Civil War? The same side who couldn't feed themselves nor their army and deservedly lost.

They lost because they could not produce the things needed to fight the war. Once they were blockaded from the sea they could not get what they needed. Like I said, I will do a racism / civil war debate in another thread. We can resurrect one. Here, I would like to stick to what a fucktard Dick Parry is. Oh, and in those days the men were fighting wars. Crops did not get planted or harvested, and both side made it a point to burn them so neither side could use them.

:lol::lol: The cotton was PILING us because the plantation owners (who got to stay home if they had a certain # of slaves) kept growing it. The South STARVED because they were stupid and arrogant and couldn't finish what they started.

Dick Perry.
 

Not only was Perry calling for secession..he was mealy mouthed about it.:lol:

yes he was indeed. Rick Perry is nothing but a pretty boy fuck who will say and do anything to achieve his monitory and political means. In a way, I do hope he runs. That way, if he resigns to run he is out of Austin. And when he loses the nomination he can fade away and go fuck him self.
 

Not only was Perry calling for secession..he was mealy mouthed about it.:lol:


Guess you missed this post.




.
From PolitiFact:
.
.
.
.

Rick Perry threatened to secede?

rulings%2Ftom-false.gif


.
.
.
.


The board liberals have lied to you again.​



Even left leaning PolitiFact agrees, Perry never threatened to secede.​
 

Not only was Perry calling for secession..he was mealy mouthed about it.:lol:


Guess you missed this post.




.
From PolitiFact:
.
.
.
.

Rick Perry threatened to secede?

rulings%2Ftom-false.gif


.
.
.
.


The board liberals have lied to you again.​



Even left leaning PolitiFact agrees, Perry never threatened to secede.​

What we find: In a politically theatrical moment, Perry edged toward a secession threat. Then or since, however, he hasn’t said Texas should quit the United States. (You wudda read all about it.)

Gee, lets hope that if he becomes President, there are no "politically theatrical" moments; who knows what that goober is going to say...or "edge toward".
 
Not only was Perry calling for secession..he was mealy mouthed about it.:lol:


Guess you missed this post.




.
From PolitiFact:
.
.
.
.

Rick Perry threatened to secede?

rulings%2Ftom-false.gif


.
.
.
.


The board liberals have lied to you again.​




Even left leaning PolitiFact agrees, Perry never threatened to secede.​

What we find: In a politically theatrical moment, Perry edged toward a secession threat. Then or since, however, he hasn’t said Texas should quit the United States. (You wudda read all about it.)

Gee, lets hope that if he becomes President, there are no "politically theatrical" moments; who knows what that goober is going to say...or "edge toward".


IOW, he didn't threaten to secede...glad we got that straight.
 
Guess you missed this post.




.
From PolitiFact:
.
.
.
.

Rick Perry threatened to secede?

rulings%2Ftom-false.gif


.
.
.
.


The board liberals have lied to you again.​




Even left leaning PolitiFact agrees, Perry never threatened to secede.​

What we find: In a politically theatrical moment, Perry edged toward a secession threat. Then or since, however, he hasn’t said Texas should quit the United States. (You wudda read all about it.)

Gee, lets hope that if he becomes President, there are no "politically theatrical" moments; who knows what that goober is going to say...or "edge toward".


IOW, he didn't threaten to secede...glad we got that straight.

Glad you want a President who has to have subtitles. I never felt better about not being in the GOP until today.

Perry will say whatever the crowd wants to hear; in other words, he's a typical Republican.
 
Gee, lets hope that if he becomes President, there are no "politically theatrical" moments; who knows what that goober is going to say...or "edge toward".


IOW, he didn't threaten to secede...glad we got that straight.

Glad you want a President who has to have subtitles. I never felt better about not being in the GOP until today.

Perry will say whatever the crowd wants to hear; in other words, he's a typical Republican.


IOW, he didn't threaten to secede...glad we got that straight
 
Rick Perry will only win 2012 because it is US tradition to have dim-wits in the White House that can easily be used to accomplish missions not necessarily in the best interest of the people. And why secessionist Perry would fancy the White House beats me -

The man just done setting Texas on fire to get Fed aid to help Texas stay afloat! I tell you, wonder just never seizes.
 
He has been a nightmare for Texas too!

BlindBoo, Rick Perry has been more a nightmare than you probably know:
Texas, often portrayed by republican propagandists as state fairing better than other States because of good republican management, only stays in the black because of constant handout from Fed in form of disaster aid and cheap labor by undocumented. After Perry's little game with the Fed, the Fed folded it wings and Perry became so desperate he had to set the State on fire to get Fed disaster aid!

Remember California under republican the Governator used to be State always on fire. Somehow, California has very little or no fire, while Texas and now Arizona are on fire! The Governator passed fire baton to Perry, and when Perry was certain of some Fed disaster aid passed fire baton to Brewer! (Laughs)
 
Rick Perry will only win 2012 because it is US tradition to have dim-wits in the White House that can easily be used to accomplish missions not necessarily in the best interest of the people. And why secessionist Perry would fancy the White House beats me -

The man just done setting Texas on fire to get Fed aid to help Texas stay afloat! I tell you, wonder just never seizes.

we have one in the white house right now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top