GOP: 90% White and mostly Christian

IThe criticism hasn't been about the party being white, but about the party voting against the interests of the "middle class". The perception that the party works for the interests of corporations over the interests of the average American Citizen.

Which votes would these be?

The year Obama became president, HC rates skyrocketed 29%. If a person became sick, they could lose their HC for "pre existing" conditions, such as and "allergy" or a "hernia". The CEO of Cigna received a paycheck of 73 million dollars. The right wing has fought to keep this AND even make it worse.

Republicans apologized to BP. If they get control of both houses, they will make sure BP pays NOTHING. It will ALL be on the middle class.

The Republicans want to add another trillion to the deficit to give millionaires and billionaires more money to move jobs overseas.

How can you ask such a dumb question. The GOP hasn't been hiding their agenda. Either you agree with it or you don't.

But I suspect some agree because they hate having a "black" guy in the "WHITE" House and will agree to ANYTHING if they believe it will somehow get him out.

Do you follow Bfgrn around trying to Out-Stupid him?
 
I don't understand why this makes some people angry when I point out these truths about the Republican Party.

There is NOTHING wrong with a political party being 90% white and mostly Christian.

Some studies say the party could be as little as 89% white. Not a lot of difference.

This is why the Republican Party is the most powerful in the US, because they are a block. The vote as a block. They see their interests as the same.

It's not about who you are, but what you do.

The criticism hasn't been about the party being white, but about the party voting against the interests of the "middle class". The perception that the party works for the interests of corporations over the interests of the average American Citizen.
Soooooo... you have a problem with white people, old people... or you're just a boxcar loader looking to knock off a threat to your weak ass murderous neo-feudalist philosophy?

So are you going to be complaining about the 84% white Democrat Party?

Why you shithead's so damn stupid?????

The Democrat Party is like 60 or 70% white AT MOST. Included in that "WHITE" are gays and feminists and atheists and scientists and college professors. ALL the people the right wing DOESN'T want.

I laugh at you guys. Sometimes a little spit comes out. But I'm not really spitting on you. That was an accident.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Which votes would these be?

The year Obama became president, HC rates skyrocketed 29%. If a person became sick, they could lose their HC for "pre existing" conditions, such as and "allergy" or a "hernia". The CEO of Cigna received a paycheck of 73 million dollars. The right wing has fought to keep this AND even make it worse.

Republicans apologized to BP. If they get control of both houses, they will make sure BP pays NOTHING. It will ALL be on the middle class.

The Republicans want to add another trillion to the deficit to give millionaires and billionaires more money to move jobs overseas.

How can you ask such a dumb question. The GOP hasn't been hiding their agenda. Either you agree with it or you don't.

But I suspect some agree because they hate having a "black" guy in the "WHITE" House and will agree to ANYTHING if they believe it will somehow get him out.

Do you follow Bfgrn around trying to Out-Stupid him?

Calling the truth "stupid" doesn't make the truth stupid.

You on the other hand......
 
Please, PLEASE, PLEASE debate me on it.:eusa_pray:

I'll meet you tonight, in the moonlight that shines through the North Belltower.......:cool:

WOW, you don't even understand the English language and the use of a preposition?

On
preposition
Dealing with the subject of, about, or concerning something.

A book on history.

:lol::lol::lol:

Try "about."

Here's your word for the day pea brain:

synonym
 
Black support for the Dems will continue to erode as more and more blacks learn and understand the real racist history of the Dem Party and Dem Heroes.
 
I don't understand why this makes some people angry when I point out these truths about the Republican Party.

There is NOTHING wrong with a political party being 90% white and mostly Christian.

Some studies say the party could be as little as 89% white. Not a lot of difference.

This is why the Republican Party is the most powerful in the US, because they are a block. The vote as a block. They see their interests as the same.

It's not about who you are, but what you do.

The criticism hasn't been about the party being white, but about the party voting against the interests of the "middle class". The perception that the party works for the interests of corporations over the interests of the average American Citizen.
Soooooo... you have a problem with white people, old people... or you're just a boxcar loader looking to knock off a threat to your weak ass murderous neo-feudalist philosophy?

So are you going to be complaining about the 84% white Democrat Party?

Why you shithead's so damn stupid?????

The Democrat Party is like 60 or 70% white AT MOST. Included in that "WHITE" are gays and feminists and atheists and scientists and college professors. ALL the people the right wing DOESN'T want.

I laugh at you guys. Sometimes a little spit comes out. But I'm not really spitting on you. That was an accident.

at least you admit your rabid. But thanks for proving my point you have a problem with white people. Is this racism or self hatred?
 
Last edited:
The year Obama became president, HC rates skyrocketed 29%. If a person became sick, they could lose their HC for "pre existing" conditions, such as and "allergy" or a "hernia". The CEO of Cigna received a paycheck of 73 million dollars. The right wing has fought to keep this AND even make it worse.

Republicans apologized to BP. If they get control of both houses, they will make sure BP pays NOTHING. It will ALL be on the middle class.

The Republicans want to add another trillion to the deficit to give millionaires and billionaires more money to move jobs overseas.

How can you ask such a dumb question. The GOP hasn't been hiding their agenda. Either you agree with it or you don't.

But I suspect some agree because they hate having a "black" guy in the "WHITE" House and will agree to ANYTHING if they believe it will somehow get him out.

Do you follow Bfgrn around trying to Out-Stupid him?

Calling the truth "stupid" doesn't make the truth stupid.

You on the other hand......
Still waiting for truth to make it around your fry filled mouth, hairnet.
 
Black support for the Dems will continue to erode as more and more blacks learn and understand the real racist history of the Dem Party and Dem Heroes.

The party of Lincoln is no more Frank. It has been replaced by Negrophobe whites that play 'Barack the magic negro'

Nixon's Southern Strategy

The Republican Party built its power on the white vote, the church-going vote, and the male vote. But each of these groups are shrinking as a share of the electorate, while groups with little taste for the GOP are exploding.

One of the architects of the southern strategy, key Nixon advisor Kevin Phillips, described the GOP’s strategic choice to repudiate black voters and welcome southern whites back in a 1970 New York Times interview (James Boyd, May 17, 1970, “Nixon’s Southern strategy: ‘It’s All in the Charts,’” The New York Times).

“From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don’t need any more than that… but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That’s where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats.”
 
ROFL, trying to apply Godwin's law to cartoons?

Tardtard, you are amusing at times.

Ah, my favorite pwned pea brain, Big Fizzzzzzz

Hey pea brain, please tell us again that you are not a Statist, but you believe when the State executes an innocent person it is not murder, it's just a boo-boo...

No system of justice is perfect. Secondly, executing the wrong person is an accident. Not murder. Executions are a punishment for a crime.
ROFL... Wow, tardtard... you never fail to provide.

A demand for law enforcement and an equal justice system in a society that is not afraid to punish criminals and utilize the best deterrent of all, when appropriately used... equal stateism.

thanks for proving once again why you earned the title Tardtard. A tard among tards.

Here's your problems pea brain...first, executing an innocent human being is NOT equal justice or any form of 'justice', it is murder. Second, capital punishment is NOT a deterrent. What person that plans a murder plans on getting caught?

But, when your beloved State commits murder, you call it 'equal justice'
 
Ah, my favorite pwned pea brain, Big Fizzzzzzz

Hey pea brain, please tell us again that you are not a Statist, but you believe when the State executes an innocent person it is not murder, it's just a boo-boo...
ROFL... Wow, tardtard... you never fail to provide.

A demand for law enforcement and an equal justice system in a society that is not afraid to punish criminals and utilize the best deterrent of all, when appropriately used... equal stateism.

thanks for proving once again why you earned the title Tardtard. A tard among tards.

Here's your problems pea brain...first, executing an innocent human being is NOT equal justice or any form of 'justice', it is murder. Second, capital punishment is NOT a deterrent. What person that plans a murder plans on getting caught?

But, when your beloved State commits murder, you call it 'equal justice'
ROFL.

Just plug another nickle in and hit the ole "anti-death penalty rag".

Jeez, you're so damn easy, tardtard. You got a brother in jail or something? Mother? Grandmother? Or is it you?
 
Last edited:
I see I have reduced you to posting cartoon characters...pwned


If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.
Douglas Adams

.....just keep up the Great, Ironically Prejudice Posts.

:clap2::clap2::clap2:


The five leaders of the Philistine nation went to Delilah, and demanded that she find out from Samson what made him so strong, so they could subdue him. She eventually found out it was because his hair had never been cut. While asleep, Samson's hair was cut off. Losing his strength, he was captured by the Philistines, who gouged out his eyes, and made him grind grain in prison.

I was nice enough to find you a new avatar...

work.900521.6.fc-550x550-silver.v3.jpg
i guess he "pwned" you, since you are reduced to posting cartoon characters
 
Last edited:
ROFL, trying to apply Godwin's law to cartoons?

Tardtard, you are amusing at times.

Ah, my favorite pwned pea brain, Big Fizzzzzzz

Hey pea brain, please tell us again that you are not a Statist, but you believe when the State executes an innocent person it is not murder, it's just a boo-boo...

No system of justice is perfect. Secondly, executing the wrong person is an accident. Not murder. Executions are a punishment for a crime.
ROFL... Wow, tardtard... you never fail to provide.

A demand for law enforcement and an equal justice system in a society that is not afraid to punish criminals and utilize the best deterrent of all, when appropriately used... equal stateism.

thanks for proving once again why you earned the title Tardtard. A tard among tards.

I really don't care how you 'feel' or what your 'emotions' are on this issue. Besides your gross ignorance, you exhibit the sickening signs of an authoritarian followers...a passion to punish.

A national survey of police chiefs from around the country discredits the repeated assertion that the death penalty is an important law enforcement tool. While politicians have extolled the importance of capital punishment in fighting crime, they have failed to assess the actual priorities of those in law enforcement and have saddled the taxpayers with an enormously costly death penalty at the expense of more effective crime fighting strategies.

In January, 1995, Peter D. Hart Research Associates conducted a national opinion poll of randomly selected police chiefs in the United States. In that poll, the chiefs had the opportunity to express what they believe really works in fighting crime. They were asked where the death penalty fit in their priorities as leaders in the law enforcement field. What the police chiefs had to say may be surprising to many lawmakers, and to much of the public as well. The Hart Poll found that:

* Police chiefs rank the death penalty last as a way of reducing violent crime, placing it behind curbing drug abuse, more police officers on the streets, lowering the technical barriers to prosecution, longer sentences, and a better economy with more jobs.

* The death penalty was rated as the least cost-effective method for controlling crime.

* Insufficient use of the death penalty is not considered a major problem by the majority of police chiefs.

* Strengthening families and neighborhoods, punishing criminals swiftly and surely, controlling illegal drugs, and gun control are considered much more important than the death penalty.

* Although a majority of the police chiefs support the death penalty in the abstract, when given a choice between the sentence of life without parole plus restitution versus the death penalty, barely half of the chiefssupport capital punishment.

* Police chiefs do not believe that the death penalty significantly reduces the number of homicides.

* Police chiefs do not believe that murderers think about the range of possible punishments.

* Debates about the death penalty distract Congress and state legislatures from focusing on real solutions to crime.

dpic.r0301.gif


dpic.r0303.gif


More
 
I don't understand why this makes some people angry when I point out these truths about the Republican Party.

There is NOTHING wrong with a political party being 90% white and mostly Christian.

Some studies say the party could be as little as 89% white. Not a lot of difference.

This is why the Republican Party is the most powerful in the US, because they are a block. The vote as a block. They see their interests as the same.

It's not about who you are, but what you do.

The criticism hasn't been about the party being white, but about the party voting against the interests of the "middle class". The perception that the party works for the interests of corporations over the interests of the average American Citizen.
What's wrong? The Republican Party has a rather bleak future in the 21st century. Republicans who are predominately white, promote an anti-social welfare, immigration, and tax agenda that, disproportionately hurts blacks, Latino's and other minorities. Yet it is these minority groups that are the fastest growing segments in or society. Young voters more often than not vote for Democrats and tend to be more liberal than the general population. They have more liberal views than the general public on same-sex marriage and universal healthcare, issues that Republicans strongly oppose. Republicans may tend toward block voting, but it's going to be a decreasing block unless they begin to represent all America.

African American Population Demographics
Democratic Party (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
I don't understand why this makes some people angry when I point out these truths about the Republican Party.

There is NOTHING wrong with a political party being 90% white and mostly Christian.

Some studies say the party could be as little as 89% white. Not a lot of difference.

This is why the Republican Party is the most powerful in the US, because they are a block. The vote as a block. They see their interests as the same.

It's not about who you are, but what you do.

The criticism hasn't been about the party being white, but about the party voting against the interests of the "middle class". The perception that the party works for the interests of corporations over the interests of the average American Citizen.
What's wrong? The Republican Party has a rather bleak future in the 21st century. Republicans who are predominately white, promote an anti-social welfare, immigration, and tax agenda that, disproportionately hurts blacks, Latino's and other minorities. Yet it is these minority groups that are the fastest growing segments in or society. Young voters more often than not vote for Democrats and tend to be more liberal than the general population. They have more liberal views than the general public on same-sex marriage and universal healthcare, issues that Republicans strongly oppose. Republicans may tend toward block voting, but it's going to be a decreasing block unless they begin to represent all America.

African American Population Demographics
Democratic Party (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One word...
A
R
I
Z
O
N
A
 
I am almost convinced that the likes of rdean, Bfgrn, flopper, et all actually believe this shit they're churning out. Can they really be that stupid?
 
I am almost convinced that the likes of rdean, Bfgrn, flopper, et all actually believe this shit they're churning out. Can they really be that stupid?
yes, they can
LOL

Until today, my theory was that they make these ludicrous claims for political point scoring. But I think I may have to re-evaluate that. How sad.
well, if only the more reasonable on the left would just call them out on their stupidity maybe they would stop
i wont be holding my breath waiting for that
 

Forum List

Back
Top