Good Ole Socialists/Progressives: Trying To Get Fox News Banned...

[FJO]

Of course, the "Liberals" are really MODERATE CON$ passed off as Libs, and even then they are NEVER allowed to speak without constant and habitually rude interruption.

The "Libs" are never free to speak without interruption, their right to free speech ends with each interruption. That's free speech CON$ervoFascist style!

Ridiculous! I see the "cutting off" going both ways and all ways! I have seen O"Reilly over talk liberals and conservatives- BUT I have likewise seen both cutting him off- On Hannity and the Five all sides and voices get heard as well. The POINT- no not the one atop your head, is that all sides are present and all sides have a voice- whereas in the biased MSNBC and a few of the network programming- It's ALL liberal all the time.

HanNITWITty is by far the worst offender for interrupting. You must need a hearing aid if you never hear it!

On all of these opinion shows, time is very restricted. When a question is asked, it should be answered succinctly, truthfully and clearly, not by spinning, filibustering and bloviating.

I'm sure you have absolutely no problem with Chris Matthews (perfect example of a liberal charm school dropout) when he rudely interrupts his conservative guests, who may or may not appear on his show.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Ridiculous! I see the "cutting off" going both ways and all ways! I have seen O"Reilly over talk liberals and conservatives- BUT I have likewise seen both cutting him off- On Hannity and the Five all sides and voices get heard as well. The POINT- no not the one atop your head, is that all sides are present and all sides have a voice- whereas in the biased MSNBC and a few of the network programming- It's ALL liberal all the time.

HanNITWITty is by far the worst offender for interrupting. You must need a hearing aid if you never hear it!

No, I just don't wear any Fox News is evil glasses or Fox News provides no liberal voice earmuffs when watching. I actually dislike Hannity's show because of all the cross-talk being too distracting.

I'm a "conservative" libertarian and don't like Hannity either. Colmes just made Hannity look smarter and more independent than he actually is when he was playing sidekick.

IMO, Hannity is a RINO.....

 

[peach174]

Yep, Chris Matthews is the worst at interrupting. Talks all the time doesn't hardly let his guests speak at all. Yet, his intruping is because he doesn't like the answers.
Did you watch him on Jeopardy? He lost so bad. He was wrong on so many questions. Yet, on his show he a know it all.

 

[Bigfoot]

Ridiculous! I see the "cutting off" going both ways and all ways! I have seen O"Reilly over talk liberals and conservatives- BUT I have likewise seen both cutting him off- On Hannity and the Five all sides and voices get heard as well. The POINT- no not the one atop your head, is that all sides are present and all sides have a voice- whereas in the biased MSNBC and a few of the network programming- It's ALL liberal all the time.

HanNITWITty is by far the worst offender for interrupting. You must need a hearing aid if you never hear it!

I don't know.......Juan Williams, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, Barrack Obama, etc......just about every lib spokesperson uses interruption and shouting over people as a tactic to dominate debates and discussions. Personally, I think Bill O'Reilly is worse, but Rachel Maddow is the worst.

Axelrod shouts down everyone he disagrees with and then goes off on a Talking Point. He is a huge offender.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Yep, Chris Matthews is the worst at interrupting. Talks all the time doesn't hardly let his guests speak at all. Yet, his intruping is because he doesn't like the answers.
Did you watch him on Jeopardy? He lost so bad. He was wrong on so many questions. Yet, on his show he a know it all.

Yeah he is a big mouthed fool, same goes for Olbermann and that Young Turks idiot (forget his name)...

That guy makes apes look like they're Einstein....

 

[clevergirl]

HanNITWITty is by far the worst offender for interrupting. You must need a hearing aid if you never hear it!

No, I just don't wear any Fox News is evil glasses or Fox News provides no liberal voice earmuffs when watching. I actually dislike Hannity's show because of all the cross-talk being too distracting.

I'm a "conservative" libertarian and don't like Hannity either. Colmes just made Hannity look smarter and more independent than he actually is when he was playing sidekick.

IMO, Hannity is a RINO.....

Really? It's funny how people have different impressions... I always thought Colmes was better prepared then Hannity. And I would never take Hannity as a RINO- He is a total Reagan devotee. My reasons for not really caring for the forum is honestly due to the constant cross talk- it gets annoying. I think The Factor is so successful because Bill actually allows for differing voices in a more segment specific style.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Anyone see Chris Matthiews on Jeopardy??

He kept on talking shit about how Sarah Palin would fail at Jeopardy, then he bombed.

He hardly knew how to play.

 

[mudwhistle]

FOX News was relentless against Paul because of his opposition to Republican national security and domestic surveillance policies.

Ron Paul was one of the most vocal critics of Homeland Security, which he compared to Germany of the 30s & the KGB of the old Soviet Union (in it's secrecy and scope).

FOX News systematically attacked (& withheld support for) Ron Paul's policies because he opposed Big Government Conservatism and the Iraq War.

The OP is confused. He is protecting a news outfit that marginalizes the only sane voices Right of center, chief among them being Ron Paul.

God Help Us . . . because the OP votes

And I'm a Ron Paul supporter......... Of course I disliked how Paul was treated by Fox News and republican media in general, but at the same time as a libertarian I love, respect and would die for the First Amendment (Bill of Rights)....

One of the better things about this country is that you can speak your mind, apparently progressives don't believe so.

I don't think Ron Paul was treated badly......unless you count not kissing his ass being treated badly.

They let him act like he was a Republican in the debates.


They could have told him to hold his own events......but no.....he was included.

I think the media showed him a great deal of consideration.

 

[Mr.Nick]

No, I just don't wear any Fox News is evil glasses or Fox News provides no liberal voice earmuffs when watching. I actually dislike Hannity's show because of all the cross-talk being too distracting.

I'm a "conservative" libertarian and don't like Hannity either. Colmes just made Hannity look smarter and more independent than he actually is when he was playing sidekick.

IMO, Hannity is a RINO.....

Really? It's funny how people have different impressions... I always thought Colmes was better prepared then Hannity. And I would never take Hannity as a RINO- He is a total Reagan devotee. My reasons for not really caring for the forum is honestly due to the constant cross talk- it gets annoying. I think The Factor is so successful because Bill actually allows for differing voices in a more segment specific style.

I thought Colmes was an idiot...... Colmes would make horrible arguments.

Both are fools...

 

[Mr.Nick]

FOX News was relentless against Paul because of his opposition to Republican national security and domestic surveillance policies.

Ron Paul was one of the most vocal critics of Homeland Security, which he compared to Germany of the 30s & the KGB of the old Soviet Union (in it's secrecy and scope).

FOX News systematically attacked (& withheld support for) Ron Paul's policies because he opposed Big Government Conservatism and the Iraq War.

The OP is confused. He is protecting a news outfit that marginalizes the only sane voices Right of center, chief among them being Ron Paul.

God Help Us . . . because the OP votes

And I'm a Ron Paul supporter......... Of course I disliked how Paul was treated by Fox News and republican media in general, but at the same time as a libertarian I love, respect and would die for the First Amendment (Bill of Rights)....

One of the better things about this country is that you can speak your mind, apparently progressives don't believe so.

I don't think Ron Paul was treated badly......unless you count not kissing his ass being treated badly.

They let him act like he was a Republican in the debates.


They could have told him to hold his own events......but no.....he was included.

I think the media showed him a great deal of consideration.

The media in general treated him like he didn't exist.

He was beating Newt in several states, yet the media hardly mentioned Paul....

 

[clevergirl]

I'm a "conservative" libertarian and don't like Hannity either. Colmes just made Hannity look smarter and more independent than he actually is when he was playing sidekick.

IMO, Hannity is a RINO.....

Really? It's funny how people have different impressions... I always thought Colmes was better prepared then Hannity. And I would never take Hannity as a RINO- He is a total Reagan devotee. My reasons for not really caring for the forum is honestly due to the constant cross talk- it gets annoying. I think The Factor is so successful because Bill actually allows for differing voices in a more segment specific style.

I thought Colmes was an idiot...... Colmes would make horrible arguments.

Both are fools...

Not disagreeing his arguments were bad- just that he was better prepared then Hannity IMO. I personally like Hannity- just not his program. Colmes seems like a nice guy with really bad politics.

 

[mudwhistle]

And I'm a Ron Paul supporter......... Of course I disliked how Paul was treated by Fox News and republican media in general, but at the same time as a libertarian I love, respect and would die for the First Amendment (Bill of Rights)....

One of the better things about this country is that you can speak your mind, apparently progressives don't believe so.

I don't think Ron Paul was treated badly......unless you count not kissing his ass being treated badly.

They let him act like he was a Republican in the debates.


They could have told him to hold his own events......but no.....he was included.

I think the media showed him a great deal of consideration.

The media in general treated him like he didn't exist.

He was beating Newt in several states, yet the media hardly mentioned Paul....

Because he's an after-thought.

He's not a serious candidate.....no offense.

 

[Cowman]

This is what the Democratic Party has come to. Pretty sad.


This month, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) wrote to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski asking him to revoke the broadcasting licenses of Rupert Murdoch. A ban would include any and all news organizations affiliated with Murdoch’s umbrella organization, News Corp, which owns Fox News.

Read more: Should Fox News be banned? | The Daily Caller

I hear a bunch of "socialists/progressives" who disagree with what fox news says, not wanting for it to be banned.

Idiot.

 

[nitroz]

Lol, I couldn't care either way.

Faux news just spews bullshit while hiding behind the freedom of speech. A warning or disclaimer would be nice for all news networks because the majority are biased one way or another. (Including progressive/socialist)

You know that they are just spreading lies or things that aren't the full truth, right?
This nation isn't smart enough for Democracy as a whole because of it. Look at all of these higher ups in wallstreet and all of that. They own these news companies and such. They are informing YOU and everyone bitches at how they should be jailed and blah blah blah. Look at all of these occupy wallstreet protests. All the news coverage was biased in some way because the big players are controlling what gets covered or not. This ignorance makes it to where people will make more predictable choices and makes it easier for the big players to cash in on more reliable investments and whatnot. If that doesn't work, they can always the misinformation to enable them to abuse political power to put more $$$ in their pocket. Look at CISPA, SOPA, ACTA, PIPA, ETC. And look at how congress sells their power to corporations and such.

 

[mudwhistle]

Really? It's funny how people have different impressions... I always thought Colmes was better prepared then Hannity. And I would never take Hannity as a RINO- He is a total Reagan devotee. My reasons for not really caring for the forum is honestly due to the constant cross talk- it gets annoying. I think The Factor is so successful because Bill actually allows for differing voices in a more segment specific style.

I thought Colmes was an idiot...... Colmes would make horrible arguments.

Both are fools...

Not disagreeing his arguments were bad- just that he was better prepared then Hannity IMO. I personally like Hannity- just not his program. Colmes seems like a nice guy with really bad politics.

Everybody at Fox loves Colmes......but his job is to act like a jerk.

 

[Mr.Nick]

I don't think Ron Paul was treated badly......unless you count not kissing his ass being treated badly.

They let him act like he was a Republican in the debates.


They could have told him to hold his own events......but no.....he was included.

I think the media showed him a great deal of consideration.

The media in general treated him like he didn't exist.

He was beating Newt in several states, yet the media hardly mentioned Paul....

Because he's an after-thought.

He's not a serious candidate.....no offense.

Dude, thats because the media ignored him...... My local news station would say: "Romney came in first, Santorum second and Newt fourth" with no mention of Paul coming in third.

It was/is disgusting.

 

[BDBoop]

 

[Mr.Nick]

This is what the Democratic Party has come to. Pretty sad.


This month, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) wrote to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski asking him to revoke the broadcasting licenses of Rupert Murdoch. A ban would include any and all news organizations affiliated with Murdoch’s umbrella organization, News Corp, which owns Fox News.

Read more: Should Fox News be banned? | The Daily Caller

I hear a bunch of "socialists/progressives" who disagree with what fox news says, not wanting for it to be banned.

Idiot.

Then why do democrats always bring up the "fairness doctrine?"

Let me ask you this: do you believe Nancy Pelosi, Obamafuck(s), Eric Holder and Van Jones would vote to ban Fox News??

 

[nitroz]

OMG! I fucking pissed my pants laughing!

 

[mudwhistle]

The media in general treated him like he didn't exist.

He was beating Newt in several states, yet the media hardly mentioned Paul....

Because he's an after-thought.

He's not a serious candidate.....no offense.

Dude, thats because the media ignored him...... My local news station would say: "Romney came in first, Santorum second and Newt fourth" with no mention of Paul coming in third.

It was/is disgusting.

Okay.....REALITY CHECK.....

The media invited him to show up the Republicans......they probably think he would make good comedy-relief.

Maybe give him some semblance of legitimacy.

He has some good ideas....but some of them are idiotic.