Good Ole Socialists/Progressives: Trying To Get Fox News Banned...

[BDBoop]

OMG! I fucking pissed my pants laughing!

I hope snow was involved.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Because he's an after-thought.

He's not a serious candidate.....no offense.

Dude, thats because the media ignored him...... My local news station would say: "Romney came in first, Santorum second and Newt fourth" with no mention of Paul coming in third.

It was/is disgusting.

Okay.....REALITY CHECK.....

The media invited him to show up the Republicans......they probably think he would make good comedy-relief.

Maybe give him some semblance of legitimacy.

He has some good ideas....but some of them are idiotic.

I agree with all of his domestic policies, however foreign policies are pretty stupid....But his domestic policies are what this nation needs right now.

I'm not an isolationist - I think Paul is.

 

[mudwhistle]

Dude, thats because the media ignored him...... My local news station would say: "Romney came in first, Santorum second and Newt fourth" with no mention of Paul coming in third.

It was/is disgusting.

Okay.....REALITY CHECK.....

The media invited him to show up the Republicans......they probably think he would make good comedy-relief.

Maybe give him some semblance of legitimacy.

He has some good ideas....but some of them are idiotic.

I agree with all of his domestic policies, however foreign policies are pretty stupid....But his domestic policies are what this nation needs right now.

I'm not an isolationist - I think Paul is.

Which is why they used him.

He seems like a nice ole guy that doesn't have a chance in hell of being elected......but they included him to give the disenchanted GOP voter an alternative.........just to help Obama get re-elected.

 

[nitroz]

OMG! I fucking pissed my pants laughing!

I hope snow was involved.

indeed, it was.

banana flavored?

 

[Mr.Nick]

Okay.....REALITY CHECK.....

The media invited him to show up the Republicans......they probably think he would make good comedy-relief.

Maybe give him some semblance of legitimacy.

He has some good ideas....but some of them are idiotic.

I agree with all of his domestic policies, however foreign policies are pretty stupid....But his domestic policies are what this nation needs right now.

I'm not an isolationist - I think Paul is.

Which is why they used him.

He seems like a nice ole guy that doesn't have a chance in hell of being elected......but they included him to give the disenchanted GOP voter an alternative.........just to help Obama get re-elected.

Maybe he is passionate about his beliefs just like I am??

Libertarians are a different breed....

 

[Mac1958]

I don't think anyone should be taken off the air!!!

That's not the American way!!!!

BTW....can you name me ONE fox news anchor, commentator, ect. who has any educational experience in political science? Any practical experience in matters of war? Any background in economics or business?

During my 20 years in that business, I don't recall such a prerequisite for the anchor position. Link? Also, how would your question apply to MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS achors?

Looking forward to your response.

.

Well, Rachel Maddow's father was an Air Force Captain which automatically makes her MORE qualified to discuss military issues than O'Reilly, Hannity, Van Suesteren, AND Geraldo combined lol!

Of course when you add to that her degree in Public Policy (Stanford University 1984), and a Rhodes Scholarship and Doctorate of Philosophy in politicts from Oxford University you can see that she alone is more qualified to discuss public policy than ANY of the jokers at FOX including Rupert Murdoch or Roger Ailes (the poineers of this propaganda network).

I'm just sayin!

Intelligence AIN'T always necessarily evil when you're talking about "KNOWLEDGE!"

Okay, where to begin.

Maddow's dad was military, and you say that makes her more qualified to discuss military issues than those guys on Fox. Are you saying you know that none of the names you listed had parents in the military? Are you serious?

And when you say she is more qualified to discuss politics than the guys you listed, precisely how does that matter, unless you want the network eliminated? She's a hardcore lefty, too, and she speaks for Republicans all the time. Is she a mind reader as well? Does that make her more qualified?

And you list one person out of all the networks. Is that it?

Or this just one big game?

You're obviously just throwing out shit to discredit Fox. Okay, that's how the game is played, sadly. But this thread is about people trying to silence them. Again.

.

 

[clevergirl]

I don't think anyone should be taken off the air!!!

That's not the American way!!!!

BTW....can you name me ONE fox news anchor, commentator, ect. who has any educational experience in political science? Any practical experience in matters of war? Any background in economics or business?

During my 20 years in that business, I don't recall such a prerequisite for the anchor position. Link? Also, how would your question apply to MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS achors?

Looking forward to your response.

.

Well, Rachel Maddow's father was an Air Force Captain which automatically makes her MORE qualified to discuss military issues than O'Reilly, Hannity, Van Suesteren, AND Geraldo combined lol!

Of course when you add to that her degree in Public Policy (Stanford University 1984), and a Rhodes Scholarship and Doctorate of Philosophy in politicts from Oxford University you can see that she alone is more qualified to discuss public policy than ANY of the jokers at FOX including Rupert Murdoch or Roger Ailes (the poineers of this propaganda network).

I'm just sayin!

Intelligence AIN'T always necessarily evil when you're talking about "KNOWLEDGE!"

So now your dad has to have been in the military to make you qualified to be a news analyst? So when O'Reilly and other Fox commentators, who regularly have military personnel on their shows to discuss military issues, that means what exactly? Do they need to ask Maddow to approve because her daddy was in the military? Do you realize how retarded you sound?

 

[Bloodline]

This is what the Democratic Party has come to. Pretty sad.


This month, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) wrote to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski asking him to revoke the broadcasting licenses of Rupert Murdoch. A ban would include any and all news organizations affiliated with Murdoch’s umbrella organization, News Corp, which owns Fox News.

Read more: Should Fox News be banned? | The Daily Caller

What do you expect from a bunch of anti-freedom assholes?

They're anti-First Amendment, Second Amendment and Tenth Amendment..

They're a bunch of tyrannical fucks who only run to the Constitution when it is convenient for them to do so.....

They'll scream Fourteenth and Sixteenth Amendment all day long, but will turn around and call the Bill of Rights and the Constitution itself "old fashioned."

DUDE......TAKE A PILL OR SOMETHING MAN!

Uh.....do you think you MIGHT be overreacting here and being melodramatic just a touch?

Not to mention pathologically stereotypical!

 

[Too Tall]

Please research the educational levels and academic credentials of the staffs at both networks and after comparison get back to me ok?

Why don't you do your own homework?

 

[edthecynic]

That's because they dodge the questions. ORielly and Hannity doesn't let them get away with it. They interrupt them when they go off on a different direction to try to avoid the subject, or question.

That's the rationalization HanNITWITty uses to rudely interrupt when the speaker does not give HanNITWITty the answer he wants to his "question" premised on a lie. When an honest person exposes the lie the "question" is based on they are interrupted, HanNITWITty can't let his audience get exposed to the truth.

You don't watch Hannity do you?
If you did you would see that they do not answer the question directly, they go off on something else to deflect it. It's oldest political ploy in the handbook of deceitful politician's and journalists.

HanNITWITty never asks questions. He makes a rant filled with falsehoods and then demands a yes or no reply both of which require accepting the falsehoods in his rant. Anyone who attempts to inform HanNITWITty's audience of the falsehoods in his rant is rudely interrupted and shouted down. You don't have to watch very long to see the pattern. HanNITWITty does the same thing on radio, it has always been his MO.

 

[Too Tall]

HanNITWITty is by far the worst offender for interrupting. You must need a hearing aid if you never hear it!

That's because they dodge the questions. ORielly and Hannity doesn't let them get away with it. They interupt them when they go off on a different direction to try to avoid the subject, or question.

That's the rationalization HanNITWITty uses to rudely interrupt when the speaker does not give HanNITWITty the answer he wants to his "question" premised on a lie. When an honest person exposes the lie the "question" is based on they are interrupted, HanNITWITty can't let his audience get exposed to the truth.

HanNITWITty reminds me of when we were kids in grammar school and called each other silly names. How old did you say you were?

 

[clevergirl]

Please research the educational levels and academic credentials of the staffs at both networks and after comparison get back to me ok?

Why don't you do your own homework?

Because Google is not his friend???

 

[edthecynic]

That's because they dodge the questions. ORielly and Hannity doesn't let them get away with it. They interupt them when they go off on a different direction to try to avoid the subject, or question.

That's the rationalization HanNITWITty uses to rudely interrupt when the speaker does not give HanNITWITty the answer he wants to his "question" premised on a lie. When an honest person exposes the lie the "question" is based on they are interrupted, HanNITWITty can't let his audience get exposed to the truth.

HanNITWITty reminds me of when we were kids in grammar school and called each other silly names. How old did you say you were?

HanNITWITty has names for everyone he disagrees with and he claims to be a Christian, so I just give him a taste of the Golden Rule.

Obviously it is a well-chosen nickname since it spurred you to comment on it.
Thank you for the unconscious compliment.

 

[mudwhistle]

That's the rationalization HanNITWITty uses to rudely interrupt when the speaker does not give HanNITWITty the answer he wants to his "question" premised on a lie. When an honest person exposes the lie the "question" is based on they are interrupted, HanNITWITty can't let his audience get exposed to the truth.

HanNITWITty reminds me of when we were kids in grammar school and called each other silly names. How old did you say you were?

HanNITWITty has names for everyone he disagrees with and he claims to be a Christian, so I just give him a taste of the Golden Rule.

Obviously it is a well-chosen nickname since it spurred you to comment on it.
Thank you for the unconscious compliment.

Quit arguing with your sock numb-nuts.

 

[paulitician]

'If you can't beat em, ban em.' That's the Socialist/Progressive motto. This attempt by them really is Un-American.

 

[Bigfoot]

During my 20 years in that business, I don't recall such a prerequisite for the anchor position. Link? Also, how would your question apply to MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS achors?

Looking forward to your response.

.

Well, Rachel Maddow's father was an Air Force Captain which automatically makes her MORE qualified to discuss military issues than O'Reilly, Hannity, Van Suesteren, AND Geraldo combined lol!

Of course when you add to that her degree in Public Policy (Stanford University 1984), and a Rhodes Scholarship and Doctorate of Philosophy in politicts from Oxford University you can see that she alone is more qualified to discuss public policy than ANY of the jokers at FOX including Rupert Murdoch or Roger Ailes (the poineers of this propaganda network).

I'm just sayin!

Intelligence AIN'T always necessarily evil when you're talking about "KNOWLEDGE!"

So now your dad has to have been in the military to make you qualified to be a news analyst? So when O'Reilly and other Fox commentators, who regularly have military personnel on their shows to discuss military issues, that means what exactly? Do they need to ask Maddow to approve because her daddy was in the military? Do you realize how retarded you sound?

You nailed it.

 

[Mad Scientist]

'If you can't beat em, ban em.' That's the Socialist/Progressive motto. This attempt by them really is Un-American.

Trying to ban News Outlets is called "Supporting Freedom of the Press" nowadays.

I don't watch CNN but whenever some one mentions that channel I just say that there are blogs on the internet that get more page views than CNN has viewers.

Let's just leave it there as an example of how not to do things.

 

[Bigfoot]

That's the rationalization HanNITWITty uses to rudely interrupt when the speaker does not give HanNITWITty the answer he wants to his "question" premised on a lie. When an honest person exposes the lie the "question" is based on they are interrupted, HanNITWITty can't let his audience get exposed to the truth.

HanNITWITty reminds me of when we were kids in grammar school and called each other silly names. How old did you say you were?

HanNITWITty has names for everyone he disagrees with and he claims to be a Christian, so I just give him a taste of the Golden Rule.

Obviously it is a well-chosen nickname since it spurred you to comment on it.
Thank you for the unconscious compliment.

Hannity is a sharp guy and good at what he does. I enjoy his TV show when I am home long enough to see it.

 

[paulitician]

'If you can't beat em, ban em.' That's the Socialist/Progressive motto. This attempt by them really is Un-American.

Trying to ban News Outlets is called "Supporting Freedom of the Press" nowadays.

I don't watch CNN but whenever some one mentions that channel I just say that there are blogs on the internet that get more page views than CNN has viewers.

Let's just leave it there as an example of how not to do things.

The Socialists/Progressives are on a banning binge. What will they come up with next?

 

[Bigfoot]

'If you can't beat em, ban em.' That's the Socialist/Progressive motto. This attempt by them really is Un-American.

Pretty much, yep.