And all accidents happen for a reason which is discovered using logic. Engineers use logic to evaluate plant, people and processes for possible risks. Through this evaluation they discover logical mitigations such as engineering out the risk (plant), identifying competency levels required of operators (people) and procedures to prevent accidents (processes). Often times these evaluations occur because of accidents. That's because there was something which occurred which was not thought of before and was discovered and then corrected. This is exactly how standards get developed. Standards exist for logical reasons. When we deviate from this standard and normalize our deviance from the standard or fail to recognize the standard, the reason the standard exists or should have existed is discovered. The reason this happens is because error cannot stand. Eventually error will fail and the truth will be discovered.Logic is objective and absolute. Man is subjective and relative. Man is free to establish any standard he wishes but he is not free to avoid the consequences of establishing an inferior standard. See the cause, normalization of deviance and predictable surprise of the Challenger disaster for proof.The standard is a man made concept therefore not absolute.Behaviors and standards are two different things. The standard is never negated because the behavior does not meet the standard.Morality is a standard of conduct. Standards exist for logical reasons.Morality is a human concept and if humans are subjective then morals are too because morals have changed over time and are inconsistent.No. Humans are subjective. Morals are standards of behavior.Exactly morals are subjectiveAgain... that's because of subjectivity. Which I have already explained to you before.Reality is defined as the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them. So seeing reality instead of perception of reality is indeed winning as there can only be one correct view which is known as reality.You have some need to feel like you win don't you? That's kind of sad that you think you have to claim victory on an anonymous message board.
Doesn't matter how many people believe it. It only matters what logic determines to be the objective truth. There is only one objective truth. Objective truth is the final state of fact. Once discovered it will be known that objective truth was always that way and will always be that way even if others don't believe it.And just because i think some behaviors are unacceptable doesn't mean everyone does.
That's incorrect. It's not me that determines anything. It is logic which determines objective truth which is also known as reality. Standards exist for logical reasons so people can choose any standard they like but only the correct standard won't have negative consequences. I am not arguing that I know better. I am arguing that logic knows better.I'm not arrogant enough to think my thoughts and opinions constitute some absolute law as you seem to.
Correct. Logic is. Logic determines the standard. Anything less will lead to predictable surprises because standards exist for logical reasons.So no i don't condone the abuse of children or slavery. But I am not the absolute authority on these matters and neither are you
Since there are still people in bondage and children still are abused it seems that not all humans have the same access to your universal code of morals therefore it isn't universal
Subjective: based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Standards don't have personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Humans do.
But it is no the reality of conduct. So it's the actual conduct that is the standard not the ideal
Most accidents involving machinery of any kind boiled down to human error and that has nothing to do with the rules of logic.
There can be no absolute standard unless one concedes that there is an absolute authority. I have seen no reason to believe there is an absolute authority.