Global Warming Deniers Become More Desperate By the Day

[jc456]

The deniers certainly are getting more shrill. You can see it here, the same small handful of kooks having the same meltdowns over and over.

The SS Denier has run into the iceberg of facts, and is taking on water. Some of the passengers are rearranging deck chairs, some are abandoning ship, some are standing there numbly as they accept their fate, and some are screaming hysterically.

It is indeed quite amusing to watch their desperate antics as they become increasingly irrelevant.

Naw, this is good theater right here!!

BTW, go to this thread and see where we are winning... More Proof the skeptics are WINNING.

And so much winning that this lame thread was started to show you and your peers are desparate.

 

[Kosh]

The deniers certainly are getting more shrill. You can see it here, the same small handful of kooks having the same meltdowns over and over.

The SS Denier has run into the iceberg of facts, and is taking on water. Some of the passengers are rearranging deck chairs, some are abandoning ship, some are standing there numbly as they accept their fate, and some are screaming hysterically.

It is indeed quite amusing to watch their desperate antics as they become increasingly irrelevant.

The AGW cult has become so desperate that they will argue that "Global Warming" (which is a naturally occurring event) to be solely man-made.

Then again how can you argue with the AGW religious scriptures that say that 95% of the computer models claim the real science observations are wrong.

 

[saveliberty]

Global Poll: Americans Don't Believe in Climate Change Alarm

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com Global Poll: Americans Don't Believe in Climate Change Alarm

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". ? OSS Foundation

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[Vigilante]

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

 

[Vigilante]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

LOLOLOL.....that's why we call you denier cultists (or utterly retarded)....just like the Flat-Earthers, you deny the scientifically observed reality and cling desperately to crackpot myths and conspiracy theories....

Scientific opinion on climate change
Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia
The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels.

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:

* Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
* Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]​

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[12] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007,[54] and revised and expanded in 2013,[55] affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer:

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

While important scientific uncertainties remain as to which particular impacts will be experienced where, no uncertainties are known that could make the impacts of climate change inconsequential. Furthermore, surprise outcomes, such as the unexpectedly rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice, may entail even more dramatic changes than anticipated."​

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) statement adopted by their council in 2012 concluded:

"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. The ongoing warming will increase risks and stresses to human societies, economies, ecosystems, and wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, making it imperative that society respond to a changing climate. To inform decisions on adaptation and mitigation, it is critical that we improve our understanding of the global climate system and our ability to project future climate through continued and improved monitoring and research. This is especially true for smaller (seasonal and regional) scales and weather and climate extremes, and for important hydroclimatic variables such as precipitation and water availability.

Technological, economic, and policy choices in the near future will determine the extent of future impacts of climate change. Science-based decisions are seldom made in a context of absolute certainty. National and international policy discussions should include consideration of the best ways to both adapt to and mitigate climate change. Mitigation will reduce the amount of future climate change and the risk of impacts that are potentially large and dangerous. At the same time, some continued climate change is inevitable, and policy responses should include adaptation to climate change. Prudence dictates extreme care in accounting for our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.[66]"​

​

 

[Vigilante]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

LOLOLOL.....that's why we call you denier cultists (or utterly retarded)....just like the Flat-Earthers, you deny the scientifically observed reality and cling desperately to crackpot myths and conspiracy theories....

Scientific opinion on climate change
Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia
<B>The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels.

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:

* Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
* Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]​

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[12] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007,[54] and revised and expanded in 2013,[55] affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer:

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

While important scientific uncertainties remain as to which particular impacts will be experienced where, no uncertainties are known that could make the impacts of climate change inconsequential. Furthermore, surprise outcomes, such as the unexpectedly rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice, may entail even more dramatic changes than anticipated."​

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) statement adopted by their council in 2012 concluded:

"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. The ongoing warming will increase risks and stresses to human societies, economies, ecosystems, and wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, making it imperative that society respond to a changing climate. To inform decisions on adaptation and mitigation, it is critical that we improve our understanding of the global climate system and our ability to project future climate through continued and improved monitoring and research. This is especially true for smaller (seasonal and regional) scales and weather and climate extremes, and for important hydroclimatic variables such as precipitation and water availability.

Technological, economic, and policy choices in the near future will determine the extent of future impacts of climate change. Science-based decisions are seldom made in a context of absolute certainty. National and international policy discussions should include consideration of the best ways to both adapt to and mitigate climate change. Mitigation will reduce the amount of future climate change and the risk of impacts that are potentially large and dangerous. At the same time, some continued climate change is inevitable, and policy responses should include adaptation to climate change. Prudence dictates extreme care in accounting for our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.[66]"​

</B>

Please come back and present your case, as with all things scientific (at least 95% probability) is NOT ENOUGH PROOF OF ANYTHING!

Wonder how many of them are getting Government grants to LIE to us? Seems reminiscent of the SOLYNDRA SCANDAL!

 

[RollingThunder]

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

LOLOLOL.....that's why we call you denier cultists (or utterly retarded)....just like the Flat-Earthers, you deny the scientifically observed reality and cling desperately to crackpot myths and conspiracy theories....

Scientific opinion on climate change
Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia
The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels.

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:

* Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
* Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]​

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[12] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007,[54] and revised and expanded in 2013,[55] affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer:

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

While important scientific uncertainties remain as to which particular impacts will be experienced where, no uncertainties are known that could make the impacts of climate change inconsequential. Furthermore, surprise outcomes, such as the unexpectedly rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice, may entail even more dramatic changes than anticipated."​

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) statement adopted by their council in 2012 concluded:

"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. The ongoing warming will increase risks and stresses to human societies, economies, ecosystems, and wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, making it imperative that society respond to a changing climate. To inform decisions on adaptation and mitigation, it is critical that we improve our understanding of the global climate system and our ability to project future climate through continued and improved monitoring and research. This is especially true for smaller (seasonal and regional) scales and weather and climate extremes, and for important hydroclimatic variables such as precipitation and water availability.

Technological, economic, and policy choices in the near future will determine the extent of future impacts of climate change. Science-based decisions are seldom made in a context of absolute certainty. National and international policy discussions should include consideration of the best ways to both adapt to and mitigate climate change. Mitigation will reduce the amount of future climate change and the risk of impacts that are potentially large and dangerous. At the same time, some continued climate change is inevitable, and policy responses should include adaptation to climate change. Prudence dictates extreme care in accounting for our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.[66]"​

Please come back and present your case, as with all things scientific (at least 95% probability) is NOT ENOUGH PROOF OF ANYTHING!
Wonder how many of them are getting Government grants to LIE to us? Seems reminiscent of the SOLYNDRA SCANDAL!

There are no"proofs" in science, you ignorant retard, there is only a preponderance of evidence supporting one theory over another. A 95% confidence level in science means they are pretty near certain they are correct.

Thanks for demonstrating how scientifically ignorant you are. This makes you very ignorable.

And BTW, the failure of Solyndra did not involve any "scandals" moron. Except in the fevered imaginations of the rightwingnut propagandists.

The Phony Solyndra Scandal
The New York Times

 

[Vigilante]

LOLOLOL.....that's why we call you denier cultists (or utterly retarded)....just like the Flat-Earthers, you deny the scientifically observed reality and cling desperately to crackpot myths and conspiracy theories....

Scientific opinion on climate change
Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia
<B>The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels.

National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:

* Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
* Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]​

No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[12] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) statement, adopted by the society in 2003, revised in 2007,[54] and revised and expanded in 2013,[55] affirms that rising levels of greenhouse gases have caused and will continue to cause the global surface temperature to be warmer:

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

While important scientific uncertainties remain as to which particular impacts will be experienced where, no uncertainties are known that could make the impacts of climate change inconsequential. Furthermore, surprise outcomes, such as the unexpectedly rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice, may entail even more dramatic changes than anticipated."​

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) statement adopted by their council in 2012 concluded:

"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research. The observed warming will be irreversible for many years into the future, and even larger temperature increases will occur as greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Avoiding this future warming will require a large and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. The ongoing warming will increase risks and stresses to human societies, economies, ecosystems, and wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, making it imperative that society respond to a changing climate. To inform decisions on adaptation and mitigation, it is critical that we improve our understanding of the global climate system and our ability to project future climate through continued and improved monitoring and research. This is especially true for smaller (seasonal and regional) scales and weather and climate extremes, and for important hydroclimatic variables such as precipitation and water availability.

Technological, economic, and policy choices in the near future will determine the extent of future impacts of climate change. Science-based decisions are seldom made in a context of absolute certainty. National and international policy discussions should include consideration of the best ways to both adapt to and mitigate climate change. Mitigation will reduce the amount of future climate change and the risk of impacts that are potentially large and dangerous. At the same time, some continued climate change is inevitable, and policy responses should include adaptation to climate change. Prudence dictates extreme care in accounting for our relationship with the only planet known to be capable of sustaining human life.[66]"​

</B>

Please come back and present your case, as with all things scientific (at least 95% probability) is NOT ENOUGH PROOF OF ANYTHING!
Wonder how many of them are getting Government grants to LIE to us? Seems reminiscent of the SOLYNDRA SCANDAL!

There are no"proofs" in science, you ignorant retard, there is only a preponderance of evidence supporting one theory over another. A 95% confidence level in science means they are pretty near certain they are correct.

Thanks for demonstrating how scientifically ignorant you are. This makes you very ignorable.

Asswipe, you can't HANG A MAN on 95% evidence, and you can't claim shit on FALSE EVIDENCE uncovered in e-mails, and now tried desperately to cover it up! Your LACK of scientific accuracy is like throwing a hand grenade into a lake, hoping to kill some fish!

 

[itfitzme]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

You were good till "and when he was, he didn't!"


See the part that goes up?

That's the mankind part.

Fucking idiot.

 

[RollingThunder]

Please come back and present your case, as with all things scientific (at least 95% probability) is NOT ENOUGH PROOF OF ANYTHING!
Wonder how many of them are getting Government grants to LIE to us? Seems reminiscent of the SOLYNDRA SCANDAL!

There are no"proofs" in science, you ignorant retard, there is only a preponderance of evidence supporting one theory over another. A 95% confidence level in science means they are pretty near certain they are correct.

Thanks for demonstrating how scientifically ignorant you are. This makes you very ignorable.

Asswipe, you can't HANG A MAN on 95% evidence, and you can't claim shit on FALSE EVIDENCE uncovered in e-mails, and now tried desperately to cover it up! Your LACK of scientific accuracy is like throwing a hand grenade into a lake, hoping to kill some fish!

Ignorance about science, crackpot conspiracy theories and the stink of desperation - How to Spot an AGW Denier

 

[Vigilante]

Ahhhh.....those good old crackpot conspiracy theories.....sooooo desperate...

Meanwhile the denier cultists remain like this...

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

You were good till "and when he was, he didn't!"


See the part that goes up?

That's the mankind part.

Fucking idiot.

All I see is a fucking "X", but I'm 95% certain, it was a picture that no one would have cared about!

 

[Vigilante]

There are no"proofs" in science, you ignorant retard, there is only a preponderance of evidence supporting one theory over another. A 95% confidence level in science means they are pretty near certain they are correct.

Thanks for demonstrating how scientifically ignorant you are. This makes you very ignorable.

Asswipe, you can't HANG A MAN on 95% evidence, and you can't claim shit on FALSE EVIDENCE uncovered in e-mails, and now tried desperately to cover it up! Your LACK of scientific accuracy is like throwing a hand grenade into a lake, hoping to kill some fish!

Ignorance about science, crackpot conspiracy theories and the stink of desperation - How to Spot an AGW Denier

What government agency do you work for again?

 

[itfitzme]

It's called weather, you fucking idiots, it's been changing since the earth became round! It's been much hotter, and much colder, and MAN wasn't present to do anything to change it.....and when he was, he didn't!

You were good till "and when he was, he didn't!"


See the part that goes up?

That's the mankind part.

Fucking idiot.

All I see is a fucking "X", but I'm 95% certain, it was a picture that no one would have cared about!

Case in point.

 

[RollingThunder]

You were good till "and when he was, he didn't!"


See the part that goes up?

That's the mankind part.

Fucking idiot.

All I see is a fucking "X", but I'm 95% certain, it was a picture that no one would have cared about!

Case in point.

LOL....yeah, no shit....

Just when you think these dimwitted denier cult dupes couldn't possibly get any more idiotic, one of them goes and manages to say something even more jaw-dropping stupid, like ol' Vacuous's last statement....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AGWCult: Climate change is for real because we say so

Normal people: that's not science

AGWCult: Denier!!! DEATH TO THE DENIER!! AGW AKBAR!!!

 

[itfitzme]

AGWCult: Climate change is for real because we say so

Normal people: that's not science

AGWCult: Denier!!! DEATH TO THE DENIER!! AGW AKBAR!!!

Yeah, see. Nothing you said there has the hint of anything related to science.

 

[RollingThunder]

All I see is a fucking "X", but I'm 95% certain, it was a picture that no one would have cared about!

Case in point.

LOL....yeah, no shit....

Just when you think these dimwitted denier cult dupes couldn't possibly get any more idiotic, one of them goes and manages to say something even more jaw-dropping stupid, like ol' Vacuous's last statement....

AGWCult: Climate change is for real because we say so

Normal people: that's not science

AGWCult: Denier!!! DEATH TO THE DENIER!! AGW AKBAR!!!

And there you go....ol' CrazyFruitcake already managed to say something even more insanely retarded than the nonsense Vacuous just spewed. That didn't take long. It's almost as if the denier dingbats were having a contest.