Glenn Beck analyzes fascist and communist symbolism in artwork at Rockefeller Center

[paperview]

The distinction here is between The Free Man and The Slave. You are repeating Other Peoples Words, in Part, in part because complete Comprehension defeats your cause. Throw Off The Chains of Bondage. Why use Your Voice to Chain Others?

The more I read your posts, the more I am convinced you spend the better part of your daylight hours shlepping between Main & Fruit street with a Sandwich boards attached and slapping up manifestos to telephone poles.

Thats One way to deal with confrontation and avoid a reasoned response, on your part. I Will not conform to Your Expectation or Profile. I have made Points and backed them up, rather than tear you a New Asshole. In Truth, Tearing You a New Asshole does not Interest Me In The Slightest. I'm searching You for Depth, Yet so Far, you haven't left the kiddie pool. Hit me with some Profound Truth as to Why You Believe What You Believe. Hit Me with Where, Precisely I am Astray. Back It Up If You Will.

Many Totalitarian Rulers Throughout Bible History. You Like to Quote from There, go for it. Choose from somewhere else. To Whom or What is Government Accountable, to what degree?

Back up the truck, Chuck.

I went round and round with you yesterday about MLK, his politics and the NBRA...post after post - all you could do was throw up (and I do mean that somewhat literally *hork*) cut & pastes from Francis Rice of the NBRA - no thought, no original rebuttal to the points I was making.

In fact, even after being told about Ms. Rice and her Front Operation and imploring you to look into her background some, you continued to cut & paste - to the point where you didn't even know (admittedly) what you were pasting - or so you say, as the name attached was Francis WHITE - in an attempt to pass off another article that *Wasn't* by her. Either that is exceptionally sloppy, or you really aren't interested in true debate. Has to be one or the other.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

I recognize futility when I see it.

 

[paperview]

The more I read your posts, the more I am convinced you spend the better part of your daylight hours shlepping between Main & Fruit street with a Sandwich boards attached and slapping up manifestos to telephone poles.

Thats One way to deal with confrontation and avoid a reasoned response, on your part. I Will not conform to Your Expectation or Profile. I have made Points and backed them up, rather than tear you a New Asshole. In Truth, Tearing You a New Asshole does not Interest Me In The Slightest. I'm searching You for Depth, Yet so Far, you haven't left the kiddie pool. Hit me with some Profound Truth as to Why You Believe What You Believe. Hit Me with Where, Precisely I am Astray. Back It Up If You Will.

Many Totalitarian Rulers Throughout Bible History. You Like to Quote from There, go for it. Choose from somewhere else. To Whom or What is Government Accountable, to what degree?

Why the Random Capitalization?

You noticed that too?

Dear Lord.

A mini-Malcontent.

 

[RadiomanATL]

It's how I Accent.

whatEver floats Your boAT.

 

[KittenKoder]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

 

[RadiomanATL]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

 

[paperview]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

Bugs the hell out of me too.

In Malcontents case, he does it cause he thinks he's Benjamin Franklin.

 

[Intense]

The more I read your posts, the more I am convinced you spend the better part of your daylight hours shlepping between Main & Fruit street with a Sandwich boards attached and slapping up manifestos to telephone poles.

Thats One way to deal with confrontation and avoid a reasoned response, on your part. I Will not conform to Your Expectation or Profile. I have made Points and backed them up, rather than tear you a New Asshole. In Truth, Tearing You a New Asshole does not Interest Me In The Slightest. I'm searching You for Depth, Yet so Far, you haven't left the kiddie pool. Hit me with some Profound Truth as to Why You Believe What You Believe. Hit Me with Where, Precisely I am Astray. Back It Up If You Will.

Many Totalitarian Rulers Throughout Bible History. You Like to Quote from There, go for it. Choose from somewhere else. To Whom or What is Government Accountable, to what degree?

Back up the truck, Chuck.

I went round and round with you yesterday about MLK, his politics and the NBRA...post after post - all you could do was throw up (and I do mean that somewhat literally *hork*) cut & pastes from Francis Rice of the NBRA - no thought, no original rebuttal to the points I was making.

In fact, even after being told about Ms. Rice and her Front Operation and imploring you to look into her background some, you continued to cut & paste - to the point where you didn't even know (admittedly) what you were pasting - or so you say, as the name attached was Francis WHITE - in an attempt to pass off another article that *Wasn't* by her. Either that is exceptionally sloppy, or you really aren't interested in true debate. Has to be one or the other.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

I recognize futility when I see it.

Bottom Line about Yesterday is there is no found Documentation that Can Confirm His Membership in Either Party. Google is filled with Links of People attempting to Do Just That. The Strongest Arguments I Personally Believe support He Was Republican. I chose 3 Separate Links to support The Claim. They are still there. Nothing was changed or tampered with. That's all there was to it, nothing more. You make it into a scheme, which is disingenuous of You. MLK's Dad was Republican (Fact), Most Blacks in The South at That Time Were Republican (Fact). MLK voted for Eisenhower, (Fact). The Links plainly document that. There is very little to go on here. Just because You don't like the Source, does not make it false. Get over it.
We did go around Yesterday. That Was Then, This Is Now.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

Every claim is supported. You need to take a look at your own posts PP. You can't handle My point of view, or defend against it. You are poor on History, Scripture, and Fact. Your attack, is beneath you.

 

[Intense]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

Bugs the hell out of me too.

In Malcontents case, he does it cause he thinks he's Benjamin Franklin.

Life can be a bitch. Get over it Silver Spoon.

 

[Intense]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics, that would be okay, with them. If one Remembers that Capital Accents, the Value of the word, The Flow of what is being said is what is actually being said. What is Disingenuous on their part is failing to Acknowledge that only the First letter of a word is Capitalized. It ain't going away.

 

[DiveCon]

noticew that no where in that passage was anyone COMPELLED or FORCED(aka TAXES) to do this

The Bible was written by a bunch of monks who never ventured outside. What would they know of taxes when their bounty and everything else was a "miracle"?? Just like all the bounty Americans enjoy thanks to taxes--which some of you believe miraculously come from trees.

I'm pretty sure Jesus said "Render unto Caesar..."

now point out where He said to have Ceasar take care of the sick and the poor

 

[RadiomanATL]

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics,that would be okay, with them.

Actually, that is incorrect too.

 

[Intense]

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics,that would be okay, with them.

Actually, that is incorrect too.

So Your Bigotry is Impartial? Your not Okay with it at all.

Explain Prima Donna.

Free Speech Is Great Huh.

 

[paperview]

I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

Bugs the hell out of me too.

In Malcontents case, he does it cause he thinks he's Benjamin Franklin.

Life can be a bitch. Get over it Silver Spoon.

WTF? Silver Spoon???


lololol.

 

[Intense]

Bugs the hell out of me too.

In Malcontents case, he does it cause he thinks he's Benjamin Franklin.

Life can be a bitch. Get over it Silver Spoon.

WTF? Silver Spoon???


lololol.

The Party Elite. Enjoy it while it lasts Comrade.

 

[paperview]

Holy shit I think he IS Malcontent.

 

[RadiomanATL]

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics,that would be okay, with them.

Actually, that is incorrect too.

So Your Bigotry is Impartial? Your not Okay with it at all.

Explain Prima Donna.

Free Speech Is Great Huh.

Bigotry?

No. I object to you assuming what would or would not be OK with me, with zero supporting evidence. Jumping to conclusions about what I think, without asking me first, tends to raise my ire.

And I already have stated what bugs me about it. And I have ALSO already stated "whatever floats your boat". Meaning that you can do whatever it is you want. I don't care if you make yourself hard to understand. That's your cross to bear, not mine. But don't jump to conclusions about what I will find objectionable.

 

[paperview]

Thats One way to deal with confrontation and avoid a reasoned response, on your part. I Will not conform to Your Expectation or Profile. I have made Points and backed them up, rather than tear you a New Asshole. In Truth, Tearing You a New Asshole does not Interest Me In The Slightest. I'm searching You for Depth, Yet so Far, you haven't left the kiddie pool. Hit me with some Profound Truth as to Why You Believe What You Believe. Hit Me with Where, Precisely I am Astray. Back It Up If You Will.

Many Totalitarian Rulers Throughout Bible History. You Like to Quote from There, go for it. Choose from somewhere else. To Whom or What is Government Accountable, to what degree?

Back up the truck, Chuck.

I went round and round with you yesterday about MLK, his politics and the NBRA...post after post - all you could do was throw up (and I do mean that somewhat literally *hork*) cut & pastes from Francis Rice of the NBRA - no thought, no original rebuttal to the points I was making.

In fact, even after being told about Ms. Rice and her Front Operation and imploring you to look into her background some, you continued to cut & paste - to the point where you didn't even know (admittedly) what you were pasting - or so you say, as the name attached was Francis WHITE - in an attempt to pass off another article that *Wasn't* by her. Either that is exceptionally sloppy, or you really aren't interested in true debate. Has to be one or the other.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

I recognize futility when I see it.

Bottom Line about Yesterday is there is no found Documentation that Can Confirm His Membership in Either Party. Google is filled with Links of People attempting to Do Just That. The Strongest Arguments I Personally Believe support He Was Republican. I chose 3 Separate Links to support The Claim. They are still there. Nothing was changed or tampered with. That's all there was to it, nothing more. You make it into a scheme, which is disingenuous of You. MLK's Dad was Republican (Fact), Most Blacks in The South at That Time Were Republican (Fact). MLK voted for Eisenhower, (Fact). The Links plainly document that. There is very little to go on here. Just because You don't like the Source, does not make it false. Get over it.
We did go around Yesterday. That Was Then, This Is Now.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

Every claim is supported. You need to take a look at your own posts PP. You can't handle My point of view, or defend against it. You are poor on History, Scripture, and Fact. Your attack, is beneath you.

You DIDN'T HAVE a point of view. You just cut and pasted and refused to address the questions and posts that refuted what was there. You made a statement that couldn't be backed up, and when called on it, just Control C'ed and Control ^Peed your way through it.
All with the help of a KNOWN liar, plagiarizer and a woman so poisonous she caused the entire founding membership of the NBRA to resign, except her own husband.
Outside of the well of that deceptive Front organization known as the NBRA, you had NOTHING.

You simply played a record, figuratively and literally.

 

[paperview]

Remember intense - your CLAIM was he was a REGISTERED Republican.

THAT information is a matter of public record.
To date NO ONE, and I state unequivocally

NO ONE has been able to prove that as a matter of fact.

Inferences by the same group that at one time called him a communist, a socialist, a wife beater and a endemic threat to America (in one of the worlds most incredible ironies) - is all you have.

 

[paperview]

Now, lets see if you can do this without a Cut and paste, intense. I'll give it one more shot at it, which I may regret, mostly because my patience is wearing thin with you - but lets see if you can answer ON YOUR OWN.

At what point do you think MLK remained a republican, if he was, as you want to proclaim him as yours.

What years...which election?

Let's narrow this down the dates. Give me the year and the presidential elections you think he voted republican. Do you think he ever changed party affiliation?

We don't have all that many to work with, as MLK would have been of voting age in these pres. elections: 1956, then 60, then 64...then 68. That's 4.

GO head. Give it your best shot.

 

[Intense]

Actually, that is incorrect too.

So Your Bigotry is Impartial? Your not Okay with it at all.

Explain Prima Donna.

Free Speech Is Great Huh.

Bigotry?

No. I object to you assuming what would or would not be OK with me, with zero supporting evidence. Jumping to conclusions about what I think, without asking me first, tends to raise my ire.

And I already have stated what bugs me about it. And I have ALSO already stated "whatever floats your boat". Meaning that you can do whatever it is you want. I don't care if you make yourself hard to understand. That's your cross to bear, not mine. But don't jump to conclusions about what I will find objectionable.

Fair Enough.



Radio Man:I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

That shows intent. That You are bothered my my style. Just not why. Not really why.

Do consider that it is, and will Remain how I Write, and it was You that brought it up, in the First Place. That does lead to conclusion, right or wrong.