Glenn Beck analyzes fascist and communist symbolism in artwork at Rockefeller Center

[RadiomanATL]

So Your Bigotry is Impartial? Your not Okay with it at all.

Explain Prima Donna.

Free Speech Is Great Huh.

Bigotry?

No. I object to you assuming what would or would not be OK with me, with zero supporting evidence. Jumping to conclusions about what I think, without asking me first, tends to raise my ire.

And I already have stated what bugs me about it. And I have ALSO already stated "whatever floats your boat". Meaning that you can do whatever it is you want. I don't care if you make yourself hard to understand. That's your cross to bear, not mine. But don't jump to conclusions about what I will find objectionable.

Fair Enough.



Radio Man:I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

That shows intent. That You are bothered my my style. Just not why. Not really why.

Do consider that it is, and will Remain how I Write, and it was You that brought it up, in the First Place. That does lead to conclusion, right or wrong.

That's the why. I spelled it out from the beginning. Not that hard to understand.

 

[Intense]

Back up the truck, Chuck.

I went round and round with you yesterday about MLK, his politics and the NBRA...post after post - all you could do was throw up (and I do mean that somewhat literally *hork*) cut & pastes from Francis Rice of the NBRA - no thought, no original rebuttal to the points I was making.

In fact, even after being told about Ms. Rice and her Front Operation and imploring you to look into her background some, you continued to cut & paste - to the point where you didn't even know (admittedly) what you were pasting - or so you say, as the name attached was Francis WHITE - in an attempt to pass off another article that *Wasn't* by her. Either that is exceptionally sloppy, or you really aren't interested in true debate. Has to be one or the other.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

I recognize futility when I see it.

Bottom Line about Yesterday is there is no found Documentation that Can Confirm His Membership in Either Party. Google is filled with Links of People attempting to Do Just That. The Strongest Arguments I Personally Believe support He Was Republican. I chose 3 Separate Links to support The Claim. They are still there. Nothing was changed or tampered with. That's all there was to it, nothing more. You make it into a scheme, which is disingenuous of You. MLK's Dad was Republican (Fact), Most Blacks in The South at That Time Were Republican (Fact). MLK voted for Eisenhower, (Fact). The Links plainly document that. There is very little to go on here. Just because You don't like the Source, does not make it false. Get over it.
We did go around Yesterday. That Was Then, This Is Now.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

Every claim is supported. You need to take a look at your own posts PP. You can't handle My point of view, or defend against it. You are poor on History, Scripture, and Fact. Your attack, is beneath you.

You DIDN'T HAVE a point of view. You just cut and pasted and refused to address the questions and posts that refuted what was there. You made a statement that couldn't be backed up, and when called on it, just Control C'ed and Control ^Peed your way through it.
All with the help of a KNOWN liar, plagiarizer and a woman so poisonous she caused the entire founding membership of the NBRA to resign, except her own husband.
Outside of the well of that deceptive Front organization known as the NBRA, you had NOTHING.

You simply played a record, figuratively and literally.

Educate then. Provide the Support. I am unaware of the History. Was MLK's Dad a Republican? Did MLK indeed vote for Eisenhower or Not? What Party was most affiliated with Southern Blacks in the Mid and Late 50's. Can You Prove beyond Doubt that MLK was a Democrat at any Time at All. I searched and could not find any.

If You will respond on the appropriate Thread, I will hear your argument further, and answer as best I can.

 

[Intense]

Bigotry?

No. I object to you assuming what would or would not be OK with me, with zero supporting evidence. Jumping to conclusions about what I think, without asking me first, tends to raise my ire.

And I already have stated what bugs me about it. And I have ALSO already stated "whatever floats your boat". Meaning that you can do whatever it is you want. I don't care if you make yourself hard to understand. That's your cross to bear, not mine. But don't jump to conclusions about what I will find objectionable.

Fair Enough.



Radio Man:I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

That shows intent. That You are bothered my my style. Just not why. Not really why.

Do consider that it is, and will Remain how I Write, and it was You that brought it up, in the First Place. That does lead to conclusion, right or wrong.

That's the why. I spelled it out from the beginning. Not that hard to understand.

When I explained why I wrote that way, that issue would have been resolved. Not that hard to understand either.

 

[paperview]

Bottom Line about Yesterday is there is no found Documentation that Can Confirm His Membership in Either Party. Google is filled with Links of People attempting to Do Just That. The Strongest Arguments I Personally Believe support He Was Republican. I chose 3 Separate Links to support The Claim. They are still there. Nothing was changed or tampered with. That's all there was to it, nothing more. You make it into a scheme, which is disingenuous of You. MLK's Dad was Republican (Fact), Most Blacks in The South at That Time Were Republican (Fact). MLK voted for Eisenhower, (Fact). The Links plainly document that. There is very little to go on here. Just because You don't like the Source, does not make it false. Get over it.
We did go around Yesterday. That Was Then, This Is Now.

I've been the merry go round with you Intense. I see how you work. You refuse to even begin to digest the argument and provide your own analysis, content instead to believe, without inspection, the dogma, representations and misrepresentations, of what you so doggedly want to believe is true.

As I said, you have convinced me - as I witnessed with my very first post to you on this thread, many posts ago - you are deeply marinated in the propaganda, and you like it there.

Every claim is supported. You need to take a look at your own posts PP. You can't handle My point of view, or defend against it. You are poor on History, Scripture, and Fact. Your attack, is beneath you.

You DIDN'T HAVE a point of view. You just cut and pasted and refused to address the questions and posts that refuted what was there. You made a statement that couldn't be backed up, and when called on it, just Control C'ed and Control ^Peed your way through it.
All with the help of a KNOWN liar, plagiarizer and a woman so poisonous she caused the entire founding membership of the NBRA to resign, except her own husband.
Outside of the well of that deceptive Front organization known as the NBRA, you had NOTHING.

You simply played a record, figuratively and literally.

Educate then. Provide the Support. I am unaware of the History. Was MLK's Dad a Republican? Did MLK indeed vote for Eisenhower or Not? What Party was most affiliated with Southern Blacks in the Mid and Late 50's. Can You Prove beyond Doubt that MLK was a Democrat at any Time at All. I searched and could not find any.

If You will respond on the appropriate Thread, I will hear your argument further, and answer as best I can.

Thank you for your more reasoned response.

...you know....I just recognized this was not the same thread we began that discussion on. They do get blurred when bouncing back and forth.

Very well, I will take it to that thread, and I apologize to the posters for the diversion.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Fair Enough.



Radio Man:I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

That shows intent. That You are bothered my my style. Just not why. Not really why.

Do consider that it is, and will Remain how I Write, and it was You that brought it up, in the First Place. That does lead to conclusion, right or wrong.

That's the why. I spelled it out from the beginning. Not that hard to understand.

When I explained why I wrote that way, that issue would have been resolved. Not that hard to understand either.

And I was explaining my viewpoint to another poster. If you had followed the thread.

 

[paperview]

Fair Enough.



Radio Man:I have to admit. It bugs me.

A capital letter on a non-proper noun to me means the start of a new sentence/thought. Its disconcerting to me to have to focus so hard on the flow of what is being said rather than what is actually being said.

That shows intent. That You are bothered my my style. Just not why. Not really why.

Do consider that it is, and will Remain how I Write, and it was You that brought it up, in the First Place. That does lead to conclusion, right or wrong.

That's the why. I spelled it out from the beginning. Not that hard to understand.

When I explained why I wrote that way, that issue would have been resolved. Not that hard to understand either.

From my perspective, it's not easy to "resolve" visually, as I read. RAndom Capitalization likewise bothers me.
I feel like the sentence flow is full of fits and starts, jagged - or like witnessing a literary tic. It's disconcerting.

On the previous board I was on, a poster did this, and after I while I completely ignored him.
Never even bothered to read the posts. I know others did as well.
Scroll.
Ignored. I don't need to spend my time reading a poster who chooses to make me work harder than I have to just to take in what he says. There are too many other posts, those that do not go out of their way to defy the rules of at least common usage, to read and spend better energy on.

So you can keep posting that way, and more power to ya - and as RadioALT says: whatever floats your boat
... but I will tell you, if history is an indicator, I will likely ignore you as well. (Which you may greet with a welcome!
Sadly, your message will get lost because of insistence on embracing a CaPPy tic.
(To be fair, your affliction doesn't seem nearly as bad as his so far...)

Just thought I'd let you know.

 

[Intense]

That's the why. I spelled it out from the beginning. Not that hard to understand.

When I explained why I wrote that way, that issue would have been resolved. Not that hard to understand either.

From my perspective, it's not easy to "resolve" visually, as I read. RAndom Capitalization likewise bothers me.
I feel like the sentence flow is full of fits and starts, jagged - or like witnessing a literary tic. It's disconcerting.

On the previous board I was on, a poster did this, and after I while I completely ignored him.
Never even bothered to read the posts. I know others did as well.
Scroll.
Ignored. I don't need to spend my time reading a poster who chooses to make me work harder than I have to just to take in what he says. There are too many other posts, those that do not go out of their way to defy the rules of at least common usage, to read and spend better energy on.

So you can keep posting that way, and more power to ya - and as RadioALT says: whatever floats your boat
... but I will tell you, if history is an indicator, I will likely ignore you as well. (Which you may greet with a welcome!
Sadly, your message will get lost because of insistence on embracing a CaPPy tic.
(To be fair, your affliction doesn't seem nearly as bad as his so far...)

Just thought I'd let you know.

I'm researching NBRA and will Post on the other Thread. So far, in all honesty, I see a fender bender, not a Multi car wreck. The only resignations I find were in relation to Katrina. Witch Burning comes to mind so far. Those were harsh words. Are You Sure that you want to stand by them?

 

[Intense]

The Bible was written by a bunch of monks who never ventured outside. What would they know of taxes when their bounty and everything else was a "miracle"?? Just like all the bounty Americans enjoy thanks to taxes--which some of you believe miraculously come from trees.

I'm pretty sure Jesus said "Render unto Caesar..."

Still chasing your tail. What is Un-American is Denying Americans Inalienable Rights, Which come from a Higher Authority than Government.

Your Failure to distinguish between Personal Property and The Property of The State suggest defect. Is Your Body the Property of The State? What you use to sustain Your Life and Well Being, Belongs to Whom?


Scripture was around before the Monks. St. Jerome has a real interesting though, should you be sincerely interested in Bible History.

Three References to a Source You like to Quote from.

Luke 20:25 And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's.


Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.


Matthew 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.






From Matthew In Context.

22:15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk.

22:16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.

22:17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?

22:18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?

22:19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.

22:20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?

22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

22:22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

Back to the beginning. Any comments on context, meaning, and intent?

 

[Polk]

Is Intense Makesmalescontent's doppelganger?

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiMiMuMqXrE]YouTube - Meet the real boss: Rockefeller & Co.[/ame]

 

[paperview]

Is Intense Makesmalescontent's doppelganger?

That's a mouthful.

In more ways than one.

;O

 

[Polk]

Is Intense Makesmalescontent's doppelganger?

That's a mouthful.

In more ways than one.

;O

 

[Intense]

I'm pretty sure Jesus said "Render unto Caesar..."

Still chasing your tail. What is Un-American is Denying Americans Inalienable Rights, Which come from a Higher Authority than Government.

Your Failure to distinguish between Personal Property and The Property of The State suggest defect. Is Your Body the Property of The State? What you use to sustain Your Life and Well Being, Belongs to Whom?


Scripture was around before the Monks. St. Jerome has a real interesting though, should you be sincerely interested in Bible History.

Three References to a Source You like to Quote from.

Luke 20:25 And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's.


Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.


Matthew 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.






From Matthew In Context.

22:15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk.

22:16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.

22:17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?

22:18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?

22:19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.

22:20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?

22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

22:22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

Back to the beginning. Any comments on context, meaning, and intent?

Christ's Redistribution V.S. Governments? No Takers?

 

[mskafka]

lol...so you go out of your way to research his stuff on you tube....thats actually worse then watching him on TV...


And I don't think he cares about you not adding to his ratings...pretty sure Fox News still rapes every news channel in ratings

Yes we do. Because for some reason, many people watch him and take him seriously. And this worries me, and my fellow moderates and liberals. A man with his limited education, narrow view of the world, psychopathic tendencies, and...ahem...addictions, should not be a "news" commentator.

He is a man with very little substance, and people who are as shallow as he clearly is....AND who are looking for another reason to justify their hatred toward the president. He is delusional and seems hell bent on starting another civil war in this country.

And he is absolutely clueless on healthcare. His blog about his "near-death" experience convinced me of that. But...for some reason, a great deal of people take him seriously. Just like Obi Wan said: "Who's the more foolish; the fool, or the fool who follows him?". The intelligence or critical thinking ability of his apostles is questionable at best. He, Hannity, and Limbaugh with their large level of education are convincing the emotionally unstable of this country to do dangerous things. God help us.

 

[MaggieMae]

The more I read your posts, the more I am convinced you spend the better part of your daylight hours shlepping between Main & Fruit street with a Sandwich boards attached and slapping up manifestos to telephone poles.

Thats One way to deal with confrontation and avoid a reasoned response, on your part. I Will not conform to Your Expectation or Profile. I have made Points and backed them up, rather than tear you a New Asshole. In Truth, Tearing You a New Asshole does not Interest Me In The Slightest. I'm searching You for Depth, Yet so Far, you haven't left the kiddie pool. Hit me with some Profound Truth as to Why You Believe What You Believe. Hit Me with Where, Precisely I am Astray. Back It Up If You Will.

Many Totalitarian Rulers Throughout Bible History. You Like to Quote from There, go for it. Choose from somewhere else. To Whom or What is Government Accountable, to what degree?

Why the Random Capitalization?

I'm thinking a new computer/different location for Mal Contempt. (It's not only hard to read, but actually hard to type that way.) A very unusual (unique?) style.

 

[MaggieMae]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics, that would be okay, with them. If one Remembers that Capital Accents, the Value of the word, The Flow of what is being said is what is actually being said. What is Disingenuous on their part is failing to Acknowledge that only the First letter of a word is Capitalized. It ain't going away.

It's a "class" thing all right. Apparently you missed the "classes" in basic English grammar which included sentence structure. Initial caps are used at the first character of the first word of a sentence and only to designate a proper noun within that sentence. Toot Toot!

 

[MaggieMae]

Holy shit I think he IS Malcontent.

Did it get banned again?

 

[Intense]

you know capItalization isn't such an important thing to most people, as long as it's spelleD halfway rIght. i dOn't geT why people are peStered by it so.

It's a Class thing. Now if I was a Proletarian, or a Peasant, or talking Ebonics, that would be okay, with them. If one Remembers that Capital Accents, the Value of the word, The Flow of what is being said is what is actually being said. What is Disingenuous on their part is failing to Acknowledge that only the First letter of a word is Capitalized. It ain't going away.

It's a "class" thing all right. Apparently you missed the "classes" in basic English grammar which included sentence structure. Initial caps are used at the first character of the first word of a sentence and only to designate a proper noun within that sentence. Toot Toot!

And I will Continue to use caps to Accent. I'm sure that in your warped mind this is at the Top of your list of Global catastrophe, so please continue. Jerk.

 

[Intense]

Holy shit I think he IS Malcontent.

Did it get banned again?

Are you Special Needs? Are you that stupid? Or is this a show at cleverness? Is there any point?

 

[Intense]

Mark 12:13 And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians, to catch him in his words.

12:14 And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?

12:15 Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.

12:16 And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar's.

12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.