Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He was elected in 2000, assumed office in 2001, so other than playing word games, put up or shut up. The earliest Bush could have cut VA benefits is 2001, thus a starting point of 2000 as a base.
Either prove your claim or slink off to some other thread.
You gotta be kidding me, RGS.
You demonstrate your own ignorance, partisanship and self loathing commentary on a freaking almost daily basis. Have you checked out the history of this administration on VA funding lately?
This isn't you? You didn't make this statement?
You can't provide anything other than a partisan site as your "proof"? No link to budgets? No link to VA benefits before and after? How hard can it be? These are public records, available to any one.
Yet you can not provide a single one to support your claim?
You are flat wrong in saying that Bush reduced vet benefits, he did reduce vet medical funding which is what happened to Walter Reed.2,000? You are so obsessed!!!!!!!!!!
I asked you for actual numbers to verify your claims, you get all chicken shit and want to put us in a completely different era and you have the nerve to ask me to "DIG IT?"
What a complete waste of time you are. Do you remember what happened yesterday? I doubt it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
all you tender hearted souls, that the General has carried that onerous title for several years. It was bestowed by his troops in the 101st.
It is just amazing what a bunch of cry babies you patriots of convenience become when you think you have a bloody shirt to wave. Your desperation is fetid and wearying.
History will note what a traitorous rabble you were with your support of the high crimes and misdemeanors of this crutched up lame duck administration.
Indeed.
I AM
If he has committed a high crime and misdemeanor, then it is the Democrats duty to start impeachment proceedings...
Wonder why they haven't??
Yes, I wish they would, then we can be assured a Republican majority in 2008.
You are flat wrong in saying that Bush reduced vet benefits, he did reduce vet medical funding which is what happened to Walter Reed.
On September 10, MoveOn.org's much-discussed advertisement headlined "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?" critical of Gen. David Petraeus, appeared in The New York Times. On the September 11 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh called the advertisement "contemptible" and "indecent." However, months earlier, on his radio show, he told his audience that he had a new name for Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE): "Senator Betrayus." [Ed. note: Senator Hagel served in Vietnam and has two purple hearts]
On the January 25 broadcast (subscription required) of his radio show, Limbaugh broke from his commentary on an interview of Vice President Dick Cheney on the January 24 edition of CNN's The Situation Room to say: "By the way, we had a caller call, couldn't stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel in Nebraska, we got General Petraeus and we got Senator Betrayus, new name for Senator Hagel." A day earlier, Hagel had sided with Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in voting to approve a nonbinding resolution declaring that Bush's escalation in Iraq was against "the national interest."
http://mediamatters.org/items/200709220003
