Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
yup.
pretty fucking lame.
thank god this is a team sport.
Shucks. I was hoping for a tiny bit more commentary on this. Perhaps some liberals and/or Democrats would say that this stunt was petty and inappropriate. - no offence Shogun.
Shucks. I was hoping for a tiny bit more commentary on this. Perhaps some liberals and/or Democrats would say that this stunt was petty and inappropriate. - no offence Shogun.
Did you see the news about the Move-On ad basically calling General Petraeus general Betray Us? It was a pretty lame and petty stunt in my opinion.
http://pol.moveon.org/images/PetraeusNYTad.jpg
I think you might find that many are disgusted by it. I must say I have avoided reading any ad or website or whatever that has a variation of the name "Petraeus" in it. It's a bit like "Repugs". "Rethugs" etc and "Dimocrats" and "Dhimmicrats" and all the rest of the words from both sides of the fence.
It's childish.
I'm much more interested in why Petraeus didn't give sworn testimony. If that's the usual approach then that answers my question. If not asking his to take an oath was unusual practice then I'm interested to know why.
I prefer issues of substance over personal smears.
The substance is simple. Patraeus said that the surge is working.
According to retired General Wesley Clark, former candidate for the Democratic Party presidential nomination, former boss of General Petraeus, someone who knows Petraeus quite well and has for many years, "I think he'd never say something that he didn't believe was totally accurate."
As a vet, myself, I have also defended those that I would otherwise consider cold blooded murderers.
Nobody is all bad. You have to consider the implications of the testimony, the career aspirations of the witness and the experience and power of the tribunal, if you can dig it.
I can "dig" your ignorant partisan bullshit quite well.
You gotta be kidding me, RGS.
You demonstrate your own ignorance, partisanship and self loathing commentary on a freaking almost daily basis. Have you checked out the history of this administration on VA funding lately?
Other than it goes up every year? Other than the republicans are the ones that made it so combat veterans can draw retired pay AND VA disability, ya thats a bad record alright. Ohh and did I mention the VA is now extending doctor hours for mental health?
Just where are you getting your numbers, RGS?
The genuine shrub signed legislation that reduced Veterans benefits and eliminated combat pay for WOT theatre troops the very day he exclaimed "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED". You are so full of indoctrinated shit!!!!!!
Funny, I haven't seen any budget that reduced the previous years amount sent to the VA, nor have I received anything from the VA every year EXCEPT increases.
Perhaps you could take time out from that groovy time warp your in to provide actual evidence that the VA has less money now and less benefits now then in 2000. CAN YOU DIG IT?
2,000? You are so obsessed!!!!!!!!!!
I asked you for actual numbers to verify your claims, you get all chicken shit and want to put us in a completely different era and you have the nerve to ask me to "DIG IT?"
What a complete waste of time you are. Do you remember what happened yesterday? I doubt it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gwb was never the president in 2,000. You suck, you lie and you expect me to believe you.
