Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually you are not only an idiot, you are a stupid lying idiot!no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force.
Cute .... look who's calling me unhinged ^^^but we are comparing bush to obama; so you DID move the goalposts. OF course YOU ARENT MAN ENOUGH TO ADMIT IT DUMMY!!
Actually you are not only an idiot, you are a stupid lying idiot!no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force.
Under Bush record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS left the workforce each and every year of his regime, and Bush didn't have Boomers retiring. That's how Bush got his phony UE rate so low.
Cute .... look who's calling me unhinged ^^^I moved nothing, rightard. I've been posting from the beginning that Bush added 13 million onto SNAP.There's no need to try again, bedwetter. You're a moron. Bush's 13 million increase was on top of Clinton's numbers.YAWN
once again retard; obama's 13 milion come on top of those Bush numbers
try again.............................................
You're clearly too stupid to comprehend that.
Bush added as many as Obama but with a smaller population and without inheriting the worst economy since the Great Depression. That makes Bush's increase of SNAP even worse than Obama's.
How many times did you vote for Bush?
now you're moving the goalposts LOSER; the comparison is bush to obama and obama to bush, not clinton to bush to obama
nice WHITE FLAG though loser, you wear it well!!
I merely pointed out, because it turned out you were too dense to understand without my help, that Bush added 13 million on top of Clinton's numbers just as you are pointing out Obama added 13 million on top of Bush's.
G'head, bedwetter ... this is where you exercise your jaw again ...
but we are comparing bush to obama; so you DID move the goalposts. OF course YOU ARENT MAN ENOUGH TO ADMIT IT DUMMY!!
Again, imbecile. I am pointing out how Bush added 13 million onto food stamps. Just as I have from the start.
Nothing of Bush's was real!no idiot; bush's unemployment number was real
Holyfuckingshit!you're premise is that obama has done better than bush. out of the other side of your mouth though you think you arent making excuses when you are told OBAMA'S FOOD STAMPS NUMBERS ARE ON TOP OF BUSHS INCREASE; meaning THE STATE OF THE COUNTRY UNDER OBAMA ISNT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IT IS
you're a clown; not to be taken seriously
But they are not leaving the labor market because they are discouraged, like they did under Bush. Discouraged workers are decreasing under Obama.Actually you are not only an idiot, you are a stupid lying idiot!no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force.
Under Bush record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS left the workforce each and every year of his regime, and Bush didn't have Boomers retiring. That's how Bush got his phony UE rate so low.
another loser comparing bush to the guy before him and ignoring what has happened on OBAMA'S WATCH
MORE working-age Americans are dropping out of the Labor Market altogether
Holyfuckingshit!you're premise is that obama has done better than bush. out of the other side of your mouth though you think you arent making excuses when you are told OBAMA'S FOOD STAMPS NUMBERS ARE ON TOP OF BUSHS INCREASE; meaning THE STATE OF THE COUNTRY UNDER OBAMA ISNT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IT IS
you're a clown; not to be taken seriously
You really are as dumb as you look.
You're claiming Bush did better than Obama and you're pointing to the 13 million SNAP increase of under Obama... but you're incapable of comprehending that make Bush look worse since he also added 13 million. Only Bush did it with a smaller population, making his 13 million increase even bigger per capita, than Obama's.
Even worse, Bush's policies led to his 13 million increase and contributed to Obama's increase of 13 million.
You're such a fucking imbecile, bedwetter. That's why it's entertaining making fun of you.
But they are not leaving the labor market because they are discouraged, like they did under Bush. Discouraged workers are decreasing under Obama.Actually you are not only an idiot, you are a stupid lying idiot!no we're not idiot; because unlike under bush, under obama record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS who are ABLE-BODIED arent participating in the Labor Force.
Under Bush record numbers of WORKING-AGE AMERICANS left the workforce each and every year of his regime, and Bush didn't have Boomers retiring. That's how Bush got his phony UE rate so low.
another loser comparing bush to the guy before him and ignoring what has happened on OBAMA'S WATCH
MORE working-age Americans are dropping out of the Labor Market altogether
Of course you did -- by pointing out Bush's average unemployment rate. When you do that, you expose that to be compared to any other president.No, idiot, when you post stupid shit, like the average unemployment rate under Bush, you should expect to be called on it.Average unemployment rate is meaningless. Unless you actually do believe that Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.Under Bush, the U-6 nearly doubled from 7.3% to 14.2%.
Under Obama, the U-6 is down from 14.2% to 10%.
yawn; once again you poor idiot; Bush's U-6 AVERAGE will be much better than obama's
keep trying....................
Reagan, 16 million jobs .... Bush, 1 million jobs.
i havent mentioned reagan, or clinton
only you have
you're a desperate clown, all over the place ;_)
And according to you, Bush did a better job that Reagan in terms of jobs. Which of course, is completely ludicrous.
If making an ass of you is in your eyes, me being all over the place ... who cares? I still made an ass of you.
and again; i nevef mentioned Reagan you mindless moron. what are you babbling about???
Because of the depth of the Bush Depression, DUH!Why would I cry because Bush comes in dead last in terms of job creation than every other president since Hoover?Tell that to economists who use the U-3 as a measure for full employment that they've got it all wrong. You know, the full employment numbers you were bragging earlier about Bush being near.Yes, ya flaming imbecile, we are.
According to its latest projections, the Fed sees "full employment" as the U3 rate falling between 5.2% and 5%.
US full employment - Business Insider
once more; because you're a loser who lies TO HIMSELF
U-3 is a garbage number; U-6 is more reliable. more long-tern unemployed under obama
more on disability
more dropping out of the Labor Market altogether not even being counted
You're such a fucking imbecile.
actually you're a crybaby coming unhinged; so predictable. you losers cant take the heat, cant handle reality.
i bragged about it under bush becaue his numbers actually represented something closer to reality than obama's do
go cry
And how many times did you vote for Bush? Including primaries?
YAWN
one more time for the pussy; if things are so great now how come there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps then there EVER was under bush????
Asked and answered, fluffer. But hey, keep workin' them muscles.Why would I cry because Bush comes in dead last in terms of job creation than every other president since Hoover?Tell that to economists who use the U-3 as a measure for full employment that they've got it all wrong. You know, the full employment numbers you were bragging earlier about Bush being near.Yes, ya flaming imbecile, we are.
According to its latest projections, the Fed sees "full employment" as the U3 rate falling between 5.2% and 5%.
US full employment - Business Insider
once more; because you're a loser who lies TO HIMSELF
U-3 is a garbage number; U-6 is more reliable. more long-tern unemployed under obama
more on disability
more dropping out of the Labor Market altogether not even being counted
You're such a fucking imbecile.
actually you're a crybaby coming unhinged; so predictable. you losers cant take the heat, cant handle reality.
i bragged about it under bush becaue his numbers actually represented something closer to reality than obama's do
go cry
And how many times did you vote for Bush? Including primaries?
YAWN
one more time for the pussy; if things are so great now how come there are 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps then there EVER was under bush????
Of course you did -- by pointing out Bush's average unemployment rate. When you do that, you expose that to be compared to any other president.No, idiot, when you post stupid shit, like the average unemployment rate under Bush, you should expect to be called on it.Average unemployment rate is meaningless. Unless you actually do believe that Bush did a better job than Reagan when it came to jobs.yawn; once again you poor idiot; Bush's U-6 AVERAGE will be much better than obama's
keep trying....................
Reagan, 16 million jobs .... Bush, 1 million jobs.
i havent mentioned reagan, or clinton
only you have
you're a desperate clown, all over the place ;_)
And according to you, Bush did a better job that Reagan in terms of jobs. Which of course, is completely ludicrous.
If making an ass of you is in your eyes, me being all over the place ... who cares? I still made an ass of you.
and again; i nevef mentioned Reagan you mindless moron. what are you babbling about???
In this case, Reagan. Who according to you, can't hold a candle to Bush in terms of jobs.
Which is why you now cry like a baby that I mentioned Reagan when I showed you how stupid your metric of average unemployment is by comparing Bush to Reagan.
You can't refute that comparison -- so you cry about it instead.
There is nothing about "underemployment" under Obama that hasn't been true for much longer than Obama has been around.
The same complaints about "underemployment", the labor force participation rate, and "true unemployment" were heard during the Bush years.
If you look at the LFPR over a wide span of time, you can see quite plainly it began plunging before anyone ever heard of Obama.
