Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Apparently it is you who needs this chart explained.Troll boy showing he’s terrified of the truth.The entire process of this thread is:There are key issues that atheists refuse to address, because if they do their position falls apart...
My "position" as an atheist has nothing to do with big bangs.
"We don't know...therefore, gods!!!"
Same conman trick since conmen walked the planet.
Something for you to chew on, shitforbrains.
View attachment 226891
If you need someone to explain that go start your own thread, ignoramus.
Explaining things is not one of them.They have their uses.
Explaining things is not one of them.They have their uses.
Stuff you just make up with no evidence has value as far as soothing ourselves. But it doesn't actually explain anything. It merely replaces one mystery with another.Explaining things is not one of them.They have their uses.
It can be. All of our explanations, even scientific ones, are just useful approximations: stories that work for a given set of purposes. If the purpose is to give meaning to life, or bind a set of values into a cohesive whole, a story can be wildly metaphoric and still provide value.
The OP pretends to know the precise answer. While, of course, ridiculing anyone who dares query this topic.Have you ever wondered why is there something rather than nothing?
A stupid thing to say...we can't even comprehend "nothing", nor have we ever been able to test it or learn anything about it. This is the arrogance of religious nuts, on display.Simply put, from our experience, nothing ever makes something.
Stuff you just make up with no evidence has value as far as soothing ourselves. But it doesn't actually explain anything. It merely replaces one mystery with another.Explaining things is not one of them.They have their uses.
It can be. All of our explanations, even scientific ones, are just useful approximations: stories that work for a given set of purposes. If the purpose is to give meaning to life, or bind a set of values into a cohesive whole, a story can be wildly metaphoric and still provide value.
No it isn't, because then you have to also explain why the moon has phases and why Venus has phases. So it's only "good enough" if you give up trying to explain anything else.Explaining the day/night cycle on earth by describing the sun as going "around" the earth once a day is perfectly valid for anyone with no need to delve into the more detailed description that astronomy provides.
No it isn't, because then you have to describe why the moon has ohases, and why Venus has phases. So it's 9nly "good enough" if you give up trying to explain anythi g else.Explaining the day/night cycle on earth by describing the sun as going "around" the earth once a day is perfectly valid for anyone with no need to delve into the more detailed description that astronomy provides.
Which is exactly why it's not good enough. You make my point for me.No it isn't, because then you have to describe why the moon has ohases, and why Venus has phases. So it's 9nly "good enough" if you give up trying to explain anythi g else.Explaining the day/night cycle on earth by describing the sun as going "around" the earth once a day is perfectly valid for anyone with no need to delve into the more detailed description that astronomy provides.
It's good enough until you need to explain something else. All of science is like this.
People once thought demons caused disease. So they crafted magical trinkets and chanted magical spells and tried to flush the demons. And some people got better.No it isn't, because then you have to describe why the moon has ohases, and why Venus has phases. So it's 9nly "good enough" if you give up trying to explain anythi g else.Explaining the day/night cycle on earth by describing the sun as going "around" the earth once a day is perfectly valid for anyone with no need to delve into the more detailed description that astronomy provides.
It's good enough until you need to explain something else. All of science is like this.
Which is exactly why it's not good enough. You make my point for me.No it isn't, because then you have to describe why the moon has ohases, and why Venus has phases. So it's 9nly "good enough" if you give up trying to explain anythi g else.Explaining the day/night cycle on earth by describing the sun as going "around" the earth once a day is perfectly valid for anyone with no need to delve into the more detailed description that astronomy provides.
It's good enough until you need to explain something else. All of science is like this.
And I am agreeing, as in it has value to soothe ourselves and alter our moods. But it has no value in explaining anything, ever. Anyone who thinks it does is merely using it for the purposes I already stated, soothing themselves and altering their own mood. I am not calling it worthless, I am saying it is worthless beyond these things I mentioned.I'm just saying that religion does have value.
Got a link that there were Roos in the Middle East?Guess you didn’t know Marsupials were native to North America and the Middle East.So remind me, how did roos get to the ark from Oz? Some god magic?As would a pair of elephants!Do you realize that a pair of roos walking from Oz to the Middle East wouldn't live long enough to make it there? And what did they use, a GPS?How did elephants end up in Africa and North America?Was does that have to do with how roos got from Oz and back?
View attachment 226881
You’re being an exceptional dumbass.
I’m not your google researcher. Look it up yourself. Every time I answer you you go off in a new strawman.Got a link that there were Roos in the Middle East?Guess you didn’t know Marsupials were native to North America and the Middle East.So remind me, how did roos get to the ark from Oz? Some god magic?As would a pair of elephants!Do you realize that a pair of roos walking from Oz to the Middle East wouldn't live long enough to make it there? And what did they use, a GPS?How did elephants end up in Africa and North America?
View attachment 226881
You’re being an exceptional dumbass.
Because their ancestors traveled to north America millions of years ago. This is not a mystery.How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
Don’t know much, do you.Because their ancestors traveled to north America millions of years ago. This is not a mystery.How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
This fact actually contradicts your flood myth nonsense, so I am curious as to why you present it.
You can't even make a point. Just little fits, over and over . It appears the fact of evolution remains quite safe, if the opposition to it is comprised of ignorant, incapable people like you.Don’t know much, do you.Because their ancestors traveled to north America millions of years ago. This is not a mystery.How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
This fact actually contradicts your flood myth nonsense, so I am curious as to why you present it.
So you have no link, so you made it up. Got it.I’m not your google researcher. Look it up yourself. Every time I answer you you go off in a new strawman.Got a link that there were Roos in the Middle East?Guess you didn’t know Marsupials were native to North America and the Middle East.So remind me, how did roos get to the ark from Oz? Some god magic?As would a pair of elephants!Do you realize that a pair of roos walking from Oz to the Middle East wouldn't live long enough to make it there? And what did they use, a GPS?
You’re being an exceptional dumbass.
How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
Answer that and you’ll have your own answer.
Holy shit. You're still on this?So you have no link, so you made it up. Got it.I’m not your google researcher. Look it up yourself. Every time I answer you you go off in a new strawman.Got a link that there were Roos in the Middle East?Guess you didn’t know Marsupials were native to North America and the Middle East.So remind me, how did roos get to the ark from Oz? Some god magic?As would a pair of elephants!
You’re being an exceptional dumbass.
How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
Answer that and you’ll have your own answer.
As for the elephants, it's not because of Noah, that's for sure.
Dude’s saying Roos are indigenous to the ME.Holy shit. You're still on this?So you have no link, so you made it up. Got it.I’m not your google researcher. Look it up yourself. Every time I answer you you go off in a new strawman.Got a link that there were Roos in the Middle East?Guess you didn’t know Marsupials were native to North America and the Middle East.So remind me, how did roos get to the ark from Oz? Some god magic?
How come you can’t answer how elephants ended up in two continents?
Answer that and you’ll have your own answer.
As for the elephants, it's not because of Noah, that's for sure.
