Global Warming Alarmists, please, kill yourselves. Do it for the children. Save the planet!
Help the babies...
Help the babies...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I doubt if anyone on the left would try to make a case that the water deep under the Arctic ice is warming and I doubt if they would try to make a case that bubbles of methane are caused by some man-made phenomenon. They post this stuff hoping that the ignorant and the grammar school kids will draw sinister conclusions. Throw enough crap against the wall and some of it might stick.
"The shelf is shallow, 50 meters or less in depth, which means it has been alternately submerged or above water, depending on sea levels throughout Earths history. "
Read more: 'Fountains' of methane 1,000m across erupt from Arctic ice - a greenhouse gas 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide | Mail Online
Which can only mean that the SUV is far older than anticipated
No, but your moronically drooling posts can only mean that your brain died some time ago and was replaced by some moldy cottage cheese.
Jeez, it didn't happen in the 1930's (when it was warmer) it didn't happen in the MWP (when it was way warmer, and it didn't happen during the RWP (when it was likewise way warmer). I say get a team down there and cap the plumes at their source and start generating some power with it!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.....wow, big surprise, the walleyedretard is insanely wrong again...as usual for the poor confused imbecile...
The world was not warmer in the 1930's, but the walleyedretard has fixated on the old news that the continental US (only 2% of the Earth's surface) was a tiny fraction of a degree warmer in 1934 than 1998 compared to the 1951-1980 average. Like two one hundredths of one percent (1934 ~ 1.25ºC vs. 1998 ~ 1.23ºC). The difference is not statistically significant. In the global mean, 2005 remains the warmest year with 2010 in a close tie.
The world was not warmer either during the MWP or the RWP according to the scientific evidence, even though the walleyedretard's denier cult myths say the opposite. The world is warmer than it has ever been in at least the last six thousand years, maybe eight.
Talking about "capping" a multitude of methane plumes each a thousand meters wide just demonstrates how insane and clueless the walleyedretard really is.
Jeez, it didn't happen in the 1930's (when it was warmer) it didn't happen in the MWP (when it was way warmer, and it didn't happen during the RWP (when it was likewise way warmer). I say get a team down there and cap the plumes at their source and start generating some power with it!
10,000 sq. miles. A square one hundred miles on the side. And in this small area, they found over 100 of these plumes. Some exceeding 1/2 mile wide.
If you have a reasonable way of capping this, patent it. It will be a real money maker, and a boon to us all.
However, returning to reality, last year, they were looking at some plumes 100 meters across. And ten years ago, they were measuring methane in solution in the ocean, and the increase in percentage of methane in the air above the oceans. This is releases on an order of magnitude in the space of a year. That is correct, they did not have these plumes in the MWP when it was not warmer than at present. And it was not warmer the world over in the '30's, only in the continental US.
Methane, once it is in the atmosphere, for the first 20 years is over 60 times as effective of a greenhouse gas as CO2. The higher the percentage of methane in the atmosphere, the longer this more effective period lasts. In other words, an addition of 1 ppm would be the equivelant of an increase of over 60 ppm of CO2. Even discounting present methane and other GHG increases, that 1 ppm would push us over the equivelant of 450 ppm of CO2.
Going to be interesting to see what happens in 2012 in this region. A major burp, such as that of the Storega Slide of 8000 years ago could provide us with some real entertainment.
'Fountains' of methane 1,000m across erupt from Arctic ice
Daily mail ^ | 12.13.2011 | n/a
The Russian research vessel Academician Lavrentiev conducted a survey of 10,000 square miles of sea off the coast of eastern Siberia. They made a terrifying discovery - huge plumes of methane bubbles rising to the surface from the seabed. 'We found more than 100 fountains, some more than a kilometre across,' said Dr Igor Semiletov, 'These are methane fields on a scale not seen before. The emissions went directly into the atmosphere.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
'Fountains' of methane 1,000m across erupt from Arctic ice - a greenhouse gas 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide | Mail Online
huge plumes of methane bubbles rising to the surface from the seabed
I thought humans were responsible for the increase of methane in the atmosphere.
Now we're supposed to believe that there is methane that we're not responsible for?
Impossible!!!
Next they'll tell us that termites generate methane that we can't be blamed for as well.
You are one fucking dumb asshole. We warmed the atmosphere and ocean with our GHG emissions. That is why the clathrates are rapidly degrading.
From Australia, Russia, and the Missouri and Mississippi of the US, we can see that weather events of the magnitude of the past two years spare no one in their path, irregardless of position or wealth.
And Florida saw the same in 2004, 1960, 1845, etc...
Much of the nation saw this in the 1930s with the dustbowl.
Soooo..... ???
So, in the last two years we have seen weather disasters around the world in very rapid succession.
Flooding in Australia: The reality of a secondary peril | Swiss Re - Leading Global Reinsurer
According to Mehlhorn secondary perils have contributed to about 30% of the total insured natural catastrophe losses over the last 30 years on a global level. Insured losses for recent years totaled around USD 10bn annually, which is well above the long term average.
The December 2010 January 2011 events in Australia underline once again the importance
And this year in just the US, we had 12 Billion+ dollar weather events. Ignore it if you want, it is going to be at your front door eventually.
Here are a few links from peer reviewed papers from all over the world (including Antarctica) that show the MWP was global and warmer then the current day.
So, in the last two years we have seen weather disasters around the world in very rapid succession.
Wow, just imagine NONE of this has ever happened before...in the WHOLE 4.5 billion year history of this planet man is in the space of 200 years destroying everything. Man we kick ASS!
Jeez, it didn't happen in the 1930's (when it was warmer) it didn't happen in the MWP (when it was way warmer, and it didn't happen during the RWP (when it was likewise way warmer). I say get a team down there and cap the plumes at their source and start generating some power with it!
10,000 sq. miles. A square one hundred miles on the side. And in this small area, they found over 100 of these plumes. Some exceeding 1/2 mile wide.
If you have a reasonable way of capping this, patent it. It will be a real money maker, and a boon to us all.
However, returning to reality, last year, they were looking at some plumes 100 meters across. And ten years ago, they were measuring methane in solution in the ocean, and the increase in percentage of methane in the air above the oceans. This is releases on an order of magnitude in the space of a year. That is correct, they did not have these plumes in the MWP when it was not warmer than at present. And it was not warmer the world over in the '30's, only in the continental US.
Methane, once it is in the atmosphere, for the first 20 years is over 60 times as effective of a greenhouse gas as CO2. The higher the percentage of methane in the atmosphere, the longer this more effective period lasts. In other words, an addition of 1 ppm would be the equivelant of an increase of over 60 ppm of CO2. Even discounting present methane and other GHG increases, that 1 ppm would push us over the equivelant of 450 ppm of CO2.
Going to be interesting to see what happens in 2012 in this region. A major burp, such as that of the Storega Slide of 8000 years ago could provide us with some real entertainment.
Wow, just imagine NONE of this has ever happened before...in the WHOLE 4.5 billion year history of this planet man is in the space of 200 years destroying everything. Man we kick ASS!
From Australia, Russia, and the Missouri and Mississippi of the US, we can see that weather events of the magnitude of the past two years spare no one in their path, irregardless of position or wealth.
And Florida saw the same in 2004, 1960, 1845, etc...
Much of the nation saw this in the 1930s with the dustbowl.
Soooo..... ???
So, in the last two years we have seen weather disasters around the world in very rapid succession.
Flooding in Australia: The reality of a secondary peril | Swiss Re - Leading Global Reinsurer
According to Mehlhorn secondary perils have contributed to about 30% of the total insured natural catastrophe losses over the last 30 years on a global level. Insured losses for recent years totaled around USD 10bn annually, which is well above the long term average.
The December 2010 January 2011 events in Australia underline once again the importance
And this year in just the US, we had 12 Billion+ dollar weather events. Ignore it if you want, it is going to be at your front door eventually.
'Fountains' of methane 1,000m across erupt from Arctic ice
Daily mail ^ | 12.13.2011 | n/a
The Russian research vessel Academician Lavrentiev conducted a survey of 10,000 square miles of sea off the coast of eastern Siberia. They made a terrifying discovery - huge plumes of methane bubbles rising to the surface from the seabed. 'We found more than 100 fountains, some more than a kilometre across,' said Dr Igor Semiletov, 'These are methane fields on a scale not seen before. The emissions went directly into the atmosphere.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
'Fountains' of methane 1,000m across erupt from Arctic ice - a greenhouse gas 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide | Mail Online