Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Wow, you bring new meaning to the term moron. The plume may be 1000 meters across when it reaches the surface but I assure you the point of origin is smaller then that. As far as the MWP goes, you are as usual, wrong. Here are a few links from peer reviewed papers from all over the world (including Antarctica) that show the MWP was global and warmer then the current day.
Evidence for a warmer period during the 12th and 13th centuries AD from chironomid assemblages in Southampton Island, Nunavut, Canada
Generation, transport, and preservation of the alkenone-based <b xmlns="">U</b> <sub xmlns=""> <b>37</b> </sub> <sup xmlns=""> <b>K′</b> </sup> sea surface temperature index in the water column and sediments of the Cariaco Basin (Venezuela)
ScienceDirect - Quaternary Research : Unstable Climate Oscillations during the Late Holocene in the Eastern Bransfield Basin, Antarctic Peninsula
Short-term climate change and New Zealand temperatures during the last millennium
ScienceDirect - Quaternary International : Climate changes and flood/drought risk in the Yangtze Delta, China, during the past millennium
Alkenone-based reconstruction of late-Holocene surface temperature and salinity changes in Lake Qinghai, China
Very interesting. A point source for an area of a kilometer in water 50 to 150 meters deep. Those are quite some angles on the sides of that cone. Walleyes, do you ever think before you post?
Yes I do, unlike yourself. The bottom is fractured throughout the region. It is a relatively simple matter to seal up the fractures to get one hole that you cap. But that's called engineering and clearly anything more complicated then 2+2 is beyond your ability.
LOL. In an area 100 miles by 100 miles, there were over 100 'boils'. And you are going to seal them up, on an ocean bottom that is only 50 to 150 meters deep? At what cost? And what does the first storm do to your 'seals'?