its you thats stuck on the bible not me,,,
And thus why it's a THEORY. Carbon dating is being adjusted about 10% older. We aren't talking about 5 billion years ago being 4000 years ago all of a sudden. We aren't disproving science but getting even more exacting using other proven data sources to dial that in. Impressive that we are finding sediment levels, tree rings, coral growth and all are pointing to this long time frame along with Carbon 14 dating.
But you have to throw all that evidence away to believe a literal biblical sense of the age of the planet. Much like years ago you had to throw all the evidence of astronomy away to believe the literal biblical belief the earth went around the sun. And yes, we have dialed in and adjusted the measurements of orbits and distance from the sun over time. But it hasn't debunked heliocentric theory
and just wait cause they change the dating several times until now and will most likely change it again later
Exactly. Just like Earths orbit has been changed multiple times as we've gotten better and better at it. Doesn't mean that Heliocentric theory (the earth revolves around the sun) is debunked in any way.
What we have now is yet another completely different time measurement proving within 10% of Carbon 14, and putting it within 10% of coral growth, tree ring, and glacial movement records.
The ONLY outlier is the young earth creationism, which this new method once again debunks completely.
tree ring dating is more flawed than the geo column
Says you. Science disagrees. Unfortunately the only thing science agrees on is debunking the "young earth Conspiracy".
So why do you oppose fact and science and instead rely on the guy who believes in Nessie the loch ness monster, but not the scientific facts proven that dino's were warm blooded and many had feathers?