Fossil Fuel's War to Delay Action on Global Warming

[Crick]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

 

[Oddball]

The hell you say?!?

Innocent businessmen don't want a bunch of neo-Luddite cultist freaks to put them out of business?!?

 

[ReinyDays]

What stupidity ... never heard of fiduciary responsibility ... that's lame even for the OP ...

Did you ever learn what "instrumentation error" is? ... or the definition of temperature? ...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

If the climate action means we have to waste trillions of dollars on less reliable energy,
I discourage it as well.

 

[ding]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

AGW is fake news, bro. The sky isn't falling. They have mistaken an ordinary warming trend for AGW. The geologic record is littered with similar warming trends.

 

[elektra]

more stupidity from crick

did crick quote the article, no

does crick's comment set a tone to respond to, no

crick's comment just says, AGW true, all others deniers.

 

[elektra]

another moronic AGW thread, there is no proof CO2 harms the climate or changes the climate

there is proof without CO2 we all die.

The Democrats want to eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere. The Democrats obviously want us to die

 

[elektra]

AGW is fraud, people who think know this

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, its data are fraudulent.

www.investors.com

The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare​

• 03:12 AM ET 03/29/2018

Global Warming: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion. Its data are fraudulent.

 

[elektra]

Now, we can see hundreds of people presenting facts that destroy the AGW hoax

The Cook '97% consensus' paper, exposed by new book for the fraud that it really is • Watts Up With That?

I don't like to use the word "fraud", and I can't recall if I've ever used it in a title. In this case it is warranted. Brandon Shollenberger writes of a new book, The Climate Wars: How the Consensus is Enforced, that proves without a doubt that John Cook and his "Skeptical Science" team are

wattsupwiththat.com

The paper is rather remarkable in that it admits several of the criticisms of the (in)famous Cook et al consensus paper, such as saying:

During the rating process of C13, raters were presented only with the paper title and abstract to base their rating on. Tol (2015) queries what steps were taken to prevent raters from gathering additional information. While there was no practical way of preventing such an outcome, raters conducted further investigation by perusing the full paper on only a few occasions, usually to clarify ambiguous abstract language.

Which acknowledges the raters on the project cheated and looked at material they weren’t supposed to look at (but insisting it is okay because the raters only cheated a few times, trust us). Similarly, the paper acknowledges the raters were not independent of one another like Cook et al claimed, but rather:

 

[elektra]

Thank God we have great scientists, laying to rest the myths of AGW

The Cook '97% consensus' paper, exposed by new book for the fraud that it really is • Watts Up With That?

I don't like to use the word "fraud", and I can't recall if I've ever used it in a title. In this case it is warranted. Brandon Shollenberger writes of a new book, The Climate Wars: How the Consensus is Enforced, that proves without a doubt that John Cook and his "Skeptical Science" team are

wattsupwiththat.com

ABSTRACT A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate. Increased carbon dioxide has, however, markedly increased plant growth. Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in hydrocarbon use and mi nor greenhouse gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge. The environmental effects of rapid expansion of the nuclear and hydrocarbon energy industries are discussed.

 

[skookerasbil]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

More evidence...dude...you are always wrong

Whoooops


Watch: Fauci Squirms As CNN Anchor Confronts Him With Data Showing Masks Don't Work | ZeroHedge

 

[skookerasbil]

Okay.....back to AGW fakery discussion.

 

[PredFan]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

Good! I hope they succeed. The whole Climate Change thing is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on mankind.

 

[skookerasbil]

Anybody with half a brain knows....

Fossil fuels will be with us for many decades. The climate crusaders can piss and moan until the cows come home....won't change a thing.

And the climate crusaders will continue to bay at the moon....

 

[Crick]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

As could this one.

 

[ding]

As could this one.

You are chasing windmills.

 

[Dagosa]

Good! I hope they succeed. The whole Climate Change thing is the biggest scam ever perpetrated on mankind.

And you have no evidence that every climate science institute in the world, is scamming you. That includes every accredited university in the world. You’re now saying that every climate science related degree dished out by all of them, is bogus. Gee……amazing..

 

[EMH]

While deniers have produced ZERO evidence that AGW is actually the result of a grand conspiracy or the greed of scientists or misanthropy or a hunger for power among intellectuals and elites, the evidence supporting AGW AND the evidence supporting the scheme by Exxon and other fossil fuel corporations to delay action on global warming is replete.

Oil companies discourage climate action, study says

Harvard researchers have turned a spotlight on the sometimes subtle, yet effective, strategies employed by oil companies to foster doubt and delay action on climate change.

news.harvard.edu

Actually it is your side that cannot produce any real evidence of any "warming" outside of Urban Heat.

Your side has

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT IN CANES
NO OCEAN RISE


and if you claim the oceans are rising SHOW US A PHOTO!!

and if you claim the oceans are warming then WHY IS THE RECORD DECADE FOR CANES STILL THE 1940s???

 

[Dagosa]

Actually it is your side that cannot produce any real evidence of any "warming" outside of Urban Heat.

Sure….just go to the NASA website and address your questions to them. Who do you normally ask ?

 

[EMH]

Sure….just go to the NASA website and address your questions to them. Who do you normally ask ?

90% of Earth ice is on land mass Antarctica.

Your side says it is "melting" but in reality there is NO LIQUID WATER there... and.... every year of the Co2 FRAUD Antarctica has ADDED ICE...

Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses â Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

climate.nasa.gov

which explains why there is no ocean rise, since there is no ongoing net ice melt, because planet Earth is NOT WARMING...