Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare is not.Start being more moral, so we won't need as much Government.Not enough, "moral of goodwill toward men" to go around?
We have more than Ten Commandments for rules and regulations. We don't need infidels, protestants, and renegades to morals from the Age of Iron, to harp on moral forms of indignation.
just quit, and stop whining about taxes if it is too much of burden for you; it may be better for your health.
That's the excuse many use. They say that personal charity isn't enough as their justification for mandates.
Start providing for yourself and quit relying on the rest of us to do what you should be doing.
You mean give to others with my money the way you think I should? If anyone goes without, it's your fault. I don't owe anyone anything. Since you think they're owed something and they don't get it, you're not doing enough.
Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare is not.Start being more moral, so we won't need as much Government.That's the excuse many use. They say that personal charity isn't enough as their justification for mandates.
Start providing for yourself and quit relying on the rest of us to do what you should be doing.
You mean give to others with my money the way you think I should? If anyone goes without, it's your fault. I don't owe anyone anything. Since you think they're owed something and they don't get it, you're not doing enough.
Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare is not.Start being more moral, so we won't need as much Government.
You mean give to others with my money the way you think I should? If anyone goes without, it's your fault. I don't owe anyone anything. Since you think they're owed something and they don't get it, you're not doing enough.
Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
You have to prove such things are a delegated power in order to be valid.
I've told you that getting rid of the war on crime, drugs, and poverty is OK. The war on terror is a military function and the Constitution grants delegated power to Congress to do such things.
Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare is not.You mean give to others with my money the way you think I should? If anyone goes without, it's your fault. I don't owe anyone anything. Since you think they're owed something and they don't get it, you're not doing enough.
Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
You have to prove such things are a delegated power in order to be valid.
I've told you that getting rid of the war on crime, drugs, and poverty is OK. The war on terror is a military function and the Constitution grants delegated power to Congress to do such things.
You have no solution.Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Providing for the general warfare is not.
Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
You have to prove such things are a delegated power in order to be valid.
I've told you that getting rid of the war on crime, drugs, and poverty is OK. The war on terror is a military function and the Constitution grants delegated power to Congress to do such things.
Food stamps and all other social programs aren't in it.
You have no solution.Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.Food stamps, healthcare subsidies, WIC, and the life aren't in the Constitution. Raising and supporting a military are. I can provide the location where what I say exists. I'm yet to have one of you bleeding hearts provide one where what you support exists.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
You have to prove such things are a delegated power in order to be valid.
I've told you that getting rid of the war on crime, drugs, and poverty is OK. The war on terror is a military function and the Constitution grants delegated power to Congress to do such things.
Food stamps and all other social programs aren't in it.
Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, solves simple poverty.
It solves everything. it even fixes our first world standard of living; just so the right can whine about it.You have no solution.Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.You have to prove that we don't have a First World standard of living, to prove that it doesn't provide for the general welfare.
Where are wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, specifically defined in the Republican Doctrine?
You have to prove such things are a delegated power in order to be valid.
I've told you that getting rid of the war on crime, drugs, and poverty is OK. The war on terror is a military function and the Constitution grants delegated power to Congress to do such things.
Food stamps and all other social programs aren't in it.
Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, solves simple poverty.
I've offered a solution. If you see what YOU consider a valid need, meet it with your money. I'll do the same. I won't tell you what to consider valid and you don't tell me. That's a solution.
Unemployment compensation for not working solves nothing.
SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.
It does so, in a general manner. You simply pay taxes. Congress gets to manage, the People's, petty cash funds.Proving for the general welfare is in our social Contract and federal Constitution.
Again i point out that word "general"..That means programs that help everyone and our welfare system doesn't do that. It' takes money from one group and gives it to another, THINK
Read it again....it is covered. You will see the "etc." at the end. It means et caetera also spelled etcetera what means>>"and other things," "and so forth," "and the rest /of such things/"SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
No cereal & oatmeal for the kids?
Read it again....it is covered. You will see the "etc." at the end. It means et caetera also spelled etcetera what means>>"and other things," "and so forth," "and the rest /of such things/"SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
No cereal & oatmeal for the kids?
I appreciate your diligence in the efforts made to spin the issue. Here is a little help to understand what "etc." means and the how it relates to the continuation of the whole. Pay attention and remember it that next time you wouldn't make a clown of yourself. Thanks for playing, you are a good sport.Read it again....it is covered. You will see the "etc." at the end. It means et caetera also spelled etcetera what means>>"and other things," "and so forth," "and the rest /of such things/"SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
No cereal & oatmeal for the kids?
The term "etc" is reserved for things of little importance to the whole. So little they are unworthy of mention.
If that's the level of importance you place on ensuring the children are well fed, speaks volumes. All of it bad.
Right wing and Left wing are the same. They are the establishment and yes, they infringe upon our freedom gradually chipping it away.Infringing upon Individual Liberty is what the right wing likes to do; while decrying communism.
Govt says it's so people can make healthy choices but it's really so welfare queens can buy their junk food anonymously.
Government testing online grocery shopping for food stamp participants
jan 5 2017 The U.S. Department of Agriculture plans to launch a two-year pilot program this summer with seven retailers to allow food stamp recipients the ability to purchase their groceries online.
More than 44 million Americans participated last year in federal government's low-income food assistance program, called SNAP, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Last year, the average benefit each person received was just over $125.50 per month.
"Online purchasing is a potential lifeline for SNAP participants living in urban neighborhoods and rural communities where access to healthy food choices can be limited," USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a release. "We're looking forward to being able to bring the benefits of the online market to low-income Americans participating in SN
nope; some on the left actually read our Constitution and believe in the federal way.Right wing and Left wing are the same. They are the establishment and yes, they infringe upon our freedom gradually chipping it away.Infringing upon Individual Liberty is what the right wing likes to do; while decrying communism.
Your blatant lie is refreshing to see. It confirms the left's Goebbelsian methodology.nope; some on the left actually read our Constitution and believe in the federal way.Right wing and Left wing are the same. They are the establishment and yes, they infringe upon our freedom gradually chipping it away.Infringing upon Individual Liberty is what the right wing likes to do; while decrying communism.
I appreciate your diligence in the efforts made to spin the issue. Here is a little help to understand what "etc." means and the how it relates to the continuation of the whole. Pay attention and remember it that next time you wouldn't make a clown of yourself. Thanks for playing, you are a good sport.Read it again....it is covered. You will see the "etc." at the end. It means et caetera also spelled etcetera what means>>"and other things," "and so forth," "and the rest /of such things/"SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
No cereal & oatmeal for the kids?
The term "etc" is reserved for things of little importance to the whole. So little they are unworthy of mention.
If that's the level of importance you place on ensuring the children are well fed, speaks volumes. All of it bad.
"The phrase et cetera is often used to denote the logical continuation of some sort of series of descriptions. For example, in the following expression:
We will need a lot of bread: wheat, granary, wholemeal, etc."
et cetera - Wikipedia
"English
Wikipedia has an article on:
Et cetera
Alternative forms
Etymology
- etc
- (dated): &c., &c, et cetera, & cetera
- (obsolete): et cætera, et caetera
- (proscribed, dated): etcetera
- (hypercorrect, obsolete): et ceteræ
From Latin etc., an abbreviation of et cetera (“and the rest [of the things]; and the other things”).
Pronunciation
Phrase
- IPA(key): /ˌɛt ˈsɛt(ə)ɹə/, /ˌɛkˈsɛt(ə)ɹə/ (See Usage below)
Audio (US)
Menu
0:00
etc.
etc - Wiktionary.
- And so on: used to note that the rest of a list or piece of information has been left out on the assumption that it is similar or already known.
The grocery sells cucumbers, lettuce, radishes, etc.
The plagiarism was painfully obvious: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times," etc."
Digging what? You were busted about your stupidity, don't blame me, blame yourself...oh, that's right... lefties never take responsibility for their fuckups, theyalways blame somebody else...I appreciate your diligence in the efforts made to spin the issue. Here is a little help to understand what "etc." means and the how it relates to the continuation of the whole. Pay attention and remember it that next time you wouldn't make a clown of yourself. Thanks for playing, you are a good sport.Read it again....it is covered. You will see the "etc." at the end. It means et caetera also spelled etcetera what means>>"and other things," "and so forth," "and the rest /of such things/"SNAP should be limited to staple foods only. Bread, flour, beans, ground beef, chicken, milk, bulk yogurt...etc.
No cereal & oatmeal for the kids?
The term "etc" is reserved for things of little importance to the whole. So little they are unworthy of mention.
If that's the level of importance you place on ensuring the children are well fed, speaks volumes. All of it bad.
"The phrase et cetera is often used to denote the logical continuation of some sort of series of descriptions. For example, in the following expression:
We will need a lot of bread: wheat, granary, wholemeal, etc."
et cetera - Wikipedia
"English
Wikipedia has an article on:
Et cetera
Alternative forms
Etymology
- etc
- (dated): &c., &c, et cetera, & cetera
- (obsolete): et cætera, et caetera
- (proscribed, dated): etcetera
- (hypercorrect, obsolete): et ceteræ
From Latin etc., an abbreviation of et cetera (“and the rest [of the things]; and the other things”).
Pronunciation
Phrase
- IPA(key): /ˌɛt ˈsɛt(ə)ɹə/, /ˌɛkˈsɛt(ə)ɹə/ (See Usage below)
Audio (US)
Menu
0:00
etc.
etc - Wiktionary.
- And so on: used to note that the rest of a list or piece of information has been left out on the assumption that it is similar or already known.
The grocery sells cucumbers, lettuce, radishes, etc.
The plagiarism was painfully obvious: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times," etc."
Keep digging.
