Finally: A Transparent Voting Process That Can't Be Corrupted, Hacked, or Cheated — Democrats Will Hate It

No. And you'll note Hillary Clinton conceded the election the day after.
That was just so no one could claim she never did anything good for this country
There was demonstrated interference from Russian intelligence as was proven in both the DOJ (under Trump) and the US Senate (under GOP leadership). This was the same group that Trump's campaign manager had repeated meetings with during the campaign.
There was no such thing, just exoneration

But let me guess...nothing to see there, right
nor here for that matter...you just did what you claimed the trump crowd would do.
 
Describing your manhood won't erase the facts that Trump's campaign met with Russian intel several times.
No. And you'll note Hillary Clinton conceded the election the day after.

And the moment Trump loses, you will lead the chorus of chanting "the computers were hacked"!!!!!

There is no evidence of massive voter fraud from the 2020 election. You don't like the results...so you claim there was massive fraud.

There was demonstrated interference from Russian intelligence as was proven in both the DOJ (under Trump) and the US Senate (under GOP leadership). This was the same group that Trump's campaign manager had repeated meetings with during the campaign.

But let me guess...nothing to see there, right?
Will it be OK if the trump crowd does all ^this/that^ if they lose? jus askin
 
Will it be OK if the trump crowd does all ^this/that^ if they lose? jus askin
Uhhhh...

Trump's DOJ is the one that reported Trump's campaign met with Russian Intel. His supporters in the Senate said the same thing.

As we all know, Trump got his mara-lard-ass kicked in the 2020 election.

Are you retarded? jus askin
 
spit it out
Trump's DOJ is the one that reported Trump's campaign met with Russian Intel. His supporters in the Senate said the same thing.

As we all know, Trump got his mara-lard-ass kicked in the 2020 election.
is that a yes or a no?...no wonder ya don't want the trump crowd to act like ^this/that^
Are you retarded? jus askin
Why? need a tutor? no need to ask if you went to public school
 
Is that what your gay lovers say to you?
no thats what I said to you

Wow..you're stupid. Trump's crowd acted exactly like that.
yeah no spit, that was your post you are claiming they acted exactly like...jeez

At least I actually finished school (and college). You don't seem to know much of anything.
That just means ya had enough birthdays to graduate public school and the college thing if true is the real indictment of our woeful education system
 
Uhhhh...

Trump's DOJ is the one that reported Trump's campaign met with Russian Intel. His supporters in the Senate said the same thing.

As we all know, Trump got his mara-lard-ass kicked in the 2020 election.

Are you retarded? jus askin

indeed they did; several volumes worth.

Publications​

Print
CRPT-116srpt290.pdf

Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
Volume 4, Additional Declassifications, July 2020
Volume 5
[Senate Report 116-290]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]


116th Congress} { Report
SENATE
2d Session } { 116-290

======================================================================

RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS
AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION

R E P O R T

VOLUMES I-V

TOGETHER WITH

ADDITIONAL VIEWS

----------

SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
UNITED STATES SENATE



[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]




November 10, 2020.--Ordered to be printed

Publications | Intelligence Committee

& looks like you answered yer own question regarding francis.
 
And the moment Trump loses, you will lead the chorus of chanting "the computers were hacked"!!!!!

There is no evidence of massive voter fraud from the 2020 election. You don't like the results...so you claim there was massive fraud.
Yup....Democrats are not the ones suppressing the vote and trying to come up with ways to put elections in the hands of election deniers.
 
Last edited:
That 923 citizens attested means nothing if the purpose of their attesting is to overturn an election by giving false testimony. That is what we had here, so their "findings" were as bogus as it gets.
That people "swear" is to be expected by Trump followers.
 
That 923 citizens attested means nothing if the purpose of their attesting is to overturn an election by giving false testimony. That is what we had here, so their "findings" were as bogus as it gets.
That people "swear" is to be expected by Trump followers.
Mentally inept
 
That 923 citizens attested means nothing if the purpose of their attesting is to overturn an election by giving false testimony. That is what we had here, so their "findings" were as bogus as it gets.
That people "swear" is to be expected by Trump followers.
Brainwashed. Those are what you call grassroot Americans,. They should all get the Presidential medal of Freedom
 

Finally: A Transparent Voting Process That Can't Be Corrupted, Hacked, or Cheated — Democrats Will Hate It​

22 Mar 2022 ~~ By Kevin Downey Jr.

The left loves absentee voting, so I say let’s give it to them. And let’s make it as easy as picking up a scratch-off lottery ticket from the local store. Hell, let them vote on their phones. What could go wrong?
Nothing. Welcome to Redo Voting, the world’s first and only transparent, unhackable, incorruptible, paper-based voting system. No wiggle room on chain of custody, no Zuckerbucks to buy influence, and no reason to stop counting votes at 10:30 p.m. when the Republican presidential candidate is pummelling whatshisface, you know, the thing.
From the Redo Voting website:
Redo Voting is a hybrid of existing secure document technology used by state lotteries, combined with government-level encryption. The result is a voting system that is paper-based, but uses a web browser for data entry. A great example of this is your state’s lottery program. 45 states currently have a state-wide lottery, and because of the massive amounts of money that pass through that system the security is the best available this side of military encryption. If that were “hackable,” billions would be stolen on a regular basis; but it does not happen. We use the same technology and processes.
You may not yet have heard about the brilliance of Redo Voting, but it’s the latest rage in Washington, D.C. Everyone is talking about it.
You’ve heard a lot about “chain of custody” problems in the 2020 election. With Redo Voting, chain of custody is no longer an issue. It is 100% guaranteed from the printer right through exhaustion of post-election excuses. You cast your vote on a secure .gov domain website, and no one but you touches your ballot.
It can be used to vote in person or from anywhere on the planet. Here is how that aspect works:
You get a scratch-off “ballot” (again, based on the same technology as a lottery scratch-off ticket) from any retail store, scratch it, and scan the QR code underneath with your phone (you can also enter the info into your home computer browser).
  • Your browser is then directed to a state.gov website.
  • Eligible registered voters cast their votes.
  • The vote is private, secure, and sent directly to a secure database. It cannot be altered or deleted.
When voting is closed, the secretary of State applies a decryption key to the repository and tallies the votes in seconds. She/he can give the key to anyone who wants to see the results (including voters). The tallies can’t be altered.
The public instantly knows how many votes each candidate received.
~Snip~
Redo Voting is a win-win-win-win system. It’s private, unhackable, will save the government millions of dollars, and people can vote from anywhere. If a politician rejects a voting system that is secure, private, allows voting from the moon, and saves money, we know they are up to something fishy.

Commentary:
Because of posting restrictions I am not able to post the complete article. I suggest that those interested in responding read the whole article at the link supplied.
Each State could adopt the voting system with no problem.
Although the Carter Commission concluded that balloting could not be secured under any conditions if there was no in-person voting only.
I’m inclined to agree.
The Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrat Commies and globalists would somehow game the system and drive the costs of challenging the system so it costs millions of dollars per vote to verify the vote.
The real proof of the validity of this methodology will be how loudly and insanely Democrats oppose the system.
The attacks upon democratic elections by Losers and their bum kissers fail, but they persist in their fanatical jihad against democracy.

In 2020, fifty states, those under both Republican and Democratic administrations, certified their votes, often after recounts, investigations, audits, and multiple court challenges. The imaginary fraudulent votes could not be found, not even by the most zealous. Fake claims of such a vast conspiracy with no suspects were exposed as


Screen Shot 2022-09-08 at 8.39.13 AM.png

"BULLSHIT!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top