I’ve shown that they did and were Intended to inflict economic harm to Russia. I’ve even shown you exactly how it happened and was intended to happen, directly from NATO.also, west wall.......if Putin controlled the White House, why did Putin enact sanctions against Russia?
Your conspiracy simply makes no sense.
I think you meant to say obummer, but regardless, you still havn't shown us how those sanctions harmed any of pootins biddies. Sanctions are supposed to DO something to your target. obummers sanctions were lip service only. Troops under obummer went out of their way to not interfere with anything that pootins troops were doing. Troops under the trump admin have KILLED hundreds of them.
You folks pay all sorts of attention to pretty words. Words that mean, and do nothing. I care about the actions that our presidents take, and obummer did nothing, and trumps admin have killed them. obummer refused to sell arms to the countries that russia is targeting for invasion, trump has allowed it. So, in every measure that we have, obummer did pootins bidding, and trump hasn't.
“Furthermore, the combined effect of these sanctions and of the fall in oil prices caused significant downward pressure on the value of the Rouble and increased capital flight.
At the same time, the sanctions on access to financing forced the Russian state to use part of its foreign exchange reserves to shore up the sanctioned entities.
These developments forced the hand of the Central Bank of Russia, which abruptly ceased to defend the value of the Rouble and hike interest rates in December 2014.”
Sanctions after Crimea: Have they worked?
Interest rate hikes, the ruble in free fall, flight of capital out of Russia, depletion of their foreign exchange reserves. And per your conspiracy......Putin did this to Russia.
Why? Why would PUtin enact crippling sanctions that knocked a full half a percent off their GDP......per year?
Your conspiracy makes no sense.
My conspiracy? Surely you jest. NATO at least acknowledged that it was the fall in oil prices that seems to have had the most impact. I find it interesting that they make the claim, but can't back it up with anything measurable. The financial industry on the other hand, has been very precise in measuring the economic impact of the lowered oil prices.
So, no measurable effect from the sanctions, but a very measurable effect from the drop in oil prices. Take a look at the oil companies still doing business in russia despite the sanctions. I wonder who they had to pay off?
Falling oil prices hurt Russia more than sanctions
"It is not surprising, therefore, that a country that relies heavily on oil and gas exports is struggling with the plunge in global prices. Around half of Russia’s budget revenue is linked to oil and gas exports, and low prices create havoc for the energy industry as well as the overall economy.
The key problem for the Russian oil industry, in addition to the low oil prices, is the lack of fresh capital and access to technology created by the sanctions regime. Although the oil and gas industry is a major target of Western sanctions, financial strains have been partially alleviated by reducing capital expenditure and rouble devaluation, which cut operating costs by around 30%. In addition, foreign energy companies, including ExxonMobil, Statoil, and BP, have continued to operate in Russia, despite the sanctions."
Falling oil prices hurt Russia more than sanctions | Global Risk Insights