Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In a ruling with national impact, a federal judge in Chicago on Friday blocked the Trump administration's rules requiring so-called sanctuary cities to cooperate with immigration agents in order to get a public safety grant.
U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber wrote in his 41-page ruling that the city has shown a "likelihood of success" in its arguments that U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions exceeded his authority in imposing new standards governing Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants across the country.
He also said Mayor Rahm Emanuel's administration has shown the city could suffer "irreparable harm" in its relationship with the immigrant community if it were to comply with the U.S. Department of Justice's new standards.
"Once such trust is lost, it cannot be repaired through an award of money damages, making it the type of harm that is especially hard to rectify" if he were to wait until the lawsuit is settled, Leinenweber wrote.
Read the constitution. This ruling ain't goin' no where.Hopefully the Supremes will shove this traitor judges ruling up his ass.
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
The federal govt isnt supposed to be giving grants to cities and states any damn way, geniusRead the constitution. This ruling ain't goin' no where.Hopefully the Supremes will shove this traitor judges ruling up his ass.
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
Unconstitutional. Donnie just doesn't know...I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
This doesn't force them to. It just means if you don't cooperate, we'll withold federal dollars.
Its unconstitutional to withhold funds for unconstitutional actions because of unconstitutional actions!!!Unconstitutional. Donnie just doesn't know...I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
This doesn't force them to. It just means if you don't cooperate, we'll withold federal dollars.
Unconstitutional. Donnie just doesn't know...I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
This doesn't force them to. It just means if you don't cooperate, we'll withold federal dollars.
I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
Unconstitutional. Donnie just doesn't know...I would guess the basis is that you can't make local jurisdictions responsible for enforcing federal laws.
This doesn't force them to. It just means if you don't cooperate, we'll withold federal dollars.
Everyone knows the feds are responsible for immigration.
When Arizona made an attempt to protect it's own borders, mother fucking cock sucking goddamn piece of shit liberals had a fit, and went to the Supremes who reaffirmed feds are responsible for borders.
Now that the feds are trying to enforce immigration laws, mother fucking goddamn cock sucking piece of shit liberals in cities won't cooperate, and instead put up any kind of legal road block they can to halt the deportation of illegals.
It doesn't matter what you try to do to enforce our immigration laws, drooling mother fucking cock sucking pieces of shit liberals will always get in the way.
American liberals do not velueve in borders or a country's rights of sovereignty.
Let's just do away with the border, border patrols and immigration laws. Just let everyone in and give all of them welfare. We'll change our name to The United Welfare States.
Read the constitution. This ruling ain't goin' no where.Hopefully the Supremes will shove this traitor judges ruling up his ass.
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction
That'd actually overturn historic rulings if it stuck...
The Fed's have withheld funding from states for many things. I'm on my way out so I don't have time to post links but I know they threatened to take funds from Alaska for not criminalizing marijuana. I think they've done it over seat-belts, drinking age, "intoxication" levels, and other reasons.
