Andrew2382
Gold Member
- Oct 1, 2008
- 3,994
- 551
- 153
first of all kitten...for being a computer geek, you should know where the fucking enter button is.
If you are going to try an type a novel and seem intelligent then paragraphs would be greatly appreciated
You are just dumb. Healthy foods are not made up of the same stuff mcdonalds is you idiot. Grilled chicken? Tuna? Turkey? Egg Whites? Sorry to break it to ya champ but these are the main things that healthy people eat. YOu are just showing everyone how fucking clueless you are. When you eat CORRECTLY, you have more energy when you eat like shit you have less. I mean i always see the 400 pounders doing jumping jacks cause they are bursting with energy.
you are wrong....the craving arguement is fucking flawed, just like your lifestyle.
If you are craving nuts, thats fine....Almonds aren't bad for you...the snickers fucking is!
Yes buy choclate syrup, the cheap kind.
HERSHEY'S Syrup - HERSHEY'S
Serving Size 2 tbsp. (39 g)
Amount Per Serving %DV *
Total Calories 100
Calories from Fat
Sodium 15 mg 1%
Total Carbohydrate 24 g 8%
Dietary Fiber 1 g 4%
Sugars 20 g
Protein less than 1 g 1%
Umm 2 table spoons has 24 carbs and 20 grams of sugar with almost no protien an dno fiber. Yes douse on that chocolate syrup!!!! I really hope no one on this board takes you seriously because you give advise for the worst shit in the world.
Did you really say that fat people are healthy just the way they are because of their weight height ratio? Are you realy this fucking dense or are you making a special effort today? Guess what....weight to height ratio isn't a fixed fucking number. Go to any doctor and ask them if someone 5'3 should weigh 245 pounds...
Yes, I know all about the MINOR benefits that chocolate gives...that is of course pure chocolate, so unless you are growing cocoa beans in your yard you are shit out of luck!
Is Chocolate a Health Food? | Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients | Find Articles at BNET
Positives
Chocolate is quite nutritious. Not only is it a good source of folic acid, [3] copper, [4] and magnesium, [5] but it is rich in antioxidant polyphenols, [6] including flavonoids. [7] The polyphenol content alone in a single 40 gram candy bar of dark chocolate is equivalent to 2 days' worth of fruits and vegetables. [8] In fact, cocoa powder is believed to surpass both green tea and garlic as a protective antioxidant food. [9]
Monomers of the flavonoid catechin in commercial dark chocolate are 4 times higher than those in black tea, and epidemiological studies suggest that tea, presumably because of these monomers, may have a protective effect against cardiovascular diseases, and possibly cancer. 7 This comparison is even more striking when the catechin oligomers are included, as they are abundant in chocolate, but are present in only minor amounts in tea. [10] These substances resemble the oligomeric proanthocyanidins found in Pycnogenol[R], a commercial antioxidant extract which has been studied extensively for its beneficial health effects. [11]
Chocolate's flavonoids are generally more powerful than vitamins in limiting the oxidation of cholesterol circulating in low-density, and very-low-density lipoproteins (LDL & VLDL cholesterol), [9] a process which has been found to be fundamental to the development of atherosclerosis. Indeed, when volunteers consumed cocoa in which the fat had been removed, the time it took for LDL to oxidize (lag time) was prolonged. [12] There is also evidence that cocoa has an aspirin-like effect on blood clotting. [13]
It has very nice positives...however there are hudnreds of other foods that do the same shit or better and don't have the following negatives to it!
Negatives
Chocolate is high in fat, the majority of which is saturated, and cocoa butter has been shown to raise serum cholesterol concentrations. [14] Thirty percent of the fatty acids in chocolate consist of stearic acid, a long-chain saturated fatty acid. A study of 80,000 women found that stearic acid increased the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) more than the other three long-chain saturates (lauric, myristic and palmitic acids). [15] The data also suggested, however, that moderate chocolate consumption is unlikely to have major adverse or beneficial effects on CHD risk. [16]
Rich in oxalates, chocolate may contribute to the development of kidney stones. [17] Its high content of methylxanthines (theobromine and caffeine) may foster the development of benign breast disease [18] and migraine headaches. [19] Chocolate ingestion relaxes the lower esophageal sphincter, [20] which may cause heartburn.
In addition, there have been numerous reports of hypersensitivity reactions to chocolate, resulting in headache, eczema, bronchial asthma and other illnesses. [21] However, some of these reactions can be attributed to its additives, such as soya lecithin, vanillin, and lactose.
Now am I saying to NEVER eat chocolate...not at all. I will have some rarely from time to time, its delicious. Though I am more of a vanilla man myself.
i am just trying to get to everyone else ont he board that everything you are spewing here is bullshit. Like I said, I used to be large and I lost weight in my early teens. I never hated skinny people fo rbeing in shape...you just sound like a fat person who hates the world and everyone in shape because they do something about it and you have no determination or will power to get there.
Yeah and also fat people were the first to be gutted and eaten by tribes because they supplied the most meat...wahts your fucking point. The fat caveman was also the first to be eaten by the sabertooth tiger cause he couldn't run away fast enough. Also, not all vikings were obese genius...Leif Erikson was far from a fat guy.
And like I said before, I am not talking about being a fucking body builder! Get the ring ding out of your mouth and try to soak that thought in for a second. You have provided no medical data to prove your claims, no sources...nothing!
Your logic fails and as I said before I hope to God no one on this board takes any of the lunacy you say seriously because you are prescribing bad nutrition.
Yes, Health issures do not come from being over weight??????? LMAO That is the most ridiuclous statement I have ever heard.....Keep typing really, I am enjoying all the messages from people telling me whata fucking loon you are on this thread
If you are going to try an type a novel and seem intelligent then paragraphs would be greatly appreciated
*smirks* Now to point out the circle you have talked yourself into by twisting and not really paying attention to most of what I say. McDonalds (and other fast food places) are not real food, we know this, and yet ... here's the kicker .. they are made of the same stuff all the "health" foods you have mentioned are. Funny how that works. I never said eat anything you want, what I did say is that the natural foods which have the tastes your body craves contain the nutrients your body needs at the time of the craving, the unnatural and processed foods sharing this flavor do not. By eating the "healthy" (ie unnatural) foods which share the flavor you are starving part of your body. When your bodies chemistry becomes that out of sync you will lose energy or develop serious health problems regardless of your weight.
You are just dumb. Healthy foods are not made up of the same stuff mcdonalds is you idiot. Grilled chicken? Tuna? Turkey? Egg Whites? Sorry to break it to ya champ but these are the main things that healthy people eat. YOu are just showing everyone how fucking clueless you are. When you eat CORRECTLY, you have more energy when you eat like shit you have less. I mean i always see the 400 pounders doing jumping jacks cause they are bursting with energy.
People have a predetermined weight height ratio, and as you already said, everyone's is different. Thus fat people are most often just the way they are at their healthiest. Do you really think it's natural to crave a Snickers bar? No, however the sweet, chocolatey taste with peanuts are a natural craving, sweet being the fruit, peanuts ... well any nuts will usually do but sometimes it has to be peanuts, and chocolate actually has major health benefits as they have recently published (and I even think the news reported this fact for once). The problem is that the Snickers bar is mostly unnatural and over processed products. So, what to do, buy some chocolate syrup (most of the cheap brands are more natural), strawberries (or some other fruit you like), and peanuts, then chow until you no longer crave it. After that you can pretty much eat anything (which will likely be only a small amount because of already being full).
you are wrong....the craving arguement is fucking flawed, just like your lifestyle.
If you are craving nuts, thats fine....Almonds aren't bad for you...the snickers fucking is!
Yes buy choclate syrup, the cheap kind.
HERSHEY'S Syrup - HERSHEY'S
Serving Size 2 tbsp. (39 g)
Amount Per Serving %DV *
Total Calories 100
Calories from Fat
Sodium 15 mg 1%
Total Carbohydrate 24 g 8%
Dietary Fiber 1 g 4%
Sugars 20 g
Protein less than 1 g 1%
Umm 2 table spoons has 24 carbs and 20 grams of sugar with almost no protien an dno fiber. Yes douse on that chocolate syrup!!!! I really hope no one on this board takes you seriously because you give advise for the worst shit in the world.
Did you really say that fat people are healthy just the way they are because of their weight height ratio? Are you realy this fucking dense or are you making a special effort today? Guess what....weight to height ratio isn't a fixed fucking number. Go to any doctor and ask them if someone 5'3 should weigh 245 pounds...
Yes, I know all about the MINOR benefits that chocolate gives...that is of course pure chocolate, so unless you are growing cocoa beans in your yard you are shit out of luck!
Is Chocolate a Health Food? | Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients | Find Articles at BNET
Positives
Chocolate is quite nutritious. Not only is it a good source of folic acid, [3] copper, [4] and magnesium, [5] but it is rich in antioxidant polyphenols, [6] including flavonoids. [7] The polyphenol content alone in a single 40 gram candy bar of dark chocolate is equivalent to 2 days' worth of fruits and vegetables. [8] In fact, cocoa powder is believed to surpass both green tea and garlic as a protective antioxidant food. [9]
Monomers of the flavonoid catechin in commercial dark chocolate are 4 times higher than those in black tea, and epidemiological studies suggest that tea, presumably because of these monomers, may have a protective effect against cardiovascular diseases, and possibly cancer. 7 This comparison is even more striking when the catechin oligomers are included, as they are abundant in chocolate, but are present in only minor amounts in tea. [10] These substances resemble the oligomeric proanthocyanidins found in Pycnogenol[R], a commercial antioxidant extract which has been studied extensively for its beneficial health effects. [11]
Chocolate's flavonoids are generally more powerful than vitamins in limiting the oxidation of cholesterol circulating in low-density, and very-low-density lipoproteins (LDL & VLDL cholesterol), [9] a process which has been found to be fundamental to the development of atherosclerosis. Indeed, when volunteers consumed cocoa in which the fat had been removed, the time it took for LDL to oxidize (lag time) was prolonged. [12] There is also evidence that cocoa has an aspirin-like effect on blood clotting. [13]
It has very nice positives...however there are hudnreds of other foods that do the same shit or better and don't have the following negatives to it!
Negatives
Chocolate is high in fat, the majority of which is saturated, and cocoa butter has been shown to raise serum cholesterol concentrations. [14] Thirty percent of the fatty acids in chocolate consist of stearic acid, a long-chain saturated fatty acid. A study of 80,000 women found that stearic acid increased the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) more than the other three long-chain saturates (lauric, myristic and palmitic acids). [15] The data also suggested, however, that moderate chocolate consumption is unlikely to have major adverse or beneficial effects on CHD risk. [16]
Rich in oxalates, chocolate may contribute to the development of kidney stones. [17] Its high content of methylxanthines (theobromine and caffeine) may foster the development of benign breast disease [18] and migraine headaches. [19] Chocolate ingestion relaxes the lower esophageal sphincter, [20] which may cause heartburn.
In addition, there have been numerous reports of hypersensitivity reactions to chocolate, resulting in headache, eczema, bronchial asthma and other illnesses. [21] However, some of these reactions can be attributed to its additives, such as soya lecithin, vanillin, and lactose.
Now am I saying to NEVER eat chocolate...not at all. I will have some rarely from time to time, its delicious. Though I am more of a vanilla man myself.
However, you completely took it into your own context simply because your self hatred is still strong in your own mind, so you project it onto fat people.
i am just trying to get to everyone else ont he board that everything you are spewing here is bullshit. Like I said, I used to be large and I lost weight in my early teens. I never hated skinny people fo rbeing in shape...you just sound like a fat person who hates the world and everyone in shape because they do something about it and you have no determination or will power to get there.
Historically, fat people have actually been the strongest, for many reasons, in cold climates for instance, a skinny person is more likely to get hypothermia, while someone well insulated could probably avoid it for a lot longer (thus why most vikings were pretty heavy and many Europeans of all walks). Fat people are also less likely to be harmed in a fall, though some less likely to be able to right themselves afterward quickly, but that's another issue.
Yeah and also fat people were the first to be gutted and eaten by tribes because they supplied the most meat...wahts your fucking point. The fat caveman was also the first to be eaten by the sabertooth tiger cause he couldn't run away fast enough. Also, not all vikings were obese genius...Leif Erikson was far from a fat guy.
There are benefits and risks with both sides of the spectrum, you do know most body builders have VERY weak bones, even the ones that remember to take their calcium suppliments, right? The health issues do not come from being over weight, they come from eating too much unnatural foods, no matter how "healthy" the companies say they are. Oh, but that requires logic to realize ...
And like I said before, I am not talking about being a fucking body builder! Get the ring ding out of your mouth and try to soak that thought in for a second. You have provided no medical data to prove your claims, no sources...nothing!
Your logic fails and as I said before I hope to God no one on this board takes any of the lunacy you say seriously because you are prescribing bad nutrition.
Yes, Health issures do not come from being over weight??????? LMAO That is the most ridiuclous statement I have ever heard.....Keep typing really, I am enjoying all the messages from people telling me whata fucking loon you are on this thread