Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Gay men = a cult of misogyny? 
It's just a curiosity really. Why homosexual males reject women, only to use their boyfriend as an artificial vagina. I've heard women complain aloud "he's so cute, but he's gay!" *sigh*... But this is a provocative topic and not one I've seen explored very much if at all. I like to delve deep into the subconscious where it is clearly manifesting in overt behaviors. This topic has vast political impact.
Men who reject women so utterly that they won't embrace their bodies are men who are disgusted by women in general...while they seek to emulate their fashion and gestures to "turn each other on"... think about it. That's a factual shut-out of the female as mattering AT ALL..
And I got to thinking about the gay-inspired sex ed class so famous now in Pine Valley California that caused the parents there to freak out.
All three pictures paint women out as disgusting, objectionable or even filthy. Quite a message to send frightened young virgin males in elementary school who already find it difficult to approach girls..This was a subliminal message of misogyny instruction. "Reject females for sex"...or "just reject females in general"..
Three pictures specifically were the most telling, as to the title of this thread. The first was a woman dominating a male by standing on his back (ostensibly to teach boys that women can still get pregnant if they are on top), teaching boys that "girls are dominating". The second was a group of young males being labelled as "douchebags" (ostensibly to teach boys that not using condoms makes you a douchebag). But the word "douchebag" conjures up images of filth coming from a woman's vagina. Pretty powerful stuff (a visceral deterrent) if you're a young virgin boy wondering what sex with girls is like. And the last, the most disgusting of all was an image for boys of a man with blood all over his face with the caption "real men love their women every day of the month". If the disgust for sex with females wasn't completed by that picture, it never would be.
And I've argued that those images were specifically introduced into the sex ed curriculum in a California school to completely nauseate young boys to the idea of relationships with women AT ALL.
Good old California...the testing ground for what's heading your way, readers.
So, are bleeding-heart (pardon the pun here) women complete fools for promoting and trusting the gay males who supposedly "share" their political value system? Or are women being duped by the most insidious of misogynistic cults into shoving themselves into complete obscurity outside wombs for rent for their gay male "friends"?...
I was also inspired to write this thread courtesy of a poster here who, being of far left "orientation" recently referred to Kim Davis (a woman) as a "pig woman" for standing up for her rights, which conflict with gay male wishes. Apparently woman suffrage only gains support from the far left male when it promotes his agenda, ultimately, of women not mattering at all. Gay men have even spoken in forums of what their vision of utopia is: a world without even the need for a female's womb, where little boys are created in artificial wombs.
It's just a curiosity really. Why homosexual males reject women, only to use their boyfriend as an artificial vagina. I've heard women complain aloud "he's so cute, but he's gay!" *sigh*... But this is a provocative topic and not one I've seen explored very much if at all. I like to delve deep into the subconscious where it is clearly manifesting in overt behaviors. This topic has vast political impact.
Men who reject women so utterly that they won't embrace their bodies are men who are disgusted by women in general...while they seek to emulate their fashion and gestures to "turn each other on"... think about it. That's a factual shut-out of the female as mattering AT ALL..
And I got to thinking about the gay-inspired sex ed class so famous now in Pine Valley California that caused the parents there to freak out.
All three pictures paint women out as disgusting, objectionable or even filthy. Quite a message to send frightened young virgin males in elementary school who already find it difficult to approach girls..This was a subliminal message of misogyny instruction. "Reject females for sex"...or "just reject females in general"..
Three pictures specifically were the most telling, as to the title of this thread. The first was a woman dominating a male by standing on his back (ostensibly to teach boys that women can still get pregnant if they are on top), teaching boys that "girls are dominating". The second was a group of young males being labelled as "douchebags" (ostensibly to teach boys that not using condoms makes you a douchebag). But the word "douchebag" conjures up images of filth coming from a woman's vagina. Pretty powerful stuff (a visceral deterrent) if you're a young virgin boy wondering what sex with girls is like. And the last, the most disgusting of all was an image for boys of a man with blood all over his face with the caption "real men love their women every day of the month". If the disgust for sex with females wasn't completed by that picture, it never would be.
And I've argued that those images were specifically introduced into the sex ed curriculum in a California school to completely nauseate young boys to the idea of relationships with women AT ALL.
Good old California...the testing ground for what's heading your way, readers.
So, are bleeding-heart (pardon the pun here) women complete fools for promoting and trusting the gay males who supposedly "share" their political value system? Or are women being duped by the most insidious of misogynistic cults into shoving themselves into complete obscurity outside wombs for rent for their gay male "friends"?...
I was also inspired to write this thread courtesy of a poster here who, being of far left "orientation" recently referred to Kim Davis (a woman) as a "pig woman" for standing up for her rights, which conflict with gay male wishes. Apparently woman suffrage only gains support from the far left male when it promotes his agenda, ultimately, of women not mattering at all. Gay men have even spoken in forums of what their vision of utopia is: a world without even the need for a female's womb, where little boys are created in artificial wombs.
Last edited:
...
...
...
...
...
