Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side

[bripat9643]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

 

[Norman]

Wow, it is almost like the ministry of truth is a far left organization, and a concept.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

​

Then you do the unthinkable.

 

[bripat9643]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

What "fact check test" is that?

Please show us this test and how the article fails.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

What "fact check test" is that?

Please show us this test and how the article fails.

Actually, it's all there in the cite. Fact check the cite yourself. Try and not take your Handlers word for it. He's lying and expecting you to not notice. He's got you read pretty well so far. Fact check it yourself at factcheck.org.

 

[bripat9643]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

What "fact check test" is that?

Please show us this test and how the article fails.

Actually, it's all there in the cite. Fact check the cite yourself. Try and not take your Handlers word for it. He's lying and expecting you to not notice. He's got you read pretty well so far. Fact check it yourself at factcheck.org.

In other words, you can't explain what the "fact check test" is. In fact, there is no such test. Being a left-winger seems to be the jist of it.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

What "fact check test" is that?

Please show us this test and how the article fails.

Actually, it's all there in the cite. Fact check the cite yourself. Try and not take your Handlers word for it. He's lying and expecting you to not notice. He's got you read pretty well so far. Fact check it yourself at factcheck.org.

In other words, you can't explain what the "fact check test" is. In fact, there is no such test. Being a left-winger seems to be the jist of it.

I fact check every hair brained thing you bring up. (IAW, I do a LOT of fact checking). You should try that with what I bring up. In fact, you should try that on information BEFORE you bring it up. It's fairly easy. Go to Factcheck.org and look it up. Or you can go to mediabias.org. The fact that your bunch fails those fact checks on a regular basis is no surprise considering your Orange Deity can't go 3 sentences without failing a fact check and you quote him on a regular basis.

Factcheck is checking if your facts are correct and true. Your own cite failed.

 

[Auld Phart]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail.

Makes ya wonder why Schiff and Nadler comments weren't on the list, don't it?

 

[rightwinger]

Damn fact checkers only look at the side of real facts

 

[Nostra]

The so called “ fact checkers” have been exposed as left wing for years. This is nothing new.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail.

Makes ya wonder why Schiff and Nadler comments weren't on the list, don't it?

I just fact check your statement. You failed the fact check.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Damn fact checkers only look at the side of real facts

How Dare they. Facts are Liars when they disagree with a lie.

 

[Mac1958]

Wingers always look at just one side, and usually purposely distort the other.

That's part of what make them wingers. I wish they'd find another fucking hobby.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Wingers always look at just one side, and usually purposely distort the other.

That's part of what make them wingers. I wish they'd find another fucking hobby.

But it sure is fun fact checking them. It's a hobby of mine.

 

[OldLady]

The so called “ fact checkers” have been exposed as left wing for years. This is nothing new.

Facts are not "so called," they are true and backed up by clear evidence. Facts are not "left wing." It's just that the right wing no longer listens to facts.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I didn't think it was possible for leftists to be any more uninformed then along came the interwebs.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The so called “ fact checkers” have been exposed as left wing for years. This is nothing new.

Facts are not "so called," they are true and backed up by clear evidence. Facts are not "left wing." It's just that the right wing no longer listens to facts.

In all fairness (Yes, you rightwingnutjobs, I do this once in awhile), I have called the leftwingnutjobs on theirs as well. It's just that it's not quite a full time job for the leftwingnutjobs like it is for the rightwingnutjobs.

Another person said that both extremists do it. He's right. But right now, the rightwingnutjobs are leading the field in things that fail fact checks. I do long for the days when it was about even.

 

[Mac1958]

Wingers always look at just one side, and usually purposely distort the other.

That's part of what make them wingers. I wish they'd find another fucking hobby.

But it sure is fun fact checking them. It's a hobby of mine.

Yeah. Lots of low-hanging fruit, I'll bet!
.

 

[Theowl32]

Here's an article for all you TDS morons who believe fact check sites are honest, unbiased and not fake news.

Fact-Checkers Only Looking At One Side​

WASHINGTON -- Google "fact-check Senate impeachment" and you can read about all the factual errors made by President Donald Trump's team of lawyers. What about those of the House impeachment managers? Apparently, this week, head prosecutor Adam Schiff and his colleagues cannot tell a lie. Or even a half-truth.

Factcheck.org rattles off the White House's sins. White House counsel Pat Cipollone wrongly suggested that Republicans were barred from closed-door depositions conducted by the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow falsely said that the Trump team was denied "the right to have counsel present at hearings" -- when the Trump lawyers declined to participate.

Cipollone said Schiff "manufactured a false version" of the July 25 phone call during which Trump suggested that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dig up dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's well-paid work for a Ukrainian energy company. Wrong, say the arbiters of actuality, because Schiff described his version of the call as "the essence" of Trump's remarks and later said it was "at least part in parody."

"In 2016, then-candidate Trump implored Russia to hack his opponent's email account, something that the Russian military agency did only hours later -- only hours later," Schiff told the Senate Wednesday. "When the president said, 'Hey, Russia, if you're listening,' they were listening. Only hours later, they hacked his opponent's campaign."

I found no mention by the big fact-crunchers on what was obvious at the time -- Trump was joking.

But the fact-checkers don't seem to care. ​

When I fact check your fact check document guess what. it fails the fact check tests. The problem is, when you use a bunch of lies to try and prove the other side is lying then you fail. And you get a big time award.

View attachment 302619
​

Then you do the unthinkable.

View attachment 302618​

What "fact check test" is that?

Please show us this test and how the article fails.

Actually, it's all there in the cite. Fact check the cite yourself. Try and not take your Handlers word for it. He's lying and expecting you to not notice. He's got you read pretty well so far. Fact check it yourself at factcheck.org.

In other words, you can't explain what the "fact check test" is. In fact, there is no such test. Being a left-winger seems to be the jist of it.

I fact check every hair brained thing you bring up. (IAW, I do a LOT of fact checking). You should try that with what I bring up. In fact, you should try that on information BEFORE you bring it up. It's fairly easy. Go to Factcheck.org and look it up. Or you can go to mediabias.org. The fact that your bunch fails those fact checks on a regular basis is no surprise considering your Orange Deity can't go 3 sentences without failing a fact check and you quote him on a regular basis.

Factcheck is checking if your facts are correct and true. Your own cite failed.

You lose

Again

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Wingers always look at just one side, and usually purposely distort the other.

That's part of what make them wingers. I wish they'd find another fucking hobby.

But it sure is fun fact checking them. It's a hobby of mine.

Yeah. Lots of low-hanging fruit, I'll bet!
.

On both sides of the coin. Always has been. But sometimes I feel like the dinasaur under the sink in the Flintstones, "It's a living".