Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is confusing because the Egypt/Palestine border goes through Rafah.Arabs don't have to serve in the IDF - however service in the IDF is leads to greater promotions and career choices. Not serving limits.
Your opinion sounds pretty half baked as well.
How many Jewish homes are bulldozed?
How many Arab homes?
How many permits are granted for Jewish projects?
How many permits are granted for Arab projects?
How many new Jewish settlements have been approved? Can Arabs live in them? How many new Arab settlements have been approved?
How does the amount of money given to Jewish schools compare with Arab schools?
Why do illegal Arab settlements get bull dozed while most illegal Jewish settlements get infrastructure?
Why are Arabs being pushed out of Jeruselum through a complicated system of denied "residency" permits and absentee confiscations?
half of those with infractions have charges filed against them and less than 10% are bulldozed.
the number has raised gradually over the years.
Egypt has also bulldozed homes in the sinai.
more than 14,000 settler homes in the WB have been bulldozed
Egypt is bulldozing homes for to create a buffer - not part of an ongoing thing.
Do you have sources to support your claim of less than 10% and more than 14,000?
WRONG ....................Egypt is bulldozing homes under the same clause of the Geneva conventions that Israel is. That of Military necessity and it is an ongoing thing. Remember Rachel Corrie who was protesting against Egypt bulldzoing tunnels in gaza and committed suicide, still bulldozing the same areas today.
Rachel Corrie wasn't protesting against the Egyptians. The best way to do public relations for Israel is to get all of our facts straight.
She was protesting in Rafah which is the Egyptian side of gaza. The Egyptian army are bulldozing homes and collapsing tunnels the same as Israel . My point is that none of the islamonazi's are making any noises about what Egypt are doing.
It is confusing because the Egypt/Palestine border goes through Rafah.half of those with infractions have charges filed against them and less than 10% are bulldozed.
the number has raised gradually over the years.
Egypt has also bulldozed homes in the sinai.
more than 14,000 settler homes in the WB have been bulldozed
Egypt is bulldozing homes for to create a buffer - not part of an ongoing thing.
Do you have sources to support your claim of less than 10% and more than 14,000?
WRONG ....................Egypt is bulldozing homes under the same clause of the Geneva conventions that Israel is. That of Military necessity and it is an ongoing thing. Remember Rachel Corrie who was protesting against Egypt bulldzoing tunnels in gaza and committed suicide, still bulldozing the same areas today.
Rachel Corrie wasn't protesting against the Egyptians. The best way to do public relations for Israel is to get all of our facts straight.
She was protesting in Rafah which is the Egyptian side of gaza. The Egyptian army are bulldozing homes and collapsing tunnels the same as Israel . My point is that none of the islamonazi's are making any noises about what Egypt are doing.
Israel wanted a buffer zone so it bulldozed whole neighborhoods on the Palestinian side. Egypt is bulldozing on the Egyptian side.
It is an asshole thing to do either way.
It is confusing because the Egypt/Palestine border goes through Rafah.Egypt is bulldozing homes for to create a buffer - not part of an ongoing thing.
Do you have sources to support your claim of less than 10% and more than 14,000?
WRONG ....................Egypt is bulldozing homes under the same clause of the Geneva conventions that Israel is. That of Military necessity and it is an ongoing thing. Remember Rachel Corrie who was protesting against Egypt bulldzoing tunnels in gaza and committed suicide, still bulldozing the same areas today.
Rachel Corrie wasn't protesting against the Egyptians. The best way to do public relations for Israel is to get all of our facts straight.
She was protesting in Rafah which is the Egyptian side of gaza. The Egyptian army are bulldozing homes and collapsing tunnels the same as Israel . My point is that none of the islamonazi's are making any noises about what Egypt are doing.
Israel wanted a buffer zone so it bulldozed whole neighborhoods on the Palestinian side. Egypt is bulldozing on the Egyptian side.
It is an asshole thing to do either way.
It wasn't very smart of her to play "Chicken" with a bulldozer.
That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.There are some facts that we need to remember.Phoenall, toastman, Tinmore, et al,
We go through this periodically.
(REFERENCE)Can you quote where it says that?
The boundaries are described as follows:-- INTRODUCTORY Position
Palestine lies on the western edge of the continent of Asia between Latitude 30º N. and 33º N., Longitude 34º 30’ E. and 35º 30’ E.
On the North it is bounded by the French Mandated Territories of Syria and Lebanon, on the East by Syria and Trans-Jordan, on the South-west by the Egyptian province of Sinai, on the South-east by the Gulf of Aqaba and on the West by the Mediterranean. The frontier with Syria was laid down by the Anglo-French Convention of the 23rd December, 1920, and its delimitation was ratified in 1923. Briefly stated, the boundaries are as follows:
North.—From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.
East.—From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.
South.—From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.
West.—The Mediterranean Sea.
(COMMENT)
The "administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, was based on the Sykes-Picot Treaty and the Franco-British Boundary Agreement of 1920 (AKA: Paulet–Newcombe Agreement named after the two Military Officers that lead the Survey Team). The boundary between the Mandates of Palestine and Mesopotamia were authored by LTC Newcombe British Surveyor in agreement with the French. The Mandate of Syria and the Lebanon, were authored by LTC Paulet, French Surveyor in agreement with the British. These Survey results were finally established and agreed upon on 7 March 1923; shortly before the British and French took-up Mandatory responsibilities on 29 September 1923.
There was no political subdivision called Palestine prior to the establishment of the territory under which the Mandate for Palestine was applied. What "P F Tinmore" is using and referring to are the boundaries established in the Paulet–Newcombe Agreement of 1923 for the Mandate was named after. It is also why the All Palestine Government (as an example) used the phrase: ""PALESTINE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AS ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE TERMINATION OF THE BRITISH MANDATE."" It is because the Arab Palestinian had no other means to identify the territory other than in relationship to --- and by the name the Allied Powers assigned the Mandate.
Most Respectfully,
R
The Mandates never annexed or otherwise gained possession of the mandated territories. They had no land or borders of their own.
The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
"The people" were defined by international law and reiterated by the Treaty of Lausanne. In the defined territory of Palestine that would be the Palestinians. "The People" have the inherent, inalienable right to self determination, independence and sovereignty, and territorial integrity.
The mandates had procedures, goals, and end times specified in the LoN Covenant.
Link from the LoN itself saying this
Try again using the correct terms as in the mandated powers and not the actual mandate
No Palestine before the Mandate so the people where Jews, Christians and muslims. Each granted the same rights to declare independence on their own section of land. A pity the arab muslims chose the wrong route to self determination
LINK from the LoN saying that the mandates had an end time, show the date of the end time ?The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
Several authorities, basing their views on the wording of Article 22 of the Covenant, and stressing that the League was founded on the principle of non-annexation of territories and that the mandates prohibited the alienation of territory (article 5 of the Palestine Mandate), have ruled that sovereignty rested with the people of a Mandated Territory, albeit in suspense since they could not exercise it.
To all intents and purposes, these Territories belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities, which the League has set out to defend and on whose behalf it acts as a kind of family council". - See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978
So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Particularly when there is a single digit IQ asshole driving it.It is confusing because the Egypt/Palestine border goes through Rafah.Egypt is bulldozing homes for to create a buffer - not part of an ongoing thing.
Do you have sources to support your claim of less than 10% and more than 14,000?
WRONG ....................Egypt is bulldozing homes under the same clause of the Geneva conventions that Israel is. That of Military necessity and it is an ongoing thing. Remember Rachel Corrie who was protesting against Egypt bulldzoing tunnels in gaza and committed suicide, still bulldozing the same areas today.
Rachel Corrie wasn't protesting against the Egyptians. The best way to do public relations for Israel is to get all of our facts straight.
She was protesting in Rafah which is the Egyptian side of gaza. The Egyptian army are bulldozing homes and collapsing tunnels the same as Israel . My point is that none of the islamonazi's are making any noises about what Egypt are doing.
Israel wanted a buffer zone so it bulldozed whole neighborhoods on the Palestinian side. Egypt is bulldozing on the Egyptian side.
It is an asshole thing to do either way.
It wasn't very smart of her to play "Chicken" with a bulldozer.
It is confusing because the Egypt/Palestine border goes through Rafah.WRONG ....................Egypt is bulldozing homes under the same clause of the Geneva conventions that Israel is. That of Military necessity and it is an ongoing thing. Remember Rachel Corrie who was protesting against Egypt bulldzoing tunnels in gaza and committed suicide, still bulldozing the same areas today.
Rachel Corrie wasn't protesting against the Egyptians. The best way to do public relations for Israel is to get all of our facts straight.
She was protesting in Rafah which is the Egyptian side of gaza. The Egyptian army are bulldozing homes and collapsing tunnels the same as Israel . My point is that none of the islamonazi's are making any noises about what Egypt are doing.
Israel wanted a buffer zone so it bulldozed whole neighborhoods on the Palestinian side. Egypt is bulldozing on the Egyptian side.
It is an asshole thing to do either way.
It wasn't very smart of her to play "Chicken" with a bulldozer.
That's the Israel firster coming out. Had it been an American protesting in Egypt during the Arab Spring that was killed by the Egyptian security forces in the same way, no American would side with the Egyptians.
That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.There are some facts that we need to remember.Phoenall, toastman, Tinmore, et al,
We go through this periodically.
(REFERENCE)
The boundaries are described as follows:-- INTRODUCTORY Position
Palestine lies on the western edge of the continent of Asia between Latitude 30º N. and 33º N., Longitude 34º 30’ E. and 35º 30’ E.
On the North it is bounded by the French Mandated Territories of Syria and Lebanon, on the East by Syria and Trans-Jordan, on the South-west by the Egyptian province of Sinai, on the South-east by the Gulf of Aqaba and on the West by the Mediterranean. The frontier with Syria was laid down by the Anglo-French Convention of the 23rd December, 1920, and its delimitation was ratified in 1923. Briefly stated, the boundaries are as follows:
North.—From Ras en Naqura on the Mediterranean eastwards to a point west of Qadas, thence in a northerly direction to Metulla, thence east to a point west of Banias.
East.—From Banias in a southerly direction east of Lake Hula to Jisr Banat Ya’pub, thence along a line east of the Jordan and the Lake of Tiberias and on to El Hamme station on the Samakh-Deraa railway line, thence along the centre of the river Yarmuq to its confluence with the Jordan, thence along the centres of the Jordan, the Dead Sea and the Wadi Araba to a point on the Gulf of Aqaba two miles west of the town of Aqaba, thence along the shore of the Gulf of Aqaba to Ras Jaba.
South.—From Ras Jaba in a generally north-westerly direction to the junction of the Neki-Aqaba and Gaza-Aqaba Roads, thence to a point west-north-west of Ain Maghara and thence to a point on the Mediterranean coast north-west of Rafa.
West.—The Mediterranean Sea.
(COMMENT)
The "administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, was based on the Sykes-Picot Treaty and the Franco-British Boundary Agreement of 1920 (AKA: Paulet–Newcombe Agreement named after the two Military Officers that lead the Survey Team). The boundary between the Mandates of Palestine and Mesopotamia were authored by LTC Newcombe British Surveyor in agreement with the French. The Mandate of Syria and the Lebanon, were authored by LTC Paulet, French Surveyor in agreement with the British. These Survey results were finally established and agreed upon on 7 March 1923; shortly before the British and French took-up Mandatory responsibilities on 29 September 1923.
There was no political subdivision called Palestine prior to the establishment of the territory under which the Mandate for Palestine was applied. What "P F Tinmore" is using and referring to are the boundaries established in the Paulet–Newcombe Agreement of 1923 for the Mandate was named after. It is also why the All Palestine Government (as an example) used the phrase: ""PALESTINE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AS ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE TERMINATION OF THE BRITISH MANDATE."" It is because the Arab Palestinian had no other means to identify the territory other than in relationship to --- and by the name the Allied Powers assigned the Mandate.
Most Respectfully,
R
The Mandates never annexed or otherwise gained possession of the mandated territories. They had no land or borders of their own.
The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
"The people" were defined by international law and reiterated by the Treaty of Lausanne. In the defined territory of Palestine that would be the Palestinians. "The People" have the inherent, inalienable right to self determination, independence and sovereignty, and territorial integrity.
The mandates had procedures, goals, and end times specified in the LoN Covenant.
Link from the LoN itself saying this
Try again using the correct terms as in the mandated powers and not the actual mandate
No Palestine before the Mandate so the people where Jews, Christians and muslims. Each granted the same rights to declare independence on their own section of land. A pity the arab muslims chose the wrong route to self determination
LINK from the LoN saying that the mandates had an end time, show the date of the end time ?The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
Several authorities, basing their views on the wording of Article 22 of the Covenant, and stressing that the League was founded on the principle of non-annexation of territories and that the mandates prohibited the alienation of territory (article 5 of the Palestine Mandate), have ruled that sovereignty rested with the people of a Mandated Territory, albeit in suspense since they could not exercise it.
To all intents and purposes, these Territories belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities, which the League has set out to defend and on whose behalf it acts as a kind of family council". - See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978
So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.There are some facts that we need to remember.
The Mandates never annexed or otherwise gained possession of the mandated territories. They had no land or borders of their own.
The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
"The people" were defined by international law and reiterated by the Treaty of Lausanne. In the defined territory of Palestine that would be the Palestinians. "The People" have the inherent, inalienable right to self determination, independence and sovereignty, and territorial integrity.
The mandates had procedures, goals, and end times specified in the LoN Covenant.
Link from the LoN itself saying this
Try again using the correct terms as in the mandated powers and not the actual mandate
No Palestine before the Mandate so the people where Jews, Christians and muslims. Each granted the same rights to declare independence on their own section of land. A pity the arab muslims chose the wrong route to self determination
LINK from the LoN saying that the mandates had an end time, show the date of the end time ?The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
Several authorities, basing their views on the wording of Article 22 of the Covenant, and stressing that the League was founded on the principle of non-annexation of territories and that the mandates prohibited the alienation of territory (article 5 of the Palestine Mandate), have ruled that sovereignty rested with the people of a Mandated Territory, albeit in suspense since they could not exercise it.
To all intents and purposes, these Territories belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities, which the League has set out to defend and on whose behalf it acts as a kind of family council". - See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978
So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.Link from the LoN itself saying this
Try again using the correct terms as in the mandated powers and not the actual mandate
No Palestine before the Mandate so the people where Jews, Christians and muslims. Each granted the same rights to declare independence on their own section of land. A pity the arab muslims chose the wrong route to self determination
LINK from the LoN saying that the mandates had an end time, show the date of the end time ?The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
Several authorities, basing their views on the wording of Article 22 of the Covenant, and stressing that the League was founded on the principle of non-annexation of territories and that the mandates prohibited the alienation of territory (article 5 of the Palestine Mandate), have ruled that sovereignty rested with the people of a Mandated Territory, albeit in suspense since they could not exercise it.
To all intents and purposes, these Territories belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities, which the League has set out to defend and on whose behalf it acts as a kind of family council". - See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978
So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.The Mandates were temporally assigned to hold defined territories in trust on behalf of the people.
Several authorities, basing their views on the wording of Article 22 of the Covenant, and stressing that the League was founded on the principle of non-annexation of territories and that the mandates prohibited the alienation of territory (article 5 of the Palestine Mandate), have ruled that sovereignty rested with the people of a Mandated Territory, albeit in suspense since they could not exercise it.
To all intents and purposes, these Territories belong to the indigenous inhabitants and communities, which the League has set out to defend and on whose behalf it acts as a kind of family council". - See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978
So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.So where is the date of the end of the mandatory power, seeing as the mandate for Palestine is still in existence until Palestine becomes a full nation
Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.That is true. Britain was to assist the Palestinians until they could stand alone. They didn't do that. They fucked thing up so bad that they just threw up their hands and left.
Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.Then why didn't they declare independence under 181 in 1948 instead of wasting 40 years
Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Resolution 181 was a non binding recommendation. It didn't mean shit.
Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
Post a link that explains the definition of 'Jewish National Home'
You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
Post a link that explains the definition of 'Jewish National Home'
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate
The Jewish immigrants were to become Palestinians. As Palestinians they could live anywhere in Palestine and enjoy the other fruits of citizenship.
Don't ask me. I didn't write the Mandate.You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
Post a link that explains the definition of 'Jewish National Home'
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project The Palestine Mandate
The Jewish immigrants were to become Palestinians. As Palestinians they could live anywhere in Palestine and enjoy the other fruits of citizenship.
Where does it say anything there about a Jewish National Home?
The problem is that there was no definition for the term. Look at ther term again. Jewish NATIONal Home. See the word nation? How is living as Palestinians in 'Palestine' a Jewish national home ?
You are confused by the meaning of Jewish National Home.Do you have a 1923 international law that mentions Israel?Indeed, both of those losers are using it to pretend to have legitimacy.Not even today when the Palestinians are using it.
remember that the LoN mandate was used by Israel to declare independence in 1948, and that the Palestinians tried to trump that by using 181 and failing because they did not read the terms through. The Palestinians after 67 years still cant show they can stand on their own feet. Guess you support the losers
No pretence in the case of Israel as they have International law supporting their right to exist and have legitimacy. Unless you can find another international law that trumps the one enacted in 1923.
Yes under the term Jewish National Home, just as the same 1923 international law mentions Jordan as trans Jordan.
You can obfuscate all you want it wont make any difference to the facts that the Jews where granted the land for their national home. The name Israel was a later construct coined in 1948, just as Jordan was a later construct so does this make it an illegal state as you claim for Israel ?
