rayboyusmc
Senior Member
Sure thing retard.
My word, how do you refute such logic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sure thing retard.
My word, how do you refute such logic.
Wonder why Mccellan didn't take his own advise?
Challenging motivation
McClellan pointed to the timing of Clarke's book.
"If Dick Clarke had such grave concerns, why wait so long? Why wait until the election?" Instead, McClellan said, Clarke "conveniently" released a book in the middle of the campaign season.
CNN.com - Bush administration rejects Clarke charges - Mar 23, 2004
Still no one has addressed the Clarke book and Mcclellan comments.
McClellan would probably tell you that he was told to say that though....
I never thought McClellan was credible. Had he any conviction at all, he should have resigned when he knew all of this was going on.So do you think Mcclellan is credible? If so which time, when he was defending the President or now when he claims that he was lying and propagating for the President?
I never thought McClellan was credible. Had he any conviction at all, he should have resigned when he knew all of this was going on.
Nope, that is your fantasy about me.But you now trust him, when he says he was lying and propagating the whole time.
Nope, that is your fantasy about me.
The ability to read minds is no longer available in Bud Light.
The word Propaganda does not mean to lie. It has taken on that context but that is NOT its meaning.
Propaganda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Every Politician, every Government uses Propaganda and I do not mean in the negative sense.
As Larkinn likes to say, words have meanings.
Wikipdedia: "Propaganda is a concerted set of messages aimed at influencing the opinions or behaviors of large numbers of people. As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense presents information in order to influence its audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the cognitive narrative of the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda."
The wiki link:
We shouldn't have been propagandized, misled, or lied (by ommission) into war. War should be fought for self defense, and the reason for going to war should be self evident. We shouldn't have to be propagandized into a war. That's just wrong. I don't care if you point back to history to other immoral wars, like Vietnam. Pointing to the bad behaviour of others, is child like behaviour unworthy of further debate.
You were told 5 years ago that Bush was exaggerating, misleading, and misrepresenting the nature and scope of the threat from Iraq. And you and other Bush voters denied it, and called those of us who pointed it out "traitors". Now, you're admitting that Bush exaggerated and misled us on the threat from iraq.
The wiki link:
We shouldn't have been propagandized, misled, or lied (by ommission) into war. War should be fought for self defense, and the reason for going to war should be self evident. We shouldn't have to be propagandized into a war. That's just wrong. I don't care if you point back to history to other immoral wars, like Vietnam. Pointing to the bad behaviour of others, is child like behaviour unworthy of further debate.
You were told 5 years ago that Bush was exaggerating, misleading, and misrepresenting the nature and scope of the threat from Iraq. And you and other Bush voters denied it, and called those of us who pointed it out "traitors". Now, you're admitting that Bush exaggerated and misled us on the threat from iraq.
The true beliver always believes even in the face of all evidence to the contrary.
CONGNITIVE DISSONANCE