Ew! A new low for the First Lady

I wish ;) The conservatives we're talking to are stuck in the 18th century. :eek:



The 1950's were better then many areas over today.

-One parent could work and sustain a large family

-Children worked hard and grew up to be successful. Can't say that about a lot of children today as they watch lady gaga! This is good for America's future!

-The parents as a percentage cared more for their children.

-The lower and upper classes were more fair

-America's ability to innovate was far higher! Rockets, medical science, etc...No one would ever question rather it is good or not as they're today.

-America was respected



And that is when Progressivism really took over!



My how we have fallen.


You mean When Eisenhower was President? When the rich were taxed more, and republicans didn't mind social security and labor laws.
Weren't Unions big then too?

A more accurate statement would have been, when capitalism took over. In the 50s we had capitalism but it didn't rule our lives. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

how about that....we CAN live well with capitalism....:thup:

capitalism per se is not ruling our lives today either......Obama and his socialism and corporatism is.....think we could get rid of those three and bring the economy back....?
 
Last edited:
I wish ;) The conservatives we're talking to are stuck in the 18th century. :eek:



The 1950's were better then many areas over today.

-One parent could work and sustain a large family

-Children worked hard and grew up to be successful. Can't say that about a lot of children today as they watch lady gaga! This is good for America's future!

-The parents as a percentage cared more for their children.

-The lower and upper classes were more fair

-America's ability to innovate was far higher! Rockets, medical science, etc...No one would ever question rather it is good or not as they're today.

-America was respected



And that is when Progressivism really took over!



My how we have fallen.


You mean When Eisenhower was President? When the rich were taxed more, and republicans didn't mind social security and labor laws.
Weren't Unions big then too?

A more accurate statement would have been, when capitalism took over. In the 50s we had capitalism but it didn't rule our lives. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

No, the "free love" generation, early 60's, the beginning of the downfall. they were the children of "Ozzie and Harriet" generation and the beginning of the end, the Progressives who ruined it all.
 
And that is when Progressivism really took over!







My how we have fallen.





You mean When Eisenhower was President? When the rich were taxed more, and republicans didn't mind social security and labor laws.

Weren't Unions big then too?



A more accurate statement would have been, when capitalism took over. In the 50s we had capitalism but it didn't rule our lives. ;)





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.



No, the "free love" generation, early 60's, the beginning of the downfall. they were the children of "Ozzie and Harriet" generation and the beginning of the end, the Progressives who ruined it all.


Sure.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
 
And that is when Progressivism really took over!







My how we have fallen.





You mean When Eisenhower was President? When the rich were taxed more, and republicans didn't mind social security and labor laws.

Weren't Unions big then too?



A more accurate statement would have been, when capitalism took over. In the 50s we had capitalism but it didn't rule our lives. ;)





Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.



how about that....we CAN live well with capitalism....:thup:



capitalism per se is not ruling our lives today either......Obama and his socialism and corporatism is.....think we could get rid of those three and bring the economy back....?


I don't want to get rid of Capitalism, I love shopping and my smart phone. The problem is people spend more than they have. One parent could afford not to work because they didn't need a huge SUV, and all the latest and greatest.
I have a friend who is LDS, so very family driven, and she doesn't work so she can raise the children and her husband isn't making the big bucks. They live modestly and within their means, and they are probably the happiest couple I know.



Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
 
What happened to us.
Are we raising a nation of weaklings?
Kids and I use that term loosely aged 26 can't get jobs? need to live at home and be cared for by the
parents and government.Can't be trusted to use a knife in fear tha they will cut themselves.
They need to be like pajama boy sitting on the couch all safe and sound.
Needing mommy to provide the hot cocoa in a little sippy cup!

Outragous.
 

Forum List

Back
Top