Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and no proof at all.No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....so it takes 2 years to prove shit in plain site?‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”
~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
There has been no obstruction of justice.I note in the article Schiff talks about different definitions.
Since he is aware that collusion has a legal definition why the need to move the goal posts instead of relying on the legal standard?
It's a rhetorical question.
Schiff might be the member of Congress with the greatest amount of his political reputation riding on this investigation. When it flops, so does his career in the ash heap of history.
Schiff is a highly capable and experience prosecutor who knows what evidenciary standards are. Schiff railed at Devon Nunez' sham of an investigation wherein Nunez refused to subpeona Manafort, Flynn, and other members of the President's campaign who were known to have met with Russians. Committee members knew that Junior and Cohen were lying, but Nunez refused to refer this matter to the FBI, and allowed other witnesses to refuse to answer questions and to claim "executive privelege", which only the President is legally allowed to claim.
Nunez may yet face prosecution for his role in the President's obstruction of justice in the Mueller probe.
Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....so it takes 2 years to prove shit in plain site?‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”
~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
and no proof at all.No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....so it takes 2 years to prove shit in plain site?‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”
~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
still.
just hyper-speculation.
prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....so it takes 2 years to prove shit in plain site?
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
ever hear me cite that shit?and no proof at all.No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....so it takes 2 years to prove shit in plain site?
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
still.
just hyper-speculation.
Sort of like you guys and your birther offensive.
Even after it was proven to be lies…you still believe it.
prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
ever hear me cite that shit?and no proof at all.No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
still.
just hyper-speculation.
Sort of like you guys and your birther offensive.
Even after it was proven to be lies…you still believe it.
no.
misfire. again.
podesta was phished n gave up passwords.prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
Ahh…the old “prove it was hacked” bullshit.
Yep…Podesta and the DNC officials just released his own embarrasing e-mails.
Perhaps Trump’s intel team could clue you in—they say it was hacked…. Oh yeah, you don’t trust them either.
you like to rape stuffed trump dolls n scream MAGAMAN I LOVE YOU.ever hear me cite that shit?and no proof at all.No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
still.
just hyper-speculation.
Sort of like you guys and your birther offensive.
Even after it was proven to be lies…you still believe it.
no.
misfire. again.
Dunno. Prove you didn’t .
Mueller indicted the 13 GRU agents FOR that hack stupid.prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.collusion occurred, over and over and over again by the Trump Campaign and the Russians.... over 100 contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians... Stone working with the GRU and wikileaks to distribute the stolen emails, Manafort giving the Russians Trump campaign, secret, campaign polling data, Manafort request for ''getting whole'' with the Oligarch he owed money to by being campaign manager, Manafort changing the Republican platform in favor of Russia vs Ukraine, Trump tower meeting to get dirt on Hillary from the Russian gvt as their help and support of Trump, Trump asking in public, for Russia to find/steal, and distribute Hillary's 30,000 PRIVATE emails her staff deleted, the NRA connection, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc....
COLLUSION OCCURRED.
What would make it a Conspiracy, which is against the law, is if there was a quid pro quo between the Trump campaign and the Russians...
ie.
You help the Trump campaign/Trump win, and we will try to remove the US sanctions put on you by the USA when you invaded Crimea etc...
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
Read Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling - CNNPoliticsMueller indicted the 13 GRU agents FOR that hack stupid.prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!No Russian's voted for Trump. No Russian's changed votes on the voting machines. There was no Russian collusion! Trump won through the electoral college process payed out in the Constitution.
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
Ask HIM for the proof
podesta was phished n gave up passwords.
proven.
now prove it was hacked.
podesta was phished, not hacked.podesta was phished n gave up passwords.
proven.
now prove it was hacked.
The Podesta hack was only one of dozens. Don't play stupid. People will start to think it's accurate
There's your problem. Wrong indictmentRead Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling - CNNPoliticsMueller indicted the 13 GRU agents FOR that hack stupid.prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.Collusion is not a crime!
COLLUSION has nothing to do with changing votes in the voting booth in this case.... as far as I know?
They still colluded with the Russian gvt and operatives...
Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.
Ask HIM for the proof
show me the dnc hack part.
podesta was phished, not hacked.
prove your previous idiocy please.
podesta was phished, not hacked.Correct! His password was password. What an idiot!podesta was phished n gave up passwords.
proven.
now prove it was hacked.
The Podesta hack was only one of dozens. Don't play stupid. People will start to think it's accurate
prove your previous idiocy please.
Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
