‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says



‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Who paid Christopher Steele - Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele. The Clinton Campaign has no ties to the Dossier or its production, because neither Steele nor Fusion ever had contact with the Campaign. In order to have "collusion" you need meetings, phone calls, emails - communication with whoever you're colluding with. The Clinton Campaign had no contact with Fusion, except through arm's length third parties.

That is how "opposition research" is done. Clinton asked the lawyers to get her some opposition research and they did. She didn't know from who, or from where.

The rest of your Russian troll bullshit is ignored.


~~~~~~
Obviously you didn't get the factual information under that rock where you live. I've taken the opportunity to enlighten you this time.

Obama Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Paid Fusion GPS
Obama Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Paid Fusion GPS
Former president Barack Obama’s official campaign organization has directed nearly a million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS, the firm behind the infamous Steele dossier. Since April of 2016, Obama For America (OFA) has paid over $972,000 to Perkins Coie, records filed with the Federal Election Commission
************
The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It - The ...
The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It
Oct 25, 2017 · The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It. After Donald J. Trump secured the Republican presidential nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to try to unearth
************
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.e535f0a1f504
Oct 24, 2017 · The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS's research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day. Fusion GPS gave Steele's reports and other research documents to Elias, the people familiar with the matter said.
 
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”

~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Who paid Christopher Steele - Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele. The Clinton Campaign has no ties to the Dossier or its production, because neither Steele nor Fusion ever had contact with the Campaign. In order to have "collusion" you need meetings, phone calls, emails - communication with whoever you're colluding with. The Clinton Campaign had no contact with Fusion, except through arm's length third parties.

That is how "opposition research" is done. Clinton asked the lawyers to get her some opposition research and they did. She didn't know from who, or from where.

The rest of your Russian troll bullshit is ignored.

~~~~~~
Obviously you didn't get the factual information under that rock where you live. I've taken the opportunity to enlighten you this time.

Obama Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Paid Fusion GPS
Obama Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Paid Fusion GPS
Former president Barack Obama’s official campaign organization has directed nearly a million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS, the firm behind the infamous Steele dossier. Since April of 2016, Obama For America (OFA) has paid over $972,000 to Perkins Coie, records filed with the Federal Election Commission
************
The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It - The ...
The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It
Oct 25, 2017 · The Trump Dossier: What We Know and Who Paid for It. After Donald J. Trump secured the Republican presidential nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to try to unearth
************
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.e535f0a1f504
Oct 24, 2017 · The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS's research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day. Fusion GPS gave Steele's reports and other research documents to Elias, the people familiar with the matter said.
And they claim they got the information from Kremlin linked Russians, while also claiming that any connections between anyone in the Trump campaign with Russians justifies illegal spying on the campaign by the Obama Administration
 
Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
She did NOT say she never sent or received classified information over her private email, she said she never sent or received MARKED Classified information on her private email.

MARKED classified means the classified document is MARKED at the top with:

the classified level designation
the person and agency classifying it
the date it was classified
and the date it was to be declassified.

so Gowdy LIED in his question to Comey



Comey said she did.

Who's lying....you or Comey?

Both?



The difference between your post and truth is akin to the difference between a lightning bug and lightning.
Why is this so hard for you to actually comprehend?

Comey answered the question as Gowdy put it, which would be a no.... there was classified emails transferred on her private email. But Gowdy's accusation and your accusation that she lied about them is incorrect.

Because she NEVER SAID there were no classified emails sent or received....

she said there were no MARKED Classified emails sent or received.

the difference between it being Marked classified and NOT Marked classified is the difference between a lightning bug and lightening.

MARKED classified means she knew the email was classified information, classified by any of our agencies.

there were no emails that were MARKED classified by any of our agencies means she and her people did not take anything that was top secret classified and known to be top secret classified from it's proper storing place and then put it out in the open via her private email.

Since none were marked classified, there was no way to punish her or primarily her staff, because they were not designated as classified with the markings...there was no intent that could be proven.

Also, by not being MARKED classified as per the gvt protocols, means the Classified information could have been classified, AFTER they emailed each other.

Trey Gowdy LIED when he said to Comey: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?

Hillary Clinton NEVER SAID the bold part in Gowdy's statement/question.... Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED.

Except there were some so marked.
There were 2 or 3, that had a small 'c' next to a diplomat's name that the scheduler was trying to set up a meeting with Hillary....

but that was only a partial marking and NOT MARKED Classified with all the information at the top of the correspondence and Comey said it could be missed by not having the full MARKINGS in his testimony.

Also, it was never classified information... and a mistake in the first place by the scheduling secretary.

Everything in her emails that they have, has been declassified and available to the public but the 4 to 6 email chains that the FBI began the investigation on via recommendation of the IG, in the first place.

Wasn't she trained in identifying classified markings, and shouldn't she have been vigilantly looking for indications like that? I would think so. Wasn't she also trained on how to recognize classified information even if it wasn't marked? I would think so.

The bottom line remains, whether it rose to the level of criminality or not, she was extremely careless with classified information, and that's a problem.
 
The FBI’s investigation of Clinton was spurred by her decision to set up a private server to handle her email during her four years as secretary of State. The server in her mansion in Chappaqua, N.Y., was insecure and exposed emails with classified information to detection by foreign sources and others.

the State.gov emails system, that all State department employees used, but clinton with her private server,
IS ALSO AN UNSECURE/ unclassified E-mail system,

Every email that she had on her unsecure private server, if she had used the State department's email system, State.gov email address, would ALSO be classified information on an unsecure/unclassified email system, NO DIFFERENT than her private one....

The classified information would be on an unsecure system.

There is NO EMAIL SYSTEM for top secret documents, Top secret and secret documents are never ever put on any department's email system, the SCIFS this information is viewed in, are not connected to the internet.

What was in the FBI investigation report was what Hillary's staff was doing in these 4 to 6 email chains that still have not been declassified, is talking about a news paper article that was on our Drones and what the press knew about them and how the State Department should handle the situation since our Drone program was classified Top Secret, YET someone, somewhere, leaked this info to the press.

Even though they were in a pickle about the Drone News article and on how they should handle it when the press contacts them to confirm or get more information, and needed to decide what that information should be....

Her upper level staff should have not emailed each other about it, and then eventually forwarded
their discussions on how it should be addressed to Clinton... that could easily fall in to the category of

"loose lips, sink ships''....

BUT KNOW, even if the State department upper level employees used only the State.gov email system and Hillary had only the State.gov email address and not a private one,

this Drone information and emails would have been sent back and forth on an UNSECURE/unclassified E-mail system....

in FACT, the State.gov email system is hacked in to, no less than 50,000 times a year.

At least Hillary's private email server, was NEVER hacked in to successfully, that the FBI could find.
You just make shit up as you go.
 
The FBI’s investigation of Clinton was spurred by her decision to set up a private server to handle her email during her four years as secretary of State. The server in her mansion in Chappaqua, N.Y., was insecure and exposed emails with classified information to detection by foreign sources and others.

the State.gov emails system, that all State department employees used, but clinton with her private server,
IS ALSO AN UNSECURE/ unclassified E-mail system,

Every email that she had on her unsecure private server, if she had used the State department's email system, State.gov email address, would ALSO be classified information on an unsecure/unclassified email system, NO DIFFERENT than her private one....

The classified information would be on an unsecure system.

There is NO EMAIL SYSTEM for top secret documents, Top secret and secret documents are never ever put on any department's email system, the SCIFS this information is viewed in, are not connected to the internet.

What was in the FBI investigation report was what Hillary's staff was doing in these 4 to 6 email chains that still have not been declassified, is talking about a news paper article that was on our Drones and what the press knew about them and how the State Department should handle the situation since our Drone program was classified Top Secret, YET someone, somewhere, leaked this info to the press.

Even though they were in a pickle about the Drone News article and on how they should handle it when the press contacts them to confirm or get more information, and needed to decide what that information should be....

Her upper level staff should have not emailed each other about it, and then eventually forwarded
their discussions on how it should be addressed to Clinton... that could easily fall in to the category of

"loose lips, sink ships''....

BUT KNOW, even if the State department upper level employees used only the State.gov email system and Hillary had only the State.gov email address and not a private one,

this Drone information and emails would have been sent back and forth on an UNSECURE/unclassified E-mail system....

in FACT, the State.gov email system is hacked in to, no less than 50,000 times a year.

At least Hillary's private email server, was NEVER hacked in to successfully, that the FBI could find.
Did they get access to her hard drives before she bleach-bitted them?
The subpoena from congress NEVER ask for her server hard drives, the subpoena asked only for gvt related email involved with Benghazi and Libya... her lawyers went thru her emails, pulled out every government email from anyone on every topic, including benghazi...then deleted all emails including gvt and personal emails, then shipped off the server to their computer maintenance company, to prepare it for reuse in December.

The congressional subpoena for Benghazi stuff came the following March, which her lawyer had on the disk he had copied all gvt emails to... And the State dept had gotten a copy of the gvt records for the archives.

The maintenance computer firm bleachbit her emails March 27, I do not know if he bleachbit her entire server.... I am not certain how bleach bit works.

I know it did not remove dormant email files, so it did not work that well...

Comey said they found thousands of additional emails in an obscure file that had them from an upgrade transfer to a new server that had gone haywire.

So bleach bit did not work that we'll.
 
The FBI’s investigation of Clinton was spurred by her decision to set up a private server to handle her email during her four years as secretary of State. The server in her mansion in Chappaqua, N.Y., was insecure and exposed emails with classified information to detection by foreign sources and others.

the State.gov emails system, that all State department employees used, but clinton with her private server,
IS ALSO AN UNSECURE/ unclassified E-mail system,

Every email that she had on her unsecure private server, if she had used the State department's email system, State.gov email address, would ALSO be classified information on an unsecure/unclassified email system, NO DIFFERENT than her private one....

The classified information would be on an unsecure system.

There is NO EMAIL SYSTEM for top secret documents, Top secret and secret documents are never ever put on any department's email system, the SCIFS this information is viewed in, are not connected to the internet.

What was in the FBI investigation report was what Hillary's staff was doing in these 4 to 6 email chains that still have not been declassified, is talking about a news paper article that was on our Drones and what the press knew about them and how the State Department should handle the situation since our Drone program was classified Top Secret, YET someone, somewhere, leaked this info to the press.

Even though they were in a pickle about the Drone News article and on how they should handle it when the press contacts them to confirm or get more information, and needed to decide what that information should be....

Her upper level staff should have not emailed each other about it, and then eventually forwarded
their discussions on how it should be addressed to Clinton... that could easily fall in to the category of

"loose lips, sink ships''....

BUT KNOW, even if the State department upper level employees used only the State.gov email system and Hillary had only the State.gov email address and not a private one,

this Drone information and emails would have been sent back and forth on an UNSECURE/unclassified E-mail system....

in FACT, the State.gov email system is hacked in to, no less than 50,000 times a year.

At least Hillary's private email server, was NEVER hacked in to successfully, that the FBI could find.
Did they get access to her hard drives before she bleach-bitted them?
The subpoena from congress NEVER ask for her server hard drives, the subpoena asked only for gvt related email involved with Benghazi and Libya... her lawyers went thru her emails, pulled out every government email from anyone on every topic, including benghazi...then deleted all emails including gvt and personal emails, then shipped off the server to their computer maintenance company, to prepare it for reuse in December.

The congressional subpoena for Benghazi stuff came the following March, which her lawyer had on the disk he had copied all gvt emails to... And the State dept had gotten a copy of the gvt records for the archives.

The maintenance computer firm bleachbit her emails March 27, I do not know if he bleachbit her entire server.... I am not certain how bleach bit works.

I know it did not remove dormant email files, so it did not work that well...

Comey said they found thousands of additional emails in an obscure file that had them from an upgrade transfer to a new server that had gone haywire.

So bleach bit did not work that we'll.


Every word in that post is a lie.

Coming from you, I would expect nothing less.

Uberscrunt belongs in prison. For all eternity.

Maybe you would like to be her cellmate?
 
Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?
She did NOT say she never sent or received classified information over her private email, she said she never sent or received MARKED Classified information on her private email.

MARKED classified means the classified document is MARKED at the top with:

the classified level designation
the person and agency classifying it
the date it was classified
and the date it was to be declassified.

so Gowdy LIED in his question to Comey



Comey said she did.

Who's lying....you or Comey?

Both?



The difference between your post and truth is akin to the difference between a lightning bug and lightning.
Why is this so hard for you to actually comprehend?

Comey answered the question as Gowdy put it, which would be a no.... there was classified emails transferred on her private email. But Gowdy's accusation and your accusation that she lied about them is incorrect.

Because she NEVER SAID there were no classified emails sent or received....

she said there were no MARKED Classified emails sent or received.

the difference between it being Marked classified and NOT Marked classified is the difference between a lightning bug and lightening.

MARKED classified means she knew the email was classified information, classified by any of our agencies.

there were no emails that were MARKED classified by any of our agencies means she and her people did not take anything that was top secret classified and known to be top secret classified from it's proper storing place and then put it out in the open via her private email.

Since none were marked classified, there was no way to punish her or primarily her staff, because they were not designated as classified with the markings...there was no intent that could be proven.

Also, by not being MARKED classified as per the gvt protocols, means the Classified information could have been classified, AFTER they emailed each other.

Trey Gowdy LIED when he said to Comey: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?

Hillary Clinton NEVER SAID the bold part in Gowdy's statement/question.... Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED.

Except there were some so marked.
There were 2 or 3, that had a small 'c' next to a diplomat's name that the scheduler was trying to set up a meeting with Hillary....

but that was only a partial marking and NOT MARKED Classified with all the information at the top of the correspondence and Comey said it could be missed by not having the full MARKINGS in his testimony.

Also, it was never classified information... and a mistake in the first place by the scheduling secretary.

Everything in her emails that they have, has been declassified and available to the public but the 4 to 6 email chains that the FBI began the investigation on via recommendation of the IG, in the first place.




Marked classified at the time




It cuts back to Comey revealing that emails were found on her server that contained information that was indeed classified during her time as secretary of State.

“From the group of 30,000 emails returned to the State Department in 2014, 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received,” Comey says in a clip from his Tuesday press briefing.

Comey announced in the briefing that he would not be pushing for charges against Clinton, though he called her actions “extremely careless,” in remarks that Trump has already seized on in his campaigning. Trump video shows Comey refuting Clinton on classified emails




Contradicts Hillary




.....the NYTimes writes:

1. "Hillary Clinton may not be indicted on criminal charges over her handling of classified email, but the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, all but indicted her judgment and competence on Tuesday – two vital pillars of her presidential candidacy – and in the kind of terms that would be politically devastating in a normal election year."


This is really some piece.

"Mrs. Clinton’s campaign is built on the premise that she has the national security experience and well-honed instincts to keep Americans safe in the age of terrorism, and that Donald J. Trump does not. Nearly every day, she seeks to present herself as a more thoughtful and responsible leader.

She has spent months describing Mr. Trump as “reckless,” “unprepared” and “temperamentally unfit” to be president, and she has presented her four years as secretary of state and eight in the senate as unparalleled preparation for becoming commander in chief.

Yet in just a few minutes of remarks, Mr. Comey called into question Mrs. Clinton’s claims of superiority more memorably, mightily and effectively than Mr. Trump has over the past year. And with potentially lasting consequences."
F.B.I.’s Critique of Hillary Clinton Is a Ready-Made Attack Ad
 
She did NOT say she never sent or received classified information over her private email, she said she never sent or received MARKED Classified information on her private email.

MARKED classified means the classified document is MARKED at the top with:

the classified level designation
the person and agency classifying it
the date it was classified
and the date it was to be declassified.

so Gowdy LIED in his question to Comey

Comey said she did.

Who's lying....you or Comey?

Both?



The difference between your post and truth is akin to the difference between a lightning bug and lightning.
Why is this so hard for you to actually comprehend?

Comey answered the question as Gowdy put it, which would be a no.... there was classified emails transferred on her private email. But Gowdy's accusation and your accusation that she lied about them is incorrect.

Because she NEVER SAID there were no classified emails sent or received....

she said there were no MARKED Classified emails sent or received.

the difference between it being Marked classified and NOT Marked classified is the difference between a lightning bug and lightening.

MARKED classified means she knew the email was classified information, classified by any of our agencies.

there were no emails that were MARKED classified by any of our agencies means she and her people did not take anything that was top secret classified and known to be top secret classified from it's proper storing place and then put it out in the open via her private email.

Since none were marked classified, there was no way to punish her or primarily her staff, because they were not designated as classified with the markings...there was no intent that could be proven.

Also, by not being MARKED classified as per the gvt protocols, means the Classified information could have been classified, AFTER they emailed each other.

Trey Gowdy LIED when he said to Comey: Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?

Hillary Clinton NEVER SAID the bold part in Gowdy's statement/question.... Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED, Gowdy LIED.

Except there were some so marked.
There were 2 or 3, that had a small 'c' next to a diplomat's name that the scheduler was trying to set up a meeting with Hillary....

but that was only a partial marking and NOT MARKED Classified with all the information at the top of the correspondence and Comey said it could be missed by not having the full MARKINGS in his testimony.

Also, it was never classified information... and a mistake in the first place by the scheduling secretary.

Everything in her emails that they have, has been declassified and available to the public but the 4 to 6 email chains that the FBI began the investigation on via recommendation of the IG, in the first place.

Wasn't she trained in identifying classified markings, and shouldn't she have been vigilantly looking for indications like that? I would think so. Wasn't she also trained on how to recognize classified information even if it wasn't marked? I would think so.

The bottom line remains, whether it rose to the level of criminality or not, she was extremely careless with classified information, and that's a problem.
"Extremely Careless" was the term of art from the Whitewash. What she was, was grossly negligent.
 
The FBI’s investigation of Clinton was spurred by her decision to set up a private server to handle her email during her four years as secretary of State. The server in her mansion in Chappaqua, N.Y., was insecure and exposed emails with classified information to detection by foreign sources and others.

the State.gov emails system, that all State department employees used, but clinton with her private server,
IS ALSO AN UNSECURE/ unclassified E-mail system,

Every email that she had on her unsecure private server, if she had used the State department's email system, State.gov email address, would ALSO be classified information on an unsecure/unclassified email system, NO DIFFERENT than her private one....

The classified information would be on an unsecure system.

There is NO EMAIL SYSTEM for top secret documents, Top secret and secret documents are never ever put on any department's email system, the SCIFS this information is viewed in, are not connected to the internet.

What was in the FBI investigation report was what Hillary's staff was doing in these 4 to 6 email chains that still have not been declassified, is talking about a news paper article that was on our Drones and what the press knew about them and how the State Department should handle the situation since our Drone program was classified Top Secret, YET someone, somewhere, leaked this info to the press.

Even though they were in a pickle about the Drone News article and on how they should handle it when the press contacts them to confirm or get more information, and needed to decide what that information should be....

Her upper level staff should have not emailed each other about it, and then eventually forwarded
their discussions on how it should be addressed to Clinton... that could easily fall in to the category of

"loose lips, sink ships''....

BUT KNOW, even if the State department upper level employees used only the State.gov email system and Hillary had only the State.gov email address and not a private one,

this Drone information and emails would have been sent back and forth on an UNSECURE/unclassified E-mail system....

in FACT, the State.gov email system is hacked in to, no less than 50,000 times a year.

At least Hillary's private email server, was NEVER hacked in to successfully, that the FBI could find.
Did they get access to her hard drives before she bleach-bitted them?
The subpoena from congress NEVER ask for her server hard drives, the subpoena asked only for gvt related email involved with Benghazi and Libya... her lawyers went thru her emails, pulled out every government email from anyone on every topic, including benghazi...then deleted all emails including gvt and personal emails, then shipped off the server to their computer maintenance company, to prepare it for reuse in December.

The congressional subpoena for Benghazi stuff came the following March, which her lawyer had on the disk he had copied all gvt emails to... And the State dept had gotten a copy of the gvt records for the archives.

The maintenance computer firm bleachbit her emails March 27, I do not know if he bleachbit her entire server.... I am not certain how bleach bit works.

I know it did not remove dormant email files, so it did not work that well...

Comey said they found thousands of additional emails in an obscure file that had them from an upgrade transfer to a new server that had gone haywire.

So bleach bit did not work that we'll.
For someone who is now admitting you don't know the details, you sure do blindly defend her.
 
You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”
Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.
Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence? Those ARE actual facts.
she did not lie to congress, she did not destroy evidence.... those are right wing lies told that you chose to believe.

1. Her server was not subpoenaed by congress... the subpoena was for gov't emails relating to Benghazi and Libya.

You can't get a subpoena Willy-nilly, you must have probable cause.... subpoenas are specific and are narrowed.

Her 30k private emails WERE NEVER SUBPOENAED.

I read the subpoena.

Her private emails were NEVER evidence that could be destroyed by bleachbit.... because her personal emails were never subpoenaed.... they were never EVIDENCE.

Destroying personal emails that were never subpoenaed by congress in the first place, is not a crime....

Get it?

2. The cell phone devices that were smashed after they had been upgraded to new devices so no one could steal gvt info off of the old devices when discarded, were not destroyed after subpoenas were issued... they were routinely smashed when the upgrade to new devices occurred.

Comey testified there was no malice by employees that crushed their own devices after upgrades, there was no Criminality......

MAYBE you should try researching and read up on these right wing propaganda and baseless conspiracies before you repeat them?

She's not a crook, no matter how much you want to believe what your right wing's rags tell you and have brainwashed you with.

The crook Is sitting in the oval office... with PROOF that he's a crook through his Trump University scam, thru his family tax evasion, through his campaign finance law felony accusation where named as "individual 1", through the Trump Foundation that was closed down by the State for being crooked.....
Comey admitted Hillary lied to Congress. Why do you lie for her?



Because Care4all is utterly without integrity or any code of ethics. She is a scumbag - party above all. Socialism is her one and only god, which she subverts all to.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top