Everybody Loves Him!

Jonah Goldberg is a neocon. So, his response is typical.

He wants the Rs to nominate another a-hole establishment elitist (like Romney, McCain, Shrubs, Dole, etc...because they did so well for the nation.

CRAZY!

Bush is the establishment A-hole, moron.
 
Pubs would actually go along with him, Dems would continue to be for good gov't, so we might be able to get somewhere for a change.

Could you post an example of this "good government" that Democrats supposedly support?
 
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.


Of course republicans have become that stupid. Haven't you read the crazy shit they post?
 
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.
_____________

Here's the deal Rabbi.

Lot of people watched Reid & Pelosi run Congress...until they puked when they watched their T. V.

So, they went out and voted in Boehner and McConnell...and they are still puking.

Replacing scoundrels and fools with Pussies is not helpful.

Trump shares this in common with some truly great men: He is half-crazy & he has stones. That also describes Theodore Roosevelt and Winston Churchill.

The Brits were none too happy to turn to Winston Churchill after France fell (French--true Pussies), but the Brits were desperate for a set of stones.

Every generation or so, you just have to take a chance. (We were assured by the Liberals that Reagan would get us into a World War....so fuck Liberals.)

After 7 years of Obama, we are desperate.

________
 
Last edited:
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.

Yo, all I can say is, they elected Obama, we elect Trump! The People are tired of the same dead faces running for office! Maybe a non-Political person will be better than a Bush.or Clinton! I like Ted Cruz, but he needs to get louder!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 49652
So Democrats are idiots for electing Obama and we'll prove we're bigger idiots by electing Trump?
I'm not seeing the wisdom here.
The idea is that many Democrats are as angry as the average Trump supporter. They aren't happy with the direction of the country either. Trump relates to those who want honesty and directness in our elected officials. Finally a country coming together...who would've thought....


Sure, Democrats are angry and unhappy with the direction of the country, but the crazy crap Trump is advocating is exactly the reason we are angry. He shouldn't expect any help from the left.
 
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.

Yo, all I can say is, they elected Obama, we elect Trump! The People are tired of the same dead faces running for office! Maybe a non-Political person will be better than a Bush.or Clinton! I like Ted Cruz, but he needs to get louder!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 49652
So Democrats are idiots for electing Obama and we'll prove we're bigger idiots by electing Trump?
I'm not seeing the wisdom here.
The idea is that many Democrats are as angry as the average Trump supporter. They aren't happy with the direction of the country either. Trump relates to those who want honesty and directness in our elected officials. Finally a country coming together...who would've thought....


Sure, Democrats are angry and unhappy with the direction of the country, but the crazy crap Trump is advocating is exactly the reason we are angry. He shouldn't expect any help from the left.

Yo, look in the news? He already has some of you Puppets!!

"GTP"
trump-hell-hole (1).jpg
 
Yo, Trump has a few Mini Socialist looking his way? You Mini Socialist here on this USMB better get with the program, or be left out!!! :beer:

DONALD TRUMP’S CROSSOVER APPEAL :clap::clap::clap:


AP_294938362751-640x418.jpg

AP Photo/Brynn Anderson
by JOEL B. POLLAK8 Sep 2015262

Jonah Goldberg argues that Donald Trump is no conservative–and he is disappointed in conservatives who support him.
He singles out my Breitbart colleague John Nolte, who has tweeted effusive praise of the way Trump confronts the media.

I wish Goldberg had noted some of Nolte’s other writing, expressing skepticism of Trump’s positions. The argument Nolte is making, to borrow a phrase from Bill Kristol, is less “pro-Trump” than “anti-anti-Trump.”

But let us assume that Goldberg is correct–that Trump is no conservative. Would it follow, then, that it would be better to let a Democrat win than to see a President Trump?

Presumably not–unless Trump’s ego is a bigger threat to our Constitution than Obama’s power grabs.

Yet there would likely be more opposition to a President Trump than to Obama–partly because some conservatives dislike him. The media would also re-discover their “integrity.”

It seems apparent that a President Trump is, at least, a real possibility. The reason is not just his huge lead in GOP polls, but also his growing cross-party appeal.

In recent days I have been approached by several liberal friends–not particularly political people–who disagree with me on everything, but like Trump. And not just in that oh-I-could-vote-for-Jeb-Bush kind of way, which is really just another way to say they dislike Republicans.

They are serious.

Donald Trump's Crossover Appeal - Breitbart

"GTP" :udaman:
View attachment 49648


The Donald always has something up his sleeve.

I imagine his next T.V. Reality show will be--SEE HOW STUPID AMERICANS ARE FOR SUPPORTING ME--a person that Carly Fiorina kicked my ass on terrorism and foreign policy--because I sure couldn't answer a single dam question--and LOOK they still supported me--LOL

NOTHING WOULD SURPRISE ME:

Carly Fiorina kicking Trump's ass over foreign policy.
"A conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt who will co-moderate the Sept. 16 Republican primary debate in California stumped Donald Trump on Thursday with tough questions about Middle Eastern terror leaders, but heard clear answers a few hours later from the billionaire's rival Carly Fiorina.

Trump's interview with conservative broadcaster Hugh Hewitt hadn't yet aired when Fiorina rattled off responses to questions about the leaders of Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, the al-Nusra Front and the ISIS terror army.

'I'm looking for the next commander-in-chief to know who Hassan Nasrallah is, and Zawahiri, and al-Julani, and al-Baghdadi,' Hewitt told Trump. 'Do you know the players without a scorecard yet? 'No,' the business tycoon replied.

FIORINA faced with the same challenge, conceded that it's easy to 'get confused a bit between the name and group because they sound a bit alike sometimes, so I have to pause and think sometimes.''But, I certainly know all those names both of the individual leaders and of the terrorist groups. I certainly understand where these terrorists are in play.' Hamas is focused in Palestinian territories,' Fiorina added. 'Hezbollah focuses in Beirut and other places. But the truth is both of them are proxies of Iran. Both of them threaten Israel. Both of them are going to be benefiting from the agreement which Obama and Kerry have struck with Iran.'

Trump's approach was to deflect the question rather than answer it. You know, I'll tell you honestly – I think by the time we get to office, they'll all be changed,' he said. 'They'll be all gone.'

Trump would later claim Hewitt had asked him a 'gotcha question.' But he conceded that 'I knew you were going to ask me things like this.'

Fiorina insisted that 'I don’t think they’re "gotcha questions" at all.' She focused on describing 'the depth of the ideology that Israel cannot exist, and so Hamas or Hezbollah or the Quds force or Al-Nusra or the Supreme Leader in Iran chant "Death to America," closely followed by "We must wipe Israel off the face of the map".' 'This isn't a joke,' she said.

But that didn't stop The Donald from blasting Hewitt on Friday morning as a 'third-rate radio announcer' curing an appearance on the MSBNC 'Morning Joe' program."
Trump stymped on terror questions but Carly knows the answers cold


Everyone loves an "entertainer."

image.jpg
 
Yo, Trump has a few Mini Socialist looking his way? You Mini Socialist here on this USMB better get with the program, or be left out!!! :beer:

DONALD TRUMP’S CROSSOVER APPEAL :clap::clap::clap:


AP_294938362751-640x418.jpg

AP Photo/Brynn Anderson
by JOEL B. POLLAK8 Sep 2015262

Jonah Goldberg argues that Donald Trump is no conservative–and he is disappointed in conservatives who support him.
He singles out my Breitbart colleague John Nolte, who has tweeted effusive praise of the way Trump confronts the media.

I wish Goldberg had noted some of Nolte’s other writing, expressing skepticism of Trump’s positions. The argument Nolte is making, to borrow a phrase from Bill Kristol, is less “pro-Trump” than “anti-anti-Trump.”

But let us assume that Goldberg is correct–that Trump is no conservative. Would it follow, then, that it would be better to let a Democrat win than to see a President Trump?

Presumably not–unless Trump’s ego is a bigger threat to our Constitution than Obama’s power grabs.

Yet there would likely be more opposition to a President Trump than to Obama–partly because some conservatives dislike him. The media would also re-discover their “integrity.”

It seems apparent that a President Trump is, at least, a real possibility. The reason is not just his huge lead in GOP polls, but also his growing cross-party appeal.

In recent days I have been approached by several liberal friends–not particularly political people–who disagree with me on everything, but like Trump. And not just in that oh-I-could-vote-for-Jeb-Bush kind of way, which is really just another way to say they dislike Republicans.

They are serious.

Donald Trump's Crossover Appeal - Breitbart

"GTP" :udaman:
View attachment 49648


The Donald always has something up his sleeve.

I imagine his next T.V. Reality show will be--SEE HOW STUPID AMERICANS ARE FOR SUPPORTING ME--a person that Carly Fiorina kicked my ass on terrorism and foreign policy--because I sure couldn't answer a single dam question--and LOOK they still supported me--LOL

NOTHING WOULD SURPRISE ME:

"A conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt who will co-moderate the Sept. 16 Republican primary debate in California stumped Donald Trump on Thursday with tough questions about Middle Eastern terror leaders, but heard clear answers a few hours later from the billionaire's rival Carly Fiorina.

Trump's interview with conservative broadcaster Hugh Hewitt hadn't yet aired when Fiorina rattled off responses to questions about the leaders of Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, the al-Nusra Front and the ISIS terror army.

'I'm looking for the next commander-in-chief to know who Hassan Nasrallah is, and Zawahiri, and al-Julani, and al-Baghdadi,' Hewitt told Trump. 'Do you know the players without a scorecard yet? 'No,' the business tycoon replied.

FIORINA faced with the same challenge, conceded that it's easy to 'get confused a bit between the name and group because they sound a bit alike sometimes, so I have to pause and think sometimes.''But, I certainly know all those names both of the individual leaders and of the terrorist groups. I certainly understand where these terrorists are in play.' Hamas is focused in Palestinian territories,' Fiorina added. 'Hezbollah focuses in Beirut and other places. But the truth is both of them are proxies of Iran. Both of them threaten Israel. Both of them are going to be benefiting from the agreement which Obama and Kerry have struck with Iran.'

Trump's approach was to deflect the question rather than answer it. You know, I'll tell you honestly – I think by the time we get to office, they'll all be changed,' he said. 'They'll be all gone.'

Trump would later claim Hewitt had asked him a 'gotcha question.' But he conceded that 'I knew you were going to ask me things like this.'

Fiorina insisted that 'I don’t think they’re "gotcha questions" at all.' She focused on describing 'the depth of the ideology that Israel cannot exist, and so Hamas or Hezbollah or the Quds force or Al-Nusra or the Supreme Leader in Iran chant "Death to America," closely followed by "We must wipe Israel off the face of the map".' 'This isn't a joke,' she said.

But that didn't stop The Donald from blasting Hewitt on Friday morning as a 'third-rate radio announcer' curing an appearance on the MSBNC 'Morning Joe' program."
Trump stymped on terror questions but Carly knows the answers cold


Everyone loves an "entertainer."

image.jpg

Yo, the "Typical Jealous Socialist" writings, more BS!!! Get over it, you assholes are going down!!!

"GTP"
trump-hell-hole (1) (1).jpg
 
Yo, Trump has a few Mini Socialist looking his way? You Mini Socialist here on this USMB better get with the program, or be left out!!! :beer:

DONALD TRUMP’S CROSSOVER APPEAL :clap::clap::clap:


AP_294938362751-640x418.jpg

AP Photo/Brynn Anderson
by JOEL B. POLLAK8 Sep 2015262

Jonah Goldberg argues that Donald Trump is no conservative–and he is disappointed in conservatives who support him.
He singles out my Breitbart colleague John Nolte, who has tweeted effusive praise of the way Trump confronts the media.

I wish Goldberg had noted some of Nolte’s other writing, expressing skepticism of Trump’s positions. The argument Nolte is making, to borrow a phrase from Bill Kristol, is less “pro-Trump” than “anti-anti-Trump.”

But let us assume that Goldberg is correct–that Trump is no conservative. Would it follow, then, that it would be better to let a Democrat win than to see a President Trump?

Presumably not–unless Trump’s ego is a bigger threat to our Constitution than Obama’s power grabs.

Yet there would likely be more opposition to a President Trump than to Obama–partly because some conservatives dislike him. The media would also re-discover their “integrity.”

It seems apparent that a President Trump is, at least, a real possibility. The reason is not just his huge lead in GOP polls, but also his growing cross-party appeal.

In recent days I have been approached by several liberal friends–not particularly political people–who disagree with me on everything, but like Trump. And not just in that oh-I-could-vote-for-Jeb-Bush kind of way, which is really just another way to say they dislike Republicans.

They are serious.

Donald Trump's Crossover Appeal - Breitbart

"GTP" :udaman:
View attachment 49648


The Donald always has something up his sleeve.

I imagine his next T.V. Reality show will be--SEE HOW STUPID AMERICANS ARE FOR SUPPORTING ME--a person that Carly Fiorina kicked my ass on terrorism and foreign policy--because I sure couldn't answer a single dam question--and LOOK they still supported me--LOL

NOTHING WOULD SURPRISE ME:

"A conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt who will co-moderate the Sept. 16 Republican primary debate in California stumped Donald Trump on Thursday with tough questions about Middle Eastern terror leaders, but heard clear answers a few hours later from the billionaire's rival Carly Fiorina.

Trump's interview with conservative broadcaster Hugh Hewitt hadn't yet aired when Fiorina rattled off responses to questions about the leaders of Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, the al-Nusra Front and the ISIS terror army.

'I'm looking for the next commander-in-chief to know who Hassan Nasrallah is, and Zawahiri, and al-Julani, and al-Baghdadi,' Hewitt told Trump. 'Do you know the players without a scorecard yet? 'No,' the business tycoon replied.

FIORINA faced with the same challenge, conceded that it's easy to 'get confused a bit between the name and group because they sound a bit alike sometimes, so I have to pause and think sometimes.''But, I certainly know all those names both of the individual leaders and of the terrorist groups. I certainly understand where these terrorists are in play.' Hamas is focused in Palestinian territories,' Fiorina added. 'Hezbollah focuses in Beirut and other places. But the truth is both of them are proxies of Iran. Both of them threaten Israel. Both of them are going to be benefiting from the agreement which Obama and Kerry have struck with Iran.'

Trump's approach was to deflect the question rather than answer it. You know, I'll tell you honestly – I think by the time we get to office, they'll all be changed,' he said. 'They'll be all gone.'

Trump would later claim Hewitt had asked him a 'gotcha question.' But he conceded that 'I knew you were going to ask me things like this.'

Fiorina insisted that 'I don’t think they’re "gotcha questions" at all.' She focused on describing 'the depth of the ideology that Israel cannot exist, and so Hamas or Hezbollah or the Quds force or Al-Nusra or the Supreme Leader in Iran chant "Death to America," closely followed by "We must wipe Israel off the face of the map".' 'This isn't a joke,' she said.

But that didn't stop The Donald from blasting Hewitt on Friday morning as a 'third-rate radio announcer' curing an appearance on the MSBNC 'Morning Joe' program."
Trump stymped on terror questions but Carly knows the answers cold


Everyone loves an "entertainer."

image.jpg

Yo, the "Typical Jealous Socialist" writings, more BS!!! Get over it, you assholes are going down!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 49696


I am sure Trump is going to spend money on infrastructure, science, education and safetynet. If not then he'll not be doing his job.
 
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.

Yo, all I can say is, they elected Obama, we elect Trump! The People are tired of the same dead faces running for office! Maybe a non-Political person will be better than a Bush.or Clinton! I like Ted Cruz, but he needs to get louder!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 49652


You're certainly not referring to Ted Cruz being out of the political class are you? He's received a government paycheck for most of his life. He's just another couldn't make in the private sector lawyers that decide to go into politics. Like we need more of them in Washington D.C.--LOL While he can put on a great dog and pony show for extreme nutcases, this guy has no chance what-so-ever of getting within 200 yards of the White House.

Frankly I couldn't possibly imagine, if by some miracle Ted Cruz became the nominee what the DNC would do with this video. Possibly a 24/7 T.V add stream--LOL

 
Pubs would actually go along with him, Dems would continue to be for good gov't, so we might be able to get somewhere for a change.

Could you post an example of this "good government" that Democrats supposedly support?
Compromise, actually allowing a few to vote with the pres when he has a mandate, not theatening gov't shutdowns, like when Booosh and Reagan were pres. Taxing those who are getting 95% of new wealth more. Allowing a vote on the immigration bill that would PASS. ALLOWING ANYTHING!!!!!!!!
 
W was the only total catastrophe domestic AND foreign.

You weren't alive during the Carter regime, were you? However, you have lived through the Obama regime, so there's no excuse for that statement.
Um, Carter didn't even have a recession or a single soldier killed in combat. Teddy screwed him. Yes I was alive, and unlike you intelligent lol.
 
Pubs would actually go along with him, Dems would continue to be for good gov't, so we might be able to get somewhere for a change.

Could you post an example of this "good government" that Democrats supposedly support?
Compromise, actually allowing a few to vote with the pres when he has a mandate, not theatening gov't shutdowns, like when Booosh and Reagan were pres. Taxing those who are getting 95% of new wealth more. Allowing a vote on the immigration bill that would PASS. ALLOWING ANYTHING!!!!!!!!

I'll take that as a "no."
 
Wow people complain about the MSM choosing their candidates because they highlight one or the other. Now that they are choosing the candidate by opposing one or the other suddenly that's OK.
Have Republicans and conservatives really become this stupid/? Are we really going to be taken in by a TV personality with no history of political philosophy, no experience, and whose only recommendation is he pisses people off by being rude? WOw.

Yo, all I can say is, they elected Obama, we elect Trump! The People are tired of the same dead faces running for office! Maybe a non-Political person will be better than a Bush.or Clinton! I like Ted Cruz, but he needs to get louder!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 49652


You're certainly not referring to Ted Cruz being out of the political class are you? He's received a government paycheck for most of his life. He's just another couldn't make in the private sector lawyers that decide to go into politics. Like we need more of them in Washington D.C.--LOL While he can put on a great dog and pony show for extreme nutcases, this guy has no chance what-so-ever of getting within 200 yards of the White House.

Frankly I couldn't possibly imagine, if by some miracle Ted Cruz became the nominee what the DNC would do with this video. Possibly a 24/7 T.V add stream--LOL


Thats of course wrong. Cruz worked in private practice.
Cruz is one of the top contribution getters in the race. He is very charismatic and connects well with his audience. I saw him personally. He looks like a winner and I'd take him over Trump every single day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top