Asclepias
Diamond Member
No its not the opposite. DNA has debunked many aspects of Darwins theory but it is the resounding proof evolution is a fact. Your claim was that evolution was based on Darwins Theory but its not. He just happened to be the one that came to that conclusion first.DNA research has long overtaken and proven what the 1859 naturalist discovered as a theory. Evolution is a fact. You should keep up with current events like the Genome project so you dont sound so behind the current science.Carson claims to not believe in evolution. Since he is a doctor I have a serious problem with that. Either he is psychotic or he is lying. Every time he operates on someones brain he has to be reminded of how that brain developed.
It's disturbing to me how people in the 21st century cling to the conjectures of an 1859 naturalist as some kind of valid science. Tell me... do you believe in Spontaneous Generation as well?
Actually, it is the opposite. DNA and the genome contradict Darwinian theory. Evolution, as defined by Darwin, is NOT a fact. It is a debunked theory that has no basis in scientific fact.
But just so you are aware of this, Darwinian theory was used for over 100 years as a basis to discriminate against black people. The Darwinian argument was, blacks were "less evolved" members of the species and some even argued they were a different species.
I've long been aware of Darwins theory. I suggest you read "On the Origins of the Species". Also what he used his findings for are not relevant to the point. The point is DNA is the proof of evolution not Darwins theory. Carson should know this being a doctor.