Crackerjack
Too sick for a cure
There are many threads you insane idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are many threads you insane idiot.
so you are just going to claim its not true?
wow what a pack of fools you people are
Think things are good for your messiah?so now they seem to think its good for Rush?
Don't you mean which network one may "veiw" Rush?I was just gonna ask her on which network one could "view" Rush.
Maybe his 24/7 Premium service which you can watch...I was just gonna ask her on which network one could "view" Rush.
Maybe his 24/7 Premium service which you can watch...I was just gonna ask her on which network one could "view" Rush.
There are many threads you insane idiot.
why this one if you dont care?
Well, according to that rating your MessiahRushie is down from 40 million per day in May 2011 to 15 million per week by Spring 2011.Of course the liberal bloggers and websites will jump all over any kind of negative news they can associate with the conservative media giants. They will of course ignore that the same negative news applies proportionately to their own heroes and icons. From October 2010 to October 2011, Rush Limbaugh gained listeners and, so far as I know, has not been disenfranchised by anybody. We are, however, in a non election year, and the GOP primary race has been anything but exciting over the last months. All media goes through ebbs and flow and a 30% drop (which is grossly exaggerated by the way) is not a cause for alarm when producers can see that it is pretty well across the board.
Look for the ratings to all spike again when the 2012 election cycle really begins to heat up and people are hungry for information.
Meanwhile, Rush is in absolutely no danger of losing his crown and number #1 position for as long as he wants it when he can produce numbers like this:
From Talkers Magazine, the "bible" of talk radio:
i knew TM was pretty fucking stupid, but i didn't think she believed people watch the radio.
Then why are you responding to the thread?
It's easier to hear what it says if you watch it, too.i knew TM was pretty fucking stupid, but i didn't think she believed people watch the radio.
She does.
Of course the liberal bloggers and websites will jump all over any kind of negative news they can associate with the conservative media giants. They will of course ignore that the same negative news applies proportionately to their own heroes and icons. From October 2010 to October 2011, Rush Limbaugh gained listeners and, so far as I know, has not been disenfranchised by anybody. We are, however, in a non election year, and the GOP primary race has been anything but exciting over the last months. All media goes through ebbs and flow and a 30% drop (which is grossly exaggerated by the way) is not a cause for alarm when producers can see that it is pretty well across the board.
Look for the ratings to all spike again when the 2012 election cycle really begins to heat up and people are hungry for information.
Meanwhile, Rush is in absolutely no danger of losing his crown and number #1 position for as long as he wants it when he can produce numbers like this:
From Talkers Magazine, the "bible" of talk radio:
If Fox News viewers want to be informed about current events, they might as well turn off the TV.
A poll released by Fairleigh Dickinson University on Monday found that people who get their news from Fox News know significantly less about news both in the U.S. and the world than people who watch no news at all.
In a survey of 612 New Jersey natives, Fox News fans flunked questions about Egypt and Syria when compared with people who don't watch the news. Fox viewers were 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians toppled their government and 6 points less likely to be aware that Syrians have not yet overthrown theirs.
Of course the liberal bloggers and websites will jump all over any kind of negative news they can associate with the conservative media giants. They will of course ignore that the same negative news applies proportionately to their own heroes and icons. From October 2010 to October 2011, Rush Limbaugh gained listeners and, so far as I know, has not been disenfranchised by anybody. We are, however, in a non election year, and the GOP primary race has been anything but exciting over the last months. All media goes through ebbs and flow and a 30% drop (which is grossly exaggerated by the way) is not a cause for alarm when producers can see that it is pretty well across the board.
Look for the ratings to all spike again when the 2012 election cycle really begins to heat up and people are hungry for information.
Meanwhile, Rush is in absolutely no danger of losing his crown and number #1 position for as long as he wants it when he can produce numbers like this:
From Talkers Magazine, the "bible" of talk radio:
Hungry for "information"? Really?
If Fox News viewers want to be informed about current events, they might as well turn off the TV.
A poll released by Fairleigh Dickinson University on Monday found that people who get their news from Fox News know significantly less about news both in the U.S. and the world than people who watch no news at all.
In a survey of 612 New Jersey natives, Fox News fans flunked questions about Egypt and Syria when compared with people who don't watch the news. Fox viewers were 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians toppled their government and 6 points less likely to be aware that Syrians have not yet overthrown theirs.
Fox News viewers less informed than those who don?t watch news at all: study - New York Daily News
I don't think you mean information, I think you mean propaganda.