Conveniently edited.
You do realize anyone can go back read what I actally posted, right?
What's your next trick?
If you are claiming he altered your words report him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Conveniently edited.
You do realize anyone can go back read what I actally posted, right?
What's your next trick?
Now that the "accident" argument has been removed from the gun-control crowd, next is the "saving only one lif, then it's worth it" argument.
PR, I'm curious, do you even register on the IQ scale or does it start at too high of a number?
Pathetic...perhaps. But certainly not sarcasm.
To argue in favor of gun rights on the basis of statistics is to miss the point. I don't care how many "accidental" deaths result in gun ownership or how many times they're used in the commission of criminal acts. None of that is justification to deny the "people" the fundamental right to bear arms to defend themselves against a government gone tyrannical. That is what the Second Amendment is all about. It's not about hunting. It's not about guns being less hazardous than doctors, automobiles or anything else for that matter. When you make the debate about any of those things, you're playing right into the hands of the "liberals" you detest so much.
Hey Pole Rider,
For the record, this is sarcasm.
Conveniently edited.
You do realize anyone can go back read what I actally posted, right?
What's your next trick?
I never changed what "YOU" said, and that was enough to illustrate you said exactly what you claimed you didn't say.
Get real.
I think your big problem is reading comprehension. Go back and read the thread a few times and maybe you'll see that Loki is correct and you are not.
I won't even bring up the idiocy of correlating gun death to death by doctor's mistake because I know it keeps assholes like you frothing at the mouth and voting.
I think your big problem is reading comprehension. Go back and read the thread a few times and maybe you'll see that Loki is correct and you are not.
I won't even bring up the idiocy of correlating gun death to death by doctor's mistake because I know it keeps assholes like you frothing at the mouth and voting.
Now that the "accident" argument has been removed from the gun-control crowd, next is the "saving only one lif, then it's worth it" argument.
Could you point out where I said "accident" was removed from the OP--I must have missed it.
I think your loyalty is making you out to be just as big of a lying back peddler as Loki is. Nice... a two'fer...I think your big problem is reading comprehension. Go back and read the thread a few times and maybe you'll see that Loki is correct and you are not.
You condem the comparison as "idiocy" without as much of a mention as to "why." Kinda makes you out to be nothing more than another garden variety, opinion based, name calling, liberal that can't debate their way out of a wet paper bag.I won't even bring up the idiocy of correlating gun death to death by doctor's mistake because I know it keeps assholes like you frothing at the mouth and voting.
I know I've slapped the liberals in the face with the kind of logic they can't dispute when the only thing they can muster in response is some lame ass sarcasm.
Since 1960, 1,000,000 Americans have been killed by guns.
Wrong, since 1960, 1,000,000 Americans have been killed by PEOPLE with guns. Big difference. Guns are non-living and incapable of operating without humans.... Guns are no more responsible for the death of another human than a kitchen knife would be. People are killed with ice-picks, shovels, knives, poison, cars, doctors, etc... Many things should be outlawed by using your logic.
Wrong, since 1960, 1,000,000 Americans have been killed by PEOPLE with guns. Big difference. Guns are non-living and incapable of operating without humans.... Guns are no more responsible for the death of another human than a kitchen knife would be. People are killed with ice-picks, shovels, knives, poison, cars, doctors, etc... Many things should be outlawed by using your logic.
Im just wondering. Do you feel the same way about pornography?
There are just films, paper, or digits on a computer screen.
Hmmmm?
Who's the more bitter bitch? The bitter bitch or the bitter bitch that bitterly bitches about the bitter bitch with a frequency and tenacity of purpose that rises to the level of an OCD?