Do you Believe Kavanaugh's Rape Accuser?

Do you believe Kavanaughs rape accuser?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 19.6%
  • No

    Votes: 111 80.4%

  • Total voters
    138
Oh, Boo-Frelling-Hooo.

This is all nonsense.
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!
I'm pretty sure millions like me are wondering how Kav could be the choirboy he professed to being and still rape girls and drink himself into oblivion.
 
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!
I'm pretty sure millions like me are wondering how Kav could be the choirboy he professed to being and still rape girls and drink himself into oblivion.
I haven’t yet seen enough to convince me he was raping girls but there is definatley some shade about his drinking and the fact that he was dishonest while under oath is troubling. Let’s see what the FBI digs up
 
Oh, Boo-Frelling-Hooo.

This is all nonsense.
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!


What a maroon.

They are using his drinking beer to attack his character. If he were a teetotaller, they would use that to attack his character. Anything he does, no matter how mundane, will be used against him.
 
You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!
I'm pretty sure millions like me are wondering how Kav could be the choirboy he professed to being and still rape girls and drink himself into oblivion.
I haven’t yet seen enough to convince me he was raping girls but there is definatley some shade about his drinking and the fact that he was dishonest while under oath is troubling. Let’s see what the FBI digs up


There's definitely some shade in how his character is being assassinated.
 
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!


What a maroon.

They are using his drinking beer to attack his character. If he were a teetotaller, they would use that to attack his character. Anything he does, no matter how mundane, will be used against him.
No they are using lying to attack character. Do you really not understand that?

And were you trying to call me a moron when you called me maroon? You should be a little more careful with your insults
 
Oooops :eek-52:


Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm



In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.

The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.


He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a "very small," 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.

Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote.

However, on Thursday, Ford testified, "I was hoping to avoid getting on an airplane. But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane." She also acknowledged regularly -- and, in her words, "unfortunately" -- traveling on planes for work and hobbies.

And Ford explicitly told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Thursday that she had a second front door installed in her home because of "anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms" that she purportedly suffered in the wake of Kavanaugh's alleged attack at a house party in the 1980s -- "more especially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing."

In a pointed, no-holds-barred letter Tuesday evening that referenced the ex-boyfriend's declaration, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley demanded that attorneys for Ford turn over her therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than truthful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday's dramatic Senate hearing.

"Your continued withholding of material evidence despite multiple requests is unacceptable as the Senate exercises its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent for a judicial nomination," Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote.

Under questioning from experienced sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell last week, Ford said that she had "never" had "any discussions with anyone ... on how to take a polygraph" or "given any tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test." She repeatedly said the process of taking her own polygraph in August was stressful and uncomfortable, although she testified she could not remember if she took the test on the same day as her grandmother's funeral, or the next day....

Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm


It is interesting that her lawyers are pushing the public line that they want the FBI to talk to her again......considering that will put her story and her life in legal peril, it would be a stupid idea....

Why would FBI need to talk to her? They have all they need from her testimony.

By the way, if there would be an interview, is she going to fly to them, and does interview must be on a specific day of the week? :D
Why wouldn’t the FBI interview her? Wouldn’t you think it strange if they didn’t?

She said it all during the testimony, they got all they need from her to verify if she's telling the truth.

Nothing strange there.
 
Oooops :eek-52:


Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm



In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.

The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.


He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a "very small," 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.

Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote.

However, on Thursday, Ford testified, "I was hoping to avoid getting on an airplane. But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane." She also acknowledged regularly -- and, in her words, "unfortunately" -- traveling on planes for work and hobbies.

And Ford explicitly told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Thursday that she had a second front door installed in her home because of "anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms" that she purportedly suffered in the wake of Kavanaugh's alleged attack at a house party in the 1980s -- "more especially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing."

In a pointed, no-holds-barred letter Tuesday evening that referenced the ex-boyfriend's declaration, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley demanded that attorneys for Ford turn over her therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than truthful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday's dramatic Senate hearing.

"Your continued withholding of material evidence despite multiple requests is unacceptable as the Senate exercises its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent for a judicial nomination," Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote.

Under questioning from experienced sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell last week, Ford said that she had "never" had "any discussions with anyone ... on how to take a polygraph" or "given any tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test." She repeatedly said the process of taking her own polygraph in August was stressful and uncomfortable, although she testified she could not remember if she took the test on the same day as her grandmother's funeral, or the next day....

Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm


It is interesting that her lawyers are pushing the public line that they want the FBI to talk to her again......considering that will put her story and her life in legal peril, it would be a stupid idea....

Why would FBI need to talk to her? They have all they need from her testimony.

By the way, if there would be an interview, is she going to fly to them, and does interview must be on a specific day of the week? :D
Why wouldn’t the FBI interview her? Wouldn’t you think it strange if they didn’t?

She said it all during the testimony, they got all they need from her to verify if she's telling the truth.

Nothing strange there.
You would make a horrible investigator
 
Oooops :eek-52:


Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm



In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.

The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.


He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a "very small," 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.

Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote.

However, on Thursday, Ford testified, "I was hoping to avoid getting on an airplane. But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane." She also acknowledged regularly -- and, in her words, "unfortunately" -- traveling on planes for work and hobbies.

And Ford explicitly told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Thursday that she had a second front door installed in her home because of "anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms" that she purportedly suffered in the wake of Kavanaugh's alleged attack at a house party in the 1980s -- "more especially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing."

In a pointed, no-holds-barred letter Tuesday evening that referenced the ex-boyfriend's declaration, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley demanded that attorneys for Ford turn over her therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than truthful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday's dramatic Senate hearing.

"Your continued withholding of material evidence despite multiple requests is unacceptable as the Senate exercises its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent for a judicial nomination," Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote.

Under questioning from experienced sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell last week, Ford said that she had "never" had "any discussions with anyone ... on how to take a polygraph" or "given any tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test." She repeatedly said the process of taking her own polygraph in August was stressful and uncomfortable, although she testified she could not remember if she took the test on the same day as her grandmother's funeral, or the next day....

Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm


It is interesting that her lawyers are pushing the public line that they want the FBI to talk to her again......considering that will put her story and her life in legal peril, it would be a stupid idea....

Why would FBI need to talk to her? They have all they need from her testimony.

By the way, if there would be an interview, is she going to fly to them, and does interview must be on a specific day of the week? :D
Why wouldn’t the FBI interview her? Wouldn’t you think it strange if they didn’t?

She said it all during the testimony, they got all they need from her to verify if she's telling the truth.

Nothing strange there.
You would make a horrible investigator

Who cares would I or not.

There is nothing that she need to say that she hasn't said it during the testimony.

They're checking her story, and if there is something that they need to clarify, I'm sure they will contact her.

I hope they will, with arrest warrant.
 
It is interesting that her lawyers are pushing the public line that they want the FBI to talk to her again......considering that will put her story and her life in legal peril, it would be a stupid idea....

Why would FBI need to talk to her? They have all they need from her testimony.

By the way, if there would be an interview, is she going to fly to them, and does interview must be on a specific day of the week? :D
Why wouldn’t the FBI interview her? Wouldn’t you think it strange if they didn’t?

She said it all during the testimony, they got all they need from her to verify if she's telling the truth.

Nothing strange there.
You would make a horrible investigator

Who cares would I or not.

There is nothing that she need to say that she hasn't said it during the testimony.

They're checking her story, and if there is something that they need to clarify, I'm sure they will contact her.

I hope they will, with arrest warrant.
They cant contact her or Kav. Obviously you werent listening.
 
Oooops :eek-52:


Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm



In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.

The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her "life-long best friend" prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.


He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a "very small," 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door -- apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh's alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.

Ford "never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit," the former boyfriend wrote.

However, on Thursday, Ford testified, "I was hoping to avoid getting on an airplane. But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane." She also acknowledged regularly -- and, in her words, "unfortunately" -- traveling on planes for work and hobbies.

And Ford explicitly told Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Thursday that she had a second front door installed in her home because of "anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms" that she purportedly suffered in the wake of Kavanaugh's alleged attack at a house party in the 1980s -- "more especially, claustrophobia, panic and that type of thing."

In a pointed, no-holds-barred letter Tuesday evening that referenced the ex-boyfriend's declaration, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley demanded that attorneys for Ford turn over her therapist notes and other key materials, and suggested she was intentionally less than truthful about her experience with polygraph examinations during Thursday's dramatic Senate hearing.

"Your continued withholding of material evidence despite multiple requests is unacceptable as the Senate exercises its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent for a judicial nomination," Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote.

Under questioning from experienced sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell last week, Ford said that she had "never" had "any discussions with anyone ... on how to take a polygraph" or "given any tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test." She repeatedly said the process of taking her own polygraph in August was stressful and uncomfortable, although she testified she could not remember if she took the test on the same day as her grandmother's funeral, or the next day....

Christine Blasey Ford ex-boyfriend says she helped friend prep for potential polygraph; Grassley sounds alarm


It is interesting that her lawyers are pushing the public line that they want the FBI to talk to her again......considering that will put her story and her life in legal peril, it would be a stupid idea....

Why would FBI need to talk to her? They have all they need from her testimony.

By the way, if there would be an interview, is she going to fly to them, and does interview must be on a specific day of the week? :D
Why wouldn’t the FBI interview her? Wouldn’t you think it strange if they didn’t?

She said it all during the testimony, they got all they need from her to verify if she's telling the truth.

Nothing strange there.
Its very strange you cant question Kav or Ford on a case involving them. Are you retarded or something?
 
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!


What a maroon.

They are using his drinking beer to attack his character. If he were a teetotaller, they would use that to attack his character. Anything he does, no matter how mundane, will be used against him.
Says the person that cant spell moron correctly. :21:

They are using his drinking habits and actions during to figure out how that works with being the choirboy he made himself out to be.
 
Says the person that cant spell moron correctly. :21:
They are using his drinking habits and actions during to figure out how that works with being the choirboy he made himself out to be.

Did you know "Maroon" has other meanings?
Look it up.

can also refer to certain Jamaicans

He may have insidiously called you out....without you knowing it at all :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Says the person that cant spell moron correctly. :21:
They are using his drinking habits and actions during to figure out how that works with being the choirboy he made himself out to be.

Did you know "Maroon" has other meanings?
Look it up.

can also refer to certain Jamaicans

He may have insidiously called you out....without you knowing it at all :abgg2q.jpg:
That would only work if he was directing the comment at me. I'm not Jamaican so that pretty much kills that train of thought even if he was.
 
Oh, Boo-Frelling-Hooo.

This is all nonsense.
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
Yeah but Obama didnt participate in the gang rape of females after he got high like Kav did.

Kav didn't either.
 
Why is it nonsense, Because you can’t refute it? Face it, if you are going to justify going after Fords statements then you gotta apply the same standards to Kav. Maybe your too blinded by your political bias


You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!
I'm pretty sure millions like me are wondering how Kav could be the choirboy he professed to being and still rape girls and drink himself into oblivion.

Simple answer, he didn't, rape anyone that is. He's not even accused of doing so. Where did you get that stupid idea from, anyway?
 
Last edited:
You really do not have any perspective, do you?

Ford accused Kavanaugh. Her story has changed multiple times. The witnesses she mentions refute or do not recall anything she claims. Her ex-boyfriend has come forward with a statement that her excuses about flying, doors, claustrophbia etc. are highly suspect.

Kavanaugh has been put in the entirely UnAmerican situation of being told he has to prove his innocence. When he denied the charges and provided his contemporaneous evidence (calendar) of his whereabouts during the (shifting) alledged timeframe, the LW moved he goalposts to "temperament". This double-bind strategy is a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't congame. If he shows the JUSTIFIED anger of a falsely accused person, his anger shows he has the wrong temperament. If he sits quietly and doesn't react, then he's obviously guilty.

In RealityLand, the Dems have OVERPLAYED their hand. Decent people see this for the Beria style show trial that it is. So, the Dems are reduced to tossed ice cubes. And said ice cubes are melting.
Kav didn’t have to do anything. He could have taken the 5th and let things play out. Wouldn’t have been a smart move but there was no force. He did an interview with Fox and testified to Congress underoath. Why do you feel that his testimony shouldn’t be scrutinized?


B'loney. He is in a double-bind where not matter what he does will be used to deem he is guilty by the Dems.

I'll note that the people clutching their pearls over Kavanaugh liking beer has no issue with Obabble's Choom Bang Pot Smoking and Cocaine Snorting.
You really think people are taking issue with Kav drinking beer? How clueless can you be?!


What a maroon.

They are using his drinking beer to attack his character. If he were a teetotaller, they would use that to attack his character. Anything he does, no matter how mundane, will be used against him.
Says the person that cant spell moron correctly. :21:

They are using his drinking habits and actions during to figure out how that works with being the choirboy he made himself out to be.


*sigh*

My signature quote is eternally true.

 

Forum List

Back
Top