I do wish they let Paul talk more- we could save some on defense fersure. But let Obama do it...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If we are to have a true democracy to go with our constitutional republic then we must have fair debates and true free media.
Yes, I agree with Paul and Bachman that they are treated unfairly.
while I agree that given his standing in the polls Paul should have gotten more air time, lying will not help your cause. Paul does not poll better than Newt.They are just being whiny little bitches
Start coming up in the polls and you will get more FaceTime. As it is, they get more attention than their candidacy deserves
Here is the problem, people like RW that fear a candidate (Paul) that is not a fake. Paul talks about ending the wars and people like RW are scared because their party is now the huge massive evil war party. RW does not want someone like RP VS Obama because Obama would stand no chance, what would Obama tell liberals, dont vote Paul because he would end the wars and not bail out the rich???
Yes, I agree with Paul and Bachman that they are treated unfairly. Paul polls better than Newt and not too long ago Paul was polling 10-14% while Newt was polling 3% or 1% and they still gave Newt more time, so this idea that how you poll is going to determine your talk time is pure bullshit.
I also found it amazing the order they asked questions and the fact they didnt ask Paul about what cuts he would do. It was done like that because Paul offers actual cuts to balance the budget, others can just talk (as they did) and offer no meaningful cuts as long as the bar is set low. Instead they want to keep asking RP if he would allow terrorists to get nukes
I really hope if Paul does not get the nod he runs independent and kills the Republicans chances to beat Obama, there is simply no difference at this point. I liked Newt but now he is just a big spending war bitch who offers zero cuts. Go after crooks is Newts answer A it does not balance the budget and B what the fuck does that even mean
The currrent Republican voter base does not deserve to elect another war loving big spending President. I know it hurts but most Republicans are still nothing more than Progressive liberals.
I thought Bachmann did pretty well last night. She actually looked like she knew what she was talking about
More time would have just given her more time to screw up a good thing
youi didn't say he used to, you said he polls ahead of him. he does not. the last time Pau polled ahead of newt was a month ago and it was 9-8... statistically tied. Cripes man, Paul is only polling ahead of Perry in ONE current poll.while I agree that given his standing in the polls Paul should have gotten more air time, lying will not help your cause. Paul does not poll better than Newt.Here is the problem, people like RW that fear a candidate (Paul) that is not a fake. Paul talks about ending the wars and people like RW are scared because their party is now the huge massive evil war party. RW does not want someone like RP VS Obama because Obama would stand no chance, what would Obama tell liberals, “don’t vote Paul because he would end the wars and not bail out the rich???
Yes, I agree with Paul and Bachman that they are treated unfairly. Paul polls better than Newt and not too long ago Paul was polling 10-14% while Newt was polling 3% or 1% and they still gave Newt more time, so this idea that how you poll is going to determine your talk time is pure bullshit.
I also found it amazing the order they asked questions and the fact they didn’t ask Paul about what cuts he would do. It was done like that because Paul offers actual cuts to balance the budget, others can just talk (as they did) and offer no meaningful cuts as long as the bar is set low. Instead they want to keep asking RP if he would allow terrorists to get nukes…
I really hope if Paul does not get the nod he runs independent and kills the Republicans chances to beat Obama, there is simply no difference at this point. I liked Newt but now he is just a big spending war bitch who offers zero cuts. “Go after crooks” is Newts answer… A it does not balance the budget and B what the fuck does that even mean…
The currrent Republican voter base does not deserve to elect another war loving big spending President. I know it hurts but most Republicans are still nothing more than Progressive liberals.
He did for a long fucking time and some polls still show him ahead of Newt. Try and keep in mind that lying will not help your case...
It is always disappointing that Ron Paul gets to waste time better spent with worthwhile candidates. Michelle Bachman started off well, slid and just doesn't have the grace to bow out yet.
If we are to have a true democracy to go with our constitutional republic then we must have fair debates and true free media.
The Cain supporters complained about the lack of coverage for Herman Cain as well in his early campaign.
Do you agree with Ron Paul and Michele Bachman about the CBS debate?
More : Do you agree with Ron Paul and Michele Bachman about the CBS debate?
The winners of CBS debate are certainly Cain and Bachman, I agree with the statement that CBS ( Christian Bashing System) faked coverage about them. The speeches of meaningful RINOs were miserable, they should better run for Demoncrats.
You far right RINOs and CHINOs and AINOs! Listen up, suck wads, now!!
It will be Romney or Newt. Cain cannot stop the bleeding. Bachman is loony and Perry is goony. Johnson and Huntsman, the most sensible, don't stand a chance at all.
It is what it is. Get used to it.