Do Dems really want to help blacks and the poor?

You really have no clue. That was in regards to another who posted another crazy post. You can keep yelling $15.00 an hour all you want but with any luck smarter and cooler heads will prevail.
Why should I take you seriously if you don't understand the concept of unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

frivolous right wingers wasting time=money like lousy Capitalists are wont to do.
What state do you live in that does not have unemployment compensation? Every state I know of has that. Even if you are fired for being a terrible employee you are still able to recieve unemployment.

If you are talking unemployment for the rest of your life then that is welfare. That is totally diffrent.
no, it isn't. it is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. no employer Has to hire anyone on unemployment compensation, too long; not even in Right to Work States.
So you are saying that if you never try and hold a job for the rest of your life you should be compensated?
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
 
Why should I take you seriously if you don't understand the concept of unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

frivolous right wingers wasting time=money like lousy Capitalists are wont to do.
What state do you live in that does not have unemployment compensation? Every state I know of has that. Even if you are fired for being a terrible employee you are still able to recieve unemployment.

If you are talking unemployment for the rest of your life then that is welfare. That is totally diffrent.
no, it isn't. it is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. no employer Has to hire anyone on unemployment compensation, too long; not even in Right to Work States.
So you are saying that if you never try and hold a job for the rest of your life you should be compensated?
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

we have a natural rate of unemployment.

no employer Has to Hire me.
 
What state do you live in that does not have unemployment compensation? Every state I know of has that. Even if you are fired for being a terrible employee you are still able to recieve unemployment.

If you are talking unemployment for the rest of your life then that is welfare. That is totally diffrent.
no, it isn't. it is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. no employer Has to hire anyone on unemployment compensation, too long; not even in Right to Work States.
So you are saying that if you never try and hold a job for the rest of your life you should be compensated?
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

we have a natural rate of unemployment.

no employer Has to Hire me.

Yup, I figure you've got two chances....slim and none.
 
no, it isn't. it is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. no employer Has to hire anyone on unemployment compensation, too long; not even in Right to Work States.
So you are saying that if you never try and hold a job for the rest of your life you should be compensated?
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

we have a natural rate of unemployment.

no employer Has to Hire me.

Yup, I figure you've got two chances....slim and none.
don't understand the concepts, do you, right winger.
 
So you are saying that if you never try and hold a job for the rest of your life you should be compensated?
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

we have a natural rate of unemployment.

no employer Has to Hire me.

Yup, I figure you've got two chances....slim and none.
don't understand the concepts, do you, right winger.

Definitely don't understand your concepts, although I do understand attitude. And yours is your own worst enemy.
 
sure; especially if no employer has to seek me out and hire me for being unemployed too long.
You really are funny. I case you did not notice you just said that you are perfectly fine with being on welfare as long as no one tries to make you work.

The funny way that some of us think is that you should be responsible for your own life. Not everyone wants to pay for you. We actually expect you to find a job if it is available. No one should have to play the part of your parents and get you a job. No one should have to make a company take you as an employee. Some of us think that as a responsible adult you should be the one that tries to fill a job they should not have to track you down and beg you to take a job like some petulant two year old.
employment is at will in our at-will employment States.

we have a natural rate of unemployment.

no employer Has to Hire me.

Yup, I figure you've got two chances....slim and none.
don't understand the concepts, do you, right winger.

Definitely don't understand your concepts, although I do understand attitude. And yours is your own worst enemy.
anybody can gossip, right wingers; men have arguments.
 
Female-headed households produce most of our prison inmates, the highest crime rates and disproportionate numbers of high school dropouts and suicides. These devastating factors are far beyond the capacity of Washington to fix."

Washington put all the males from these households in prison. BOP Statistics: Inmate Gender Gangs of female thieves are stripping the shelves bare with impunity at every retail establishment. Band of female yoga pants thieves seen on video robbing Lululemon stores

Funny how people with little understanding always tout the $15.00 an hour minimum wage.

Just peg it to the dollar. The socialists and commies were talking $15.00/hour many years ago when it was high enough to sound really radical. Now it's nothing.

what runaway inflation?

Fed denialism. Our wages are fixed, and our cost of living is exploding.

What state do you live in that does not have unemployment compensation?

The rules keep changing in the middle of the game. Remember, you have to be fired, not lose your job voluntarily, to claim unemployment. It's corporate. There are "ways" to fire you without really "firing" you. They award it. Then they take it back. You can't pay it back or get another job because they are hard at work pressing charges against you for unemployment fraud. Good luck staying out of prison, (if you are male.)

it is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Total orthodox Keynesian Fed bullshit.

the costs of health insurance

The docs are still cutting off the feet of runaway slaves. They need to be brought to justice first. Health Care Fraud News — FBI
 
Yea, I know what the left is always saying. Thing is, you should watch people's actions because talk is cheap.

Leftist talk is about as cheap as it gets, though it does lead to major tax increases. Trillions of dollars have been spent on their "solutions" and yet the problems they address have a tendency to get bigger.

Most of the Dem-controlled cities are wastelands. Dem cities have the worst poverty, worst schools, and the highest crime.

If Dems really wanted to solve problems, then Detroit, Chicago and other places would great places to live. As it is, many fear going to these cities. Chicago has been completely controlled by Dems as long as I can remember. Anyone here want to move there? The strict gun control has allowed criminals to control the streets. Officials there clearly cannot handle the high crime.

Dems ALWAYS offer more government control and higher taxes for virtually any problem. "Personal responsibility" are dirty words. Some leftists even call them racist. No, they don't want people changing their behavior. They just want total government control and the people be damned. Leftists use minorities to advance their agenda. The need ignorant, outraged voters to carry them to victory. Should the left ever rule, and I do mean RULE, the country, those minorities and poor people they pretend to care about will not be better off. The rest of us would be dragged down to the lowest level and stay there as elitists get richer and richer. That is how it goes in socialist/communist countries 100% of the time.

Do liberals raise their children this way? Instead of insisting that they do for themselves, just do everything for them and keep convincing them that they can't do anything on their own and blame the neighbors? That is exactly how the left treats minorities. This is learned in schools and repeated constantly through leftist rhetoric.


"Would getting more blacks and Democrats in political office help? It turns out that of the Chicago City Council's 50 aldermen, only one is Republican. One is an independent. Forty-eight aldermen are Democrats, and 19 are black. In fact, most of the cities where large segments of their black citizenry live under horrible conditions have been controlled by Democrats for nearly a half-century, and there are many blacks on the instruments of control, such as chiefs of police, superintendents of schools and members of city councils. If Democratic and black control meant anything, these cities would be paradises.

How helpful to these desperate black communities are the efforts of so many black politicians to focus on allegations about President Donald Trump's ties to Russia? The leader of the movement to impeach Trump is Rep. Maxine Waters. Her congressional district suffers from high crime rates and failing schools. She, like most other black politicians, claims that she is helping her constituency by doing all she can to fight to get more taxpayer money to her district.

More money from taxpayers could not fix the problems of these communities. Over the past 50 years, more than $16 trillion has been spent on poverty programs. The majority of those programs have simply made poverty more comfortable by giving poor people more food, health care, housing, etc. What's needed most is to get poor people to change their behavior. Chief among the modifications is reducing female-headed households. Female-headed households produce most of our prison inmates, the highest crime rates and disproportionate numbers of high school dropouts and suicides. These devastating factors are far beyond the capacity of Washington to fix."


WILLIAMS: Enough's Enough

Simple answer to the op title:

NO

Prove it with a link(s) to unbiased, factual proof or your 'word' means zip.

I guarantee that you cannot provide such links.


And than your statement will be clearly seen for what it obviously is - just another outflow of factless, over-emotional bile directed at tens of millions of people - 99.9+% of them you have never even met.


Once again, I am neither Rep nor Dem.
 
Yea, I know what the left is always saying. Thing is, you should watch people's actions because talk is cheap.

Leftist talk is about as cheap as it gets, though it does lead to major tax increases. Trillions of dollars have been spent on their "solutions" and yet the problems they address have a tendency to get bigger.

Most of the Dem-controlled cities are wastelands. Dem cities have the worst poverty, worst schools, and the highest crime.

If Dems really wanted to solve problems, then Detroit, Chicago and other places would great places to live. As it is, many fear going to these cities. Chicago has been completely controlled by Dems as long as I can remember. Anyone here want to move there? The strict gun control has allowed criminals to control the streets. Officials there clearly cannot handle the high crime.

Dems ALWAYS offer more government control and higher taxes for virtually any problem. "Personal responsibility" are dirty words. Some leftists even call them racist. No, they don't want people changing their behavior. They just want total government control and the people be damned. Leftists use minorities to advance their agenda. The need ignorant, outraged voters to carry them to victory. Should the left ever rule, and I do mean RULE, the country, those minorities and poor people they pretend to care about will not be better off. The rest of us would be dragged down to the lowest level and stay there as elitists get richer and richer. That is how it goes in socialist/communist countries 100% of the time.

Do liberals raise their children this way? Instead of insisting that they do for themselves, just do everything for them and keep convincing them that they can't do anything on their own and blame the neighbors? That is exactly how the left treats minorities. This is learned in schools and repeated constantly through leftist rhetoric.


"Would getting more blacks and Democrats in political office help? It turns out that of the Chicago City Council's 50 aldermen, only one is Republican. One is an independent. Forty-eight aldermen are Democrats, and 19 are black. In fact, most of the cities where large segments of their black citizenry live under horrible conditions have been controlled by Democrats for nearly a half-century, and there are many blacks on the instruments of control, such as chiefs of police, superintendents of schools and members of city councils. If Democratic and black control meant anything, these cities would be paradises.

How helpful to these desperate black communities are the efforts of so many black politicians to focus on allegations about President Donald Trump's ties to Russia? The leader of the movement to impeach Trump is Rep. Maxine Waters. Her congressional district suffers from high crime rates and failing schools. She, like most other black politicians, claims that she is helping her constituency by doing all she can to fight to get more taxpayer money to her district.

More money from taxpayers could not fix the problems of these communities. Over the past 50 years, more than $16 trillion has been spent on poverty programs. The majority of those programs have simply made poverty more comfortable by giving poor people more food, health care, housing, etc. What's needed most is to get poor people to change their behavior. Chief among the modifications is reducing female-headed households. Female-headed households produce most of our prison inmates, the highest crime rates and disproportionate numbers of high school dropouts and suicides. These devastating factors are far beyond the capacity of Washington to fix."


WILLIAMS: Enough's Enough


34d006f321f50dfe304a464ef11cce09.jpg


What a jumbled mess of an OP.

First, you strongly imply that Dems do not want to help the poor.

Than you turn around and type 'Over the past 50 years, more than $16 trillion has been spent on poverty programs.'. And this COMPLETELY blows away the notion that Dems do not want to help the poor as they are obviously agreeing (by your stats) to throw boat loads of money at the problem.

That is called 'inefficiency'...not 'cold heartedness'.


Jeez...it's like you started typing something at the beginning. But soon you forgot what the title of your thread even was.


Now, if you want to argue that Dems tend to blindly throw too much money at the poor...I will agree with you. All the government should do - IMO - is provide basic shelter/food/education and medical care (full healthcare for the disabled/children) for those who need it. I don't agree with handing out checks or giving them apartments for free or government 'programs' to stimulate various businesses or areas.
And please save the shit about 'helping the poor is not in the Constitution'. My answer to that is - I don't give a shit about the Constitution (the same 'amazing' Constitution that did not outlaw slavery or give women the vote when it was first passed AND a bunch of other crap they got wrong)...I follow my own laws and values. And my values state that governments MUST help those who cannot help themselves. And the Founding Fathers can shove it if they don't agree. And so can you.

But STRONGLY inferring that the left do not want to help the poor and than turning around and telling us about the HUGE amounts of money they have thrown at the poor over the last two generations is ridiculous in the extremis.
 
Last edited:
And please save the shit about 'helping the poor is not in the Constitution'. My answer to that is - I don't give a shit about the Constitution

I wish everybody on the left was as honest as you are about it so America could really understand who they are voting for.
 
So Maxdeath does not know the rules of unemployment compensation
I do not know the rules for every state in the U.S. Perhaps you might but I doubt very much that you even know those for your state.
Having been glad to veterans with our state's disability and compensation and unemployment rules, I am not worried about your comment.
Glad as in happy??? Well I am glad that veterans get benefits. I think they should get more.
 
Being that gays, Muslims, and illegals are now the favored victims for the DFL, it is a return to the back of the bus for blacks in the DFL.
 
Yea, I know what the left is always saying. Thing is, you should watch people's actions because talk is cheap.

Leftist talk is about as cheap as it gets, though it does lead to major tax increases. Trillions of dollars have been spent on their "solutions" and yet the problems they address have a tendency to get bigger.

Most of the Dem-controlled cities are wastelands. Dem cities have the worst poverty, worst schools, and the highest crime.

If Dems really wanted to solve problems, then Detroit, Chicago and other places would great places to live. As it is, many fear going to these cities. Chicago has been completely controlled by Dems as long as I can remember. Anyone here want to move there? The strict gun control has allowed criminals to control the streets. Officials there clearly cannot handle the high crime.

Dems ALWAYS offer more government control and higher taxes for virtually any problem. "Personal responsibility" are dirty words. Some leftists even call them racist. No, they don't want people changing their behavior. They just want total government control and the people be damned. Leftists use minorities to advance their agenda. The need ignorant, outraged voters to carry them to victory. Should the left ever rule, and I do mean RULE, the country, those minorities and poor people they pretend to care about will not be better off. The rest of us would be dragged down to the lowest level and stay there as elitists get richer and richer. That is how it goes in socialist/communist countries 100% of the time.

Do liberals raise their children this way? Instead of insisting that they do for themselves, just do everything for them and keep convincing them that they can't do anything on their own and blame the neighbors? That is exactly how the left treats minorities. This is learned in schools and repeated constantly through leftist rhetoric.


"Would getting more blacks and Democrats in political office help? It turns out that of the Chicago City Council's 50 aldermen, only one is Republican. One is an independent. Forty-eight aldermen are Democrats, and 19 are black. In fact, most of the cities where large segments of their black citizenry live under horrible conditions have been controlled by Democrats for nearly a half-century, and there are many blacks on the instruments of control, such as chiefs of police, superintendents of schools and members of city councils. If Democratic and black control meant anything, these cities would be paradises.

How helpful to these desperate black communities are the efforts of so many black politicians to focus on allegations about President Donald Trump's ties to Russia? The leader of the movement to impeach Trump is Rep. Maxine Waters. Her congressional district suffers from high crime rates and failing schools. She, like most other black politicians, claims that she is helping her constituency by doing all she can to fight to get more taxpayer money to her district.

More money from taxpayers could not fix the problems of these communities. Over the past 50 years, more than $16 trillion has been spent on poverty programs. The majority of those programs have simply made poverty more comfortable by giving poor people more food, health care, housing, etc. What's needed most is to get poor people to change their behavior. Chief among the modifications is reducing female-headed households. Female-headed households produce most of our prison inmates, the highest crime rates and disproportionate numbers of high school dropouts and suicides. These devastating factors are far beyond the capacity of Washington to fix."


WILLIAMS: Enough's Enough
Do Republicans?
I think it is important to separate the labels, democrat/Republican, from the ideologies that have devastated the minority community.

No one has clean hands. We all need to address the problem we created as a nation and find a way to mitigate the violence while promoting education.

It's fun to point fingers but that obviously solves nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top