Disband the air force!!!!11!!

[JBeukema]

IT'S NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION! THAT MAKES IT TYRANNY!

GET YOUR GUNS, TEABAGGERS! SET YOUR SURVEYORS' MARKS ON THE AIR FORCE AND END THIS ABUSE!!







until they amend the constitution, the Air Force is unconstitutional

 

[Avorysuds]

No it's not...

 

[WillowTree]

democrat party has a big PR problem, they also have brain damage. seek help,

 

[JBeukema]

Show me where the Air Force appears in the Constitution

 

[California Girl]

Ummmm, yea, it is. It's defending the country. Defending the country is granted to congress under the Constitution.

The OP is in stupid mode today. Pity.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Show me where the Air Force appears in the Constitution

"Provide for the common defense".

Show us where ObamaCare is in the Constitution.

 

[JBeukema]

Ummmm, yea, it is.

No, it's not.


The Army is. The Navy is. The Militias are. The Coast Guard and the Air Force are not.

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

It's defending the country

Not constitutionally. You want an air force, change the constitution.

Or are you now proposing a 'living constitution' like some kind of liberocommieprogressive?

 

[JBeukema]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

 

[Avorysuds]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

bingo...

 

[BenNatuf]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

in what way does paying SOME few people minimum wage provide for the GENERAL welfare of the UNITED STATES?

 

[JBeukema]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

bingo...

I see. So you get to make it up as you go?

I get it:

Guns and killing people = good

Ending slavery = bad

bombs = good

a mother being able to feed her baby = bad



makes perfect sense!


Gottta love conservatism

 

[JBeukema]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

in what way does paying SOME few people minimum wage provide for the GENERAL welfare of the UNITED STATES?

Some? A few?

Read a history book.

Go to the library and ask for books regarding the history of the Labour movement in the US.


Then read up on economics. Specifically marginal utility and the way demand is increased when the average household has greater surplus income and greater buying power, fueling the entire economy.

 

[Avorysuds]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

bingo...

I see. So you get to make it up as you go?

I get it:

Guns and killing people = good

Ending slavery = bad

bombs = good

a mother being able to feed her baby = bad



makes perfect sense!


Gottta love conservatism

Can you show me where I said that? Didn't think so... Troll threads are bad =(

 

[Big Fitz]

Mmm... JBullshit trys Saul Alinsky and fails.

 

[Revere]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

in what way does paying SOME few people minimum wage provide for the GENERAL welfare of the UNITED STATES?

Some? A few?

Read a history book.

Go to the library and ask for books regarding the history of the Labour movement in the US.


Then read up on economics. Specifically marginal utility and the way demand is increased when the average household has greater surplus income and greater buying power, fueling the entire economy.

So every job should have a minimum wage?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Show me where the Air Force appears in the Constitution

"Provide for the common defense".

Show us where ObamaCare is in the Constitution.

You mean like "...promote the general Welfare...";.....things like vaccinations.....so you "conservatives" don't spread your diseases thru-out the entire-population???? ​

 

[G.T.]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

in what way does paying SOME few people minimum wage provide for the GENERAL welfare of the UNITED STATES?

Because noone (so, General...not some) is below a minimum standard, it's pretty simple.

 

[California Girl]

Show me where the Air Force appears in the Constitution

"Provide for the common defense".

Show us where ObamaCare is in the Constitution.

You mean like "...promote the general Welfare...";.....things like vaccinations.....so you "conservatives" don't spread your diseases thru-out the entire-population???? ​

Promote.

Provide.

Comprehend.

Got it?

No. I thought not.

Can't fix stupid.

 

[BenNatuf]

So... defense means they can make up new military forces but Article 1 Section 8 means they can't provide for the general prosperity of the nation and its people by ensuring a wage above that of the old sharecroppers and preventing 8-year-olds from being sent into the mines?

in what way does paying SOME few people minimum wage provide for the GENERAL welfare of the UNITED STATES?

Some? A few?

that would be correct. the few, comparatively, who recieve MW

Read a history book.

Understand one

Go to the library and ask for books regarding the history of the Labour movement in the US.

You mean the movement that didn't allow black people in it because it was born of the same racist cloth as the rest of the progressive movement? maybe its you who should get a book.

Then read up on economics. Specifically marginal utility and the way demand is increased when the average household has greater surplus income and greater buying power, fueling the entire economy.

Who on MW has "surplus income"?

How does the government interferance in the supply and demand of the labor market artificially increasing the COL, and therefore the cost of goods, benefit the consumer by taking his money from him in the form higher cost and redistributing it to someone else in the form of artificial wage demands (which incidently lowers demand for labor thereby creating a welfare class sucking even more money out of the consumers pocket)?

You're hybridded keyensian/marxist model has broken the bank and has the worlds economy on the brink of collapse.

 

[Publius1787]

IT'S NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION! THAT MAKES IT TYRANNY!

GET YOUR GUNS, TEABAGGERS! SET YOUR SURVEYORS' MARKS ON THE AIR FORCE AND END THIS ABUSE!!







until they amend the constitution, the Air Force is unconstitutional

Ha. Ive heard of this arguement before. No need to disband it. Just change its name BACK to the Army Air Corps. Problem solved! And yet the giant hole in your arguement remains! Amazing how changing the name sends your arguement out the window huh? So if you want to make that arguement, take it to the courts, and watch them change the name, and you lose either way. What since does that make? Congreats! Your rediculous attempt to mock thoes who want to uphold the law of the land is now dead. Boy was that ever a thread ender huh? Next please.