Dems.....STOP giving Trump "ammunition" about ICE

[Silent Warrior]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

 

[Richard-H]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

 

[Richard-H]

Abolishing or tempering the mission of ICE should be made based on a non-political basis.

I personally, think that we need ICE, but that there mission should be reduced to focusing on serious criminal behavior. Illegal border crossings are not serious criminal behavior.

So you want to change the name to NICE?
No Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

If you walked across the border from the U.S. to MExico do you think that the Mexican authorities should arrest you, separate you from your kids, and put you in a detention center?

Yes, that's exactly what would happen.

I imagine that it would -especially now tha we're doing ot tto their nationals.

But I didn't ask what 'would' happen, I asked what you thought 'should' happen.

I'm sure that if you wandered into Mexico, you would't be too happy with being arrested.

 

[S.J.]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

It is a serious crime. It undermines our economy and the American people.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Given what the majority of Americans and virtually the entire world population thinks about the idiot occupying the oval office, it should be a rather easy task to bash the heck out of his lies, flip-flops and corruption.

Instead, some democrats manage to give this charlatan ridiculous talking points. The campaign to "abolish ICE" is a perfect example.

Yes, many of us know that some of ICE's methods would make the Gestapo blush, BUT to call for its abolishing just feeds into Trump's demagoguery that Dems. are for open borders and anti law-enforcement which feeds into the biases and ignorance that is the basis of Trump cult members.

There are many, many issues to slam the moron-in-chief (issues that he himself spews on a daily basis,) BUT giving him talking points to rally his horde of sycophants should NOT be one of them.

The DNC NEEDS much better leadership.....

Yes, many of us know that some of ICE's methods would make the Gestapo blush,

The only people who "know that" are morons.

 

[S.J.]

Abolishing or tempering the mission of ICE should be made based on a non-political basis.

I personally, think that we need ICE, but that there mission should be reduced to focusing on serious criminal behavior. Illegal border crossings are not serious criminal behavior.

So you want to change the name to NICE?
No Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

If you walked across the border from the U.S. to MExico do you think that the Mexican authorities should arrest you, separate you from your kids, and put you in a detention center?

Yes, that's exactly what would happen.

I imagine that it would -especially now tha we're doing ot tto their nationals.

But I didn't ask what 'would' happen, I asked what you thought 'should' happen.

I'm sure that if you wandered into Mexico, you would't be too happy with being arrested.

They don't "wander into the U.S.", they come here knowing they're breaking the law and they should be sent back. A wall would prevent a lot of it.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Abolishing or tempering the mission of ICE should be made based on a non-political basis.

I personally, think that we need ICE, but that there mission should be reduced to focusing on serious criminal behavior. Illegal border crossings are not serious criminal behavior.

So you want to change the name to NICE?
No Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

If you walked across the border from the U.S. to MExico do you think that the Mexican authorities should arrest you, separate you from your kids, and put you in a detention center?

Yes, that's exactly what would happen.

I imagine that it would -especially now tha we're doing ot tto their nationals.

But I didn't ask what 'would' happen, I asked what you thought 'should' happen.

I'm sure that if you wandered into Mexico, you would't be too happy with being arrested.

What makes you think they haven't been doing the exact same thing as we have?

Wandered in?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Yes, many of us know that some of ICE's methods would make the Gestapo blush

Such as?

 

[Claudette]

Kinda funny how every time a bill comes up on immigration the Dems all vote no.

Now all of a sudden ICE is the Gestapo??

Loads of people want all illegals out of America and they don't want amnesty for any of them.

Immigration will be a big deal come Nov.

The Dems are on the wrong side of that issue and its an important issue to many Americans.

Good luck on that blue wave. Morons.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dims will say out of one side of their mouths that they are NOT for open borders, but out of the other side they talk about doing away with the immigration enforcement.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Given what the majority of Americans and virtually the entire world population thinks about the idiot occupying the oval office, it should be a rather easy task to bash the heck out of his lies, flip-flops and corruption.

Instead, some democrats manage to give this charlatan ridiculous talking points. The campaign to "abolish ICE" is a perfect example.

Yes, many of us know that some of ICE's methods would make the Gestapo blush, BUT to call for its abolishing just feeds into Trump's demagoguery that Dems. are for open borders and anti law-enforcement which feeds into the biases and ignorance that is the basis of Trump cult members.

There are many, many issues to slam the moron-in-chief (issues that he himself spews on a daily basis,) BUT giving him talking points to rally his horde of sycophants should NOT be one of them.

The DNC NEEDS much better leadership.....

dems 2018: FUCK YOU, AMERICA!!! We want our crumbs back, put your weapon on the ground, hand over your wallet, we <3 MS-13! Donde esta la bibliotecha?

 

[Tilly]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

Governments don’t exist to serve illegal aliens.

 

[whitehall]

democrat party's sudden lurch to socialism along with open borders and the elimination of the agency that protects Americans from criminals entering the U.S. illegally

LOL

IDIOT......does that mean that the 20,000 plus Border Patrol agents aren't worth shit????

Don't forget that a federal agency under Obama shipped over 3,000 illegal weapons to Mex. drug cartels and a Border Patrol agent was murdered with one of the weapons. Nobody in the Obama administration was indicted or even fired. It shows how much Barry Hussein cared about the agency.

 

[Richard-H]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

It is a serious crime. It undermines our economy and the American people.

So does President Trump, but we're not throwing him in a detention center...yet.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

Yes it is. Anyone breaking any law poses a definitive threat. If not, why bother to have laws at all. They won't have their liberty taken away if they enter legally. If they enter illegally they have no right to liberty.

 

[Richard-H]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

Governments don’t exist to serve illegal aliens.

If you knew anything about the founding principals and the determinations of SCOTUS you'd know that both inalienable rights and Constitutional right are applicable to everyone, not just U.S. citizens.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

Crossing the border illegally is a serious crime.

No it's not. Governments exist to serve people. Unless a person poses a definitive threat, they should not have their liberty taken away.

Governments don’t exist to serve illegal aliens.

If you knew anything about the founding principals and the determinations of SCOTUS you'd know that both inalienable rights and Constitutional right are applicable to everyone, not just U.S. citizens.

If you knew anything about the founding principals and the determinations of SCOTUS you'd know you are wrong.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Abolishing or tempering the mission of ICE should be made based on a non-political basis.

I personally, think that we need ICE, but that there mission should be reduced to focusing on serious criminal behavior. Illegal border crossings are not serious criminal behavior.

So you want to change the name to NICE?
No Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

If you walked across the border from the U.S. to MExico do you think that the Mexican authorities should arrest you, separate you from your kids, and put you in a detention center?

the Mexican police will beat your ass and then take everything you have and then let you go....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Abolishing or tempering the mission of ICE should be made based on a non-political basis.

I personally, think that we need ICE, but that there mission should be reduced to focusing on serious criminal behavior. Illegal border crossings are not serious criminal behavior.

So you want to change the name to NICE?
No Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Yes. They should be 'NICE' to people who have not comitted serious crimes.

If you walked across the border from the U.S. to MExico do you think that the Mexican authorities should arrest you, separate you from your kids, and put you in a detention center?

the Mexican police will beat your ass and then take everything you have and then let you go....

Or possibly kill your gringo ass and bury you in the desert.

 

[BookShaka]

Given what the majority of Americans and virtually the entire world population thinks about the idiot occupying the oval office, it should be a rather easy task to bash the heck out of his lies, flip-flops and corruption.

Instead, some democrats manage to give this charlatan ridiculous talking points. The campaign to "abolish ICE" is a perfect example.

Yes, many of us know that some of ICE's methods would make the Gestapo blush, BUT to call for its abolishing just feeds into Trump's demagoguery that Dems. are for open borders and anti law-enforcement which feeds into the biases and ignorance that is the basis of Trump cult members.

There are many, many issues to slam the moron-in-chief (issues that he himself spews on a daily basis,) BUT giving him talking points to rally his horde of sycophants should NOT be one of them.

The DNC NEEDS much better leadership.....

Um... correct me if I’m wrong and I’ve no doubt you’ll chastise me for even suggesting this bc of your blatant close-mindedness and superiority complex, but it seems as if you’re saying, “the Dems should stop their anti-ICE rhetoric bc it makes people believe they want open borders and to eliminate law enforcement’s authority over illegal immigrants,” is really no different from saying, “people need to stop calling water wet bc it makes people believe they need towels to dry their skin.”

Actions should speak for themselves. How exactly is it ridiculous to conclude that if the Democrats cared to stop illegal immigration, they wouldn’t be advocating for abolishing the organization whose job it is to enforce immigration laws? Seems like a fair assumption to make. Can you supply an answer without being rude and condescending?