Democrats: Let's Throw Out The Constitution

[Skylar]

Says you, citing your own imagination. The only person beyond your imagination that has been cited to support your claims.....is Ryan Cooper.

And the only one beyond myself I'm citing to support my claims.....is Lou Dobbs.

If Ryan Cooper is 'Democrats', then Lou Dobbs is 'Republicans'.

Says me and others like Billy Kinetta.

Not just Ryan Cooper but Ruth Ginsberg, University Professors and so on, many.

Can you show me Ruth Ginsberg ever saying 'lets throw out the constitution'?

Or is this imaginary Ruth Ginsberg?

She said it was out dated.

When did she say 'lets throw out the constitution'? Because so far you've only quoted IRGB

What part of what I said did you not get?

The part where she never said 'lets throw out the constitution'.

I never said that she was for throwing out the constitution.

So we're back to square one. Where you've got Ryan Cooper as 'Democrats'. And I've got Lou Dobbs as "Republicans'.

 

[Disir]

Who the hell is Ryan Cooper?

Ryan Cooper | CNN Journalist | Muck Rack

I have CNN on ignore. No wonder.

Oh, so this one dude is 'Democrats'.

Cool. Does that mean Lou Dobbs is 'Republicans'? If so, I've got some choice quotes from 'Republicans'.

So, you managed to ignore my post after that because it suited your purpose? Were you dropped on your head as a child?

 

[Skylar]

Who the hell is Ryan Cooper?

Ryan Cooper | CNN Journalist | Muck Rack

I have CNN on ignore. No wonder.

Oh, so this one dude is 'Democrats'.

Cool. Does that mean Lou Dobbs is 'Republicans'? If so, I've got some choice quotes from 'Republicans'.

So, you managed to ignore my post after that because it suited your purpose? Were you dropped on your head as a child?

I've quoted your post. You're clearly not following the conversation.

 

[Disir]

Who the hell is Ryan Cooper?

Ryan Cooper | CNN Journalist | Muck Rack

I have CNN on ignore. No wonder.

Oh, so this one dude is 'Democrats'.

Cool. Does that mean Lou Dobbs is 'Republicans'? If so, I've got some choice quotes from 'Republicans'.

So, you managed to ignore my post after that because it suited your purpose? Were you dropped on your head as a child?

I've quoted your post. You're clearly not following the conversation.

Well, he can do it the correct way in order to be taken seriously. Alter or abolish.
I'm going to need to see some usurpations and abuses.

The Final Text of the Declaration of Independence July 4 1776 < 1776-1785 < Documents < American History From Revolution To Reconstruction and beyond

If he is unwilling or unable then he can have a big bowl of STFU stew.

 

[Slash]

I used to think that was where Democrats leaned. And I am a Republican. But to see Trump side with Big Business over the US Constitution with the NFL is despicable. I get that the pre-game kneeling is disrespectful. I get that the NFL saying they let their players express their constitutional freedom of speech even if it offends some people is not a move all companies would, or have to make. But damn, to call for them to block the freedom of speech because you are offended by it? That's where it ended for me. R/D on the back of someones name doesn't matter if you hate the Constitution and speak out against it, you lost my support.

 

[Cecilie1200]

As anyone who was not sleeping in High School Civics class knows, the Founding FATHERS intentionally made it difficult to change the Constitution. Change should be by a broad consensus, and not by a temporary majority in the Congress.

The outrage at this time in history is that Progressives starting with FDR have twisted and contorted the Constitution beyond all recognition, so that today, more than half of the Federal Government's discretionary outlays are for unconstitutional programs - starting with Social Security and Medicare.

The worst recent example of the phenomenon, obviously, was the Affordable Care Act, which was unconstitutional, root and branch, but which a compliant and foolish Supreme Court elected to allow for political considerations.

It is a disgrace.

Of course, Leftists cannot comprehend the difference between good/bad, and "unconstitutional," and think that everything "good" MUST BE constitutional, and everything they don't like must be "unconstitutional." There are many GOOD ideas that are unconstitutional as hell, which is why one would need to go through the painful process of amending the Constitutional to make them happen. But Leftists are too impatient and immature to allow this process to play out.

What makes you think high schools teach Civics classes any more?

 

[ScienceRocks]

So the constitution says that the poor can fucking die, be serfs and the rich can have it all? Right?

If not then the democrats aint saying that at all.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Imagining?

No you can hear it in their speech.
It's like watching the sixties TV again saying the same thing when they started that movement of ideology.

Says you, citing your own imagination. The only person beyond your imagination that has been cited to support your claims.....is Ryan Cooper.

And the only one beyond myself I'm citing to support my claims.....is Lou Dobbs.

If Ryan Cooper is 'Democrats', then Lou Dobbs is 'Republicans'.

Says me and others like Billy Kinetta.

Not just Ryan Cooper but Ruth Ginsberg, University Professors and so on, many.

Can you show me Ruth Ginsberg ever saying 'lets throw out the constitution'?

Or is this imaginary Ruth Ginsberg?

A picture speaks a thousand words

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So the constitution says that the poor can fucking die, be serfs and the rich can have it all? Right?

If not then the democrats aint saying that at all.

Yea they saying this...

 

[TheParser]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

 

[Disir]

Does it change the oligarchy? No.

Keep the Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

 

[BS Filter]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

[danielpalos]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

 

[BS Filter]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

Solutions for what?

 

[danielpalos]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

Solutions for what?

our spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

 

[danielpalos]

Dear Judicature,

We cannot be in real times of War if the right wing believes we can lower taxes and not raise taxes, meet for the alleged exigency.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

That is what wartime tax rates look like.

The right wing alleging we can lower taxes, is just socialized income redistribution that benefits those with the most Capital, not the exigencies of our Republic.

Merely, a right wing "feel good" policy that does not benefit our Republic.

 

[BS Filter]

We have all been taught that the United States has the best Constitution ever written.

Perhaps that is true.

But perhaps the Constitution is not really suitable for this changing country (and, boy, is it changing!).

*****

Perhaps a parliamentary form of government would be better.

We would have a ceremonial president who is the symbol of the nation. S/he would be someone who is above politics and someone all Americans could either admire or ignore. This would prevent the kind of horrific (and dangerous) polarization that we are witnessing today.

We would have a prime minister, who would have the power.

Since s/he would need a vote of confidence to continue, s/he could be "invited" to leave at any time.

*****

I do believe that a parliamentary system of government (based on proportional representation) comes closest to a true democracy.

Everyone gets a voice at the table.

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

Solutions for what?

our spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

Spending on national defense is a constitutional requirement. Spending on health care insurance isn't. Are you a socialist?

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing is supposed to have better solutions at lower cost, not, nothing but repeal.

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

Solutions for what?

our spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

Spending on national defense is a constitutional requirement. Spending on health care insurance isn't. Are you a socialist?

We can lower taxes. It Must be real times of Peace, not real times of War. We have a Second Amendment, we don't need a standing army.

 

[BS Filter]

Repealing Obungocare IS a better solution. Nothing but a con game and a big lie, wasting billions of tax dollars. Ya'll should be ashamed of yourselves.

The right wing had nothing but repeal. They never had any solutions.

Solutions for what?

our spending on alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

Spending on national defense is a constitutional requirement. Spending on health care insurance isn't. Are you a socialist?

We can lower taxes. It Must be real times of Peace, not real times of War. We have a Second Amendment, we don't need a standing army.

Obviously we do need a military because it's a Constitutional requirement. Are you against the US Constitution?