Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
LOLOLIs this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
The principle of separation of church and state is not in the Constitution per se but has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in countless decisions.Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
LOLOLIs this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
The principle of separation of church and state is not in the Constitution per se but has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in countless decisions.Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
https://usconstitution.net/consttop_reli.html
The Constitution only specifically mentions religion in Article 6 with regards to prohibiting religious tests for office holders.
It’s been upheld every single time, regardless of who was on the bench. Perhaps you should consider it’s you who’s wrong, not the SCOTUS.LOLOLIs this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
Exactly.
SCOTUS isn't infallible you know.
Are you really going to argue that the first contintental congress's first hire was a congressional pastor, but they didn't want religion inside government? LOL SCOTUS themselves opens every session with a PRAYER LOL hahahahaha that's just too funny
It’s been upheld every single time, regardless of who was on the bench. Perhaps you should consider it’s you who’s wrong, not the SCOTUS.LOLOLIs this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
Exactly.
SCOTUS isn't infallible you know.
Are you really going to argue that the first contintental congress's first hire was a congressional pastor, but they didn't want religion inside government? LOL SCOTUS themselves opens every session with a PRAYER LOL hahahahaha that's just too funny
Is this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
The principle of separation of church and state is not in the Constitution...
LOLOLIt’s been upheld every single time, regardless of who was on the bench. Perhaps you should consider it’s you who’s wrong, not the SCOTUS.LOLOLIs this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
Exactly.
SCOTUS isn't infallible you know.
Are you really going to argue that the first contintental congress's first hire was a congressional pastor, but they didn't want religion inside government? LOL SCOTUS themselves opens every session with a PRAYER LOL hahahahaha that's just too funny
I've considered it and rejected it. ANY court that says that the founding fathers intended that for example a high school football coach couldn't pray after a football game, or that a Jew couldn't wear a yamaluke while at a city council meeting or that a Muslim couldn't wear her hoodie in Congress, or yes even that a Christian town couldn't put a cross up on their property because it might offend people who don't even live there is a violation of the law is WRONG.
Again I ask, if SCOTUS is and has been correct in that there is to be a wall between Church and State how come every session of Congress and every session of the Court begins with a prayer? You can't square that.
LOLOLIt’s been upheld every single time, regardless of who was on the bench. Perhaps you should consider it’s you who’s wrong, not the SCOTUS.LOLOLSeparation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
Exactly.
SCOTUS isn't infallible you know.
Are you really going to argue that the first contintental congress's first hire was a congressional pastor, but they didn't want religion inside government? LOL SCOTUS themselves opens every session with a PRAYER LOL hahahahaha that's just too funny
I've considered it and rejected it. ANY court that says that the founding fathers intended that for example a high school football coach couldn't pray after a football game, or that a Jew couldn't wear a yamaluke while at a city council meeting or that a Muslim couldn't wear her hoodie in Congress, or yes even that a Christian town couldn't put a cross up on their property because it might offend people who don't even live there is a violation of the law is WRONG.
Again I ask, if SCOTUS is and has been correct in that there is to be a wall between Church and State how come every session of Congress and every session of the Court begins with a prayer? You can't square that.
How fortunate is America that you’re a nobody with zero self awareness whose opinion counts for nothing? Meanwhile, the SCOTUS has upheld that wall at every turn — and their opinion matters very much.
The courts get around that by deeming the prayers are non denominational and not indicative of any single religion.Your childish insults attempts aside, you're conceding that you can't square "separation of church and state" with scotus and congress both beginning every session with a prayer? Of course you are, because you can't.
The courts get around that by deeming the prayers are non denominational and not indicative of any single religion.Your childish insults attempts aside, you're conceding that you can't square "separation of church and state" with scotus and congress both beginning every session with a prayer? Of course you are, because you can't.
I think you are correct that the Supreme Court has made a series of decisions that drive religion out of the public arena
as much as they can (like uttering the word "God" before a football game is censored). But hopefully their view of religion and the government will come back on them when this issue of Ilhan Omar and her hijab is brought before them, as it certainly should be, thanks to their own rejection on any religious ties to our government.
LOLOLLOLOLIt’s been upheld every single time, regardless of who was on the bench. Perhaps you should consider it’s you who’s wrong, not the SCOTUS.LOLOL
And by “liberal retards in order to attack Christianity,” you mean the repeated interpretations by multiple Supreme Court rulings spanning multiple cases brought to their court reaffirming the wall between church and state.
Exactly.
SCOTUS isn't infallible you know.
Are you really going to argue that the first contintental congress's first hire was a congressional pastor, but they didn't want religion inside government? LOL SCOTUS themselves opens every session with a PRAYER LOL hahahahaha that's just too funny
I've considered it and rejected it. ANY court that says that the founding fathers intended that for example a high school football coach couldn't pray after a football game, or that a Jew couldn't wear a yamaluke while at a city council meeting or that a Muslim couldn't wear her hoodie in Congress, or yes even that a Christian town couldn't put a cross up on their property because it might offend people who don't even live there is a violation of the law is WRONG.
Again I ask, if SCOTUS is and has been correct in that there is to be a wall between Church and State how come every session of Congress and every session of the Court begins with a prayer? You can't square that.
How fortunate is America that you’re a nobody with zero self awareness whose opinion counts for nothing? Meanwhile, the SCOTUS has upheld that wall at every turn — and their opinion matters very much.
Your childish insults attempts aside, you're conceding that you can't square "separation of church and state" with scotus and congress both beginning every session with a prayer? Of course you are, because you can't.
I'm not at all arguing that the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution properly. In fact I agree that they have interpreted it in such a way to do away with all religion, to they extent that's possible for them to do that.That' s what I'm saying. The founding fathers obviously didn't intend for their to be NO religion in our government at all. Hell, the very first person they hired was a Congressional Minister, even before they hired George Washington to lead the Army. All they intended was that, for example, Catholics couldn't punish Quakers for not being Catholics. That's it.
Is this an admission you don't even know what is in the Constitution?The Constitution indeed mentions the need to stay clear of state sponsored religions. Islam is a religion, albeit a
savage eighth century religion.
Why can't you quote it then? Constipated?
Never heard of separation of church and state? I always thought you were very very stupid, but I didn't know you were just plain ignorant.
The principle of separation of church and state is not in the Constitution per se but has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in countless decisions.Separation of Church and State is in fact NOT in the COTUS. That's a made of bunch of bullshit by liberal retards in order to attack Christianity, notice that when it comes to Islam suddenly they feign ignorance. Oh who are we kidding, they aren't feigning.
https://usconstitution.net/consttop_reli.html
The Constitution only specifically mentions religion in Article 6 with regards to prohibiting religious tests for office holders.
Yet isn't it funny that it was Bernie Sanders who last year held one nomination in particular to a religious litmus test during her Senate confirmation hearing............ LOL Democrats are morons.
Good idea. Try holding your breath too. You've already gotten all the answer there is.Sooooooooooooo still nothing.
We sit, and we wait.
Good idea. Try holding your breath too. You've already gotten all the answer there is.Sooooooooooooo still nothing.
We sit, and we wait.
There has been no silence. You asked a fucking dumb question and I answered it to the best of anyone's ability.I'm well aware of that. Which is exactly why I pose the question --- because the silence is eloquent.
