Democrats Change 181 Year-Old Rule To Allow Ilhan Omar To Wear Hijab In The House

This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.
 
This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.

You are a clueless moron, so why should we care what you think?

You keep referencing something that does not exist nor what the Constitution does not say.
 
This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.

Not really. Nobody is forced to wear a head covering, but everyone is forced to endure a prayer. If you truly want to separate church and state, eliminate the prayer.
 
This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.

It's a piece of cloth, not a "religion". Religion is an abstract, not a physical object.

Establishment of religion in Congress is much more like having a chaplain read some mumbo-jumbo hypnosis spell.
 
This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.

Not really. Nobody is forced to wear a head covering, but everyone is forced to endure a prayer. If you truly want to separate church and state, eliminate the prayer.

GMTA :thup:
 
It's a piece of cloth, not a "religion". Religion is an abstract, not a physical object.

Establishment of religion in Congress is much more like having a chaplain read some mumbo-jumbo hypnosis spell.


The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
 
It's a piece of cloth, not a "religion". Religion is an abstract, not a physical object.

Establishment of religion in Congress is much more like having a chaplain read some mumbo-jumbo hypnosis spell.


The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals

Tissue?
 
It's a piece of cloth, not a "religion". Religion is an abstract, not a physical object.

Establishment of religion in Congress is much more like having a chaplain read some mumbo-jumbo hypnosis spell.


The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals

You're welcome.

That's the "keep it" part of "a republic, if you can keep it".
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

OK, y'all know it's coming...........

 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

Interesting, however, The 10 commandments as presented by Moses are considered to be Christian law.
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

Interesting, however, The 10 commandments as presented by Moses are considered to be Christian law.


The 10 commandments were first proclaimed by Almighty God to the Jews, in actuality.


But the reality of the situation is that these 10 simple rules were meant for all mankind, regardless of their religion.
 
It's a piece of cloth, not a "religion". Religion is an abstract, not a physical object.

Establishment of religion in Congress is much more like having a chaplain read some mumbo-jumbo hypnosis spell.


The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals

This comparison again?

There is a difference between a plaque adorning a government building and a personal item of clothing.

Yes, both are religious in nature, but only one is made a part of a government building. Bulldog's example of a Sharia Law plaque is a much more apt comparison.
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

Interesting, however, The 10 commandments as presented by Moses are considered to be Christian law.


The 10 commandments were first proclaimed by Almighty God to the Jews, in actuality.


But the reality of the situation is that these 10 simple rules were meant for all mankind, regardless of their religion.

Actually they came from Chapter 125 of the Egyptian Book of the Dead*, but it's pretty damned arrogant to dictate to other people what their religion is.

Religion is a private, personal choice. You keep yours, let other people keep theirs.


* OMG that means they came from AY-rabs!!
hair-fire.gif
 
This comparison again?

There is a difference between a plaque adorning a government building and a personal item of clothing.

Yes, both are religious in nature, but only one is made a part of a government building. Bulldog's example of a Sharia Law plaque is a much more apt comparison.
Yes. This old argument again? Both the hijab and plaque are religious symbols that proselytize merely by existing
in a government setting and context though they are not precisely the same thing. That's an irrelevant detail.

I thought our secular government forbade such things? Not for Islam, it looks like.
 
The Ten Commandments plaque in the Alabama Supreme Court chamber is a physical object, yet was tossed in the dumpster at the insistence of liberals
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

Interesting, however, The 10 commandments as presented by Moses are considered to be Christian law.


The 10 commandments were first proclaimed by Almighty God to the Jews, in actuality.


But the reality of the situation is that these 10 simple rules were meant for all mankind, regardless of their religion.

They actually list moral values that were common throughout the mid east, and were seen as no particular importance above all the other rules until the 13th century when they were incorporated into a manual of instruction for those coming to confess their sins. With the rise of Protestant churches, new manuals of instruction in the faith were made available and the Ten Commandments were incorporated into catechisms as a fundamental part of religious training, especially of the young. Today they are considered to be authoritative Christian law.
 
The Ten Commandments are the basis of Chritian/Judeo ethics so therefore must be rejected but the hijab, a sign of
the basic deeply misogynistic view of women's place in Islam, must be defended and held to a different standard
by the hypocritical left.

It's pretty much as basic and simple as that: Christian symbols must be publicly driven out of view...Islamic symbols, not so much.

The 10 commandments are Christian Law. Would you be so accepting if Sharia Law was on a plaque in a court house?
/---/ Actually it's a Jewish law, 611commandments shortened to 10 and adopted by Christians. See what you lean living in New York?
613 commandments - Wikipedia
613 commandments - Wikipedia
Significance of 613. The Talmud notes that the Hebrew numerical value ( gematria) of the word "Torah" is 611, and combining Moses's 611 commandments with the first two of the Ten Commandments which were the only ones heard directly from God, adds up to 613. The Talmud attributes the number 613 to Rabbi Simlai,...

Interesting, however, The 10 commandments as presented by Moses are considered to be Christian law.


The 10 commandments were first proclaimed by Almighty God to the Jews, in actuality.


But the reality of the situation is that these 10 simple rules were meant for all mankind, regardless of their religion.

Actually they came from Chapter 125 of the Egyptian Book of the Dead*, but it's pretty damned arrogant to dictate to other people what their religion is.

Religion is a private, personal choice. You keep yours, let other people keep theirs.


* OMG that means they came from AY-rabs!!
hair-fire.gif



Of course you are wrong. The Ten Commandments came from Almighty God, not from "Ay-rabs", or any other humans.


 
This is an expression of religion! I guess it’s OK when it comes to iSLAM. We’re screwed as a nation. Fucking ABNORMALS and worthless, spineless Repukes are taking us down the path of destruction!....Wherr are the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE scumbags when they should be up in arms....but dont let a 66 year old cross stand on public property to memorialize our fallen war heros!

For 181 years, the U.S. House of Representatives has imposed a ban on its members wearing head coverings. With Ilhan Omar, one of the first Muslim women to be elected to Congress, set to take her oath of office in January, that rule—which would have prohibited her wearing her customary headscarves or the hijab—is slated to change.

The change was proposed jointly by Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Incoming Rules Chairman Jim McGovern and member-elect Ilhan Omar as part of a larger overhaul package.

When Omar is sworn in next year, she will become the first federal legislator to wear a religious headscarf. Her arrival will mark a number of other “firsts” as well. The Minnesota Democrat will be the first Somali-American in Congress and the first woman of color to represent her state in Washington. She’ll be joined by fellow Midwestern Democrat, Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, as the first two Muslim women in Congress.

Hats of any kind have been banned from the House floor since 1837.

Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...

omarilhan_111518gn2_lead.jpg




I'd call this a violation of the wall of Separation between Church and State. If this broad wants to follow her paganistic cult, that's her own affair.

But wearing it in Congress is Establishment of Religion.
Let's get rid of all the cross necklaces, etc too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top