Democrats Already Accusing Trump Of “Treason” A Month Before He Takes Office

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,072
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
DemocRATS = TRASH!!!

This weekend you can catch a preview of what the next four years of mainstream media coverage of the Trump presidency will look like by checking in at the Boston Globe. They’ve decided to run an op-ed piece penned by John Shattuck, a professor at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Clearly not wanting to pull any punches or inject a level of nuance into the discussion, the title blares out at us, Donald Trump raises specter of treason.

SEE ALSO: Sunday morning talking heads

Yes, you read that correctly. It’s still more than a month before the PEOTUS will be sworn in and we’ve already got someone bringing up the word “treason” and tying it to his name. Now, some of you might correctly point out that newspaper editors frequently write the titles which appear above guest columns, so perhaps Mr. Shattuck wasn’t actually engaging in such hyperbole himself. Let’s check out his opening paragraph to get a sense of where the author is really going here.

No, it doesn’t appear that this was manipulation on the part of the Globe. Shattuck fires of the “treason” charge only four words into the article. And the basis for this suggestion rests entirely on the fact that Trump took issue with the conclusion drawn by some in the intelligence community that the Russians hacked the DNC’s email accounts to help him win. To support this theory, Shattuck offers four “possible” explanations for why the President Elect would take this position. They can be summed up as follows:

He’s trying to “shore up” his political position in advance of the Electoral College vote on Monday He wants to “undermine the credibility of US intelligence agencies” He’s “testing his ability to go over the heads of intelligence professionals”

(Excerpt) Read more at beta.hotair.com ...
 
DemocRATS = TRASH!!!

This weekend you can catch a preview of what the next four years of mainstream media coverage of the Trump presidency will look like by checking in at the Boston Globe. They’ve decided to run an op-ed piece penned by John Shattuck, a professor at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Clearly not wanting to pull any punches or inject a level of nuance into the discussion, the title blares out at us, Donald Trump raises specter of treason.

SEE ALSO: Sunday morning talking heads

Yes, you read that correctly. It’s still more than a month before the PEOTUS will be sworn in and we’ve already got someone bringing up the word “treason” and tying it to his name. Now, some of you might correctly point out that newspaper editors frequently write the titles which appear above guest columns, so perhaps Mr. Shattuck wasn’t actually engaging in such hyperbole himself. Let’s check out his opening paragraph to get a sense of where the author is really going here.

No, it doesn’t appear that this was manipulation on the part of the Globe. Shattuck fires of the “treason” charge only four words into the article. And the basis for this suggestion rests entirely on the fact that Trump took issue with the conclusion drawn by some in the intelligence community that the Russians hacked the DNC’s email accounts to help him win. To support this theory, Shattuck offers four “possible” explanations for why the President Elect would take this position. They can be summed up as follows:

He’s trying to “shore up” his political position in advance of the Electoral College vote on Monday He wants to “undermine the credibility of US intelligence agencies” He’s “testing his ability to go over the heads of intelligence professionals”

(Excerpt) Read more at beta.hotair.com ...
And Obama and Hillary have a clean history? like abe/goerge/JFH?
 
DemocRATS = TRASH!!!

This weekend you can catch a preview of what the next four years of mainstream media coverage of the Trump presidency will look like by checking in at the Boston Globe. They’ve decided to run an op-ed piece penned by John Shattuck, a professor at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Clearly not wanting to pull any punches or inject a level of nuance into the discussion, the title blares out at us, Donald Trump raises specter of treason.

SEE ALSO: Sunday morning talking heads

Yes, you read that correctly. It’s still more than a month before the PEOTUS will be sworn in and we’ve already got someone bringing up the word “treason” and tying it to his name. Now, some of you might correctly point out that newspaper editors frequently write the titles which appear above guest columns, so perhaps Mr. Shattuck wasn’t actually engaging in such hyperbole himself. Let’s check out his opening paragraph to get a sense of where the author is really going here.

No, it doesn’t appear that this was manipulation on the part of the Globe. Shattuck fires of the “treason” charge only four words into the article. And the basis for this suggestion rests entirely on the fact that Trump took issue with the conclusion drawn by some in the intelligence community that the Russians hacked the DNC’s email accounts to help him win. To support this theory, Shattuck offers four “possible” explanations for why the President Elect would take this position. They can be summed up as follows:

He’s trying to “shore up” his political position in advance of the Electoral College vote on Monday He wants to “undermine the credibility of US intelligence agencies” He’s “testing his ability to go over the heads of intelligence professionals”

(Excerpt) Read more at beta.hotair.com ...
And Obama and Hillary have a clean history? like abe/goerge/JFK?
 
Last edited:
It should have been apparent that when a rabid cabal did this stuff to Obama, some equivalently sick folk would hand it back next chance they got.
 
I was really hoping for some mass suicides by libturds.
and Benghazi wasnt treason?

Liberalism is treasonous.

American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

Au contraire, it seems to be functioning surprisingly well.

For the substantial people I suppose, yet Trump's win is a statement that you and many others do not believe that.
 
I was really hoping for some mass suicides by libturds.
and Benghazi wasnt treason?

Liberalism is treasonous.

American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

Au contraire, it seems to be functioning surprisingly well.

For the substantial people I suppose, yet Trump's win is a statement that you and many others do not believe that.

The state of the republic is not so much the issue as the contrary administration of it by those who just got their asses kicked.

Learn.
 
and Benghazi wasnt treason?

Liberalism is treasonous.

American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

Au contraire, it seems to be functioning surprisingly well.

For the substantial people I suppose, yet Trump's win is a statement that you and many others do not believe that.

The state of the republic is not so much the issue as the contrary administration of it by those who just got their asses kicked.

Learn.


The societal wealth redistribution is about a half century old and utterly bipartisan son. I did.
 
American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

The American Republic has been undermined by marxist sociopaths.

Rhetoric isn't the issue. The issue is the deliberate actions of leftist political whores to suppress the free market, marginalize our morality and traditions, corrupt our culture and diminish our standing in the world.

Liberalism is treasonous. Saying so isn't a problem.


 
American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

The American Republic has been undermined by marxist sociopaths.

Rhetoric isn't the issue. The issue is the deliberate actions of leftist political whores to suppress the free market, marginalize our morality and traditions, corrupt our culture and diminish our standing in the world.

Liberalism is treasonous. Saying so isn't a problem.


"Both" sides, as I stated.
 
Liberalism is treasonous.

American democracy is totally dysfunctional because of this crap from "both" sides.

Au contraire, it seems to be functioning surprisingly well.

For the substantial people I suppose, yet Trump's win is a statement that you and many others do not believe that.

The state of the republic is not so much the issue as the contrary administration of it by those who just got their asses kicked.

Learn.


The societal wealth redistribution is about a half century old and utterly bipartisan son. I did.

Yawn. The old saw.

Son? Too funny. I suspect I'm a bit older than you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top