- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,385
- 18,691
- 1,915
Okay, funniest post of the day!Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Okay, funniest post of the day!Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
The issue of corporate person-hood is not in the necessary limited liability of a corporation, it is in their ability to readily exercise control over government policy and buy elections far in excess of any actual person all because they have been granted special 1st amendment rights that exceed our own.There is nothing logical about corporate person-hood, it is a concept that lawyers invented to give big business the political power of a person, a person that can shout down any number of actual persons, buy any amount of influence, that can never be held wholly responsible for their actions and never die.We condemn discrimination against people because it offends human dignity. By contrast, concern for human dignity does not require us to treat all businesses alike: to the contrary, hard experience teaches us that some businesses - drugs, banks, securities, common carriers - require more regulation than others. The tax code "discriminates" between for-profit and charitable organizations without offending anyone's dignity.
Why Personhood Matters
People and corporations should not be equal, even in the US, the country dominated by corporations.
1) Corporations are made up of people. As a result, legal entities embrace their values and their worldview. Without people there are no corporations.
2) Why don't we treat cities and even countries like human beings? The same applies to local communities. A group of people is not a separate person with his feelings, emotions and thoughts.
Can someone explain what is wrong with my logic?
The irony is that these fake conservatives who support corporate personhood are being the ultimate collectivists. Corporate personhood is the collectivism in the extreme.
Bullshit. If Walmart was not considered a legal person, its employees could be held liable for acts of the corporation, they could be sued individually if someone was injured in a store.
this is not anywhere near what you libtards are trying to make it.
Not all corporations. Have religious freedom. And only limited constitutional rights. If a corporation did not have legal personhood it could not bring a lawsuit or defend one. It could not hold a patent or protect its inventions. It could not own property in its own name.Corporations are designated as legal "persons" in order to protect the employees from personal liability for acts of the corporation. It is a legal definition.
So that's why corporates have freedom of religion?
The shareholders of corporations have freedom or religion. WTF are you talking about? The board of directors of Hobby Lobby have individual freedom of religion and the can vote on whether their stores are open on sunday and support abortions for their employees.
But we're not talking about shareholders. Corporations themselves have religious freedom. Corporations themselves possess constitutional rights stemming from their personhood.
corpotate political contributions are limited. Now, would you like to talk about unions?
It's a spurious argument, many laws pertain to the responsible use of things, guns, cars, aircraft, structures, etc. A corporation can and should be considered a thing, as they are but structures with the intended purpose of producing profit.Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
Not all corporations. Have religious freedom. And only limited constitutional rights. If a corporation did not have legal personhood it could not bring a lawsuit or defend one. It could not hold a patent or protect its inventions. It could not own property in its own name.
Hobby Lobby has religious freedom because it is not publicly traded. The entire company is owned by one family and they all share the same religious belief. If Hobby Lobby ever had an IPO it would lose their religious protection.
It's a spurious argument, many laws pertain to the responsible use of things, guns, cars, aircraft, structures, etc. A corporation can and should be considered a thing, as they are but structures with the intended purpose of producing profit.Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
Other countries do just fine treating corporations as an artificial construct rather than an organic thing with god-given rights and actually hold the people in charge responsible for wrongdoing.
It's a spurious argument, many laws pertain to the responsible use of things, guns, cars, aircraft, structures, etc. A corporation can and should be considered a thing, as they are but structures with the intended purpose of producing profit.
Other countries do just fine treating corporations as an artificial construct rather than an organic thing with god-given rights and actually hold the people in charge responsible for wrongdoing.
^^^^^^^ignorance on display^^^^^^^^^^
Can they vote? Can they get a drivers license? Can they go to jail?
I will believe that corporation are "persons" when Texas executes one.Can they vote? Can they get a drivers license? Can they go to jail?
They are persons, not people.
You people are just fucking stupid. You really are stupid.
I mean, mouth-breathing, drool cup fucking stupid scum
Quit flapping your gums dick, If you like the unaccountable power big business has over our political process just say so.^^^^^^^ignorance on display^^^^^^^^^^
No, Red. Not ignorance. dimocraps are lying scum.
They lie like you and I breathe. It's autonomic function with dimocrap scum.
Dogs bark, babies cry, ducks quack, dimocraps lie.
That entire post was a lie. He made it up completely out of whole cloth and is trying to pass it off as a fact.
dimocraps are lying scum.
period
It's a spurious argument, many laws pertain to the responsible use of things, guns, cars, aircraft, structures, etc. A corporation can and should be considered a thing, as they are but structures with the intended purpose of producing profit.Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
Other countries do just fine treating corporations as an artificial construct rather than an organic thing with god-given rights and actually hold the people in charge responsible for wrongdoing.
Laws can NOT apply to THINGS.
The fuck they can't. What do you call gun control?
You dimocraps really are stupid bitches.
I have NEVER seen a gun prosecuted for -- Anything. The owner of the gun? Yeah. Know why, STUPID? Because the owner of the gun is a person
You are so incredibly stupid, you don't even realize how stupid you are
When has a corporation ever been prosecuted for anything? Oh wait, that doesn't happen either.
This country is dominated by government.We condemn discrimination against people because it offends human dignity. By contrast, concern for human dignity does not require us to treat all businesses alike: to the contrary, hard experience teaches us that some businesses - drugs, banks, securities, common carriers - require more regulation than others. The tax code "discriminates" between for-profit and charitable organizations without offending anyone's dignity.
Why Personhood Matters
People and corporations should not be equal, even in the US, the country dominated by corporations.
1) Corporations are made up of people. As a result, legal entities embrace their values and their worldview. Without people there are no corporations.
2) Why don't we treat cities and even countries like human beings? The same applies to local communities. A group of people is not a separate person with his feelings, emotions and thoughts.
Can someone explain what is wrong with my logic?
bring it up with the supreme court. Oh wait they already decided. Deal with it, the law of the land as you liberals like to say, ha ha haWe condemn discrimination against people because it offends human dignity. By contrast, concern for human dignity does not require us to treat all businesses alike: to the contrary, hard experience teaches us that some businesses - drugs, banks, securities, common carriers - require more regulation than others. The tax code "discriminates" between for-profit and charitable organizations without offending anyone's dignity.
Why Personhood Matters
People and corporations should not be equal, even in the US, the country dominated by corporations.
1) Corporations are made up of people. As a result, legal entities embrace their values and their worldview. Without people there are no corporations.
2) Why don't we treat cities and even countries like human beings? The same applies to local communities. A group of people is not a separate person with his feelings, emotions and thoughts.
Can someone explain what is wrong with my logic?
This country is dominated by government.
damn he really posted that????When has a corporation ever been prosecuted for anything? Oh wait, that doesn't happen either.
You really are stupid piece of fucking shit.
Corporations don't get prosecuted?
What a stupid motherfucker.
Seriously. Your IQ is way too low even for this place.