Congressman Mike Capuano (D MA-07) Loses Primary

[bripat9643]

In other words, she has no other qualifications.

tell us all about the quantifications of the white people you voted for congress.

They're all Republicans. That's the only qualification needed.

Thank you once again for being so honest. First about being such a racist and now this.

Refreshing to find someone so honest about who they are

How have I demonstrated racism in any fashion? I just made it clear I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation. I would crawl over broken glass to vote against a Democrat. There's nothing racist about that.

Why do you object to may voting strategy?

Come now, a non-racist person does not say this...I'll take that to mean "she has no qualifications other than being black." or this "How about accomplishing something other than running for office while black?" or this "So you're adding kissing the ass of white politicians to her qualifications?".

Those are the words of a racist, there is no getting around it.

I bet we can never find you saying someone's only qualification is "running for office while white"

Don't blow it now, you were doing so good letting your true racist nature show, don't hide, be proud of who you are.

Sorry, turd, but, that's what anyone with a brain who knows how Democrats operate would say. I simply stated your modus operandi.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

tell us all about the quantifications of the white people you voted for congress.

They're all Republicans. That's the only qualification needed.

Thank you once again for being so honest. First about being such a racist and now this.

Refreshing to find someone so honest about who they are

How have I demonstrated racism in any fashion? I just made it clear I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation. I would crawl over broken glass to vote against a Democrat. There's nothing racist about that.

Why do you object to may voting strategy?

Come now, a non-racist person does not say this...I'll take that to mean "she has no qualifications other than being black." or this "How about accomplishing something other than running for office while black?" or this "So you're adding kissing the ass of white politicians to her qualifications?".

Those are the words of a racist, there is no getting around it.

I bet we can never find you saying someone's only qualification is "running for office while white"

Don't blow it now, you were doing so good letting your true racist nature show, don't hide, be proud of who you are.

Sorry, turd, but, that's what anyone with a brain who knows how Democrats operate would say. I simply stated your modus operandi.

Nope, that is what a racist and only a racist would say. Your true colors are shining through


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Pogo]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Her victory is yet another testament in 2018 to the wave of pent-up ambition surging through the party.

The Democratic Party is splitting. There are the corporate Democrats and the people Democrats.

you don't really believe that do you?

Yes. Hillary is a corporate Democrat and Bernie is a people Democrat.

bern is a socialist, he's a dem to get votes only.


the vast cost of berns ideas and these supposed people dems was shown to be staggering.

just look at failed socialist nations, they are stuck and may never recover.

Not really.

sheepleton

 

[bripat9643]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Joe Crowley Part II: Electric Boogaloo. Another white male Democrat gets eaten by his party's own divisive racial and gender pimping.

BOSTON — Ayanna Pressley upended the Massachusetts political order on Tuesday, scoring a stunning upset of 10-term Representative Michael Capuano, who conceded to her in a Democratic primary that few said she could win.

Ms. Pressley, 44, is now poised to become the first African-American in the state to be elected to the House of Representatives. There is no Republican on the November ballot in this storied Boston-based district, which was once represented by John F. Kennedy and is one of the most left leaning in the country.

Ayanna Pressley Stuns Capuano in Massachusetts House Race in Upset for Insurgents

Hate to say it but this makes me happy despite her positions. It's time these jokers quit treating civil service as an atm machine. The GOP needs its own upheaval.

 

[Pogo]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

So voting Republican means I am "enslaved to an associative dichotomy of labels?" That has to be one of the dumbest things you have ever posted.

Voting for the candidate is the sign of a dumbass. Any candidate who runs as a Democrat is a sleazy lying piece of shit who is helping to destroy this country. That's what it means to be a Democrat, moron. You can't join a party that is bent on destroying this country and turning us all into slaves and claim you are really a good person.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I don't vote based on race. I vote based on party affiliation.

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

 

[bripat9643]

Wowie, what a distinction that is huh. "I don't vote based on sweeping generalization A. I vote based on sweeping generalization B!!"

Thanks for clearing that up. Reminds me of the Star Trek episode where two guys were always fighting and it turned out to be because one was black on the left, white on the right while the other was the opposite.

Stupefying how many wags just enslave themselves to this false dichotomy shit.

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

 

[bripat9643]

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

Bullshit. The Dims are Stalinists. The main fault of the Republicans is that they cave to the Dims so easily. No libertarian would ever vote for a Dim.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

Bullshit. The Dims are Stalinists. The main fault of the Republicans is that they cave to the Dims so easily. No libertarian would ever vote for a Dim.

No libertarian would ever vote for a Repub either. You fucks are the one trying to get the government even more informed in our private lives and in the operations of companies. You are the fascist calling for the government to force FaceBook and Twitter to be nice to you all because you are too big of a bunch of pussies to create your own fucking social media companies.

You are the antithesis of a libertarian

 

[bripat9643]

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

Bullshit. The Dims are Stalinists. The main fault of the Republicans is that they cave to the Dims so easily. No libertarian would ever vote for a Dim.

No libertarian would ever vote for a Repub either. You fucks are the one trying to get the government even more informed in our private lives and in the operations of companies. You are the fascist calling for the government to force FaceBook and Twitter to be nice to you all because you are too big of a bunch of pussies to create your own fucking social media companies.

You are the antithesis of a libertarian

That is the lamest attack on Republicans by a faux libertarian I have ever seen. Republicans are trying to "get the government even more informed in our private lives?" What the fuck does that even mean? Name one thing they have done to reduce our personal freedoms.

Facebook and Twitter are monopolies. They have been granted exemption from lawsuits since they claim to act as a public square. If they want to continue with their current behavior, then that protection should be revoked, and they should be treated like any other publisher.

 

[Pogo]

So you believe voting based on race is in the same ethical category as voting based on political party?

You have to be the biggest dumbass in this forum.

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

Finger-Boi be all like

 

[bripat9643]

I believe that any asshat who enslaves himself to an associative dichotomy of labels while ignoring what that candidate stands for individually, is a fucking moron who arguably has no business voting at all.

If that's the sort of bullshit you want to hang your hat on why don't you just vote for a generic Republican to be named later, and then when they do, you go "oh thank you Master, whatever you say".

Fucking moron.

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

Wrong, moron. The Dims are many orders of magnitude worse than the Republicans. The later would never have passed a monstrosity like Obamacare, and you know it.

 

[Pogo]

More proof that you are no libertarian.

Yes, the fact I think being a slave to a party is bad makes me not a libertarian...holy fuck dude, could you be anymore stupid?

Only Dims spew that shit about voting for the person and not the party. Dims are scum, and no genuine libertarian would ever vote for one, just as they would never vote for a Nazi.

You have no fucking clue what a libertarian would do, I would just as much vote for a Dem as I would a Repub both are big government and less personal freedom parites.

Anyone that is a slave to a party is a fucking moron, there is no other word for it.

Wrong, moron. The Dims are many orders of magnitude worse than the Republicans. The later would never have passed a monstrosity like Obamacare, and you know it.

Actually Romney already did, in Massachusetts. Same thing.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Joe Crowley Part II: Electric Boogaloo. Another white male Democrat gets eaten by his party's own divisive racial and gender pimping.

BOSTON — Ayanna Pressley upended the Massachusetts political order on Tuesday, scoring a stunning upset of 10-term Representative Michael Capuano, who conceded to her in a Democratic primary that few said she could win.

Ms. Pressley, 44, is now poised to become the first African-American in the state to be elected to the House of Representatives. There is no Republican on the November ballot in this storied Boston-based district, which was once represented by John F. Kennedy and is one of the most left leaning in the country.

Ayanna Pressley Stuns Capuano in Massachusetts House Race in Upset for Insurgents

When you want to get rid of a Old Democrat just vote for the Radical one. Thats how to do it.